Quantcast
Channel: Kroum Nikolov – LaptopMedia.com
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593, with GTX 1070) review – the second attack

$
0
0

red-acer-predator-15-g9-593-cover

The last Predator generation with GTX 9xx GPU was a great hit and this was the laptop which proved that Acer can build one of the best gaming notebooks on the market. Several months after that we were in New York where the Taiwanese company announced Predator 17X (detailed review) – the ultimate gaming beast with a desktop GTX 980 under the hood and industry leading cooling system. The only drawback was the price (it costs around $2300) but we know that if we want cutting-edge, we have to prepare our wallets. Anyway, 17X turned out to be short-lived because NVIDIA hurried with its GTX 10xx series. And as you  may guess…it’s a big deal.

The even better news – the GTX 10xx’s notebook versions are very close to their desktop siblings in terms of raw performance. The leap from GTX 9xx to 10xx is huge and that makes the gap between GTX 9xxM and their successors even bigger. Although we were recommending 17X as a good choice, now the game has changed, in a big way. The latest Predator 15 (G9-593) with GTX 1070 will wipe the floor with its bigger and (not much) older brother, and moreover – its price will be lower.

In addition to the GTX 1070, Predator 15 (G9-593) is also equipped with a high-end Core i7-6700HQ processor, up to 64GB RAM, M.2 NVMe, HDMI 2.0 and G-Sync IPS display with up to 4K resolution. What more could gamers want?

You can check the current price of Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) here: http://amzn.to/2ccAYet

Contents

What’s in the box?

In addition to the notebook, its box also contains a powerful charger (Chicony A12-230P1A) which delivers 230W (19.5V, 11.8A), and the traditional FrostCore fan. The latter can be swapped for the DVD optical drive which you probably won’t need (like ever). It will be interesting to see if (and how much) the FrostCore module can reduce the internal temperatures during high load. We’ll check that a bit further in the review.

predator-charger
img_2644

Design and construction

G9-593’s predecessor, Acer Predator 15 G9-591 (there was a minor upgrade named G9-592) had almost the same design as the latest model that we’re looking at today. If you’re in front of the two laptops, chances are you won’t find any difference. Actually, the most notable one is on the back side – the main exhaust vents have been massively redesigned and now are much more aggressive.

predators-backs

Except for the rear side, the G9-593 looks pretty much the same as its predecessor and that’s not bad at all – both of them have awesome looking and functional design.

img_2679The keyboard is “Island Style” (chiclet) with long key travel, distinct feedback, three backlight color zones and large area – 15.5 x 15.5 mm (0.61” x 0.61”). The arrow keys have enough empty space around them so you can comfortably play racing games if you don’t have a wheel.

Just the first row, where the F1-F12 keys are, is narrower – 10.0 x 13.00 mm (0.39” x 0.51”), but you won’t need it much, since there are 5 special function keys which will do anything of your choice (you can assign their duties in the Predator Sense software), and moreover – every one of them could run up to 3 different actions, depending on its color. You can switch the colors with the upper left “P” key. For example, by default the first group (Red) activates the following: “Always use discrete graphics”, “Disable sticky keys”, “Maximum fan speed”, “Multimedia Mode Settings”, and “Game Bar”.

The power button is in the center, above the keyboard and it’s backlit by a red LED light when the computer is working.

buttons

The trackpad features a special button which disables it to prevent accidental touches while typing. There is enough area for easy interaction with gestures (~70cm2; 105 x 66 mm) and a red glowing edge. The left and right buttons are dedicated and just below the trackpad.

img_2660
img_2677
img_2699

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) has a 2.1 audio system with two front facing speakers and a subwoofer on its bottom. Speaking of the base of the notebook, it makes a good impression that Acer’s designers have made efforts to make it good looking even though we don’t turn our laptops around every day. Despite the big air vents, one little detail grabs our attention – the notebook sports two tiny outputs for its DustDefender system.

lid
bottom

On the left, Predator 15 has two USB 3.0 ports, two audio jacks for a microphone and headphones, memory card reader and the optical drive / FrostCore. On the other side we have three more USB ports, one of which is USB 3.1, while the second has a “Power-off charging” feature which lets you charge your mobile devices even when the notebook is turned off. We also have full sized HDMI and DisplayPort, RJ-45 (Ethernet) and Kensington lock slot. Good news – the notebook doesn’t have air vents on the right side so your right hand (holding the mouse) won’t feel the hell even after hours of gaming.

img_2709
img_2712
img_2716
img_2719

We can also say only good things about the materials used – Predator 15 is rock solid and its lid structure includes 40% fiberglass, making the layer 1.8 mm thick. We have already told you that fiberglass is used as a main material for elevator spools which hold their steel wire ropes. Mechanics choose glass fiber because it doesn’t rust and has great durability. This is how the material compares against Aluminum and PC+ABS+Talc, which are widely used in today’s laptops.

fiber-glass

Oh, here’s a drawback (fitness maniacs could skip that part)…Predator 15 weighs 3742 g (8.25 lbs)! And yes, this is a 15-inch notebook. Also, it’s 38.3 mm (1.51”) thick at its backside and 37.6 mm (1.48”) at the front side. It should really impress us in the temperature tests so that we could overlook this.

Let’s see what we have on the inside…

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Disassembling the Predator 15 is a relatively easy task – check out the video below or read our detailed instructions article.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

Our Predator 15 came with one 2.5″ HDD and one M.2 NVMe SSD. You also have an additional free M.2 slot. The taken one is “M” key, size 2280. The free one is “B” key, 22110.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot (1) Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7, 256GB (NVMe, 2280, M key) Upgrade options
M.2 slot (2) Free (NVMe, 22110, B key) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Hitachi Seagate HTS721010A9E630 (1TB, 7200 RPM, 32MB cache) Upgrade options
m2s
hdd
m2

RAM

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) has four RAM slots – two below the service lid and two below the motherboard. The latter are taken by 2x 16GB DDDR3 memory, so you can easily upgrade the Predator to 64GB RAM.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 16GB DDR4 Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB Upgrade options
Slot 2 16GB DDR4 Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB Upgrade options
Slot 3 Free Upgrade options
Slot 4 Free Upgrade options

ram

Other components

Our Predator 15 configuration came with Hon Hai T77H643.01 Wi-Fi module and a user-replaceable battery rated at 88Wh (6000 mAh). The latter weighs 425 g (0.94 lbs).

wi-fi
battery

Display quality

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593)’s display features an IPS matte touch panel with Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) resolution in a 15.6-inch diagonal, made by LG Philips, LP156WF6-SPP1 model. It has a pixel density of 142 PPI with 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. SPP1 can be found in the updated version of the old Predator 15 (G9-591) – G9-592.

Predator 15’s display supports G-Sync for fluent gaming without tearing. In case you’re not familiar with G-Sync, check out this article:
What is NVIDIA’s G-Sync and does it really make a difference?

The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal to or greater than 60 cm – that’s the distance above which human with “standard” 20/20 vision will stop distinguishing the individual pixels.

micr-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) has comfortable viewing angles. Here you can see how the screen looks like when viewed from 45°.

angles-acer-predator-15-g9-593

The maximum brightness of the panel is 343 cd/m2 and 316 cd/m2 is the average value across the surface. The maximum deviation is 12%. We also measured the color temperature which is 7500K at max brightness and white screen. This is a bit colder than the typical sRGB 6500K and colors may appear slightly blue-ish. The contrast ratio is 1000:1.

The maximum color deviation dE 2000 (compared to the center of the screen at 100% RGB and 100% brightness) is 3.2. Values over 4.0 are undesirable. This is a very important characteristic if you intend to work with colors.

brightnessr-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. Starting with the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that has been used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used by professional cameras, monitors and etc. for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios and the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s hard to be covered by today’s displays. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The yellow dotted line shows the Predator 15’s coverage. The screen can represent 89% of sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 (web/HDTV standard) in CIE1976. In other words, it can show almost all colors used in Internet and HDTV. Good result.

gamut-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Below you will see practically the same image but with color circles representing the reference colors and white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

You can also compare the results with and without the Office & Web Design profile, which can be bought here.

befcolors-acer-predator-15-g9-593
aftcolors-acer-predator-15-g9-593

The profile is created at 140cd/m2 luminance, target illuminant white point 6500K (D65) and sRGB gamut.

gamma-acer-predator-15-g9-593

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors such as light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The Office & Web Design profile offers much better DeltaE – 2.4, although even that isn’t an excellent result.

bef-colorchecker-acer-predator-15-g9-593
aft-colorchecker-acer-predator-15-g9-593

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games at low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings while the right one is with an activated Gaming & Movie Nights profile. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis the luminance of the display. With the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself and see how your display handles the darkest nuances, but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

GL502 doesn’t show the dark areas well and as you can see the difference between 1% and 4% white is very subtle. Our Gaming & Movie Nights profile greatly improves that.

nbs-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and vice versa.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 18.0 ms. An excellent result for an IPS screen and while the TN matrix, for example, is much faster, you won’t see any difference or unwanted lag.

resptime-acer-predator-15-g9-593

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable by the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) uses Pulse-Width Modulation for all brightness levels below 100% but at a very high frequency – 20 000 Hz, which greatly reduces the negative impact. Nevertheless, the Health-Guard profile eliminates it and that’s not the only advantage…

pwm-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Blue light emissions

The installation of our Health-Guard profile not just eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that affect negatively your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP).

spd-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Conclusion

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) has a very good screen and that is something normal having in mind that we’re testing a high-end machine. It has excellent brightness, contrast and viewing angles. However, it uses PWM for all brightness levels and it has an unwanted high color temperature. Both of these problems can be easily solved by installing the Health-Guard profile. The resolution is Full HD and we consider it as optimal for a 17-inch screen.

The “Office and Web Design” profile successfully reduces the DeltaE to a good level and “Gaming and Movie Nights” could be very handy at low ambient light when you want to see better the near-black areas. You can take an advantage of them by purchasing them for a modest price, which will also support our laboratory.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) configurations with 15.6″ LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2ccAYet

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) supports the Dolby Audio technology with Music, Movies and Games modes. The sound is relatively good but the tones aren’t clear enough in some low and high frequencies.

sound-acer-predator-15-g9-593

Specs Sheet

These technical specifications refer only to the particular device being tested in this review. Laptops from the same series could have different characteristics and features.

CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-core, 2.60-3.50 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM up to 64GB (4x 16384MB) – DDR4, 2133MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 2x M.2 SSD + HDD
Display 15.6-inch Full HD IPS, matte + G-Sync
Optical Drive DVD Writer (interchangeable with FrostCore)
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 4x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Type-C
  • LED keyboard backlight with different zones
  • HDMI 2.0
  • DisplayPort
  • RJ-45
  • SD card reader
  • 3.5 mm jacks for microphone and headphones
  • 5 programmable macro keys
  • 2x built-in loudspeakers + subwoofer
Battery 88.8Wh / 6000 mAh
Weight 3742 g

Software

All Predator configurations ship with a pre-installed Windows 10. At the first start you’ll find the PredatorSense and Killer Network Manager apps.

With Predator Sense you can track the temperatures inside the notebook and the fans speed. You can also see the current CPU frequency but unlike the 17X version of Predator Sense, you can’t overclock your system with one click. The advanced options give you the choice of always using the discrete graphics, use maximum speed or disable sticky keys.

predator-sense-1
predator-sense-2

There is a hotkey profiles panel as well where you can assign actions to the glowing buttons above the keyboard. You can also assign macros. In the third tab you can control the four zone keyboard backlight.

predator-sense-3
predator-sense-4
predator-sense-5

Killer Network Manager gives you the ability to see which applications are hogging your wireless bandwidth, and automatically prioritizes sensitive application traffic for an online game, HD video, and high-quality audio. With Killer DoubleShot Pro, Predator 15 can use wired and wireless network connections simultaneously.

killer-1
killer-2
killer-3

If you want to do a clean install of Windows 10, here you’ll find all the drivers and software you need:
http://www.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/drivers

Battery

Just as its predecessor, G9-593 has an 88.8Wh battery (6000 mAh), which we aren’t sure is enough to handle the GTX 1070 and 6700HQ for a long time. The major problem is that the notebook doesn’t take advantage of an integrated card so every application uses the GeForce one. As you can guess, that leads to serious power drain and it can’t help but reflect on the battery life.

Web Surfing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

acer-predator-15-battery-life-surfing

The new Predator 15 (G9-593) got us just 276 minutes (4 hours and 36 minutes) which wouldn’t be a disappointing result some years ago but now it’s below most of its competitors. As a matter of fact, G9-593’s predecessor G9-591 got us 464 minutes of browsing time, which is 68% more. We know who’s to blame – as we said, the new Predator has gotten rid of the integrated Intel Graphics card and the powerful GTX 1070 has to do all the work.

Video playback

For our Video playback test we use a 720p HD film.

acer-predator-15-battery-life-movies

As always, the video playback result is very close to the web browsing one. This time around we registered 257 minutes before turning off. However, that should be enough for a short movie marathon without the charger.

Gaming

For accurate gaming simulation, we use the F1:2015 benchmark on loop, at lowest graphic settings and native resolution.

acer-predator-15-battery-life-gaming

This is the hardest test and thus the Predator 15 kept working for just 113 minutes (1 hour and 53 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel_Core_i7_logoIntel Core i7-6700HQ represents the Skylake H family and it’s a high-performance chip with normal voltage and 45W TDP. This is a step down from its direct predecessor – Core i7-4700HQ, but matches its short-lived predecessor, Core i7-5700HQ. The Core i7-6700HQ has four cores ticking at 2.6GHz and can go up to 3.5 GHz for one active core and 3.1 GHz for four active cores. The silicon supports the so-called Hyper-Threading technology that emulates one virtual core for each physical and thus establishing a total of 8 threads.

Furthermore, the chip is manufactured using 14nm FinFET process and integrates Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU with 24 EU (Executable Units) clocked at 350 – 1050 MHz. The memory controller supports up to 64GB of DDR3 or DDR4 RAM at 1600 or 2133 MHz respectively. The CPU is suitable for heavy applications and gaming.

Take a look at our CPU rating system to see where the Core i7-6700HQ stands:
http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

More information about the CPU can be attained here:
http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6700hq/

Check the prices of all notebooks equipped with Core i7-6700HQ: http://amzn.to/2bZIaHY

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.28
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.07-2.88%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)7.83+7.55%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49+2.88%
ASUS ROG GL502 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.48+2.75%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)796
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)835+4.9%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)933+17.21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)831+4.4%
ASUS ROG GL502 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)830+4.27%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.9
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.4+4.59%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)9.13-16.24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.44-4.22%
ASUS ROG GL502 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.30+3.67%

Storage speeds

We made a little spoiler some days ago (okay, a not so big one), when we revealed that the new Predator 15 comes with a Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 which is an ultra fast M.2 NVMe SSD with a sequential read speed of up to 2576MB/s and seq. write speed up to 1196MB/s.

atto-ssd-3

This is one of the fastest M.2 SSDs on the market so if your configuration also happens to use the module in question, you can be sure that your operating system will run blazingly fast. Here’s a quick comparison between some of the most popular M.2 SSDs we’ve tested so far:

SSD model Seq. Read (Max) Seq. Write (Max) Read Access Time
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 TO (256GB) 2576 MB/s 1196 MB/s 0.069 ms
Samsung SM951 (256GB) 2242 MB/s 1290 MB/s 0.057 ms
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 (256GB) 1583 MB/s 313 MB/s 0.121 ms
LiteOn CV1-8B128 (128GB) 560 MB/s 181 MB/s 0.086 ms

Our Predator 15 (G9-593) came with a 2.5″ HDD as well – Hitachi Seagate HTS721010A9E630 (1TB, 7200 RPM, 32MB cache). This model reached 126 MB/sec at our sequential read test and 123 MB/sec at sequential writing.

att-hdd-predator-15

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

2016-06-02-image-33The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a part of NVIDIA’s Pascal generation of GPUs and unlike previous releases, the company finally closes the gap between mobile and desktop graphics processors and that’s why there’s no “M” in the branding of Pascal GPUs. All thanks to the 16nm TSMC manufacturing process of the GPU, which allows better thermals and overall performance in a smaller form factor. That’s a big technology jump compared to the 28nm Maxwell generation.

Compared to its desktop counterpart, the GTX 1070 doesn’t differ too much. They share an identical number of ROPs (64) and identical memory – 8GB GDDR5 with 256-bit bus clocked at 8000 MHz. However, there’s a minor difference in clock speeds – the laptop GPU ticks at 1443 MHz and can go up to 1645 MHz while the desktop variant is running at 1506 MHz – 1683 MHz. To compensate to some extent, the laptop 1070 carries more CUDA cores (2048 vs 1920) and slightly more TMUs (170 vs 120).

Due to its performance, thermals and power consumption, which is believed to be 10W more than the GTX 980M, the GPU is suitable for large 17-inch laptops with the appropriate cooling solution.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-8gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)94485
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)59765-36.75%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)76639-18.89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)66689-29.42%
ASUS ROG GL502 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)45541-51.8%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)16135
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)9952-38.32%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)11937-26.02%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)9629-40.32%
ASUS ROG GL502 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)7271-54.94%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)51773
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)32051-38.09%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)40266-22.23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)30267-41.54%
ASUS ROG GL502 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)25322-51.09%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4405
Acer Predator 15 (G9-591) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)2995-32.01%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)3487-20.84%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)2973-32.51%
ASUS ROG GL502 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)2265-48.58%

Gaming Tests

In the video below you can see how Battlefield 1, GTA V, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Hitman 2016 run on the Predator 15 with GTX 1070. If you’d like to see more gameplay benchmark videos you can subscribe to our YouTube channel.

All the gaming tests we ran with the GeForce 372.70 drivers on Minimum, Average and Max settings and Full HD resolution.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 239 fps 233 fps 203 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 137 fps 116 fps 113 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 147 fps 108 fps 52 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 155 fps 127 fps 52 fps

hitman-2016

HITMAN (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 115 fps 89 fps 38 fps

Temperatures and Comfort

For a hardcore gaming laptop like the new Predator, it is essential to maintain low temperatures under heavy load. We’ll conduct two synthetic torture tests and a real-life one, in order to check the notebook’s stability in the long-term.

100% CPU load

For starters, we run a 100% CPU load for one hour. We should note that 6700HQ’s maximum Turbo Boost for four cores is 3.1 GHz. This is the exact frequency we’ve got in this test and that’s great news, especially given the CPU temperature of 55-56C for two of the cores and 80-85C for the other two. The situation isn’t any different after the full 60 minutes so we’re going to the next level…

100-cpu-load

100% CPU + 100% GPU load

Without cutting the CPU load, we’re adding 100% GPU load as well. Yes, this is a hard one. As soon as we started the GPU load, the CPU temperatures rose to 70/70/91/96C for the four cores, while the frequency remained 3.1 GHz. We keep the things like that for an hour. After a cumulative of 2 hours CPU and GPU load, the CPU frequency was 2.9 GHz and the cores temperature – 72/73/93/96C. The GPU temperature rose to ~69-70C, at 1240 MHz frequency.

2hours-cpu-gpu-load

Comfort

Keeping the internal temperatures low is an essential task for every gaming system, but we shouldn’t give the user experience less priority. That’s why we measure the external temperatures as well, at idle and under heavy load.

External temperatures at Idle

Even the hottest point at idle is pretty cool and that is normal when you aren’t playing games.

img_9113
img_9114

External temperatures at Maximum load

When we put the notebook to 100% CPU + 100% GPU load, we measured 44.3C at the hottest point which is a great result.

img_9119
img_9123

FrostCore fan

Acer Predator 15 ships with an additional fan called FrostCore which can be swapped with the DVD optical drive. In order to see if there’s any improvement with and without it, we ran a benchmark while the notebook was already put to 100% CPU load. The disappointing surprise is that the additional fan doesn’t do anything for the cooling system and it’s more of a marketing gimmick, instead of a handy tool. The concept is great and we’d be happy to see Acer working further on that.

100-100-wo-fan
100-100-bench

Verdict

editor-choice We had a lot to say about the new Predator 15 and most of it was good words and excellent results. The product is excellent indeed and if some years ago nobody thought that Acer could come up with a top-notch gaming monster, now everyone respects their presence on this market. Just like its bigger brother, the Predator 15 offers outstanding performance, up to 64GB RAM and ultra fast PCIe storage. All of the internals are well protected by a solid construction with fiber glass reinforcement.

We can say some good words about the IPS display as well, which becomes even better with our profile package. The panel uses PWM across all brightness levels (except 100%) but our Health-Guard profile gets rid of it.

The only notable drawback is the battery life – Predator 15 is having a hard time without its charger since its processor isn’t equipped with an integrated GPU for the light tasks, and the powerful GTX 1070 has to work even when you’re reading your e-mails.

Our overall impression is excellent and we can easily say that this is one of the best gaming notebooks ever.

You can check the current price of Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) here: http://amzn.to/2ccAYet

Pros

  • Aggressive and good-looking design
  • Solid construction with fiber glass reinforcement
  • Comfortable keyboard and trackpad
  • 2.5” HDD/SSD slot + 2x M.2 PCIe NVMe slots
  • Four memory slots for up to 64GBs of RAM
  • High-quality IPS panel with G-Sync support
  • Excellent CPU, GPU and Storage performance
  • Great temperatures under maximum load

Cons

  • It weighs 3742 g (8.25 lbs)
  • PWM across all brightness levels except 100% (without Health-Guard)
  • Sub-par battery life (Lack of iGPU)
  • The FrostCore module is useless

HP ProBook 470 G3 review – the screen size is just one of the reasons to opt for the bigger version of the ProBook

$
0
0

img_1453Spanning from 14-inch to 17-inch devices, HP’s ProBook series should always be on the top of your list when looking for a budget business companion for a number of reasons. For starters, the ProBooks offer exceptional build quality, good battery life, excellent input devices, capable hardware at a reasonable price and M.2 SATA SSD support. The latter is pretty uncommon for entry-level notebooks. We know all of this because the ProBook 455/450 G3 and 440 G3 have already been reviewed here in our office and now it’s time for the 17-incher.

However, like in most cases, the 17-inch 470 G3 doesn’t really pose really compelling selling points over the 15-inch and 14-inch version except for the bigger working space of course. The hardware, including the battery, unfortunately, is identical – up to Core i7-6500U CPU paired with up to AMD Radeon R7 M340 GPU and up to 16GB of DDR3 RAM. With this configuration, we expect slightly lower battery runtimes due to the larger screen surface that needs to be lit but as far as the rest goes, the 470 G3 should perform similarly to what we’ve seen on the 14-inch 440 G3 and 15-inch 450 G3.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eiwbsE

Contents

Retail package

This is one of the things that sets the 470 G3 apart from its smaller siblings. Along with the usual DVD with drivers, user manuals, AC adapter and power cord, you receive a big bag for the notebook. And you will probably going to need this as the machine weighs around 2.61 kg.

img_1385
img_1390
img_1395

Design and construction

The casing is familiar sharing the same design signature as the rest of the ProBooks from this year. The chassis is mostly made of plastic with brushed aluminum used for the interior. Also, no surprises regarding the overall build quality – well-connected parts, no protruding edges, no irregularities.

img_1399
img_1405

We are pleased with the soft-touch matte plastic finish on the lid helping with the grip and giving the notebook a distinct look and fairly stable surface, although ripples appear on the screen when pressing the back of the lid. But that’s really common at this price range. The hinges feel really smooth with linear travel and allow opening the notebook with just one hand. And since they are a bit small and are positioned on the sides, the hinges don’t offer enough support for the middle section of the screen making it a bit too flexible but that doesn’t really make any difference in practice. The bottom piece of the notebook is again made of hard plastic with two maintenance hatches giving you access to most of the internals. The battery is again user-replaceable.

img_1465
img_1471
img_1459
img_1462

The sides are flat and made of plastic while sharing the same silver color as the interior with good port distribution without making either side overcrowded with connectors. The left side holds the DC charging port, main exhaust vent, two USB 3.0 connectors, HDMI, and VGA while the right side has the other two USB 2.0 ports, LAN, 3.5 mm audio jack and the optical drive, of course. Interestingly for a 17-incher, the ProBook 470 G3 doesn’t fall behind some 15-inch laptops with just 26 mm thin chassis. In fact, the weight of the machine isn’t all that high as well – 2.61 kg opposed to some other similarly priced competitors like the Acer Aspire E5-773G and the ASUS X751.

img_1439
img_1453
img_1450

What’s left is the interior that features excellent keyboard design with slightly thin key spacing but the key travel compensates for that. The only thing missing here is probably the LED illumination for the more expensive configurations. Moreover, the keyboard tray appears to be exceptionally stiff and doesn’t give in even under pressure. The same goes for the rest of the interior, which features brushed aluminum finish giving a nice premium feel when resting your palms. And, of course, the touchpad remains untouched and it’s identical to the one found in the ProBook 450 G3 and 440 G3. Absolutely no complaints.

img_1423
img_1444
img_1417

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Most of the hardware you are going to need to upgrade is located under the service lid. It’s easy to access without any hassle. The same thing goes for the battery as well.

p1030359

p1030365
p1030362

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

Despite its low price, the notebook offers a decent options for upgrading the storage. The service lid holds the usual 2.5-inch HDD along with a 2280 M.2 SATA SSD with M-key connector.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2280 M.2 slot Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD HGST 1TB 5400 rpm Upgrade options
p1030369
p1030362

RAM

The motherboard features two RAM slots and HP has listed this model to come with the next generation DDR4-2133 memory but our unit came with the standard for this class 8GB DDR3L-1600 chip. Keep an eye for this detail when ordering if it’s important for you.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB DDR3L-1600 RAM Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

p1030366

Other components

The rest of the hardware is also easily accessible. The battery can be removed by pulling the lever switch and no tools are needed. The unit is rated at 44Wh.

p1030377
p1030378

The Wi-Fi module is right next to the M.2 SSD slot – Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (3165NGW).

p1030361

If you need to access the rest of the components, the motherboard or the cooling fans, you will have to detach the whole bottom cover by removing the screws and the optical drive. Then you can proceed by prying it up.

p1030370
p1030374

The full disassembly article can be read here.

Display quality

We got the variant with the HD+ TN panel (1600×900) manufactured by AU Optronics with model number 219E or at least that’s what the software detects. Usually, AUO displays have much different model numbers. Anyway, since the display has a 17.3-inch diagonal, the pixel density is 106 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.24 x 0.24 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 80 cm.

micr-hp-probook-470-g3

There’s noticeable color shift under 45-degree angle due to the use of TN matrix.

angles-hp-probook-470-g3

We’ve recorded a maximum brightness of just 220 cd/m2 in the middle of the screen and 201 cd/m2 as average across the surface with a maximum deviation of just 17%. The color temperature is 7500K in the center and 7460K average, which guarantees slightly blue-ish (colder) colors than usual. The contrast ratio is 470:1 – typical for budget TN panels.

The maximum recorded color deviation dE2000 is 4.3 in the lower right corner of the screen. This isn’t a good result as values above 4.0 are unwanted.

maxbrightness-hp-probook-470-g3

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. Starting with the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy. Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that has been used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used by professional cameras, monitors and etc. for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook. Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios and the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s hard to be covered by today’s displays. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The sRGB color gamut coverage is 65% making it a little bit better than most displays that are used on similarly priced machines.

befgamut-hp-probook-470-g3

Below you will see practically the same image but with color circles representing the reference colors and white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

befcolors-hp-probook-470-g3
aftcolors-hp-probook-470-g3

The profile was created at 140 cd/m2, D65 white point and sRGB gamma mode.

gamma-hp-probook-470-g3

Below you can see the results from the accuracy color checker with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. The results are before and after calibration.

befcolorchecker-hp-probook-470-g3
aftcolorchecker-hp-probook-470-g3

We’ve also measured how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image. It’s essential when watching movies or playing games. The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings while the right one with our custom profile for gaming and multimedia. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis the luminance of the display. The display offers good visibility in dark areas of an image but it’s further improved by installing our profile.

We illustrate the first five levels of the gray (1%-5% white), right after black level, using the five boxes on the image below. Keep in mind that whether you can distinguish them or not strongly depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-hp-probook-470-g3

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 13.5 ms.

resptime-hp-probook-470-g3

PWM (Screen flickering)

Our equipment didn’t detect any pulsations across all brightness levels meaning that the display will not bother even users with sensitive eyes.

pwm-hp-probook-470-g3

Blue light emissions

With our Health-Guard profile installed, you can benefit from reduced blue light emissions. You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP).

spd-hp-probook-470-g3

Conclusion

To be honest, we weren’t expecting much from the budget TN panel considering the price point of the product but we were pleasantly surprised by some of the results we got from the lab. For instance, the sRGB coverage is slightly above average (65% as opposed to most TN panels having merely 50%) and we didn’t record any PWM across all brightness levels. But, on the other hand, properties such as color accuracy don’t make a strong case for the reviewed unit so we suggest using our custom profiles to bring the average dE2000 down from 9.8 to 2.1 and also limit the blue light emissions with the Health-Guard profile. The latter will come in handy as the display has colder than usual color temperature which automatically leads to higher blue light levels. At the end of the day, the display will be perfectly fine for everyday office work and general browsing.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP ProBook 470 G3 configurations with 17.3″ AU Optronics 219E (HD+, 1600 x 900) TN, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eiwbsE

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

No noticeable distortions were recorded during our sound tests while the maximum volume is loud enough for multimedia purposes.

sound-hp-probook-470-g3

Specs sheet

The specs provided below apply for the tested unit only and may differ depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i5-6200U (2-core, 2.30 – 2.80 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR3L-1600
GPU AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm) + Free M.2 SATA SSD slot
Display 15.6-inch (39.62 cm) – 1600×900 (HD+) TN panel, matte
Optical Drive DVD burner
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • webcam
  • microphone
  • 3.5 mm combo audio
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45
  • VGA
  • card reader(SD, SDHC, SDXC)
  • fingerprint scanner
Battery 4-cell, 44Wh / 6-cell, 55Wh
Thickness 25.98 mm (1.02″)
Weight 2.6 kg (5.75 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for the testing of this unit and if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from HP’s official website.

Battery

Usually, higher resolution and bigger screen diagonal translate into reduced battery life due to the number of pixels that need to be lit up and the surface, which the backlighting has to cover. Nonetheless, we were quite surprised by the battery performance because the tests didn’t show any significant decrease in endurance compared to the smaller 15-inch model. We got more than decent results in the web browsing and video playback tests.

And as usual, the tests were run with Wi-Fi constantly on, Windows power saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

net

Good readings for a budget 17-incher – 344 minutes (5 hours and 44 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

hp_probook_440_g3_K9J48EA (1)

Interestingly, the video playback test returned a slightly higher result – 382 minutes (6 hours and 22 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

game

The gaming test took a toll on the battery so the notebook scored just 117 minutes (1 hour and 57 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel_Core_i5_logo-300x400Intel Core i5-6200U is a 6th generation dual-core CPU. It is manufactured using 14 nm FinFET process, meaning it’s part of the Ultra-Low Voltage lineup.The CPU is clocked at 2.3GHz, but thanks to the Turbo Boost technology it could automatically increase its clock speeds up to 2.8GHz for a single core and 2.7GHz when two cores are functioning. It is designed using Intel’s Skylake architecture allowing it to have similar performance to Intel Core i7-5500U, which is part of the Broadwell lineup. The CPU boasts four logical cores and 3MB level 3 cache. It consumes 15W of energy and can operate at a maximum temperature of 100 degrees Celsius.

The SoC also integrates Intel HD Graphics 520. Its performance is similar to that of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 820 GPU. The GPU can be clocked at up to 1000MHz. The SoC supports the Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization and AES-NI technologies.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-6200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.25
Dell Inspiron 5759 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.62+11.38%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.24-0.31%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) Intel Core i7-5500U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)3.10-4.62%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)445
Dell Inspiron 5759 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482+8.31%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)440-1.12%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) Intel Core i7-5500U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)455+2.25%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.43
Dell Inspiron 5759 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.15-16.05%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.73+1.47%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) Intel Core i7-5500U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)19.22-5.92%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-6200U scored 5.562 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)

Radeon-r7The AMD Radeon R7 M340 is a low-end graphics card used for entry-level laptops and it’s based on the so-called Tonga chip so it supports the essential features like DirectX 12, Vulkan and FreeSync.

However, the chip is clocked at 1021 MHz with five compute cores so it should be a tad faster than the R5 M335. And just like its predecessors with the Tonga chip, this one offers 64-bit bus width on a DDR3 VRAM, 320 shading units and it’s produced using a 28nm process.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/amd-radeon-r7-m340-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6340
Dell Inspiron 5759 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)4696-25.93%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6322-0.28%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) NVIDIA GeForce 920M (4GB DDR3)7165+13.01%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1220
Dell Inspiron 5759 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)919-24.67%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1214-0.49%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) NVIDIA GeForce 920M (4GB DDR3)1168-4.26%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4250
Dell Inspiron 5759 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)3279-22.85%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4248-0.05%510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) NVIDIA GeForce 920M (4GB DDR3)4005-5.76%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329
Dell Inspiron 5759 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)252-23.4%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329510 EUR- EUR
(-)
Dell Inspiron 5758 (17 5000) NVIDIA GeForce 920M (4GB DDR3)295-10.33%

Temperatures

The stress test that we perform isn’t exactly the best way to represent real-life usage but it’s a good way to assess the reliability and stability of the cooling system and how it will perform after months and years exploitation.

We start off with 100% CPU load for about an hour. The silicon was running at low temperatures (65-70 °C) and there were no signs of thermal throttling as the system was able to utilize the full performance of the chip (2.7 GHz) with two active cores.

470-g3-cpu

After an hour had passed, we turned on the GPU stress test as well. The temperatures of the CPU rose to around 90 °C while still maintaining the maximum operating frequency with two active cores. The GPU, however, was running a bit too hot at 81 °C but was also able to keep within the base and turbo boost frequencies.

470-g3-gpu

Our equipment recorded relatively high temperatures in the upper left and center part of the interior along with the left side where the main exhaust vent is positioned. Nonetheless, the general user won’t reach such high loads for longer periods of time and the wrist rest area remained cool throughout the test. There’s no room for worries.

temperatures-bottom

Verdict

editor-choiceOur verdict on the ProBook 470 G3 won’t be any different from the one we wrote on the 15-inch model. In fact, it’s quite the opposite, some of the drawbacks we’ve noted in the smaller versions haven’t been inherited in the 17-inch 470 G3. For example, the absence of PWM across all brightness levels makes a strong case for the 470 G3 and probably the smarter choice over the smaller ProBooks, unless portability is your top priority. Even battery life isn’t much different.

But as far as hardware is concerned, the 17-inch ProBook features the same hardware as its smaller sibling, which is more than enough for office work, multimedia and some graphically-intensive tasks can be handled easy thanks to the discrete GPU. What’s really cool about a notebook at this price is the support for M.2 SATA SSDs. We are extremely happy to see the standard making its way to a larger user base by being implemented in more and more budget-friendly notebooks.

Finally, we would like to address the good TN panel that has decent out-of-the-box properties making it a tad better than most affordable solutions on the market. Probably a higher resolution (1080p) would have done wonders on the 17-inch diagonal. Still, you can make a good use of our custom profiles as they will improve the overall image quality and limit the negative blue light emissions.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eiwbsE

Pros

  • Sturdy and rigid construction with good choice of materials
  • Comfortable keyboard and touchpad
  • Supports M.2 SATA SSD
  • Good battery life for a 17-inch budget laptop
  • No PWM across all brightness levels

Cons

  • A Full HD resolution would have been appreciated

Lenovo Yoga 910 review – just sexy

$
0
0

lenovo-yoga-910

We doubt that Lenovo’s Yoga lineup needs any introduction but what deserves extra attention is the new Yoga 910 2-in-1 notebook. It’s slim, it’s powerful, it’s versatile and it’s absolutely astonishing. The new Yoga runs on Intel’s latest generation Kaby Lake processors – Core i5-7200U or Core i7-7500U paired with up to 16GB of DDR4-2133 RAM and up to 1TB of PCIe NVMe storage solution. But what really makes an impression to the general user – and to us apparently – is the sexy new look.

Having a footprint of a normal 13.3-inch device, the Yoga 910 incorporates almost bezel-less gorgeous 13.9-inch Full HD – or optional 4K UHD – IPS display without the bulk. Along with the new display, Lenovo has slightly altered the keyboard and touchpad, which are now just a delight to use. But what about the actual performance this notebook has to offer to the general user? Battery life, raw performance, heat management, screen flickering? It seems like it’s the most promising Yoga up to date but let’s find out for sure in our in-depth review below.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2f0ZNMD

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a fresh new box with the usual stuff inside – user manuals, AC charging adapter and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

At first glance, the notebook isn’t noticeably different than its Yoga 900 predecessor but opening it proves otherwise. Now anodized aluminum is the main order of the day, replacing the faux leather on the interior from the previous generation. However, this hasn’t affected the chassis in a negative way so the 14.9 mm thickness remains and the weight has increased by just 110 g – from 1.27 to 1.39 kg. So in practice, you won’t even notice the difference and it’s still a pretty portable hybrid solution, whatsoever.

img_4315
img_4318

Let’s begin with the lid. Seemingly it’s made of anodized aluminum or another kind of metal, which Lenovo doesn’t disclose but one thing is for sure – it’s rigid as hell. It can’t be bent, twisted and you can hardly see any deformation even under great amounts of pressure. The notebook opens up fairly hard but enough to only use one hand. Probably over time the hinge will get a slightly loosened. Speaking of the hinge, the Yoga 910 returns with another iconic watchband hinge, which does its job pretty well keeping the screen in place while typing and reducing the wobbling effect when using the touchscreen. The same applies to the base – no complaints at all. Probably the silicone feet need more resistance since the notebook slips easily on a normal desk.

img_4402
img_4391
img_4394
img_4399

The sides of the ultrabook are totally different and have almost nothing in common with the previous generation. The aluminum on the sides is polished and brushed giving it a distinct razor-sharp look. What’s missing, though, is the rubberized strips around the edges that help keep the laptop in place during presentation and tent mode. Also, we notice that there are some essential connection options missing from the previous generation. While the Yoga 900 offered two normal USBs (one of which is for charging) and a USB-C 3.0 also used for video-out, the Yoga 910 offers only one USB-A and two USB-C connectors, none of which is Gen 2 (10Gbps), unfortunately. However, the USB-C 3.0 port can be used for connecting an external display and the other USB-C port is also used for charging and falls into the 2.0 standard. Moreover, there’s no SD card reader. We wonder why the newer generation has fewer connectivity options.

img_4387
img_4361
img_4367
img_4373

The interior is another great aspect of the device and one of the key selling points as well. The surface around the keyboard and the touchpad is now totally revamped – anodized aluminum replaces the faux leather-like finish but we can’t really comment on this change because it’s more of a personal preference. Still, the leather interior kept the notebook firmly in place without slipping while in presentation mode. Anyway, the keyboard returns with the usual AccuType style with relatively short key travel but excellent tactile feedback. The LED illumination can be adjusted to two levels. The overall typing experience is excellent and it kind of reminds us of the HP Spectre 13‘s keyboard. Whereas the touchpad, well this is a whole another story. The surface of the trackpad area uses a low-resistance material and all gestures and swipes feel so natural and pleasing that it’s just a delight to use it. Mouse clicks appear to be extremely light and accurate. In short, this might be one of the best touchpads we’ve used in a while. It can easily challenge the excellently-built MacBook touchpads. And while you are on the interior, we want to comment a little bit on the fingerprint scanner – it’s fast, responsive and thanks to the Windows Hello feature, it’s also extremely easy to use.

img_4347-1
img_4354
img_4334-1
img_4337

Now let’s talk about the elephant in the room – the display. The stunning 13.9-inch – in our case Full HD – screen fits into a 13.3-inch footprint thanks to the nearly bezel-less three-sided borders. It’s practical and looks beautiful at the same time. We are glad to see another notebook taking the steps of the XPS 13 and XPS 15 notebooks. The bottom bezel seems a bit too thick but it’s nothing that actually makes a difference in practice. It’s just an aesthetic concern.

img_4380
img_4322

The Yoga 910 doesn’t revolutionize the Yoga design or the notebook’s design for that matter, but the excellently executed craftsmanship proves that little details matter and there’s still room to improve with the current tech that we have. The 13.9-inch diagonal in a 13.3-inch form factor is a neat idea that we wish more OEMs will consider doing for their high-end notebooks. We were also extremely impressed by the keyboard and touchpad comfort and usability – something we think is absolutely essential for a portable 2-in-1 device mainly aimed at the business consumers. All of this fits into a portable, premium and light package, which is an eye-catcher for sure. With all the superlatives that we used to describe the Yoga 910, it’s easy to look away from the fact that the device’s weight has increased by a tad over the last generation.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Performing simple storage upgrade or a battery swap is quite easy. You just need to detach the bottom with the help of a screw. However, if you need to access the fans, a full disassembly of the motherboard and its extensions is required., which will take some time and patience.

img_20161031_134022
img_20161031_134631

Storage upgrade options – M.2 SSD slot

As most premium ultrabooks, the Lenovo Yoga 910 also relies on the M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD standard and our unit came equipped with a 256GB drive in a 2280 form factor.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2280 M.2 slot Samsung PM951 256GB PCIe NVMe Upgrade options

img_20161031_134726

RAM

The RAM isn’t upgradeable – it’s soldered to the motherboard. You can order your’s with up to 16GB of DDR4-2133 so choose wisely.

img_20161031_140037

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is easily accessible and it’s right next to the M.2 SSD.

img_20161031_134734

Although the battery doesn’t look so big, it sure does pack a lot of energy and it’s rated at the whopping 78Wh.

img_20161031_134711

Cooling system

To access the cooling system (heat pipe, heat sink, fans) you need to flip the motherboard around. Make sure you’ve removed all the screws and cables attached to the motherboard and its extensions. Then unscrew the fans and lift it up. And now is the time to admire the fact that Lenovo was able to integrate a KBL-U chip onto such small motherboard while using the spare space for a huge battery pack.

img_20161031_140047
img_20161031_140053

IF you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

The notebook uses a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with a glossy finish and unusual diagonal – 13.9″. It’s manufactured by AU Optronics with model number B139HAN03.2 so the pixel density is 158 ppi and 0.16 x 0.16 pixel pitch. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

micr-lenovo-yoga-910

The viewing angles are excellent as you can see from the image below.

angles-lenovo-yoga-910

We’ve recorded a maximum brightness of 310 cd/m2 in the middle and 292 cd/m2 as average across the surface. This is more than enough for comfortable work indoors even if there’s a bright light source nearby but it might prove insufficient outdoors under direct sunlight, not to mention the display has a glossy finish. And given the form factor and the versatile nature of the product, using it outdoors is a very probable scenario. Anyway, the maximum deviation is just 11% – on the right side of the screen. The recorded color temperature is 7990K – far from the optimal 6500K so colors will appear a bit cold-ish/blue-ish. The contrast ratio is more than excellent – 1240:1 before calibration and 970:1 after.

The maximum dE2000 (color deviation to the center of the screen) is just 2.7 which is a good result since values above 4.0 are unwanted.

maxbrightness

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The yellow dotted line represents the area, which the Yoga 910’s display covers which is 95% of the sRGB color space. Colors will appear vivid and saturated.

gamut-lenovo-yoga-910

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

befcolors-lenovo-yoga-910
aftcolors-lenovo-yoga-910

We’ve created a profile at 140 cd/m2 and using sRGB gamma mode with D65 white point.

As you can see in the image below, the gamma curve is far from optimal – dark areas of an image will appear even darker – while the color temperature will aid for more blue-like colors. However, this can be fixed by using our Office/Web Design Profile.

gamma-lenovo-yoga-910

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

befcolorchecker-lenovo-yoga-910
aftcolorchecker-lenovo-yoga-910

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-lenovo-yoga-910

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms.

resptime-lenovo-yoga-910

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

Our equipment didn’t record any pulsations across all brightness levels thus the display can be used for long periods of time without affecting even users with sensitive eyes.

pwm-lenovo-yoga-910

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

spectrum-lenovo-yoga-910

Conclusion

There’s not much we can say about the display because it’s almost flawless. It has what it takes to deliver excellent viewing experience – wide sRGB coverage (almost full), high contrast ratio, relatively high maximum brightness, although, it might be insufficient for outdoor use, and now PWM across all brightness level making it perfect for long hours of work. Our only complaint would be the inaccurate colors and a bit cold color temperature but both can be fixed by using our custom Office/Web Design Profile, which will correct the gamma, white point and also bring the average color deviation dE2000 down to 1.2 from 6.5.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Yoga 910 configurations with 13.9″ AU Optronics B139HAN03.2 (FHD, 1920 x 1080) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eqvATB

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is rather good but there’s missing clarity in the low and high frequencies. This is a common problem with small ultrabooks.

sound-lenovo-yoga-910

Specs sheet

CPU Intel Core i5-7200U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2133 MHz
GPU Intel HD Graphics 620
HDD/SSD 256GB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD
Display 13.9-inch – Full HD (1920×1080) touch IPS, glossy
Optical drive
Connectivity Lenovo AC Wireless (2×2), Bluetooth 4.1
Features
  • 1x USB 3.0 Type-C with video-out
  • 1x USB 2.0 Type-C with charging
  • 1x USB 3.0 with always-on charging
  • 3.5 mm audio combo jack
Battery 6-cell, 78Wh
Thickness 14.9 mm (0.58″)
Weight 1.39 kg (3.06 lbs)

Software

The pre-production unit came with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) but if you wish to perform a clean install by yourself without the bloatware, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official support page.

Battery

Despite the thin aluminum body, the notebook carries a huge battery pack rated at 78Wh and quite expectedly, the notebook shatters all records in terms of battery performance. Of course, you won’t get the same battery life out of the 4K UHD version of the Yoga 910, but the Full HD variant rocks the house for sure. We will also have to give some credit to the small 13.9-inch screen and the energy-efficient Core i5-7200U ULV CPU from the Kaby Lake family.

Anyway, all tests were run using the same conditions as always – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows power saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

yoga-910-net

Outstanding result comparable to some tablets and even smartphones – 806 minutes (13 hours and 26 minutes).

Video playback

For every test of this kind, we use the same video in HD.

yoga-910-movie

Lower but still amazing result – 638 minutes (10 hours and 38 minutes).

Gaming

For accurate simulation, we used the F1 2015 benchmark running on a loop with graphic settings set to minimum.

yoga-910-game

We doubt you will start a gaming session away from the charger but here’s how much time you will get out of the system – 275 minutes (4 hours and 35 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.22-11.78%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22-11.78%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)484
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482-0.41%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444-8.26%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.75
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.78+5.8%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.08+13.13%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.405 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 6207675
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5205009-34.74%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5207207-6.1%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 620855
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520732-14.39%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520389-54.5%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 6203474
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5202451-29.45%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5203134-9.79%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 620275
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520137-50.18%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520237-13.82%

Temperatures

The stress test that we do doesn’t really represent real-life use since the general user won’t reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load for extended periods of time but it gives us a good glimpse of how the notebook will fare in the long run and how well is the cooling system built.

We started with an hour-long CPU torture test and the results seem promising. At first, the CPU ran at its maximum 3.1 GHz but after half an hour or so, the chip toned down to 2.6 – 2.8 GHz but still kept things within the Turbo Boost frequencies. Nevertheless, the chip was running a bit hot at nearly 80 °C.

Quite expectedly for a thin ultrabook, the processor started throttling when we turned on the GPU stress test. This way the CPU will give enough headroom for the iGPU to perform and lower the overall temperatures down to 69 °C.

We’ve also recorded the temperature on the surface of the notebook and found out that the aluminum interior does indeed disperse heat across the whole surface but the palm rests and the keyboard area remained cool, nonetheless.

temperatures-bottom

Verdict

editor-choiceThere isn’t we can say against the Yoga 910 because it surpassed almost all of our expectations. It’s sleek, powerful, versatile and portable. The build quality is just impeccable while the keyboard and touchpad assure excellent user experience. And even though the weight of the notebook has increased a bit, we can’t really blame Lenovo for that because it houses a monstrous 78Wh battery that will get you through the day and a half probably. Our battery tests confirm that with record-breaking results and quite honestly, you won’t find any other notebook at this price range with similar endurance.

Another unique feature that sets the Yoga 910 apart from its rivals is the unusual 13.9-inch screen diagonal that fits inside a 13.3-inch chassis without the extra bulk. The almost bezel-less screen gives the notebook a distinct look and offers more working space while the iconic Yoga watchband hinge keeps things tight and can be adjusted to your liking.

Speaking of the screen, it has numerous useful properties for a good multimedia experience – wide sRGB coverage, high contrast ratio and no PWM across all brightness levels. However, the maximum brightness might be an issue for some users that tend to use the device outdoors under direct sunlight. Still, the recorded 292 cd/m2 will be enough for indoor use even near a strong light source.

Finally, we would like to address one issue that might be a deal-breaker for some – the absence of some essential connectivity options. There are just two USB-C ports – one of which is used for charging and none of them is Gen 2 supporting up to 10Gbps bandwidth – and one USB-A 3.0 connector. Also, the Yoga 910 skips the SD card reader, which was present in the Yoga 900.

Aside from the connectivity options, the Yoga 910 is downright the best Yoga device up to date and probably the best premium all-rounder if you have the extra cash. It even beats Dell’s legendary XPS 13 in so many aspects and wipes the floor with HP’s Spectre 13, except in weight and thickness, of course.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2f0ZNMD

Pros

  • Impeccable design and build quality
  • Excellent keyboard and touchpad
  • Versatile (360-degree watchband rotating hinge) and portable (14.9 mm, 1.39 kg)
  • Nearly bezel-less crisp and vivid 13.9-inch IPS display in a 13.3-inch form factor
  • Screen has no PWM across all brighntess levels
  • Outstanding battery runtimes
  • Fast storage solution (M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD)

Cons

  • The screen’s maximum brightness might not be enough for outdoor use
  • Not enough connectivity options

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI review – has the desktop performance cliché just been shattered?

$
0
0

msi-gt83vr-6rf-titan-sli-cover

“Shatter desktop performance cliché” – this is how MSI markets its latest MSI GT83VR Titan SLI notebook which comes to take the place of the ludicrously powerful GT80S Titan SLI. The latter is equipped with two GeForce GTX 980 GPUs and although this is a 2014 model the notebook easily handles 4K resolutions at medium-high graphics settings in almost any gaming title. But what if you want to play in 4K at Max/Ultra settings (oh, and you have unlimited amount of money)?

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI is the answer – ultra-powerful 18.4-inch gaming notebook with up to two GTX 1080 GPUs. We have the “budget” alternative of the top model (just $3,499), “6RE” which comes with two GTX 1070s. Don’t worry, they will do the work. We’re talking about 16GB GDDR5X and Pascal graphics power, supported by the Core i7-6820K CPU and NVMe PCIe Gen3 X4 SSD storage. If that’s not enough, you can use the Turbo mode to overclock the CPU and GPU, and we’ll definitely put that to the test.

We have a lot of interesting things to cover so let’s get to work!

You can find the current price of MSI GT83VR Titan SLI here: http://amzn.to/2eqUyTB

Contents

What’s in the box?

If your GT83VR Titan SLI has just arrived, don’t waste time but drink an energy drink (or two), carry it to the biggest desk or table in your house and start unboxing. Besides the notebook in the box you’ll find a pretty big cleaning cloth for the 18.4-inch screen, several manuals, “drivers & utilities” DVD and two 230W chargers both of which you’ll need to power the laptop.

img_4457

Design and construction

“Well…at least it won’t throttle” – these was the first words we said while bringing the 5.5 kg (12 lbs) GT83VR out of its box. It better don’t, but we’ll check that a bit later. Anyway, we’re pretty sure that this is not just the heaviest laptop we’ve ever tested but it’s also the thickest – we measured 69 mm (2.71″) at the back.

msi-gt83v-2
msi-gt83v-1

MSI doesn’t share much about the construction of its GT83VR – the official page doesn’t even mention that it has a metal body, but we’re here to test everything you might (or might not) wan’t to know. Did you know that MSI has used different process for the lid and the interior? Both of them have brushed aluminum finish but the lid is covered with a ~0.15 mm coating which means that it will be very resistant to wearing. In comparison, the Apple MacBook Pro’s anodization thickness is 0.05 mm. The palm rest of MSI GT83VR Titan is protected by ~0.10 mm layer – a bit thinner but this isn’t actually a palm rest since you won’t rest your palms on it (or it would be sort of weird and uncomfortable) – the keyboard is placed at the front and there is free space behind it. On the right we have a fusion between a numpad and a trackpad with two physical buttons. Contrary to our initial expectations, we didn’t need much time to get used to it.

msi-gt83v-3
msi-gt83v-4

As you may see in the photos, the keyboard isn’t the typical island style as in almost every other notebook on the market. We have a mechanical keyboard, made by Steelseries. It has brown Cherry MX switches with great tactile feedback.

cherry-keys

MSI GT83VR Titan has just three above the keyboard, and none of them have macro capabilities. The first one pushes the fans to their boundaries, the second turns off the display and the third one is the Power button.

img_4501
img_4506
img_4517
img_4527

On the left side of the notebook we have an optical drive, card reader, three USB 3.0 ports, two audio port connectors for microphone and headphones, cooling grills, Kensington lock slot, Hi-Fi audio jack and SPDIF-out connector. The right side has just two more USB 3.0 ports and some more cooling grills, while the rear side is covered by big air vents and Mini-Display port, HDMI connector, RJ-45, USB 3.1 (Type-C) and the power connector.

img_4558
img_4552
img_4542
img_4550

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Here’s one very big drawback – in order to upgrade your machine you have to remove the screws from the bottom which can’t be done without tampering the warranty sticker. Sure, there is a risk while opening your $4000 machine out of a licensed service but this is your own property, after all.

warranty-sticker

Anyway, you have 4x RAM slots, 5225mAh (75.24Wh) BTY-L78 battery, HGST 1TB 7200RPM hard drive and two Samsung SM951 SSDs in RAID0 (NVMe PCIe Gen3 x4).

Display quality

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI features a matte IPS-type panel (Super PLS), Samsung XJY7J-184HL. It has 18.4-inch diagonal (46.74 cm) and 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) resolution. It has a pixel density of 120 PPI and 0.21 x 0.21 mm pixel pitch. Samsung XJY7J-184HL becomes “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal to or greater than 70 cm – that’s the distance beyond which the human eye with “standard” 20/20 vision will stop distinguishing the individual pixels.

micr-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI has comfortable viewing angles. Here you can see how the screen looks like when viewed from 45°.

angles-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

GT83VR’s screen has pretty high maximum brightness – 350 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 321 cd/m2 mean maximum level (with highest deviation in the lower left corner – 12%). The color temperature is 7640K at max brightness and white screen – it’s a bit colder than the typical sRGB 6500K and colors may appear slightly blue-ish. The contrast ratio is 1100:1 before and 830:1 after calibration.

The maximum DeltaE2000 (compared to the center of the screen at 100% RGB and 100% brightness) is 3.0. Values bigger than 4.0 are undesirable. This is a very important characteristic if you intend to work with colors.

brightness-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. Starting with the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that has been used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used by professional cameras, monitors and etc. for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios and the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s hard to be covered by today’s displays. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The yellow dotted line shows the MSI GT83VR Titan SLI’s coverage. The screen can represent 93% of sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 (web/HDTV standard) in CIE1976. In other words, it can show almost all colors used in Internet and HDTV. Good result.

gamut-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

Below you will see practically the same image but with color circles representing the reference colors and white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

You can also compare the results with and without the Office & Web Design profile, which can be bought here (Check our “Buy our profiles” section).

bef-colors-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli
aft-colors-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

The “Office and Web Design” profile is created at 140cd/m2 luminance, target illuminant white point 6500K (D65) and sRGB gamut.

gamma-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors such as light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The Office & Web Design profile offers much better DeltaE – 1.6.

befcolorchecker-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli
aftcolorchecker-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games at low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings while the right one is with an activated Gaming & Movie Nights profile. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis the luminance of the display. With the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself and see how your display handles the darkest nuances, but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and vice versa.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 19.0 ms. A very good result for an IPS screen.

resptime-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable by the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

MSI GT83VR Titan uses Pulse-Width Modulation for all brightness levels below 100%. The frequency is 250 Hz which means that the PWM is aggressive and harmful.

The Health-Guard profile eliminates the PWM at 140 cd/m2 (max position of the slider).

pwm-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

Blue light emissions

The installation of our Health-Guard profile not just eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that affect negatively your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP).

Check out the spectral power distribution at white screen and 140 cd/m2 brightness with and without our Health-Guard profile.

spd-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

Conclusion

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI’s display has very big area which comes in handy when watching movies or playing games. Its panel has high brightness and contrast and comfortable viewing angles. It also covers 93% of the sRGB colors so it can reproduce almost any color you can see in the Internet. We didn’t like the presence of aggressive PWM for all brightness levels except 100%.

While the overall quality of GT83VR’s display is good, our profiles improve the display in many aspects.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for MSI GT83VR configurations with 18.4″ Samsung XJY7J-184HL (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2erouze

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

MSI GT83VR Titan SLI has four 3W speakers and another 3W subwoofer so you shouldn’t be surprised that the sound system is pretty loud. All frequencies are clear except for a hardly noticeable part of the lower frequencies where we found light distortion.

sound-msi-gt83vr-titan-sli

Specs Sheet

These technical specifications refer only to the particular device tested in this review. Laptops from the same series could have different characteristics and features.

CPU Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-core, 2.70-3.60 GHz, 8MB cache)
RAM 32GB DDR4, 2133MHz (up to 64GB)
GPU 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)
HDD/SSD 1x M.2 SSD SATA, 2x NVMe PCIe Gen3 x4, 1x 2.5″ HDD/SSD
Display 18.4-inch Full HD Super PLS (IPS), matte (60 Hz)
Optical Drive DVD Writer
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi Killer ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 5x USB 3.0 (Type-A)
  • 1x USB 3.1/Thunderbolt 3 (Type-C, Gen2)
  • Mechanical Backlight Keyboard (Single-Color, Red)
  • HDMI (4K @ 60Hz)
  • Mini-DisplayPort 1.2
  • RJ-45
  • SD (XC/HC) Card Reader
  • 1x Mic-in, 1x Headphone-out, 1x Headphone-out (HiFi / SPDIF), 1x TOSLINK SPDIF Out
  • 4x 3W loudspeakers + 1x 3W subwoofer
Battery 75Wh Li-Ion
Weight 5.5 kg (12 lbs)

Software

If you need drivers for MSI GT83VR Titan we recommend downloading them from the official page:
https://www.msi.com/Laptop/support/GT83VR-6RF-Titan-SLI.html#down-driver&Win10 64

MSI GT83VR Titan comes with a lot of pre-installed apps, one of which is MSI Dragon Center. It has System Monitor, System Tuner and even a panel for overclocking the CPU and GPU.

app-1
app-2
app-3
overclock-150-300-gtav

Battery

MSI GT83VR Titan has relatively small battery given the size of the notebook and its specifications. The dual GTX 1070 are definitely power hungry and the Core i7-6820HK also sucks a lot of the battery’s life. Not to mention the 18.4-inch screen. Let’s see what will happen in our usual battery tests – Web surfing, Video playback and gaming.

Web Surfing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

msi-gt83vr-6rf-titan-sli-battery-web-surfing

Chances are you won’t bring your GT83VR to Starbucks but if you have to check something on the go, you have 143 minutes (2 hours and 23 mintues) before running out of juice.

Video playback

For our Video playback test we use a 720p HD film.

msi-gt83vr-6rf-titan-sli-battery-movies

Watching movies on a laptop with 18.4-inch IPS screen is great, although you should check their duration first, because our MSI GT83VR Titan went from 100% to 0% in just 128 minutes (2 hours and 8 minutes).

Gaming

For accurate gaming simulation, we use the F1:2015 benchmark on loop, at lowest graphic settings and 768p resolution.

msi-gt83vr-6rf-titan-sli-battery-gaming

What about going to a LAN party without the two chargers? Not the brightest idea of course, but you should know that if you happen to get into this situation, you’ll have 88 minutes before running out of battery life.

CPU – Intel Core i7-6820HK

corei7_02Intel Core i7-6820HK represents the Skylake H family and it’s a high-performance chip with relatively high consumption – 45W TDP, which matches its little sibling i7-6700HQ. The Core i7-6820HK has four cores ticking at 2.7GHz and can go up to 3.6 GHz for one active core, 3.4GHz for two active cores and 3.2 GHz for four active cores. However, since the cooling system in MSI GT83VR is enormous, the processor is clocked at 4.00 GHz, even when all the cores are active. That’s а whooping 25% overclock!

Intel Core i7-6820HK has 8 MB Intel Smart Cache which is the other notable difference with 6700HQ (with 6MB Smart Cache). The silicon supports the so-called Hyper-Threading technology that emulates one virtual core for each physical and thus establishing a total of 8 threads.

Furthermore, the chip is manufactured using 14nm FinFET process and integrates Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU with 24 EU (Executable Units) clocked at 350 – 1050 MHz. The memory controller supports up to 64GB of DDR3 or DDR4 RAM at 1600 or 2133 MHz respectively. The CPU is suitable for heavy applications and gaming.

Take a look at our CPU rating system to see where the Core i7-6820HK stands:
http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

More information about the CPU can be attained here:
http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6820hk/

Check the prices of all notebooks equipped with Core i7-6820HK: http://amzn.to/2e3cPZc

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)9.66
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-22.46%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)7.83-18.94%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-22.46%
ASUS ROG G752VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.40-23.4%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)948
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)827-12.76%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)933-1.58%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)831-12.34%
ASUS ROG G752VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)813-14.24%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)8.6
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.27+31.05%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)9.13+6.16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.44+21.4%
ASUS ROG G752VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.65+23.84%

Storage speeds

MSI GT83VR uses two Samsung SM951 SSDs in RAID0 so as you might guess, the storage speeds are colossal. We measured 3.2GB/s sequential read and 1.4 GB/s sequential write speeds. Here is a quick comparison:

SSD model Seq. Read (Max) Seq. Write (Max) Read Access Time
2x Samsung SM951 (256GB, RAID 0) 3243 MB/s 1385 MB/s 0.045 ms
Samsung SM951 (256GB) 2242 MB/s 1290 MB/s 0.057 ms
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 TO (256GB) 2576 MB/s 1196 MB/s 0.069 ms
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 (256GB) 1583 MB/s 313 MB/s 0.121 ms
LiteOn CV1-8B128 (128GB) 560 MB/s 181 MB/s 0.086 ms

GPU – 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)

2016-06-02-image-33The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a part of NVIDIA’s Pascal generation of GPUs and unlike previous releases, the company finally closes the gap between mobile and desktop graphics processors and that’s why there’s no “M” in the branding of Pascal GPUs. All thanks to the 16nm TSMC manufacturing process of the GPU, which allows better thermals and overall performance in a smaller form factor. That’s a big technology jump compared to the 28nm Maxwell generation.

Compared to its desktop counterpart, the GTX 1070 doesn’t differ too much. They share an identical number of ROPs (64) and identical memory – 8GB GDDR5 with 256-bit bus clocked at 8000 MHz. However, there’s a minor difference in clock speeds – the laptop GPU ticks at 1443 MHz and can go up to 1645 MHz while the desktop variant is running at 1506 MHz – 1683 MHz. To compensate to some extent, the laptop 1070 carries more CUDA cores (2048 vs 1920) and slightly more TMUs (170 vs 120).

Due to its performance, thermals and power consumption, which is believed to be 10W more than the GTX 980M, the GPU is suitable for large 17-inch or bigger laptops with the appropriate cooling solution.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find more information and specifications about the pair of GTX 1070s: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/2x-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-8gb-gddr5-sli/

Check the prices of all notebooks equipped with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: http://amzn.to/2dlgbY5

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)160908
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)84191-47.68%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)76639-52.37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)66689-58.55%
ASUS ROG G752VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)51143-68.22%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)33487
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)15485-53.76%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)11937-64.35%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)9629-71.25%
ASUS ROG G752VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)7429-77.82%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)59094
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)47767-19.17%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)40266-31.86%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)30267-48.78%
ASUS ROG G752VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)24596-58.38%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI GT83VR Titan SLI 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5, SLI)6674
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4160-37.67%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)3487-47.75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)2973-55.45%
ASUS ROG G752VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)2299-65.55%

Gaming Tests

If you jump over to our YouTube channel, you can see how GTA V and Rise of the Tomb Raider run on the MSI GT83VR Titan SLI with 2x GTX 1070 (SLI) at maximum settings. If you’d like to see more gameplay benchmark videos you can subscribe to our YouTube channel.

All the gaming tests we ran with the GeForce 373.06 drivers on Minimum, Average and Max settings and Full HD resolution.

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 140 fps 114 fps 109 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 176 fps 138 fps 79 fps (OC: 81 fps, +3%)

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 176 fps 142 fps 104 fps (OC: 107 fps, +3%)

hitman-2016

HITMAN (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 136 fps 93 fps 39 fps

We managed to squeeze additional 3% in Rise of the Tomb Raider and GTA V, at max settings. It’s not a big difference but GT83VR shows great performance anyway (much higher than other laptops with the same components).

Temperatures and Comfort

MSI GT83VR’s cooling system looks great – it has two huge turbines on the back and third little fan, placed close to the CPU. They should cool the components really cool, especially having in mind the fact that the i7-6820HK is ticking at 4.00 GHz by default. Let’s check that.

100% CPU load

First, we start with 100% CPU load. 10 minutes after the start the notebook doesn’t show any signs of trouble – the cores temperature is 75-85C and the frequency is still 4.0 GHz. In other words, no matter what the computing task is, GT83VR will handle it at its Turbo clock – 25% over the default one of 6820HK. After an hour, things look pretty much the same so we’re heading to the next chapter of our torture test…

temps-1h-cpu

100% CPU + 100% GPU load

Without stopping the 100% CPU load, we add 100% GPU load and we keep the notebook in that state for one more hour. After the total of two hours, the CPU ran at 3.4-3.5GHz / 85-95C, and the GPU at ~1.5GHz / 4.2 GHz and 70-74C.

temps-2h-2

Comfort

External temperatures at Idle

At idle or light load, the notebook keeps very low external temperatures – the panel behind the keyboard goes to 32C and the “hottest” point on the keyboard is 24C.

img_9166
img_9167
img_9173

External temperatures after 2 hours of Maximum load

After two hours of maximum load, the main panel went to just 38.6C which is great. The keyboard is cool as well.

img_9175
img_9179

Verdict

MSI GT83VR Titan isn’t for the masses. MSI GT83VR Titan is more like “Look what we can do”. We’re sure that the folks at MSI don’t think that GT83VR will become a great hit – its purpose is just to show that they have one of the best engineers out there and they can lead the market. MSI GT83VR Titan SLI has unmatchable performance (for a notebook) and we know that even though the price/performance ratio is far from the best, there will be many users who have more than enough money and just want to have the fastest notebook on the market. In case you’re one of them, the machine is great. GT83VR Titan has the best cooling system we’ve ever tested and really takes advantage of the pair of GTX 1070s / 1080s and the Core i7-6820HK processor.

The hardcore games will definitely value the fact that this is the first notebook to feature mechanical keyboard, but we would be happy to see G-Sync support and screen with more than 60 Hz refresh rate. However, GT83VR’s display did pretty well in our quality tests, except for the PWM – it uses aggressive 250 Hz modulation. We recommend to check out our profiles.

MSI GT83VR is equipped with ultra-fast PCIe NVMe storage and up to 64GB RAM so chances are you won’t be able to surprise it with any task it won’t be able to do. Along with the plenty of positives we can’t skip to share our disappointment by the fact that you can’t upgrade your machine without voiding the warranty.

You can find the current price of MSI GT83VR Titan SLI here: http://amzn.to/2eqUyTB

Pros

  • Solid construction
  • Great CPU/GPU performance
  • Mechanical keyboard and comfortable trackpad
  • 2.5” HDD/SSD slot + 3x M.2 PCIe NVMe slots
  • Four memory slots for up to 64GBs of RAM
  • IPS panel with good quality
  • Great 4.1 sound system
  • Cool internal and external temperatures even after continuous max load

Cons

  • Lack of G-Sync (60 Hz screen)
  • PWM across all brightness levels except 100% (without Health-Guard)
  • Upgrades void the warranty
  • It weighs 5.5 kg

Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M review – the true definition of a travelling companion

$
0
0

travelmate_x349_4v

Acer is expanding its successful business-oriented TravelMate lineup with a sleek new offering – the TravelMate X349. It’s supposed to come out on the market this fall with an absurdly low starting price of around $649, although the model we’ve acquired sports a Core i7-6500U chip, thus considerably more expensive. Still, the new TravelMate X349 can easily go against other more expensive 14-inchers like the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga. But, of course, you won’t get the 360-degree rotatable hinge with Acer’s solution.

Anyway, the TravelMate X349 surprises with excellent price/performance ratio, good IPS panel and exceptional build quality complimented with an all-aluminum design. Another interesting thing about this laptop is the wide range of connectivity options including a USB-C 3.1 connector, which allows you to use Acer’s USB-C docking station. It gives you more connection options and a GTX 960M GPU, which will be more than enough for you to enjoy some gaming on the go without sacrificing mobility. We will try to go into detail regarding this feature and see how it will play out.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2fspUK6

Contents

Retail package

The retail package contains all the usual user manuals, DVD with drivers, AC adapter and power cord.

img_1085

Design and construction

The outer clamshell of the notebook looks strict, minimalistic and premium and the design concept continues on the inside but we cannot stop thinking about ASUS’ ZenBook laptops while looking at the interior. The keys, the keyboard tray, the anodized aluminum, the general layout – all of it looks just too familiar. Nonetheless, Acer was able to implement something of its own – slightly concaved/curved keys on the keyboard for more comfortable typing experience.

img_1091
img_1093

Let’s start with the lid, which is covered in dark gray anodized aluminum. Fingerprints stick easily on the surface but aren’t as visible while the stability of the material is rather questionable because it bends under small weight. Interestingly, though, this doesn’t cause distortions or ripples on the LCD screen on the other side of the lid. Speaking of the screen, when we opened the notebook we were pleasantly surprised by the relatively thin bezels. There’s one big hinge supporting the whole display and stretches almost across the whole base and there you will also find the main exhaust vent. Another similarity with the ASUS ZenBook UX303 for example. Moreover, the hinge is tight enough to eliminate excessive wobbling while typing on unstable surface but loose enough to allow opening the machine with just one hand. It’s also the only plastic element on the chassis and to be honest, it doesn’t feel very rigid. And as for the bottom plate, it’s again made of thin aluminum sheet featuring two grill openings for the loudspeakers on the sides.

img_1136
img_1137
img_1126
img_1129

The ultrabook’s portability properties are backed up with a pretty thin profile of just 18 mm at its thickest point but doesn’t fail to deliver the usual set of ports you will find on a 14-inch form factor. Also, the port distribution is excellent without overcrowding either of the sides. The left side adopts the DC charging port, HDMI, USB 3.0 and USB-C 3.1 connector while the right side houses the SD card reader, 3.5 mm audio jack and USB 3.0.

img_1109
img_1116
img_1120
img_1124

What’s left is the interior. It continues the same simplistic design concept with little distractions. The palm rest area is big and houses a huge touchpad for improved usability. It’s generally good with silky-smooth surface, light mouse clicks, and accurate gesture control. No wobbling occurred while working on it. The keyboard left us with the same impression – comfortable, stable and clicky. We have decent key spacing, travel and slightly curved buttons aiding with the overall usability. You won’t see any difference between this keyboard and a standard 15-inch one, except for the missing Numpad area. What’s interesting, though, is that Acer added and an extra column of keys – Home, Pg Up, Pg Dn and End keys also serving as media player controls. We would have appreciated a different key placement regarding screen brightness, volume and media controls. We assume these keys will be more frequently used and should have been placed near the Fn key so you can operate with one hand. But this is actually a minor drawback. Kudos to the elegant implementation of the fingerprint scanner located next to the TravelMate X sign on the right side.

img_1112
img_1097
img_1100

Weighing just 1.53 kg, the TravelMate X349 is one of the finest all-aluminum ultrabooks we’ve tested so far. The pricing is going to be crucial because there are a good number of competitors in this price range with similar design, features, and hardware. To stand out from the rest, Acer must keep its aggressive pricing strategy to make its ultra portable TravelMate X lineup worthy of its name.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Opening the machine is really easy task. You just have to remove all the screws around the corners and pry up the plate with a plastic tool so you won’t scratch the surface.

img_20161107_162026
img_20161107_163150

Storage upgrade options – M.2 SSD slot

The notebook uses a 2280 M.2 SSD stick for storage and the unit ships with an SK Hynix SATA-enabled drive. However, you can upgrade it with an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD as the motherboard seems to support it.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2280 M.2 slot SK Hynix HFS256G39TND Upgrade options

img_20161107_163456

RAM

One of the main drawbacks of the device is the soldered RAM that can’t be upgraded and even the mid-range Core i5-6200U-equipped model ships with just 4GB of DDR4 RAM.

img_20161107_163548

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is easily accessible and it’s right next to the cooling fans.

img_20161107_163614

We see some empty space around the battery and we would have appreciated a slightly bigger unit but given the excellent battery results we got, there’s not much room for complaints. The 48Wh unit does its job pretty well.

img_20161107_163204

Cooling system

The cooling system seems a bit of an overkill with those two relatively big fans but, hey, it’s better to run things cooler than keeping the internals hot.

img_20161107_163555

IF you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

The notebook features a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS display with model number B140HAN02.1 manufactured by AU Optronics. The diagonal is 14 inches so the pixel density is 157 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.161 x 0.161 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

micr-acer-travelmate-x349

The display’s colors don’t shift and offer good viewing experience from a 45-degree angle.

angles-acer-travelmate-x349

We find the display’s maximum brightness a bit low – 234 cd/m2 in the middle and 224 cd/m2 as average with just 13% deviation. Color temperature, on the other hand, is pretty close to the optimal 6500K – 6730K. The contrast ratio is also pretty high – 1240:1 before and 1100:1 after calibration.

The maximum color deviation of dE2000 is 3.4 in the upper-middle part of the screen but it’s still lower than 4.0, which is an unwanted value.

maxbrightness-acer-travelmate-x349

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

If you look at the yellow dotted triangle, you will see that the display covers just 50% of the sRGB color space, which isn’t enough for a good multimedia experience – half of the colors will be missing when reproduced.

gamut-acer-travelmate-x349

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

befcolors-acer-travelmate-x349
Коaftcolors-acer-travelmate-x349

We adjusted the luminance to match 140 cd/m2 and also to reach an optimal white point (D65) and gamma in sRGB mode.
gamma-acer-travelmate-x349

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

befcolorschecker-acer-travelmate-x349
aftcolorschecker-acer-travelmate-x349

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-acer-travelmate-x349

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 19 ms. That’s surprisingly good result for an IPS panel.

resptime-acer-travelmate-x349

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

So in this case, the notebook’s screen doesn’t use PWM for regulating brightness levels so it can be considered as “user-friendly” and will not put unnecessary strain on your eyes.

pwm-acer-travelmate-x349

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

spd-acer-travelmate-x349

Conclusion

It really depends on what you are looking for but most of the user base, which would be businessmen, will be absolutely happy with the presented image quality. It’s a matte, high-contrast IPS panel with good viewing angles and close to optimal color temperature but somehow narrow sRGB coverage and slightly inaccurate color reproduction. Also, the screen’s maximum brightness might not be sufficient for outdoor use.

But as we said earlier, the panel will be perfectly fine for most users doing general web browsing, office work and will satisfy your needs for multimedia on the go. It sure is a breath of fresh air in the lower and mid-range segment of the market. The X349-M will struggle to compete only against higher-priced models where the Core i7-6500U configuration stands. And finally, it’s really important to mention that the display doesn’t use PWM at all and this is really important because as a business laptop, you are ought to spend a lot of hours in front of the screen. So keeping your eyes safe is a top priority.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer TravelMate X349-M configurations with 14.0″ AU Optronics B140HAN02.1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eeSAZB

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The stereo loudspeakers provide good sound quality throughout all frequencies and the maximum allowed volume is decent as well.

sound-acer-travelmate-x349

Specs sheet

The specs provided below may differ from the final unit and configurations may varry depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i7-6500U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) DDR4-2133
GPU Intel HD Graphics 520
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SSD
Display 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte (touchscreen is optional)
Optical Drive
Connectivity Intel® 802.11ac (2×2) Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.2 Combo
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 (Gen 2) Type-C with Thunderbolt support
  • HDMI
  • SD card reader
  • 3.5 mm audio combo jack
  • keyboard LED backlight
  • Can be paired with Acer’s USB-C dock
Battery 48.9Wh
Thickness 18 mm (0.71″)
Weight 1.53 kg (3.37 lbs)

Software

The testing unit came with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) and we used it for our testing. However, if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page when the notebook hits the market.

Battery

The battery on this thing is truly amazing. It comes as close second behind the ASUS ZenBook UX303 in terms of battery life while sporting roughly the same hardware – Core i7-6500U and a 14-inch IPS display supported by a 48.9Wh unit. The battery runtimes even beat some considerably more expensive notebooks along with some 12-inch and 13-inch devices with Core m processors, which by default should provide longer battery life.

Anyway, all tests were run under the same conditions as always – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

x349-net

More than an excellent result – 619 minutes (10 hours and 19 minutes).

Watching a movie

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

x349-movie

Much lower score but still comes on top of most devices – 441 minutes (7 hours and 21 minutes).

Gaming

For accurate simulation, we used the Metro Last Light benchmark running on loop with graphic settings set to minimum.

x349-game

This test got the most of the battery since it’s the most demanding one – 223 (3 hours and 43 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-6500U

corei7Intel Core i7-6500U is part of the Skylake generation processors and it’s entitled to the ULV lineup (ultra-low voltage) with 14nm FinFET manufacturing process. It has two cores that support Hyper-Threading technology resulting in up to 4 threads. The chip is a direct successor to the Core i7-5500U Broadwell CPU expecting slightly better performance with emphasis on the power efficiency features.

The CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and can go up to 3.1 GHz for one active core or 3.0 GHz for two active cores. Also, the silicon includes an Intel HD Graphics 520 iGPU that sports 24 Execution Units ticking at 300 MHz and can go up to 1.05 GHz. The whole SoC supports DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory in a dual-channel array. So the whole chip is rated at 15W TDP including the memory controller and the integrated graphics thus making it suitable for 11-inch notebooks or bigger. It also supports the cTDP down feature and the OEM can lower the TDP to 7.5W.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.59
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)2.75-23.4%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)2.34-34.82%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.35-6.69%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)469
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)400-14.71%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)397-15.35%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)468-0.21%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)19.20
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)23.24+21.04%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)25.78+34.27%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)19.02-0.94%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-6500U reached 6.124 million moves per second. By comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 520

intel_hd_graphicsIntel HD Graphics or also known as GT2 is an integrated graphics processor used in ULV (Ultra-low voltage) chips from intel that are part of the Skylake generation processors. The GT2 core boasts 24 Execution Units (EUs) that are clocked up to 1050 MHz, but the latter can be changed depending on the CPU that’s used in. The graphics processor supports up to DDR3L-1600 or DDR4-2133 RAM and uses two channels for reaching maximum bandwidth.

The revised GPU now supports H.265/HEVC hardware decoding but the most notable feature here is that the chip supports DisplayPort 1.2 while the HDMI support is limited to the older 1.4a. The GPU can support up to three displays simultaneously. The power consumption of the whole chip (along with the CPU and memory controller) is 15W.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-520/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 5207225
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel HD Graphics 5202547-64.75%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5154333-40.03%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)8403+16.3%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 520880
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel HD Graphics 520273-68.98%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515437-50.34%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)1532+74.09%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 5203329
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel HD Graphics 5201043-68.67%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5152106-36.74%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)4932+48.15%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 520272
Dell Inspiron 13 7359 Intel HD Graphics 52095-65.07%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515102-62.5%
ASUS ZenBook UX303UB NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)435+59.93%

Temperatures

This test doesn’t really translate into real-life use because the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load for such long periods of time but it’s still a good way to determine the reliability of the system as a whole.

We started off with 100% CPU load for an hour. At first, the system was able to utilize the full potential of the chip reaching 2.8 GHz but then declined to 2.7 GHz, which is still in the Turbo Boost range. Also, the temperature of the CPU was pretty low and you can hardly hear the fans spinning. Very silent cooling solution we have there.

x349-cpu

After we switched on the GPU stress test as well, the chip’s temperatures rose and the CPU started throttling to give enough headroom for the GPU to perform. Everything went smooth throughout the test.

x349-gpu

Even the surface temperatures were pretty low as you can see on the heat map below.

Verdict

editor-choiceAcer has finally introduced ultra-portables under the TravelMate branding especially for business and we can honestly say it’s a step in the right direction. The TravelMate X349 is going to be affordable, portable, durable and with a sleek all-aluminum design delivering excellent input devices along the way. It’s also pairable with Acer’s USB-C dock that expands the port range and GPU performance with a GTX 960M on board suitable for some light gaming on the go. It’s really hard not to recommend this device since it has little drawbacks that the general business user won’t mind.

We mean the hardware configurations include only Skylake processors despite the fact that Kaby Lake chips are already hitting the end consumer next month. But our best guess is that the notebook has been planned for a release months before Intel even announced the new Kaby Lake generation. It’s likely that the refresh of the TravelMate X3 series will come in the following months.

But even without the Kaby Lake on board, the X349 shows excellent performance in all other areas – battery life, screen quality, and cooling. And all of this comes without the extra bulk on the price. In fact, the low-end model with Core i3-6100U and the mid-range variant with Core i5-6200U come at an exceptionally low price and will most likely appeal to most users. It’s good to see that Acer has kept its aggressive pricing for its TravelMate series. We only have concerns about the higher-end model with Core i7-6500U because it will have to compete against other well-known models like the ASUS ZenBook Ux303, which sports a more powerful GPU and better screen but still beats the hell out of the bulky Dell Inspiron 7359.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2fspUK6

Pros

  • Excellent design and build quality
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Good keyboard, responsive touchpad
  • Well-priced
  • Good screen for the mid-range models with FHD IPS panels
  • No PWM across all brightness levels
  • Outstanding battery life

Cons

  • The screen quality isn’t justified for the higher-priced models
  • Limited RAM on most models and no possible to upgrade (soldered RAM chip)

Lenovo Ideapad 110 review – as cheap as it gets

$
0
0

img_1648

A year after we’ve reviewed the Ideapad 100 from Lenovo, we get to play around with the refreshed Ideapad 110 lineup, which hasn’t changed much in most aspects but receives a slightly re-designed chassis, a new updated processor and a lot better maintenance procedure that doesn’t require the keyboard to come off.

With the Ideapad 100 and Ideapad 110 being almost identical with little changes under the hood, it will be interesting to see how this has reflected on the user experience as a whole. Does the updated CPU maintain lower or at least the same temperatures as before due to the fan-less cooling design, does the display still have PWM and does it improve the overall picture quality and is there any battery improvements? We find out in the detailed review below.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eM7Z2u

Contents

Retail package

The retail package is modest containing only the user manuals, AC cord, and adapter along with the notebook itself, of course.

img_1618

Design and construction

From a design standpoint, you can’t really expect a high-end chassis without compromises in the build quality but the Ideapad 110’s case seems to be pretty decent. It’s also been updated with an interesting pattern over the surface, which wasn’t present in the previous Ideapad 100. Unfortunately, it’s still a huge fingerprint magnet so frequent cleaning is required.

img_1624
img_1627

The lid feels pretty nice, smooth and “grippy” so it’s easy to carry it around. But as we mentioned, the fingerprints are quite prominent. The surface bends under pressure and causes ripples on the LCD screen but not as much as we expected, to be honest. By opening the lid you will feel that the hinges are a bit overly tightened towards the end and middle of the travel but turn loose in the beginning. So opening the lid requires both hands but one hand is enough just to lift it up. The good thing is that the bottom piece features the same finish without contrasting to the whole design signature. Something we see quite often on even higher-end laptops. There you will see only one big opening for extra airflow for the CPU.

img_1660
img_1651
img_1654
img_1657

The sides integrate the bare minimum of ports with the left one adopting the HDMI, LAN, USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 connectors, 3.5 mm audio jack and the DC charging port, which is placed on an utterly awkward position – in the center. So the cable might get in the way sometimes. This is probably due to design limitations, as the motherboard is located near the bottom left of the base so the DC charging port,has to be somewhere nearby. As for the right side, it has only the optical drive in place. And as far as portability is concerned, the notebook hasn’t gone any slimmer than last year’s model – 22.9 mm at its thickest point vs the 22.6 mm height on the Ideapad 100.

img_1648
img_1639
img_1642
img_1645

With a slightly different finish, the interior of the Ideapad 110 resembles faux leather to touch but it’s easy to see that it’s plastic. And despite the different finish, the plastic surface still attracts a lot of fingerprints. But what about the input devices? Well, the keyboard is decent for the price range but two things didn’t make a good impression. The short key travel is understandable but the feedback when pressing the keys should have been a little bit better. Also, the whole keyboard tray is a bit spongy and even the lightest press of a button causes the keyboard to sink. On the contrary, the wrist rest area is solid and rigid. The same goes for the trackpad area, which uses two stiff mouse buttons instead of a whole touchpad plate and we strongly prefer this design on a low-end machine for sure. Usually, the entry-level notebooks have flimsy touchpad design so the one on the Ideapad 110 will suit most users pretty well.

img_1633
img_1636

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Unlike its predecessor, the Ideapad 100, the new Ideapad 110 offers a more simplified upgrade procedure that doesn’t require the keyboard to be removed in order to access the internals. You just need to take care of the optical drive…

dsc00209

…and then proceed with the bottom piece.

dsc00206
dsc00217

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD slot

Quite expectedly, the Ideapad 110 houses one 2.5-inch drive slot usually taken by a 500GB or 1TB HDD depending on the configuration you will buy. If this isn’t enough, you can always swap the 2.5-inch HDD for an SSD and stick the HDD into a caddy replacing the otpical drive.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm) WD Blue Upgrade options

dsc00220

RAM

The RAM can’t be upgraded as it comes soldered to the motherboard. Make sure you choose the appropriate amount of RAM since it cannot be changed.

Other components

The Wi-Fi module is located right above the covering plate of the CPU. Its model number is SW10A11648.

dsc00222

The battery is rated at just 24Wh and it’s located right between the screen hinges.

dsc00224

Cooling system

The Ideapad 110 uses a passive cooling system because the Intel Pentium N3710 allows it. You won’t find any fans – just a big heat sink and a thermal paste applied to it for heat dispersion.

img_20161031_140047
img_20161031_140053

If you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

As a low-end machine, the Ideapad 110 uses a budget 15-inch WXGA TN panel with 1366 x 768 HD resolution. It’s manufactured by LG with model number LP156WHU-TPG1 and has pixel density of just 100 ppi and 0.253 x 0.253 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 86 cm.

micr-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

There’s noticeable color shift from a 45-degree incline due to the TN panel as you can see in the photo below.

angles-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

We were able to record a maximum brightness of 210 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 219 cd/m2 as average with a bit higher than usual maximum deviation – 21%. The color temperature is 7370K in the center and an average of 7310K so colors will appear a bit colder than they should. The contrast ratio is low – 470:1

As of color deviation, we’ve measured dE2000 of 4.2 in the lower left corner of the screen. Keep in mind that values above 4.0 are unwanted.

max-brightness-lenovo-ideapad-110-15

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. Starting with the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy. Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that has been used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used by professional cameras, monitors and etc. for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook. Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios and the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s hard to be covered by today’s displays. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

But as far as sRGB coverage is concerned, the display goes as far as 51% as shown in the image below.

gamut-lenovo-ideapad-110-15

Below you will see practically the same image but with color circles representing the reference colors and white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

befcolor-lenovo-ideapad-110-15
aftcolor-lenovo-ideapad-110-15

We’ve created the profile at 140 cd/m2, optimal white point (D65, 6500K) and sRGB gamma mode.

gamma-lenovo-ideapad-110-15

Below you can see the results from the accuracy color checker with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. The results are before and after calibration.

bef-colorcheckerlenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch
aft-colorcheckerlenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

We’ve also measured how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image. It’s essential when watching movies or playing games. The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings while the right one with our custom profile for gaming and multimedia. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis the luminance of the display. The display offers good visibility in dark areas of an image but it’s further improved by installing our profile.

We illustrate the first five levels of the gray (1%-5% white), right after black level, using the five boxes on the image below. Keep in mind that whether you can distinguish them or not strongly depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 16 ms.

resp-time-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

PWM (Screen flickering)

Our equipment was able to detect pulsations across all brightness levels but at extremely high frequency (40 kHz). This means that the display may have an impact on users with extra sensitive eyes, although it’s quite unlikely. We can consider it as user-friendly and safe to use for longer periods of time. However, if you happen to experience some eye soreness or a headache after prolonged use, you can always turn up the brightness to 100% where the flickering stops.

pwm-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

Blue light emissions

With our Health-Guard profile installed, you can benefit from reduced blue light emissions. You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP).

spd-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

Conclusion

The notebook’s TN panel isn’t the best one for multimedia purposes but it’s sufficient for the usual office work and web browsing. It has normal maximum brightness, sRGB coverage, contrast ratio and color accuracy for a machine at this price range. However, a big plus is the high-frequency PWM, which the screen produces. Although present, it should not affect users even with sensitive eyes during long hours of work.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Ideapad 110 configurations with 15.6″ LG LP156WHU-TPG1 (HD, 1366 x 768) TN, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eDurs0

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

We didn’t notice any major distortions at low, mid and high frequencies but the maximum volume isn’t high enough.

sound-lenovo-ideapad-110-15-inch

Specs sheet

CPU Intel Pentium N3710 (4-core, 1.60 – 2.56 GHz, 2MB cache)
RAM 4GB (1x 4096MB) – DDR3, 1600MHz
GPU Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HDD/SSD 500GB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch HD (1366×768) TN panel, glossy
Optical Drive DVD burner
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • built-in webcam
  • built-in microphone
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • 4-in-1 SD card reader (MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC)
  • RJ-45
  • built-in loudspeakers
Battery 3-cell, 24Wh
Thickness 22.9 mm (0.90″)
Weight 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for the writing of this review. If you wish to do a clean install yourself as well, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official support page.

Battery

We have mixed feelings about the battery life of this notebook because it’s one of the most affordable solutions out there so it’s hard to have any complaints. However, when we reviewed last year’s model with Intel’s Celeron N2840, we got slightly better readings – around 13 to 15% better to be exact. It must be the fact that the Celeron draws slightly less power than the Pentium. Battery capacity has remained the same, though – 24Wh.

All tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

net

The notebook scored merely 204 minutes (3 hours and 24 minutes) on the web browsing test, which was kind of expected.

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

movie

We got even lower result on the video playback test – 195 minutes (3 hours and 15 minutes).

Gaming

For accurate simulation, we used the Metro Last Light benchmark running on loop with graphic settings set to minimum.

game

This test got the most of the battery since it’s the most demanding one – 62 (1 hour and 2 minutes).

CPU – Intel Pentium N3710

badge-pentiumIntel’s Pentium N3710 is an entry-level SoC usually found in affordable notebooks. It features a quad-core design based on the 14nm manufacturing process with tri-gate transistors. This improves the overall energy efficiency and performance compared to the older Bay Trail platform.

All four cores are based on the Airmont architecture and it’s pretty close to the previous Silvermont architecture so performance per clock isn’t improved as much but the new 14nm manufacturing process allows better utilization of the Burst frequency leading to better overall performance. Compared to the old Intel Pentium N3700, the N3710 successor reaches a maximum of 2.56 GHz and works at base 1.60 GHz frequency.

The whole SoC – including the integrated Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) and the DDR3L memory controller – is rated at 6W TDP while the SDP is 4W. Keep in mind that since the chip uses a passive cooling design, its performance strongly depends on the implementation of each OEM.

The chip should be sufficient for general work, browsing and in some cases even multimedia but will struggle with more demanding tasks and applications.

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 110 Intel Pentium N3710 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.56 GHz)1.72
Dell Inspiron 3552 Intel Pentium N3700 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.4 GHz)1.72
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)2.14+24.42%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 110 Intel Pentium N3710 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.56 GHz)275
Dell Inspiron 3552 Intel Pentium N3700 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.4 GHz)275
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)316+14.91%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 110 Intel Pentium N3710 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.56 GHz)43.26
Dell Inspiron 3552 Intel Pentium N3700 (4-cores, 1.6 - 2.4 GHz)43.26
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)29.80-31.11%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Pentium N3170 scored 4.462 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)

intel_hd_graphicsAn integrated GPU used in all CPUs part of the Braswell generation. The GPUs frequency can vary a lot – from around 300MHz to up to 700MHz, depending on the model of the processor. It has 16 EUs (Execution Units) and its architecture is almost the same as the one on the Core M CPUs (while the Core M’s graphics integrate 24 EUs).

The GPU can support up to 3 displays with a maximum resolution of 4K, but internally can handle only 2560 x 1440 (QHD) via eDP. The external displays can be connected via HDMI or Display Port. Other major features include the support of DirectX 12 and Open GL 4.2.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-braswell/

Verdict

As we stated earlier, the notebook’s chassis has its strong sides and its flaws but we are mostly happy with the presented build quality, of course, considering the price point. The only thing that concerns us is the spongy keyboard and the lack of feedback of the keys. We also can’t miss mentioning the super easy disassembly of the notebook that now doesn’t require the keyboard tray to be removed. The previous Ideapad 100 was a pain to maintain.

As far as the hardware is concerned, the Pentium and Celeron configuration will do just fine for education purposes and normal everyday tasks along with browsing. Just make sure you don’t spend too much time away from the charger as the 24Wh battery will only get you less than a few hours of work.

The display is also suitable given the situation and will not be suitable for any kind of multimedia activities. However, it will keep your eyes safe due to the high-frequency PWM, which should affect only users with extremely sensitive eyes.

So at the end of the day, if you are on a hunt for an ultra-affordable laptop, the Ideapad 110 should be considered if you are ready to make the logical sacrifices that come with the ridiculously low price. But don’t forget to include the Dell Inspiron 3552 and the Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-573), which carry their own perks and drawbacks as well but are still in the same ballpark.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eM7Z2u

Pros

  • The build quality isn’t necessarily bad
  • Easy maintenance
  • The display uses high-frequency (mostly harmless) PWM at 40 kHz from 0 to 99% brightness

Cons

  • The surface is a big fingerprint magnet
  • Spongy keyboard
  • Below average battery life

Dell Vostro 14 5459 review – a compelling choice, if you are into 14-inchers

$
0
0

vostro_monet-pdp-polaris_features_02

To be honest, it’s really hard to like something after reviewing the absurdly well-built HP’s ProBook 440 lineup because it covers all basic needs of a businessman while offering a little something on the side. Dell’s direct answer to the ProBooks, however, are the Vostro series, more particularly the 14-incher we have here for a review. It falls into the same price range but lacks some of the perks the ProBook 440 G3 has – for instance M.2 SATA SSD support.

However, the Vostro 14 5000 series make a compelling choice with key selling points on the portability, design, and rigidity. It will be interesting to see how it stacks against the ProBook 440 G3 in terms of display quality, GPU performance, and battery life since those are the main aspects setting these two apart. Let’s see if the Vostro 5459 is up for the challenge.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eFFyj6

Contents

Retail package

The containing box doesn’t offer anything out of the ordinary – just the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and the notebook itself.

img_1321

Design and construction

As we already said, the Vostro 5459 is mostly design-centric device and by the looks of it, you can clearly see why. The lid and interior feature brushed aluminum plate while only the bottom piece is made of plastic. It definitely brings a nice and refreshing touch to this entry-level business companion and also keeps the weight relatively low. The device is 1.7 kg and just 18.5 mm thick so if portability is a top priority for you, the 14-inch Vostro 5459 is an excellent choice.

img_1325
img_1330

Let’s begin with the lid. It’s made of brushed aluminum plate, which looks flexible at first but bending it doesn’t cause major distortions on the LCD screen. Also, the color we got for the review looks pretty nice – something resembling champagne gold. The screen is supported by a big hinge spanning across the width of the base and that’s where the main exhaust vent is located. The hinge is made of plastic and feels a bit too stiff making it hard to open the machine with one hand but this will come in handy to the touch-enabled variant as it will eliminate the annoying screen wobbling to some extent. And as for the bottom, it’s entirely made of plastic with the same gold-ish color and a few extra vent openings for better airflow. It’s held by a number of screws that need to be removed in order to access the hardware inside. But more on that in the next section of the review.

img_1372
img_1360
img_1366
img_1369

The sides are flat and connect to the interior seamlessly. No gaps or holes are to be seen. We are also happy with the port distribution because most of the connectors are positioned on the left clearing up enough space for the external mouse on the right. They are as follows: left – DC charging connector, HDMI, RJ-45 for wired LAN connection and two USB 3.0 while on the right – SD card reader, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm audio jack.

img_1354
img_1334
img_1341

As a business notebook, the Vostro 5459 should impress with excellently designed interior accompanied by comfortable and accurate input devices. And for the most part, the laptop delivers. We’ve got again brushed aluminum surface surrounding the touchpad and keyboard but with a dark gray color contrasting to the outer chassis. Anyway, the touchpad feels extremely light and comfortable to use. Left and right clicks are registered correctly, swipes and gestures are on spot and so does the overall touchpad experience. Quite frankly, we can’t say anything bad about it and we can even say we liked it more than the one on the HP ProBook 440 G3, which adopts a more old school design with dedicated mouse buttons. Usually, this is the better way to go on low-end devices but the Vostro 5459 surprises with a stable and accurate surface. However, we aren’t as happy with the keyboard. Slightly bigger keys would have been appreciated but the spacing is good. Some of the keys at the edge of the keyboard tray feel a bit mushy – probably because of the plastic tray – and the key travel doesn’t feel very “convincing”. The ProBook 440 G3 definitely takes the lead on this one.

img_1348
img_1344

In any case, for the asking price the Vostro 5459 delivers more than you’d expect – it’s quite thin, portable and rigid featuring mostly aluminum. It also features great touchpad design and healthy port distribution, however, there’s some room for improvement when it comes to the typing experience.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The Vostro 5459 is rather easy to disassemble and you will only need a screw and a plastic tool to pry up the bottom plate as shown in the photos below.

P1030337
P1030339
P1030342

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD

Like most budget-oriented devices, the Vostro 5459 features only one 2.5-inch HDD and no M.2 SSD support, although the HP ProBook 440 G3 has one and holds an edge over Dell’s offering as far as storage options are concerned. The HDD is Seagate-made with 500GB capacity.

2.5-inch HDD/SSDSeagate 500GB HDD (5400 rpm)Upgrade options

Slot Unit Upgrade price

P1030347

RAM

The motherboard supports only one DDR3L-1600 chip and the maximum supported memory is 8GB, although our unit came with a small 4GB SK Hynix chip.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 4GB DDR3L-1600 RAM SK Hynix Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi card can be found right next to the cooling fan and it’s made by Intel with model number 3165NGW.

P1030355

The battery unit is rated at 43Wh and can be easily replaced.

P1030344

Cooling system

The cooling system isn’t anything out of the ordinary. It consists of two heat pipes connected to the cooling fan, which, by the way, looks a bit big but it’s perfectly capable of keeping the internals cool. The Skylake-U chip and the GeForce 930M GPU aren’t as demanding even under high load.

P1030356

IF you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

The notebook we’ve tested uses a WXGA TN panel with 1366 x 768 resolution in a 14-inch diagonal leading to a pixel density of 112 ppi and pixel pitch of 0.227 x 0.227 mm. It’s manufactured by BOE with model number DP36C. It can be considered as “Retina” if viewed from a distance equal or greater than 80 cm.

micr-dell-vostro-5459

Viewing angles aren’t good due to the use of TN matrix. Here’s how colors shift under a 45-degree angle.

angles-dell-vostro-5459

The maximum brightness is a bit low – 206 cd/m2 and 201 cd/m2 as an average across the surface with only 5% deviation. Color temperature is 7590K in the middle and 7390K as average, which is considerably more than the optimal 6500K so colors may appear a bit blue-ish and cold. The contrast ratio is also low – 250:1. Anyway, the maximum color deviation dE2000 is just 1.3 in the bottom center part of the screen. This is an excellent result as values above 4.0 are unwanted.

maxbrightness-dell-vostro-5459

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. Starting with the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy. Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that has been used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used by professional cameras, monitors and etc. for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook. Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios and the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s hard to be covered by today’s displays. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

We’ve recorded merely 55% coverage of the sRGB gamut but that’s rather common at this price range. OEMs tend to use budget TN panels for their entry-level models.

gamut-dell-vostro-5459

Below you will see practically the same image but with color circles representing the reference colors and white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

bef-colors-dell-vostro-5459
aft-colors-dell-vostro-5459

We’ve set the profile at 140 cd/m2, 6500K white point and sRGB gamma mode.

Below you can see the results from the accuracy color checker with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. The results are before and after calibration and as you can see, after calibration the screen has excellent color reproduction.

befchecker-dell-vostro-5459
aftchecker-dell-vostro-5459

We’ve also measured how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image. It’s essential when watching movies or playing games. The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings while the right one with our custom profile for gaming and multimedia. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis the luminance of the display. The display offers good visibility in dark areas of an image but it’s further improved by installing our profile.

We illustrate the first five levels of the gray (1%-5% white), right after black level, using the five boxes on the image below. Keep in mind that whether you can distinguish them or not strongly depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-dell-vostro-5459

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 10 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Unfortunately, we’ve recorded aggressive pulsations (300 Hz) from 0 to 99% brightness so we don’t recommend using the screen for longer periods of time if you are not planning to set the display at 100% luminance. And with just 200 nits of maximum brightness, you will probably find it comfortable to use at 100% brightness for most of the time.

pwm-dell-vostro-5459

Blue light emissions

With our Health-Guard profile installed, you can benefit from reduced blue light emissions. You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP).

spd-dell-vostro-5459

Conclusion

As expected, the model doesn’t excel in display quality due to the budget TN panel used for this configuration. Its properties don’t make it good for multimedia purposes but it will do just fine for general browsing and office work. Still, the low maximum brightness and contrast ratio might be a deal-breaker for some. Moreover, the panel uses PWM at extremely low frequency (300 Hz) so if you are planning to use it for long periods of time, we suggest installing our Health-Guard profile or just pair it with an external monitor in order to keep your eyes safe.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Vostro 5459 configurations with 14.0″ BOE DP36C- (HD, 1366 x 768) TN, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eF83xK

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

No distortions were noticed throughout all frequencies. The maximum allowed volume is satisfactory.

sound-dell-vostro-5459

Specs sheet

Processor Intel Core i3-6100U (2-core, 2.30 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 4GB (1x 4096MB) – DDR3L, 1600 MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 500GB HDD
Display 14.0-inch HD (1366×768) TN, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • HD webcam
  • microphone
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • RJ-45
  • HDMI
  • SD card reader
  • fingerprint reader
  • Kensington lock
Battery 3-cell, 44Wh
Thickness 18.5 mm (0.73″)
Weight 1.7 kg (3.75 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for our testing and if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS as well, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Dell’s official support page.

Battery

We didn’t get any record-breaking results on the battery tests but that was expected. Still, the 43Wh unit performed well and even put up a fight against the ProBook 440 G3, which scored a bit better than the Vostro 5459.

Of course, all tests were performed using the usual settings – Windows battery saving feature turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Wi-Fi running all the time.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

vostro-net

Probably the most important test and the notebook got 395 minutes (6 hours and 35 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

vostro-movie

Interistingly, the laptop scored slightly better in our video playback test – 407 minutes (6 hours and 47 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

vostro-game

It’s quite unlikely that you will start a gaming session without being close to a power source, but it’s good to know that you can play for more an hour – 175 minutes (2 hours and 55 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i3-6100U

intel-core-i3-6100u-6th-gen-skylakeThe Intel Core i3-6100U is part of the Skylake generation processors from Intel and also representing the ULV (ultra low voltage) series. The chip doesn’t support the Turbo Boost feature for dynamic frequency adjustment but has the important Hyper-Threading feature that emulates one virtual core for each physical one and thus establishing up to four threads. The two clocks run at 2.3 GHz and they are manufactured using the 14nm FinFET process.

The CPU also includes the Intel HD Graphics 520 iGPU and GT2 being its code name. It has 24 EUs (Execution Units) and are clocked at 300 MHz and can go up to 1000 MHz. The whole SoC draws approximately 15W at full throttle and that includes the memory controller (DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600), the CPU and the iGPU. The chip also supports cTDP down so the TDP can go as low as 7.5W but that depends on the OEM and it affects heat dispersion and performance.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i3-6100u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)2.76
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.23+17.03%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)400
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)447+11.75%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)23.14
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.89-9.72%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i3-6100U reached 4.725 million moves per second. By comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)

geforce-930m-3qtrThe NVIDIA GeForce 930M is a lower-mid-range GPU that’s included in budget notebooks or multimedia-oriented ones. It was released in March 2015 and it is based on last year’s GeForce 840M with GM108 GPU inside. We are expecting the GPU to be marginally faster than its predecessor since the Maxwell generation GPUs mostly improve power consumption and don’t emphasize on performance as much. However, the TDP is rated at 25W (for this particular version as there’s another variant with GDDR5 memory controller). Furthermore, GeForce 930M offers 2GB of DDR3 memory, 16 ROPs, 32 texture mapping units and 384 shaders. The graphics processor runs at 928MHz with Boost clock being 941MHz which should be enough to run most of the new games at lower settings or other software that isn’t that demanding. Memory speed is 1800MHz with a bus width of 64 bit. Notable features like DirectX 12, NVIDIA Optimus support, OpenGL 4.5 and CUDA cores are at hand.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-930m-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)8504
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 5204708-44.64%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)1520
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520551-63.75%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)5250
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 5202454-53.26%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)422
HP ProBook 440 G3 Intel HD Graphics 52077-81.75%

Temperatures

The two-staged stress test that we perform isn’t a good representation of real-life usage since it’s impossible for the general user to reach such high loads but it’s the best way to determine the stability of the system in the long run, especially the cooling design.

We started with a 100% CPU load for an hour and things looked pretty good. The CPU ran at its maximum 2.3 GHz while the temperatures were pretty low.

vostro-5459-cpu

When we turned on the GPU stress test as well, the CPU temperatures remained stable along with the clocks. Also, the system was able to utilize the full performance of the GPU.

vostro-5459-gpu

The surface temperatures were low even after the long stress test.

vostro-temps

Verdict

Dell was able to build a solid all-rounder for the asking price but to be honest, it’s really hard to compete against the HP ProBook series, which happen to have a 14-inch model as well. It has slightly better battery life, better input devices, more storage options including M.2 SATA SSD support and arguably better hardware (CPU and GPU) depending on the configuration.

However, the Vostro 5459 makes a compelling choice with rigid construction, refreshing design and comfortable touchpad leaving only the keyboard with some room for improvement. It’s also pretty portable and slim given the price point.

Our only major complaint about the screen is the use of an aggressive form of PWM across all brightness levels (except 100%). But generally, it has the same properties as its direct rival, the ProBook 440 G3. Good thing that our Health-Guard profile can eliminate the negative pulsations and also limit the blue light emissions.

Finally, the battery performance is pretty good for an entry-level device despite the fact that it falls behind HP’s budget solution by a tad.

So if you are strictly looking for a 14-inch laptop, probably you’re better off with the budget configurations of the HP ProBook 440 G3 or if you even have a bit more cash to spare, you can look for the budget Acer TravelMate X349-M configuration with the same sreen specs and the same processor (Core i3-6100U).

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2eFFyj6

Pros

  • Rigid construction and refreshing design
  • Good touchpad
  • Relatively slim and portable
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Display with low contrast ratio
  • The display uses aggressive PWM from 0 to 99% brightness

Lenovo Yoga Book review – the most versatile device ever made

$
0
0

lenovo-yoga-book-feature-notetaking-windows-full-width

Lenovo introduced the Yoga Book a few months back but it still something the Internet likes to talk about and we can clearly see why. The Yoga Book is one of the most – if not the most – versatile product we’ve ever touched. It’s suitable for school, business, daily Android or Windows driver and even for creativity. The included stylus opens up possibilities we’ve rarely seen on a mobile device. But, of course, there are some trade-offs as with every device that’s the first of its kind.

You might find using the LED touch keyboard a bit tricky to use while the touchpad and keyboard integration into the Android platform is pretty sweet but it’s not there yet. We expect most of these problems won’t be present in the Windows version of the tablet but this requires for you to get out some extra cash. So here’s our experience with the Yoga Book – what we liked, what we didn’t and how well does the device perform in terms of image quality, raw performance, and battery life. We let the numbers speak for themselves.

You can find the notebook here: http://amzn.to/2fWgu8J

Contents

Retail package

Since it’s a versatile device, it comes with a bunch of cool accessories and supplies. Aside from the tablet, you will find the Wacom stylus, which can also be a real pen and uses standard pen refills but we will get to that later. Along with the pen, you will find a notebook with empty A3 sheets of paper, which can also be replaced when they run out. And, of course, there’s also the service manual, AC adapter, and micro USB cable for charging.

img_4573
img_4585
img_4559

Design and construction

The Yoga Book sports excellently built chassis with premium feel without being too boring. The base unit and the lid are covered in matte anodized aluminum finish (the main frame is reinforced with magnesium aluminum alloy) while the sides feel slightly rubberized. This way the base or the lid won’t slip on the surface when used in tent mode. Speaking of the sides, there are limited ports – only two to be exact – mini HDMI for external display and micro USB for charging and data transfer. There’s also the SIM card tray between them. And as for the right side, you will find the volume rocker, power button, and the 3.5 mm audio jack. The stereo loudspeakers are placed on both sides.

img_4632
img_4602
img_4608

The one thing that really stands out on this device is the iconic Lenovo watchband hinge, which, as always, feels pretty nice, stable and has linear travel. In fact, maybe a little too stable. It requires some force in order to rotate the screen, yet the added stiffness eliminates most of the annoying wobbling effect when using the touchscreen in tablet mode. Also, the system detects the mode in which you are using the device and adjusts the UI accordingly.

img_4666
img_4650
img_4657
img_4659

And now the interesting part – the keyboard. Since it’s a virtual keyboard and touchpad, you can’t expect flawless typing experience but we do have to admit that we got used to it pretty fast. Mostly because the size of the keys are normal and if you are a fast typer, you will adjust quickly. Every button you press, you get haptic feedback from the base, which helps with typing but it’s not quite there. We would have definitely appreciated dedicated vibration for each key in order to bring the typing experience closer to a real keyboard. And as for the touchpad, it’s quite responsive and accurate, although a bit too small to our taste. We do understand that this is just a 10.1-inch device after all so it’s hard to complain. Its optimization, however, needs some work because we often found the touchpad registering clicks when it shouldn’t. There’s also no gesture support, except for the double tap and drag function that doesn’t really get along with Android. So no two-finger swiping, instead, you will have to hold down your finger on the touchpad and then swipe. Kudos for the quick access to some functions via the keyboard like the Alt+Tab key combination, the quick Fn keys on the F-row, etc.

img_4619
img_4608
img_4612
img_4616

When you turn off the keyboard using the sensor key on the top right, you get a whole another device in your hands. Using the Wacom stylus, which registers 2048 levels of pressure, gives you the freedom of writing or drawing notes like you do on a normal paper. The surface on the interior is matte and has low resistance so writing on it is a pleasure. We were told that this is developed by Wacom, so no surprise here. Keep in mind that the surface gets dirty quite often so it requires frequent cleaning. Nonetheless, if the Wacom tablet doesn’t cut it for you and you still need real paper, the Yoga Book has got you covered. There’s a real notebook included in the package and the stylus’ tip can be replaced by a real ballpoint tip. This way you can write down notes on the real paper and they still appear on the screen. You can even change the ink and the A3 papers with your own when they run out. The features will still work as long as you use the included stylus.

What amazed us the most is that the better part of the features that this tablet offers are not gimmicky. Something we are used to seeing way too often with newly introduced tech. Sure, the keyboard takes some time to adjust and can’t really replace the physical one but the Wacom tablet and stylus work flawlessly. Interestingly enough, they are approved for the authenticity of digital signatures. All of this comes in an impeccable, premium-looking chassis. It’s also incredibly lightweight (690 g) and absurdly thin – just under 1 cm, or 9.65 mm to be exact.

Display quality

The notebook features a 101.1-inch Full HD (1920×1200) IPS panel with 16:10 aspect ratio and 224 ppi (pixel density). The pixel pitch is 0.113 x 0.113 mm and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 38 cm.

micr-lenovo-yoga-book-android

Since this is an IPS panel we are dealing with, viewing angles are excellent at a 45-degree angle.

angles-lenovo-yoga-book-android

We measured a maximum brighntess of 426 cd/m2 in the middle of the screen and an average one of 398 cd/m2. This kind of brightness is inherent to a tablet because notebooks usually have significantly lower brightness. It should be sufficient for outdoor use. The deviation is 16% in the middle-right section. The color temperature is 7300K and it’s slightly colder than the optimal 6500K. The contrast ratio is 1040:1.

The maximum color deviation is right on the verge of being too high – dE2000=3.9. That’s because values above 4.0 are unwanted and easily noticed. It’s an important aspect if you are planning to do color-sensitive work on the screen.

maxbrightness-lenovo-yoga-book-android

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 91% of the sRGB color space so it’s a good choice for multimedia content.

gammut-lenovo-yoga-book-android

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut. According to the graph, colors will appear accurate despite the color temperature being a bit colder than usual.

colors-lenovo-yoga-book-android

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc.

colorchedker-lenovo-yoga-book-android

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

Our equipment didn’t detect any pulsations except at the lowest level where the brightness is just 20 cd/m2. But even then, the pulsations are 39 kHz and probably won’t cause any harm even to users with extra sensitive eyes. Also, it’s quite unlikely that you will use the display at 20 cd/m2 brightness.

pwm-lenovo-yoga-book-android

Conclusion

The display’s quality is excellent and will suit the needs of most users. Only those who plan to use the panel for color-sensitive work will probably need some fine tuning. However, since this is and Android-powered device, such changes can’t be made but we will make sure to test the Windows version and create profiles for the display.

In any case, the maximum brightness, contrast ratio, sRGB coverage and even the color temperature, which is just a tad off, make up for a good screen. The absence of PWM is also a great plus to consider.

Sound

For a small device like the Yoga Book, we were impressed by the maximum allowed volume and the clarity at low and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

CPU Intel Atom x5-Z8500 (4-core, 1.44 – 2.24 GHz, 2MB cache)
RAM 4GB (1x 4096MB) LPDDR3-1600
GPU Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
HDD/SSD 64GB ROM
Display 10.1-inch, Full HD (1920×1200) touch IPS, glossy
Optical Drive
Connectivity WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, 4G LTE (optional)
Other features
  • micro USB v2.0
  • mini HDMI
  • Wacom stylus with 2048 pressure levels
  • built-in Wacom graphics tablet
  • virtual keyboard with haptic feedback
  • 3.5 mm audio combo jack
Battery 8500 mAh
Thickness 9.65 mm (0.38″) touch version
Weight 690 g (1.52 lbs)

Battery

Lenovo constantly stresses on the fact that the Yoga Book is actually more of a notebook than a conventional tablet and if considered as such, we can easily say that the battery life is pretty good. However, for a tablet, the battery endurance isn’t amazing. The 8500 mAh charge that the unit can hold can get you through the better part of the day but will require some charging especially if you plan to use the Halo keyboard, which draws a considerable amount of energy due to the LED and haptic feedback. We suspect that the Wacom graphics tablet is also one of the main energy consumers.

Keep in mind that the battery tests that we performed were conducted in a controlled environment – Wi-Fi turned on at all times, GPS and Bluetooth disabled and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2. Also, the Windows 10 version of the device will surely have a tad shorter battery life.

Device/Benchmark Web browsing Gaming Video playback
Lenovo Yoga Book 469 minutes (7 hours and 49 minutes) 267 minutes (4 hours and 27 minutes) 750 minutes (12 hours and 30 minutes)

Software

Since the device uses an Intel Atom x5-Z8550 processor, it can support both Android and Windows 10 OS. The version we reviewed works on Android 6.0 Marshmallow and it’s the most affordable one but if you want the full-featured Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) OS, you will have to pay a little bit more.

screenshot_20161012-235538

Anyway, along with Android, Lenovo has included several useful apps to boost your creativity and experience with the Wacom tablet and stylus. Writing and editing on the virtual notebook feels pretty natural and offers several customization options including the type of pen you are writing – standard ballpoint pen, pencil, brush etc.

screenshot_20161019-102110

And as we already said, the keyboard appears to be well integrated into the Android OS. You will find most of the usual Fn shortcut keys each of which executes useful applications like Google search, screenshot, opening the app drawer, changing the keyboard language, adjusting screen brightness, etc. We also have a substitute for the Windows key, which leads back to the home screen when tapped. Unfortunately, the standard Ctr+C/F/V functions don’t work but the Alt+Tab combination opens up the recent apps menu.

screenshot_20161019-103544

The best part is that the tablet doesn’t come with all the annoying bloatware that usually comes with custom Android UI’s. This time, Lenovo has taken a more modest approach in terms of customization. We welcome this decision because less bloatware and UI overlays mean fewer software issues in the long run. We really appreciate the preserved stock Android experience.

There are just a few exclusive features, which are mostly related to the stylus and the Halo keyboard as you can see from the screenshots below. The Halo keyboard menu allows customization of the LED brightness, sensitivity, typing speed, vibration intensity, and how long does it take for the keyboard to go to “sleep”.

screenshot_20161018-213627
screenshot_20161019-101807

The Android version is going to sell for $500 while the pricier model will sell for $550 but will include a fully-featured Windows 10 Pro. We remain a bit skeptical about the SoC’s performance under Windows. We had the chance to try out the Windows version for a short period of time and didn’t experience any lag, freezes or performance issues but it will take some more time and convincing to be sure that there won’t be any major issues with the more demanding OS.

Quite frankly, most of the users will be absolutely fine with the Android version because it holds an edge over the Windows variant in terms of battery and usability but users who demand no trade-offs compared to a fully-featured laptop, Windows is the way to go. It will also allow better multitasking, creativity, and more features. Just keep in mind that the Intel Atom x5-Z8550 isn’t one of the most powerful SoCs out there, especially when it comes to supporting a fully operational Windows 10 Pro with its features.

Performance

The device uses an Intel Atom x5-Z8500 SoC manufactured using Intel’s 14nm process. The processor relies on 4 cores running at 1.44 GHz base frequency and 2.24 GHz maximum operating frequency. It also integrates an Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) GPU running at 200 – 600 MHz. It’s also capable of running the DirectX 11.2 API.

Along with the LPDDR3 memory controller, the whole SoC has an SDP of just 2W while the TDP is rated at 4W. The relative performance of the processor is on par with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 810 but the main advantage is that the Atom x5-Z8500 supports both Android and Windows OS.

Below you will find the performance of the CPU and iGPU defined by the benchmarks we ran.

CPU – Intel Atom x5-Z8500

CPU/Benchmark Geekbench 3 Vellamo 3 Metal Pi 10 mil.
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 2954 1716 35.342

GPU – Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)

GPU/Benchmark GFX Bench 2.7 (Offscreen) GFX Bench 3.0 (Offscreen) GFX Bench 3.1 (Offscreen) 3DMark Ice Unlimited
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 47 21 14 24293

Verdict

Can the Yoga Book be your notebook replacement? Probably not. But in most cases, the Lenovo Yoga Book can do so much more while other conventional tablets and laptops fail. In terms of productivity, the Halo keyboard might pose an issue to some users because let’s face it, you can’t beat the physical keyboard with a virtual one. Although, the one presented in this device comes pretty close. Also, if you really rely on your everyday tasks, the Windows version will suit you better while the Android variant will be more suitable for casual use and creativity, not to mention that the Android version still needs more polishing in terms of usability as we already mentioned in the software section.

As far as the hardware goes, the SoC is powerful enough to handle multitasking – as much as Android can support – and we didn’t notice any hangs, lag or slow downs. The battery is good enough for a notebook but doesn’t surprise with record-breaking results for a tablet. And the screen appears to have most of the essential properties for a good multimedia content. However, if you need more accurate colors – because the stock settings won’t quite cut it – you will have to opt for the Windows-based version and our custom profiles. We will post them as soon as we get our hands on the Windows version.

And finally, we would want to address the excellent build quality and design along with the iconic Lenovo Yoga watchband hinge. It’s also pretty sturdy without sacrificing portability along the way. The only thing we would want to be changed in the next version is the presence of a lip or indentation so that you can easily lift the lid without putting in your nail. These are small design quirks that most users won’t probably have problem with.

You can find the notebook here: http://amzn.to/2fWgu8J

Pros

  • Incredibly thin and light
  • Impeccable design and build quality
  • Futuristic Halo keyboard that turns into a graphics tablet
  • 2048 levels of pressure sensitive Wacom stylus that turns into a regular ballpoint pen
  • Good battery life for a notebook

Cons

  • Short battery life for a tablet
  • The touchpad and keyboard Android software needs more work
  • Shortage of ports, if you are aiming for a daily driver with the Windows-powered version

Dell XPS 13 (9630, Late 2016) review – the best just got better

$
0
0

laptop-xps-13-9350-pdp-polaris-04

It’s really hard not to have an opinion about Dell’s top-shelf XPS notebook lineup and it’s harder not to like it, to be honest. The XPS 13 often has been named as the best alternative to Apple’s MacBook Pro 13. The ultrabook packs impressive specs, beats most 13-inch laptops on the market in terms of portability while design and build quality are rarely matched.

All of this comes at a price, though, and it’s not a small one. Some of the XPS 13 configurations are even more expensive than the MacBook Pro but our opinion still remains from two generations ago – it’s worth every penny. The battery life is amazing, the performance is good, the input devices are comfortable and whichever display option you choose, the image quality is always vivid, crisp and the screen is extra bright. Let’s see how the latest Kaby Lake refresh has changed, what new features holds, and will the new Core i7-7500U live up to the expectations and Intel’s claims.

Dell XPS 13 (9343, 2016 Broadwell review

Dell XPS 15 (9350, Skylake) review

You can find all of the available models: http://amzn.to/2ggcMvh

Contents

Retail package

The box contains only the user manuals, the AC cord and the small and stylish charger. The notebook, though, comes in a smaller black, matte box.

img_5524

Design and construction

The overall design and build quality perfectly match the premium nature and price of the product. The only noticeable change in this aspect is the inclusion of rose gold as a color of choice. The refreshed version retains the sturdiness, the excellent choice of materials and portability from the last generation.

img_5464
img_5466

Anodized aluminum remains the main material while carbon fiber base peeks through the matte and slightly transparent silicone surface on the interior. We also noticed that the hinge is more tightly pulled in order to counter the annoying wobbling effect when tapping on the touchscreen. Nevertheless, it still swings when using the touch panel but it’s not as prominent. Speaking of the screen, we see identical to the previous generation XPS 13s layout – ultra-thin bezels and a compact chin accommodating the webcam in the lower left corner only to shrink even more the overall size of the machine.

img_5513
img_5515
img_5516
img_5522

It’s really hard to come across such small 13-inchers. A small exception is the recently reviewed Lenovo Yoga 910 where things are done slightly different. The form factor hasn’t been changed as much but holds a bigger 13.9-inch display. Also, given the price point of both devices, it’s pretty fair to say that the Yoga 910 holds an edge over the XPS 13 when it comes to versatility. The 360-degree rotatable watchband hinge takes the lead in this one.

img_5472
img_5501
img_5504

However, the XPS 13 holds several other features that should appeal even to the most pretentious users. For instance, the keyboard experience is just excellent. You might notice the short key travel but this has been compensated with a clicky, tactile feedback. This type of keyboard feel always reminds us of the HP Spectre 13 and it’s also comparable to the Yoga 910’s, although the layout of the XPS 13 is entirely different. The touchpad, on the other hand, is a mixed bag. It’s responsive, stable, clicky and recognizes gestures excellently, but the surface isn’t coated with a low-resistance material. Something very essential for more precise movements of the cursor.

img_5486
img_5488
img_5491

With no visual or build changes, the XPS 13 still remains one of our top choices for a 13-inch device in terms of quality and design. We’re also delighted by the fact that the newer XPS 13 have not grown in size and weight despite the inner hardware changes.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Accessing the internals is a fairly easy task. You just need to remove the screws and pop it open. Oh, and don’t forget to open the little cap in the middle as it holds one extra screw, as shown in the photos below.

img_20161129_142736
img_20161129_142757
img_20161129_143307

Storage upgrade options – M.2 SSD slot

As a premium and ultra-thin device, the XPS 13 is equipped with an M.2 SSD as a storage solution. It supports the PCIe NVMe standard holding a standard 2280 stick. It’s manufactured by Toshiba and we found the same drive in the Acer Predator 15 and 17 notebooks and in the ASUS ROG G752VS. It’s even a tad faster than its Samsung counterpart.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2280 M.2 slot Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK PCIe NVMe Upgrade options

img_20161129_143315

RAM

The RAM chips are soldered to the motherboard, therefore cannot be upgraded. Make sure you pick up the best configuration depending on your needs.

Other components

Interestingly, the Wi-Fi module is a Killer AC 1535 with a main focus for gaming.

img_20161129_143414

The battery has seen a slight bump now offering a 60Wh charge opposed to the 56Wh in the previous model.

img_20161129_143359

Cooling system

The cooling design hasn’t changed as much and still offers good cooling properties. There’s one heat sink on the chip and a heat pipe leading to the fan, which pushes out the hot air. It may look too simple but it’s effective enough for this kind of device and the workload that’s going to withstand.

img_20161129_143407

IF you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

Since the last two generations of XPS 13 that we reviewed were equipped with a 1080p panel, we can’t really compared them to this year’s unit. But a quick research on the web shows that the laptop retains the sam IGZO IPS panel from Sharp from the previous Skylake-powered generation – SHP144A.

This is a 13.3-inch panel with glossy finish and a QHD+ resolution (3200×1800). This makes up for 276 ppi or 0.092 x 0.092 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 30 cm.

micr-dell-xps-13-9360

The panel offers excellent viewing angles even from a 45-degree incline.

angles-dell-xps-13-9360

We measured the maximum brightness with Dynamic Brightness turned off only to find out that the it’s comparable to some smartphones. We got the whopping 456 cd/m2 in the middle and 409 cd/m2 as an average value across the surface. This means around 20% deviation. The color temperature, on the other hand, seems a bit off – 7270K so colors will appear slightly colder than usual. The contrast ratio is 1020:1 before calibration and 930:1 after.

The maximum dE2000 (color deviation) compared to the center of the screen is 5.0 which is slightly higher than the maximum allowed 4.0. This is important when doing color-sensitive work.

maxbrightness-dell-xps-13-9360

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

So in this case, the notebook covers 95% of the sRGB color gamut making it an excellent choice for multimedia activities as well.

gamut-dell-xps-13-9360

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

aftcolors-dell-xps-13-9360
befcolors-dell-xps-13-9360

The “Office and Web Design” profile has been created with 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 white point and the gamma has been corrected to fit the sRGB mode.

gamma-dell-xps-13-9360

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

befcolorchecker-dell-xps-13-9360/col_half]
aftcolorchecker-dell-xps-13-9360[

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-dell-xps-13-9360

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 26 ms.

resptime-dell-xps-13-9360

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the display uses PWM for regulating brightness but at much higher frequencies than usual (19.8 kHz). This means that it will affect only users with sensitive eyes while others won’t notice any negative impact.

pwm-dell-xps-13-9360

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

spd-dell-xps-13-9360

Conclusion

The high-end display fits the high-end profile of the notebook with some excellent properties like wide sRGB coverage, high contrast ratio, relatively accurate color accuracy and incredibly high maximum brightness. However, there are some issues that need to be addressed like less than optimal gamma, color temperature and the presence of PWM from 0 to 99% screen brightness.

Luckily, our profiles are able to fix all this. They will help reduce the eye strain by eliminating the negative blue light emissions and PWM while correcting setting straight the gamma curve and color temperature.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell XPS 13 configurations with 13.3″ Sharp SHP144A (QHD+, 3200 x 1800) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2gZMuN0

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

We didn’t catch any noticeable distortions and we can say that the sound quality is very good.

sound-dell-xps-13-9360

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Processor Intel Core i7-7500U (2-core, 2.70 – 3.50 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM up to 16GB (1x 16384MB) – LPDDR3, 1866MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 620 (integrated GPU)
HDD/SSD 256GB Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK M.2 SSD (PCIe NVMe, 2280)
Display 13.3-inch – QHD+ (3200×1800), Infinity display
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac 2×2, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3)
  • webcam
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • SD card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC)
  • keyboard backlight
Battery 60 Wh, 4-Cell Battery
Thickness 0.33-0.6″ (9-15mm)
Weight 1.20 kg (2.7 lbs)

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) OS for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install without the bloatware, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Dell’s official website.

Battery

Quite frankly, we were surprised by the excellent battery performance, even though the unit is equipped with a juicy QHD+ screen that draws a lot of power. In fact, the new XPS 13 scored a little better than its FHD predecessor so we can only imagine how much better the battery life would be on the Full HD variant.

There are three main reasons for the outstanding results – the IGZO IPS panel, which is more energy-efficient than the standard IPS panels, the update to the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U CPU and the slightly bumped battery capacity from 56Wh to 60Wh.

Anyway, we ran all the tests using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature switched on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

net

Outstanding result – 613 minutes (10 hours and 13 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

movie

Considerably lower result but understandable given the resolution of the screen – 327 minutes (5 hours and 27 minutes).

Gaming

For accurate simulation, we used the Metro Last Light benchmark running on loop with graphic settings set to minimum.

game2

This test got the most of the battery since it’s the most demanding one – 117 minutes (1 hour and 57 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.80
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22-15.26%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65-3.95%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.22-15.26%
Alienware 13 R2 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.61-5%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)526
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444-15.59%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)484-7.98%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482-8.37%
Alienware 13 R2 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)480-8.75%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.46
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.08+15.01%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.75+1.66%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.78+7.56%
Alienware 13 R2 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.05-2.35%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.891 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6207494
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5207207-3.83%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 6207675+2.42%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5205009-33.16%
Alienware 13 R2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)24734+230.05%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6201004
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520389-61.25%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 620855-14.84%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520732-27.09%
Alienware 13 R2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4123+310.66%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6203699
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5203134-15.27%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 6203474-6.08%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5202451-33.74%
Alienware 13 R2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)13176+256.2%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 620302
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520237-21.52%
Lenovo Yoga 910 Intel HD Graphics 620275-8.94%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520137-54.64%
Alienware 13 R2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1189+293.71%1533 EUR- EUR
(-)

Temperatures

This two-staged test doesn’t represent real-life use as the general user wouldn’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load for such long periods of time but it will give us a good grasp of what the system can offer in terms of reliability in the long run.

We start off with 100% CPU load for an hour. At first, the CPU was able to reach its full potential of 3.5 GHz but then declined to 3.0 GHz, which is absolutely normal for a Core i7-7500U processor. The new Kaby Lake CPUs are designed to reach higher frequencies for the first 30 seconds or so and then return to more bearable clocks without exceeding the TDP of 15W. However, as you can see in the image below, the high performance of the CPU comes at a price – high temperatures.

xps-13-cpu

We also ran the GPU stress test alongside the first one, again for an hour. Quite expectedly, the CPU started throttling so it would give enough headroom for the GPU to perform at its full potential.

xps-13-gpu

Despite the inner temperatures, the surface around the keyboard and touchpad remained cool. Also, we weren’t sure where to mention this, but we noticed an annoying coil whine when the notebook is on. It’s definitely not the fan as it stays off when the device isn’t under heavy load. It’s definitely something that you can hear when you are in a quiet environment.

xps-13-temps

Verdict

editor-choiceSo the bottom line is that the new XPS 13 offers something that some people will describe as “unnecessary upgrade” and we agree with this to some extent. However, the XPS 13 was an excellent premium ultrabook as it is so the slight bump in the battery department and the all new Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U are all welcome changes, which reflect on endurance quite a lot as you can see from our tests.

Moreover, Dell has kept the same impeccable design and build quality, along with the stunning border-less screen. The keyboard feels good and the touchpad is generally comfortable to use. The surface needs a little improvement and it’s something that’s been missing for the last two generations as well.

Now let’s talk about the display because we already did a review of the Full HD versions from the last two years and we are extremely happy with the QHD+ variant this year. As we already mentioned in the display section of the review, the Sharp IGZO IPS panel used for this unit is also available in the SKylake-powered 9350 XPS 13 so the results should apply to the latter too. We are talking about high-quality, crisp, vivid and super bright screen with negligible drawbacks that can be fixed by installing our profiles. The most noticeable flaw would be the use of PWM from 0 to 99% brightness bu that’s also something we can fix with the Health-Guard profile.

Do we still recommend the refreshed XPS 13? Sure we do. In fact, we still think this is one of the best premium laptops out there as long as you can afford it. If not, you won’t make a mistake getting the previous Skylake generation – the difference isn’t that noticeable. Or you can simply opt for the Lenovo Yoga 910 which is also a great alternative if you are looking for a more versatile product and a little bit of extra endurance during the day.

You can find all of the available models: http://amzn.to/2ggcMvh

Pros

  • Impeccable design and build quality
  • Light and portable like always
  • Good input devices
  • Fast storage solution (M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD support)
  • Nearly border-less and almost flawless IPS IGZO QHD+ panel
  • Outstanding web browsing runtimes

Cons

  • Annoying coil whine
  • Pricey
  • The screen uses high-frequency PWM from 0 to 99% brightness

Dell Latitude 15 3570 review – if endurance is your top priority

$
0
0

img_4117

Dell’s Latitude 15 3570 is not your typical budget-friendly business companion. It comes in several configurations and there’s a pretty good chance that you will find what you need to better suit your taste. But whichever model you choose, you will benefit from excellent battery life and in some cases, extra long runtimes.

Aside from the big bulge on the bottom of the 65Wh configurations, the notebook sports a pleasant and strict design, limited upgrade options – in terms of storage and memory that is – and decent input devices. Another thing that didn’t quite make it to our pros list is the display but more on that in our review below so keep reading to find out if there are other alternatives worth considering.

You can find some of the available Latitude 3570 models here: http://amzn.to/2gaLjKo

Contents

Retail package

The retail package consists of the usual user manuals, AC adapter and cord, and the notebook itself.

img_3901

Design and construction

Dell’s Latitude 3570 keeps it simple with all-plastic construction featuring matte surface all-around resulting in a fairly light, compact package – excluding the protruding battery pack on the bottom, of course – and not so sturdy construction in certain areas.

img_3902
img_3906

Let’s start with the lid, which doesn’t really stand out from the rest of the design. It’s black with matte finish but fingerprints don’t stick. That’s a plus. However, the overall sturdiness isn’t exactly impressive. Bending the center of the screen has always been an issue with lower priced models but in this case, it’s somehow extra flimsy. It can’t be opened using only one hand since the hinges are a bit overly tightened. The bottom features one big service lid that holds the storage, Wi-Fi card and two RAM slots.

img_4117

img_3951
img_3961
img_3965

The sides are relatively thin – 23.25 mm and the only thing that might get in the way while carrying around the notebook would be the battery bulge. Anyway, all of the usual ports are at hand – LAN, HDMI, 3.5 mm audio jack and two USB 3.0 ports on the left while the SD card reader, the one USB 2.0 connector and VGA are located on the right. That’s what we call “healthy” port distribution.

img_3933
img_3937
img_3943

The interior seems to be a bit neglected for a business-oriented notebook, to be honest. It still adopts the soft-touch matte finish around the keyboard and touchpad but the input devices have some drawbacks that need to be considered. The keyboard features decent travel with little feedback when pressing the buttons – we’ve definitely seen better even in this price range – while the touchpad has slightly rough surface resulting in low precision at times. The clickpad, however, doesn’t wobble and registers mouse clicks correctly.

img_3910
img_3917

There are some things left to be desired for a business machine like sturdiness in some areas along with a more refined keyboard design but we have to give credit to Dell for designing a fairly thin and light notebook tipping the scale at just 2.06 kg and measuring just 23.25 mm thick.

img_3947
img_3945
img_3946

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The full disassembly of the notebook is time-consuming and a bit of a hassle but the upgrade options are featured under a big maintenance hatch on the bottom of the laptop.

img_20161101_155003
img_20161101_155151

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD

As most budget-friendly business solutions, the Latitude 3570 features only one 2.5-inch HDD slot and doesn’t integrate an additional slot for an M.2 SSD. HP’s ProBook lineup makes an exception regarding storage options, though, so if this is of great importance to you, we suggest snatching one of HP’s newest ProBook 450 G4 laptops. Anyway, the teardown revealed that the unit comes with a WD Blue Slim spinning at 5400 rpm and offering 1TB of storage.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm) WD Slim Blue Upgrade options

img_20161101_155237

RAM

The motherboard supports two slots compatible with DDR3L-1600 RAM sticks. Our unit came with one SK Hynix 8GB chip and the other slot free for upgrade.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB DDR3L-1600 RAM SK Hynix Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options
img_20161101_155306
img_20161101_155323

Other components

The Wi-Fi module is located between the 2.5-inch drive and the RAM slot. It’s a Qualcomm Atheros with model number QCNFA222.

img_20161101_155800
img_20161101_155405

The battery is user-replaceable and can be easily detached by pulling the lever switch. It’s rated at 66Wh but you can order a configuration that doesn’t feature the big bulge at the bottom but limits the capacity of the unit to 40Wh.

img_20161101_160514
img_20161101_160451

Cooling system

The cooling system is simple and consists of one big fan located near the left side of the notebook where the main exhaust vent is. One heat pipe takes away the heat from the chip. However, if you need to the cooling system or the whole motherboard, you will have to perform a full disassembly, which requires popping out the keyboard.

img_20161101_161249
img_20161101_161314
img_20161101_161935

If you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

We got the unit featuring a Full HD TN panel manufactured by BOE with a model number C1JFR. With a 1920 x 1080 resolution, the panel scores a pixel density of 142 ppi and a pixel pitch of 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The display can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

micr-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

The notebook’s screen has poor viewing angles due to the use of a TN matrix.

angles-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

We measured a maximum brightness of 210 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 209 cd/m2 as average. The maximum deviation is 6% in the upper right corner of the display. The color temperature is optimal measuring 6580K but the contrast ratio is extremely low – 250:1.

We also measured the dE2000 color deviation on several parts of the screen and turned out to be 1.4, which is an excellent result. Values above 4.0 are unwanted.

maxbrightness-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers less than half of the sRGB gamut – 49%, which is slightly lower than what most notebooks at this price range can offer.

gamut-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

befcolors-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000
aftcolors-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

We adjusted the luminance to match 140 cd/m2 and also to reach an optimal white point (D65) and gamma in sRGB mode.

gamma-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

aftcolorchecker-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000
befcolorchecker-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 11 ms.

resptime-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

And we have some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that the display uses PWM for regulating brightness but the good news is that the frequency of the emitted light is pretty high at 28.6 kHz and may be felt by users with only extra sensitive eyes. Also, PWM is absent at 100% screen brightness.

pwm-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

lbl-dell-latitude-3570-15-3000

Conclusion

It’s hard to like a screen in the lower-end segment of the notebook market and it’s just as hard to criticize because OEMs often try to balance hardware and price. And almost always budget-friendly business notebooks have particularly low-quality TN panels. But in this case, the display quality is subpar in most aspects. The contrast ratio is really low (250:1), the maximum brightness is kind of okay for closed environments, the gamma curve is all over the place, and the sRGB coverage is also below average. On top of this, the screen uses PWM for regulating brightness and might get in the way of users with sensitive eyes.

Luckily, our profiles improve some of the properties like limiting blue light emissions, eliminating PWM, adjusting the gamma and allowing for better color reproduction.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Latitude 15 3570 configurations with 15.6″ BOE C1JFR (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2fwfsja

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

Specs listed below apply only for the model we’ve tested and may differ from your’s.

Processor Intel Core i5-6200U (2-core, 2.30 – 2.80 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR3L, 1600 MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 520
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11a/g/n 2×2, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • webcam
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • VGA
  • SD card reader
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45 (LAN)
Battery 40Wh, 4-cell / 65 Wh, 6-Cell Battery
Thickness 0.92″ (23.25 mm)
Weight 2.06 kg (4.54 lbs)

Software

For testing purposes, we used a fresh install of Windows 10 (64-bit) and if you wish to perform a clean install as well, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Dell’s official support page.

Battery

As we already said earlier in the review, the notebook is offered in two variants – with a 40Wh battery and a 66Wh unit that protrudes from the bottom (as in our case with the reviewed sample). Of course, the 66Wh configuration brings more than excellent battery life for the asking price and the proof is in our tests.

We ran the usual tests using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi always turned on, Windows battery saving feature switched on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

3570-net

One of the best scores we’ve got on a 15-inch notebook – 621 minutes (10 hours and 21 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

3570-movie

We got considerably lower but still excellent runtime on the video playback test – 486 minutes (8 hours and 6 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

3570-game

It’s quite unlikely that you will start a gaming session without being close to a power source, but it’s good to know that you can play for more an hour – 273 minutes (4 hours and 33 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel_Core_i5_logo-300x400Intel Core i5-6200U is a 6th generation dual-core CPU. It is manufactured using 14 nm FinFET process, meaning it’s part of the Ultra-Low Voltage lineup.The CPU is clocked at 2.3GHz, but thanks to the Turbo Boost technology it could automatically increase its clock speeds up to 2.8GHz for a single core and 2.7GHz when two cores are functioning. It is designed using Intel’s Skylake architecture allowing it to have similar performance to Intel Core i7-5500U, which is part of the Broadwell lineup. The CPU boasts four logical cores and 3MB level 3 cache. It consumes 15W of energy and can operate at a maximum temperature of 100 degrees Celsius.

The SoC also integrates Intel HD Graphics 520. Its performance is similar to that of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 820 GPU. The GPU can be clocked at up to 1000MHz. The SoC supports the Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization and AES-NI technologies.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-6200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.21
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.24+0.93%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22+0.31%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63+13.08%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)442
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)440-0.45%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)441-0.23%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)486+9.95%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.15
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.73+2.88%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.78+3.13%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.2-14.64%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-6200U scored 5.480 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 520

intel_hd_graphicsIntel HD Graphics or also known as GT2 is an integrated graphics processor used in ULV (Ultra-low voltage) chips from intel that are part of the Skylake generation processors. The GT2 core boasts 24 Execution Units (EUs) that are clocked up to 1050 MHz, but the latter can be changed depending on the CPU that’s used in. The graphics processor supports up to DDR3L-1600 or DDR4-2133 RAM and uses two channels for reaching maximum bandwidth.

The revised GPU now supports H.265/HEVC hardware decoding but the most notable feature here is that the chip supports DisplayPort 1.2 while the HDMI support is limited to the older 1.4a. The GPU can support up to three displays simultaneously. The power consumption of the whole chip (along with the CPU and memory controller) is 15W.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-520/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5207199
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6322-12.18%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)12603+75.07%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)4619-35.84%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520380
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1214+219.47%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2239+489.21%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)918+141.58%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5203125
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4248+35.94%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)7253+132.1%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)3216+2.91%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520235
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329+40%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)604+157.02%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)248+5.53%

Temperatures

This is not the best way to assess the cooling system from the user’s standpoint but it gives valuable information about the stability of the system as a whole in the long run. That’s because the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load for such long periods of time, yet we can see how the cooling design deals with the extra heat and how reliable this notebook might be after years of use.

We kick things off with 100% CPU load for an hour. Temperatures remained stable and clock frequencies as well. The chip maintained maximum operating frequency for two active cores (2.7 GHz).

latitude-3570

After that, we turned on the GPU stress test as well. Temperatures didn’t change as much but the CPU downclocked itself so it can give enough headroom for the GPU to perform.

latitude-3570-gpu

Surface temperatures were also low with the only warm area around the main exhaust vent on the left.

3750-temps

Verdict

Dell’s Latitude 3570 is your perfect fit if you are looking for a decent and relatively business solution that focuses on endurance. That’s, of course, if you opt for the model with the bigger battery. There are some sacrifices that you need to make along the way like questionable build quality, less than average display quality, although input devices are kind of okay.

In some places, the casing of the laptop seemed less than optimal even for its price range but compensates with good dimensions and low weight – 2.06 kg. We can also say a few good words for the port distribution and the easy access to most of the upgrade options. However, the display’s quality is lower than expected even for a budget-oriented business notebook. It also features high-frequency PWM, which won’t be noticed by most users.

Still, if you are generally looking for maximum endurance, the Latitude 15 3570 with 66Wh battery is probably the best one there is right now. It scored way above most 15-inchers we’ve tested and even the mighty HP ProBook 450 G3 can’t keep up with this juice. For everything else, though, we suggest opting for HP’s solution because it has better overall build quality with better choice of materials, one extra USB connector, supports M.2 SATA SSD and the display is marginally better. Not to mention the fact that the ProBook boasts one of the best input devices for this price range. The Acer Aspire E5-575G is also a must-consider notebook and even though it’s not business-oriented, it has a few lucrative features up its sleeve. Unfortunately, battery life isn’t one of them.

You can find some of the available Latitude 3570 models here: http://amzn.to/2gaLjKo

Pros

  • Relatively light and portable
  • Not the best, but decent input devices
  • Oustanding battery life
  • Easy access to most of the hardware (including the battery)

Cons

  • Questionable build quality
  • Subpar display quality
  • High-frequency PWM from 0 to 99% brightness

Acer Swift 7 review – making the Apple Macbook look fat

$
0
0

maxresdefault-3

Announced at this year’s IFA, the Swift 7 is the latest ultra-portable device from Acer and comes just in time to adopt the improved 4.5W KBL-Y processors. Now branded as Core i7-7Y75, the processor comes as a direct successor to the Core m7-6Y75 but as Intel promises, it packs a number of changes under the hood providing better power optimization and up to 30% better performance in some scenarios.

Aside from the new Kaby Lake CPU running the show, the notebook has a number of key selling points that make it stand out in the already overcrowded ultra-portable market segment. For starters, the Swift 7 dethrones the HP Spectre 13 as the thinnest notebook ever made with profile measuring just 9.98 mm and weighing as much as 1.084 kg. That’s darn impressive for a 13-inch laptop. This, of course, comes at a price with some design limitations as you will see in the review below. Another key feature is the aluminum unibody design with surprisingly sturdy construction including a large touchpad.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2g2IE1w

Contents

Retail package

The package, in which hte notebook arrived, offered more than the bare minimum. It had the usual set of user manuals, AC adapter and two USB-C dongles. One of them is USb-C to HDMI and the other one is USB-C to USB-A 3.0.

img_3562

Design and construction

In terms of design and construction, the Swift 7 is truly remarkable not only because it’s ultra-thin and light but also because it’s super sleek with premium appearance and sturdy overall construction. The only plastic you will find on this laptop are the hinge caps and the side of the screen bezels. This is probably for better Wi-Fi reception rather than a design solution.

img_3564
img_3574

We start off with the lid. It’s covered in anodized black aluminum with a hint of matte finish on top, which attracts a ton of fingerprints and smudges. They are quite visible so frequent cleaning is a must. You will also notice a small plastic bar on top of the lid, which is also designed for better Wi-Fi reception because the antennas reside in the laptop’s lid. Speaking of which, it’s quite sturdy and gives in ever so slightly under pressure but it’s really hard to twist due to the Gorilla Glass 4 protection on the screen and the aluminum used for the build. The hinges, on the other hand, appear to be a bit too tight. Unlike the HP Spectre 13 laptop, which had extraordinary stealth and linear hinge travel making it extremely easy to open with one hand, the Swift 7 needs both hands to be opened. And as for the bottom side, the laptop uses the same anodized aluminum plate but this time drops the matte finish. It’s super easy to open and you can access the internals in no time.

img_3646
img_3642
img_3634
img_3631

The sides of the notebook don’t offer anything out of the ordinary and have a modest set of connection options. Probably due to design limitations, the notebook doesn’t feature all the usual connection types and just like the Spectre 13, this one is fully invested in the USB-C bandwagon. You will find two of those on the right side but there’s little difference between them. The one next to the 3.5 mm audio jack can be used for external displays supporting HDMI 1.4b output, data transfer up to 5Gbps due to the Gen 1 standard and can be used for charging the device. The other one can only be used for power delivery and data transfer, again up to 5Gbps. It’s quite unfortunate that the device doesn’t support the latest USB-C Gen 2 protocol for faster data transfer and Thunderbolt connectivity. This is a must-have feature for most users when using a USB-C-only device. The HP Spectre 13 for instance, delivers both connection types with three ports – two of them are Gen 2 and the other one is Gen 1.

img_3593
img_3598
img_3604
img_3617

The elegant razer-sharp chamfered edges on the sides are part of the interior aluminum gold-colored plate. We’ve got slightly concaved keyboard tray for added comfort when typing and HP-style long but narrow touchpad with diamond-cut edges around it. The touchpad feels pretty nice, offers quite the stable clickable surface and it’s accurate enough for comfortable use. A bit of more precision when making small movements of the cursor would have been nice but let’s not get too picky. The keyboard, however, feels a bit narrow. Not as narrow as the one on the Lenovo Yoga 900S, which was barely usable but the short key travel can be felt easily, especially on the space bar. You will witness generally accurate and fast typing experience with not enough prominent tactile feedback. Also, the keyboard tray sinks in under pressure but doesn’t affect the user experience so it’s fairly negligible drawback.

img_3577
img_3580
img_3583

At the end of the day, the design and construction of the device are probably the key selling points and we can clearly see why. It’s absurdly thin and light without compromising in build quality. The only small drawback of the device would be the reduced key travel of the keyboard and the limitation of the USB-C ports.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

There’s not much you can tinker with this laptop as most of the hardware is either soldered to the motherboard or it’s missing due to design limitations. In this case, you can only access the M.2 SSD slot and the Wi-Fi card. At least the process of accessing is pretty easy.

img_20160919_170509
img_20160919_170809

Storage upgrade options – M.2 SSD slot

As expected, the notebook comes with an M.2 drive, but what’s unexpected is the size of the stick and its supported standard. Unlike most high-end ultrabooks, the Acer Swift 7 lacks the PCIe NVMe drive and uses a normal M.2 SATA SSD Kingston coming in 2242 size. That’s pretty disappointing because most notebooks, which are priced similarly to this one, offer the ultra fast PCIe NVMe standard out of the box.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2242 M.2 slot Kingston 2242 M.2 SATA SSD Upgrade options

RAM

Of course, the memory is soldered to the motherboard and can’t be upgraded as well.

Other components

The Wi-Fi module is a Qualcomm Atheros QCNFA34AC and it’s located in the upper left corner of the device near the screen hinge.

Taking away most of the free space, Acer has supplied the notebook with a 41.58 (2700 mAh).

img_20160919_171633

Cooling system

Since this is a fan-less design, the notebook doesn’t use the conventional heat pipes and fans for cooling. The Core i5-7Y54 CPU with a TDP of just 4.5W allows good performance without the need of any major healing solution – just a heat sink and some vent openings for some air flow. You can see some shots of the chip itself in the photos below. The white dots are part of the thermal paste that has been applied.

img_20160919_171601
img_20160919_171623

Display quality

The notebook’s display is the same we find in the HP Spectre 13 – CHI MEI CMN1367 – a Full HD IPS panel with 167 ppi and 0.15 x 0.15 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 50 cm.

micracer-swift-7

Viewing angles are excellent.

angles-acer-swift-7

We were able to record a maximum of 272 cd/m2 brightness or 260 cd/m2 as average across the surface leading to a deviation of 12%. This might fall short for outdoor use, though. The color temperature is close to optimal – 6770K. We also measured an excellent contrast ratio of 1370:1 before calibration and 1130:1 after.

As you can see in the image below, the maximum color deviation dE2000 is 3.0 in the bottom center of the screen while the maximum allowed value is 4.0.

maxbrightnessr-acer-swift-7

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

We measured that the sRGB coverage is 91% which is an excellent result for multimedia content.

gamut-acer-swift-7

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

befcolors
aftcolors-acer-swift-7

We created the these profiles with 140 cd/m2, optimal color temperature and gamma under sRGB mode.

gamma-acer-swift-7

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

befcollorchecker
aftcollorchecker

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

nbs-acer-swift-7

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 28 ms.

resptime-acer-swift-7

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our specialized article on PWM.

The notebook’s display appears to be quite harmless to your eyes, although these results were quite different on the HP Spectre 13. We recorded PWM only below 17% (95 cd/m2) brightness and even then, the frequency of the emitted light is quite high and will not affect most users – 25 kHz.

pwm-acer-swift-7

Conclusion

The notebook’s display shows excellent properties for good multimedia experience – it’s bright enough for indoor use but not quite for outdoor environment. The sRGB coverage is wide, the contrast ratio is really high and the best part is that it’s mostly harmless to your eyes emitting pulsating light only below 17% luminance.

There’s not much we can ask for but our profiles will come in handy when lowering the negative blue light emissions and adjusting color temperature, color accuracy and gamma.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Swift 7 configurations with 13.3″ CHI MEI CMN1367 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS, which can be found on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2gUzeWC

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is on par with the competition. All frequencies sound crisp and full.

sound-acer-swift-7

Specs sheet

The specs of the notebook might be changed until the official release but won’t be much different from the ones listed below

CPU Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-core, 1.20 – 3.20 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – LPDDR3, 1600 MHz
GPU Intel HD Graphics 615
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD
Display 13.3-inch – 1920×1080 (Full HD) IPS, glossy
Optical drive
Connectivity 2×2 802.11ac Bluetooth 4.1
Features
  • 2x USB-C (Gen 1, 5Gbps)
  • combo audio jack (microphone/headset)
Battery 4-cell, 41.58Wh
Thickness 9.98 mm (0.39″)
Weight 1.1 kg (2.42 lbs)

Software

The notebook came with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) out of the box but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, you can download all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official website.

Battery

To be honest, we’ve seen better battery performance in other high-end notebooks but in this case, in which the laptop is less than 1 cm thin, we can say that its runtimes are good enough to get you through the day. The 4.5W energy-efficient Core i5-7Y54 chip paired with a 41.57Wh battery produced a satisfactory result. We have to admit, though, we were expecting a little bit more from this not so demanding hardware and tiny screen.

Of course, all tests were performed with the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

swift-7-net

Good web browsing runtime – 423 minutes (7 hours and 3 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

swift-7-movie

slightly lower but still good enough result – 396 minutes (6 hours and 36 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

swift-7-game

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery but still scored pretty well with 215 minutes (3 hours and 35 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i5-7Y54

core i5 7th genThe Intel Core i5-7Y54 is a direct successor to the Core m5-6Y54 (Skylake) SoC offering a slight improvement in terms of performance and power efficiency over the latter. It’s part of the Kaby Lake generation (7th Generation) using the same architecture as we saw in Broadwell and Skylake chips, although, Intel markets the improved architecture by naming it 14nm+.

Aside from the identical features to the last generation that the SoC offers such as HyperThreading, the clock speeds have been increased significantly. While the Core m5-6Y54 was clocked at 1.1 – 2.7 GHz, the newer i5-7Y54 can go from 1.2 to 3.2 GHz.

The SoC also incorporates an Intel HD Graphics 615 (clocked at 300 – 950 MHz) – just like the rest of the KBL-Y chips – and supports LPDDR3-1866 memory. The whole SoC is rated at 4.5W including the memory controller making it suitable for fanless, ultra thin tablets, notebooks and 2-in-1 devices.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7y54/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)2.37
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)2.34-1.27%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)1.87-21.1%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)400
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)397-0.75%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)-

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)25.07
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)25.78+2.83%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)25.94+3.47%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7Y54 reached 4.409 million moves per second. By comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 615

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 615 is a low-end integrated graphics unit found in Y-series Kaby Lake processors. It incorporates 24 EUs (Execution Units) like all GT2 units and can be clocked at up to 1050 MHz while the base frequency is 300 MHz. With these specs, the chip is integrated into KBL-Y processors rated at 4.5W TDP, including the memory controller.

Since the iGPU is using the same architecture as before, the most noticeable feature would be the full hardware acceleration of the H.265/HEVC Main10 and Google’s VP9 codecs. With this, Intel aims to improve the overall energy efficiency and performance of the iGPU.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-615/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6155511
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5154333-21.38%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 5154132-25.02%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615640
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515437-31.72%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 515544-15%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6152400
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5152106-12.25%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 5151844-23.17%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615197
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515102-48.22%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 515195-1.02%

Temperatures

This test isn’t the best representation of real-life usage but it’s still a good way to determine the overall stability of the system and in this case, how the notebook utilizes the CPU.

We started off with 100% CPU load for an hour and from the very start of the test, we noticed that the CPU wasn’t able to reach its full potential. The clock speeds didn’t exceed 2.2 GHz and eventually went down to 1.8 GHz. This still within the Turbo Boost range of the SoC (1.2 – 3.2 GHz) but it seems that it can’t utilize the full speed. This might also be the reason for the lowered performance, which is on par with ASUS’ ZenBook UX360CA with Core m5-6Y54.

swift-7-cpu

We also ran the GPU stress test and observed throttling, which is a normal occurrence in most ultrabooks. This way the CPU gives enough headroom for the GPU to perform.

swift-7-gpu

Despite the metal interior, we didn’t notice the heat spreading too much across the interior. The only hot spot was near the screen hinge where the processor is located while the wrist rest area and the center of the keyboard remained relatively cool.

temperatures-bottom

Verdict

The Acer Swift 7 is a great piece of equipment or jewelry. It’s absurdly thin, light, compact and portable. It will serve you well during the day with good battery life, enough computing for browsing, office work and multimedia. Speaking of which, the screen offers excellent properties – it’s crisp, bright enough for indoor use, vivid and uses PWM only below 17% brightness making it virtually harmless to your eyes.

However, the Swift 7 is another fallen victim to the ultra thin fad. And just like the Lenovo Yoga 900S and the HP Spectre 13, Acer’s thin solution sacrifices much-needed features along the way. It also has crippled Core i5-7Y54 on board – much like the Spectre 13 with the Core i5-6200U and Core i7-6500U. We also can’t get over the fact that the Swift 7 ships with M.2 SATA drive instead of the fast PCIe NVMe SSDs, which have become a standard for high-end ultrabooks.

To the list of missing features, we have to add the absence of keyboard backlight and limited ports as well. Acer has included two dongles for HDMI and USB-A in the package but with one of the connectors being used for charging, you are left with only one. At least, the HP Spectre 13 included 3 Type-C ports, two of which are Gen 2 and support bandwidth of up to 10 Gbps making it suitable even for larger connector hubs.

Still, if you are looking for a portable, luxurious traveling companion, the Swift 7 is probably the right one for you if you don’t mind the lack of some essential features.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2g2IE1w

Pros

  • Sturdy build and eye-pleasing design
  • Ridiculously thin (9.98 mm) and light (1.1 kg)
  • Excellent touchpad
  • Decent battery life
  • Excellent IPS panel with negligible drawbacks
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM from 17 to 100% screen brightness

Cons

  • Limited ports
  • Lacks keyboard backlight and it’s a little bit shallow
  • Ships with M.2 SATA SSD instead of a PCIe NVMe-enabled drive
  • Doesn’t utilize the full performance of the SoC

ASUS ROG Strix GL502VS (GTX 1070) review – the low-end high-ender

$
0
0

Shortly after the release of the original ASUS ROG GL502 with GTX 970M, which was featured in our full review a few months back, the company has released a refreshed version of the device with much faster GPU on board – the GTX 1070 with 8GB of GDDR5. However, there’s one key selling point that’s missing from the last generation – the price.

While the previous model was one of the most affordable GTX 970M-powered solutions on the market, the GTX 1070 variant isn’t exactly “budget-friendly” but still holds up to the competition in terms of pricing. It’s also a much more sensible alternative to the beefy ASUS ROG G752VS. What’s more, the ASUS ROG GL502VS is one of the few 15-inch GTX 1070 options on the market and we are quite eager to see how the cooling system handles all that demanding hardware. The previous alteration of the laptop handled the GTX 970M pretty well so we suspect nothing less from this one. Continue reading to find out more…

ASUS ROG GL502VT review

You can find some of the availalbe ASUS ROG GL502VS models here: http://amzn.to/2hSm3pT

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a generous package containing a backpack, cable ties, user manuals, AC cord, charging brick and the notebook itself. Keep in mind that the backpack may not be available as a bonus for other markets.

Design and construction

The ASUS ROG GL502VS features a design fit for the premium gaming notebook’s niche, although there are some aspects of the laptop we didn’t like so much. Nonetheless, the overall build feels solid and reliable while weighing just 2.6 kg and a profile measuring at 30 mm. That’s a lot less than most hefty gaming notebooks out there, yet we see an increase in both digits compared to the original GL502VT with GTX 970M, which tips the scale at 2.373 kg and it’s not more than 25 mm thick.


The casing itself isn’t much different compared the last generation. We still have the black, brushed aluminum lid along with the LED-illuminated ROG logo accompanied by two stripes in the middle. The lid itself is easily bendable but doesn’t cause ripples to appear on the LCD panel. Speaking of which, we are only unhappy with the chin and side bezels – they appear to be a bit too thick to our taste and they seem extra large on the 15-inch display. Anyway, the hinges seem stable and require only one hand to be used in order to open the laptop. As for the bottom piece, it’s made of black plastic and serves a big vent opening for extra airflow. The orange silicone legs that match the accent color of the device easily stand out but as you can see in the image above, there’s no maintenance lid. Luckily, the bottom piece comes off easily so that’s not a big issue at all.

As we already mentioned, the sides of the device have grown by 5 mm mostly because the GTX 1070 needs a little bit more room to operate. But the same amount of ports remains and we are also happy to see an identical layout to the GL502VT. The connectors are evenly distributed on the sides and most commonly used ones are on the left where they won’t get in the way when the working/gaming space is scarce. The right side goes with the SD card reader, two USB 3.0 ports and 3.5 mm audio jack while on the left you will find the remaining USB 2.0 connector, HDMI, mini DisplayPort, LAN and a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 port supporting fast data transfer up to 10Gbps. The back side of the laptop is reserved to the main exhaust vents, as before.

The interior, unfortunately, is the big let-down. Again, ASUS has made the decision to go with a plastic surface imitating brushed aluminum, which we welcome with mixed feelings. The use of plastic reduces the spread of heat along the keyboard tray so the user won’t feel the rise in temperature around the wrist rest area but, on the other hand, it carries away the feeling of a premium and solid device. A soft-touch matte finish or at least aluminum elements are probably the sweet spot between functionality and looks. Moreover, the keyboard just resembles what we’ve tested on a ROG notebook. Even the budget ASUS ROG GL552VW has longer key travel and a more pleasing stiff feedback in the beginning of the travel. Nevertheless, the LED backlight is implemented well and the WASD keys are highlighted in bright orange that lights up in the dark. The layout is familiar and comfortable but we sill miss the media control buttons. The touchpad is absolutely identical to the ASUS ROG GL552VW’s clickpad when it comes to surface, feel, and ergonomics. The surface doesn’t exactly offer low-resistance matte finish and fingerprints stick quite easily on the contrary to the surface around it. The touchpad is generally comfortable and accurate but fails to register some left clicks and there’s a barely noticeable wobble that might grow in time. We really expected a longer key travel keyboard and a much more refined touchpad for a premium device like this one.

It’s clear that the main focus of the device is performance and portability. ASUS has sacrificed some features in order to keep the weight, size, and price of the laptop as low as possible but this has resulted in some considerable drawbacks like the input devices and some of the materials used for the build. If this doesn’t bother you at all and you plan to use it with external peripherals most of the time, the ROG GL502VS might just be your next gaming machine.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Disassembling the GL502 is a very easy task – you just have to remove 10 screws (there are no hidden ones or any special tricks) and then you have to pry up the whole bottom with a plastic spudger, credit card or something else of that sort.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

GL502 is equipped with a 2.5″ (9.5mm) hard drive slot, as well as an M.2 slot for SSD storage with NVMe support. But on contrary to the GL502VT with GTX 970M that we’ve tested, our unit shipped with an M.2 SATA Sandisk SSD so be careful when buying yout GL502. Make sure you order the variant with an NVMe-enabled drive if you want maximum storage performance.

Also, the location of the M.2 slot has been moved from right to left.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1002 256GB (SATA, 2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Free Upgrade options

RAM

ASUS GL502 has just one RAM slot, which is empty in our configuration. However, this model has an 8GB memory chip soldered onto the motherboard, so you can easily upgrade it to 16GB.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 0 8GB RAM (soldered)
Slot 1 Free Upgrade options

7

Other components

Our ASUS GL502 configuration is equipped with Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 8260NGW Wi-Fi module and a user-replaceable battery rated at 64Wh (4240 mAh).

9
8

Display quality

The refreshed GL502VS uses a different panel compared to its GTX 970M-powered variant. While the ASUS ROG GL502VT goes for the Samsung 156HL01-104 display, the newer version sports an LG Philips matrix with model number LP156WF6-SPB6. If the model sounds familiar, it’s because we’ve seen the older version of the panel (LP156WF6-SPB5) in several other ASUS laptops like the ASUS N552VX, ASUS ROG GL552VW and even in the good old ASUS N551VW. The new display hasn’t come a long way but fixes some of the issues from the older alteration.

Anyway, the technical specs remain the same as the IPS panel features a Full HD (1920×1080) resolution leading to a 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

The display offers excellent viewing angles from a 45-degree angle.

We were able to measure a maximum brightness of 324 cd/m2 in the middle and 6770K color temperature, which is quite close to the optimal 6500K. The contrast is 1020:1 before calibration and 930:1 after.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The yellow dotted triangle represents the sRGB coverage of the display, which is 90% of all colors. This enough for an excellent multimedia/gaming experience.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The profile is created at 140 cd/m2 luminance, target color temperature 6500K (D65) and gamma set to sRGB mode.

It seems that the gamma settings are more than okay but you will notice that the dark areas of an image will appear dimmer than they should.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms. This is normal for a notebook IPS panel but the more pretentious gamers will notice the so-called ghosting effects on fast-paced games, especially first-person shooters.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

According to you our tests, the notebook’s display uses PWM for adjusting screen brightness from 0 to 99% luminance but at higher frequency than usual – 21.2 kHz. This means that some of the users with sensitive eyes might feel some of the negative effects of PWM during extended use.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

As always, ASUS has supplied the notebook with an excellent IPS panel with numerous good properties making it fit for multimedia and gaming experience. We’ve got high maximum brightness, close to optimal color temperature, wide sRGB coverage, high contrast and relatively good color accuracy out of the box. If you require the best viewing experience, we suggest using our custom-tailored display profiles to enhance the image quality by adjusting the gamma, color temperature, accuracy etc.

Unfortunately, the PWM is still present even in the new version of the LG Philips panel but the good news is that the panel might not affect every user as the frequency of the emitted light is higher than usual – 21.2 kHz. Only those with extra sensitive eyes will notice. And interestingly enough, that’s the first notebook with G-Sync that uses PWM for regulating screen brightness.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS ROG GL502VS configurations with 15.6″ LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2aZpyLY

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

We are happy with the sound quality as the music sounds crisp and full at low and high frequencies almost without noticeable distortions.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-core, 2.6 – 3.5 GHz)
RAM 8GB RAM – DDR4, 2133 MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD + Free 2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot
Display 15.6-inch – 1920×1080 (Full HD) IPS, matte
Features
  • 3x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Type-C (supports Thunderbolt 3)
  • 1x HDMI
  • 1x mini DisplayPort
  • 1x Ethernet LAN port
  • 1x SD/MMC card reader
  • 1x Combo audio jack
  • 1x Kensington Lock security port
  • Built-in microphones with ambient noise reduction
  • ICEpower loudspeakers
Battery 64 Wh (4240 mAh)
Thickness 30 mm (1.18″)
Weight 2.6 g (5.73 lbs)

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) OS on the machine for our review but if you wish to perform a clean install, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

Unfortunately, the battery performance is once again mediocre and not because the big 64Wh battery unit couldn’t supply the system but because once again the integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 630 is disabled and thus crippling the endurance. It seems that this has become a norm for gaming laptops these days. And if you look at the ASUS ROG GL502VT (with GTX 970M), you will see much better performance in this regard since it has the much-needed iGPU.

As always, we use the following settings when testing the battery life – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature running and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

surfing-Asus-ROG-Strix-GL502

Less than optimal result – 223 minutes (3 hours and 43 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

movie-Asus-ROG-Strix-GL502

Here, the notebook scored even lower result – 197 minutes (3 hours and 17 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

gaming-Asus-ROG-Strix-GL502

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery with just 78 minutes (1 hour and 18 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i7-6700HQ

corei7Intel Core i7-6700HQ represents the Skylake H family and it’s considered as a high-performance chip with high voltage – 45W TDP. This is a step down from its direct predecessor – Core i7-4700HQ but matches its short-lived predecessor Core i7-5700HQ. The Core i7-6700HQ has four cores ticking at 2.6GHz and can go up to 3.5 GHz for one active core and 3.1 GHz for four active cores. The silicon supports the so-called Hyper-Threading technology that emulates one virtual core for each physical and thus establishing a total of 8 threads.

Furthermore, the chip is manufactured using 14nm FinFET process and integrates Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU with 24 EU (Executable Units) clocked at 350 – 1050 MHz. The memory controller supports up to 64GB of DDR3 or DDR4 RAM at 1600 or 2133 MHz respectively. The CPU is suitable for heavy applications and gaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.28
ASUS ROG GL502VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.48+2.75%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.28
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.32+0.55%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)806
ASUS ROG GL502VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)830+2.98%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)796-1.24%
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)815+1.12%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.01
ASUS ROG GL502VT Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.30+2.63%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.9-1%
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.8-1.91%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-6700HQ managed to get 12.270 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)

2016-06-02-image-33The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the second fastest mobile GPU after the GTX 1080. It’s part of NVIDIA’s Pascal generation of GPUs and unlike previous releases, the company finally closes the gap between mobile and desktop graphics processors and that’s why there’s no “M” in the branding of Pascal GPUs. All thanks to the 16nm TSMC manufacturing process of the GPU, which allows better thermals and overall performance in a smaller form factor. That’s a big technology jump compared to the 28nm Maxwell generation.

Compared to its desktop counterpart, the GTX 1070 doesn’t differ too much. They share an identical number of ROPs (64) and identical memory – 8GB GDDR5 with 256-bit bus clocked at 8000 MHz. However, there’s a minor difference in clock speeds – the laptop GPU ticks at 1443 MHz and can go up to 1645 MHz while the desktop variant is running at 1506 MHz – 1683 MHz. To compensate to some extent, the laptop 1070 carries more CUDA cores (2048 vs 1920) and slightly more TMUs (170 vs 120).

Due to its performance, thermals and power consumption, which is believed to be 10W more than the GTX 980M, the GPU is suitable for large 17-inch laptops with the appropriate cooling solution.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-8gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)84437
ASUS ROG GL502VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)45541-46.07%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)94485+11.9%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)100753+19.32%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)16225
ASUS ROG GL502VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)7271-55.19%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)16135-0.55%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)17159+5.76%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)51253
ASUS ROG GL502VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)25322-50.59%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)51773+1.01%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)55642+8.56%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4126
ASUS ROG GL502VT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3GB GDDR5)2265-45.1%
Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4405+6.76%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4731+14.66%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 255 fps 242 fps 222 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 123 fps 108 fps 104 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 143 fps 103 fps 52 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 143 fps 111 fps 53 fps

hitman-2016

HITMAN (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 90 fps 81 fps 38 fps

Temperatures

This simple stress test isn’t the best representation of real-life use because 100% CPU load and GPU load isn’t an everyday scenario, especially to the general user, but it’s still a good way to assess the cooling system and the notebook’s reliability in the long run.

We start off with 100% CPU load for an hour and as you can see in the image below, the chip was able to maintain relatively low temperatures under load ~75 °C and also keep the clocks steady at 3.1 GHz. This is the maximum operating frequency of the Core i7-6700HQ for four active cores.

After one hour, we ran the GPU stress test as well and then things started to heat up. For instance, the CPU reached temperatures as high as 97 °C while the GPU at full load was pretty hot – 86 °C. This resulted on the CPU to tone down to 2.7 GHz, which is the base frequency and can’t be considered as thermal throttling while the GPU was running at 1645 MHz for a while but then slowly slowed down the tempo to 1450 – 1550 MHz. This concludes that the cooling system did well considering the form factor and the size of the machine but we can’t miss mentioning the fact that the fans get really loud under load. Probably because they have to compensate for the lack of airflow inside the relatively thin chassis.

However, the temperatures on the surface were a bit higher than what we are used to seeing on a ROG machine. As you can see from the heat map below, the center and the upper-center of the keyboard are a bit hot and may cause some discomfort to the user. That’s, of course, after an extensive 2-hour long stress test and the temperatures will be lower during a normal gaming session. Still, be aware that the area around the center of the keyboard gets warmer than usual and the base between the screen hinges (where the main exhaust vents are placed) gets quite hot. What also caught our attention is the prominent coil whine under load. If you are wearing headphones, you won’t notice it but otherwise is easily heard.

Verdict

Just one change has completely altered our verdict of the notebook. While we really liked the version with the GTX 970M GPU due to its portability without sacrificing performance, good build and decent pricing. However, since the GPU and price got updated in the G752VS configuration, we have a totally different opinion now.

The ASUS ROG GL502VS should have been a more affordable 15-inch solution but instead, it rivals the 15-inch Acer Predator 15 (G9-593) and fails to match its features and performance. Yes, sure the Predator 15 costs $100-150 more but these pennies are definitely worth it. Not only does the Predator 15 stands out with a more sturdy and pleasant build but also offers more storage configurations and always ships with an NMVe-enabled SSD. We also liked the keyboard and touchpad way more.

Now let’s put the Predator 15 aside and focus on the ROG GL502VS. For its price, you get an excellent G-sync-enabled IPS panel, although with high-frequency PWM from 0 to 99% brightness, cool-looking design, the all-mighty GTX 1070 GPU on board – but with somehow lower performance than usual – and an M.2 PCIe NVMe storage support. Be careful, though, not all units ship with the latter and you might have to settle for a SATA SSD.

Moreover, the battery performance is way lower than expected due to the lack of iGPU – an issue all modern laptops are suffering from. It probably has something to do with the new Pascal generation graphics cards. If battery life is of great importance to you, get the GL502VY to GL502VT instead, as they both offer the much-needed iGPU for prolonged work away from the charger.

The bottom line is: the ASUS ROG GL502VS is a good 15-inch powerhouse with compelling features but despite its relatively low price, it’s hard to recommend it over the new Predator 15, which excels in all areas where the ROG GL502VS fails. The ASUS ROG G752VS is also an option if sacrificing portability and the slightly higher price aren’t posing a problem to you.

You can find some of the availalbe ASUS ROG GL502VS models here: http://amzn.to/2hSm3pT

Pros

  • Refreshing design for a gaming machine
  • Decent overall build
  • Excellent IPS panel with G-Sync support
  • Powerful hardware in a relatively small form factor and size
  • Supports PCIe NVMe SSDs
  • Brings various connectivity options including mini DisplayPort and Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C

Cons

  • Noticeable coil whine under load
  • Some units ship witn an M.2 SATA SSD instead of PCIe NVMe drive
  • The screen uses PWM from 0 to 99% screen brightness (Health-Guard profile eliminates that)
  • The touchpad and keyboard aren’t convincing enough for a notebook at this price range
  • No integrated graphics and thus lowered battery endurance
  • Somehow crippled GTX 1070 performance

Dell Vostro 15 3559 review – when “good” just isn’t enough anymore

$
0
0

Although the Kaby Lake-powered machines are the latest craze, the Skylake generation of CPUs is still around and budget laptops sporting the 6th Generation are often the most sensible solution for the general user. That’s why we are doing a review of the ultra-budget Dell Vostro 15 3559, which should satisfy the needs of a the not-so-picky businessmen.

Its target audience is the same as the HP ProBook 450 G3 but still sells for somewhat lower price, which has also reflected on the features. The ProBook 450 G3 is probably the better choice all-around but don’t dismiss the Vostro 3559 yet. For its asking price, the notebook offers strict and simplistic design, discrete GPU if your line of work requires some extra graphics power and a decent battery performance. And what about the rest concerning business consumers? Let’s find out…

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2hWaeyS

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a standard box containing the usual user manuals, AC cord and charging brick.

Design and construction

The chassis of the Vostro 3559 is identical to the Inspiron 3552. It’s so identical that even its dimensions and weight almost match with just 3 mm difference in height and a little bit over 200 gr in weight. Of course, the Vostro 3559 is the bulkier one since it uses a standard fan to keep the Core i5-6200U cool while the Inspiron 3552 we tested earlier this year had a passive-cooled Pentium N3700 processor.

Anyway, most of what we didn’t and did like about the Inspiron 3552‘s design and build stands true for the Vostro 3559 as well. We’ve got again the bouncy lid with textured plastic finish that attracts fingerprints and tight hinges, which don’t allow one-handed opening of the laptop. The bottom piece once again gives access to some of the hardware like HDD and RAM via a service cover.

The sides follow the usual design signature for Dell’s lower-end lineup with a glossy finish and flat shape. Though, the port distribution is quite different from the one on the Inspiron 3552. The left side adopts the LAN, VGA, USB 3.0 and an SD card reader. Whereas the right side goes along with two USB 2.0 connectors, 3.5 mm audio jack and the optical drive. The profile measures at 24 mm so portability is definitely a feature here.

Continuing with the interior, we find the same textured somehow soft-touch plastic finish around the keyboard and touchpad. The material ensures rigid base with no apparent flexibility in the keyboard section and palm rest area but still attracts too many fingerprints and smudges. Speaking of the input devices, the keyboard feels a bit mushy with less than optimal key travel and no feedback to compensate for that. You might think that we are overreacting for a laptop at this price range but since it’s business-oriented, we expect nothing less than comfortable typing experience. On the contrary, the touchpad feels pretty nice without wobbles and offers light mouse clicks and responsiveness. The surface isn’t exactly the best for gliding your finger across it but it’s a small setback to consider.

Again, there’s nothing special about the notebook’s design and the only thing that we genuinely liked is the rigid base and comfortable touchpad. The rest is just okay and we would like the future model with more appropriate keyboard for the target audience.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Since the Inspiron 3552 and Vostro 3559 share the same casing, the disassembly process is identical. You will have to remove all the screws around the bottom but keep in mind that there are some under the optical drive, service lid and the battery. Then, proceed by popping out the keyboard as there are several screws beneath it as well.

2016-02-08 15.10.25
2016-02-08 15.11.20
2016-02-08 15.55.53
2016-02-08 15.40.14

The only difference is that the Vostro 3550’s motherboard is flipped face up and the cooling design is slightly different.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD

As reperesentative of the low-end segment of the market, the Vostro 3559 features only one 2.5-inch slot for HDD or SSD. Our unit came with 1TB Seagate HDD>

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Seagate 1TB HDD (5400 rpm) Upgrade options

RAM

Surprisingly, the motherboard holds two slots for RAM, one of which is occupied by an 8GB DDR3L SK Hynix chip.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 16GB DDR4-2133 RAM Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is easily accessed by removing the service lid.

But as far as the battery is concerned, you won’t need any tools to access it. It’s held by a lever switch and it’s rated at 40Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design is fairly simple – just a big cooling fan pushing the hot air out of the chassis through a big vent opening on the side. The fan is connected to the CPU’s heat sink via a copper heat pipe.

Display quality

The notebook uses a TN WXGA panel with HD (1366×768) resolution manufactured by LG Philips with model number LP156WHU-TPA1. This means that the pixel density is just 100 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.253 x 0.253 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 86 cm.

There’s a noticeable color shift under a 45-degree angle as you can see in the image below.

We measured a maximum brightness of just 183 cd/m2 in the middle of the screen and 190 cd/m2 as average so the maximum deviation is just 12%. It will be sufficient for indoor use but if there’s a strong light source or if you are outside working, you will find it uncomfortable. The matte finish will reduce the glare, though. And as far as color temperature is concerned, it’s deviating from the optimal 6500K. We measured 7590K so colors will appear colder than usual. The contrast ratio is extremely low measuring just 280:1 before calibration and 240:1 after.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 is 2.4 in the left part of the screen. Values above 4.0 are unwanted.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The sRGB coverage of the screen is 56% and it’s presented with a yellow dotted triangle in the graph below.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut before and after calibration.

We created the “Office work/Web design” profile with a target color temperature of 6500K (D65), optimal gamma under sRGB mode and 140 cd/m2 luminance.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 18 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment was able to detect pulsations from 0 to 99% screen brightness but at higher than usual frequencies making it relatively safe for working long hours. However, some users with extra sensitive eyes might feel the 20.3 kHz flickering.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

We were expecting mediocre performance from the panel, considering the price range of the product, and most of the drawbacks like excessive blue light emissions, PWM, color inaccuracy, gamma and color temperature can be fixed by installing our profiles. However, the low maximum brightness and extremely low contrast ratio can’t be fixed with just a software tweak and you might have to settle in this regard.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Vostro 3559 configurations with 15.6″ LG Philips LP156WHU-TPA1 (HD, 1366 × 768) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hAHK1e

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$0.00
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good for this class without any noticeable distortions and high and low frequencies.

Specs sheet

The specs listed below are for this particular unit and may differ depending on your region

CPU Intel Core i5-6200U (2-core, 2.30 – 2.80 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR3L, 1600 MHz
GPU AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch – HD (1366×768) TN, matte
Optical drive Yes
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11bgn, Bluetooth
Features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • webcam
  • microphone
  • stereo loudspeakers
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • VGA
  • RJ-45
  • SD card reader
Battery 4-cell, 40Wh
Thickness 24 mm (0.95″)
Weight 2.39 kg (5.27 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) when testing the unit and if you also wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Dell’s official support page.

Battery

The Vostro 3559 relies on a 40Wh battery unit when it’s off the charger, thus the endurance of the machine of your everyday tasks will be slightly above the average for this price range. The notebook scored a runtime in the web browsing test. Of course, all tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi running, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

net

Just around the average for this price range – 332 minutes (5 hours and 32 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

movie

Considerably lower but still on par with the competition – 291 minutes (4 hours and 51 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

game1

Of course, the gaming test took a toll on the battery – 111 minutes (2 hours and 51 minutes)

CPU – Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i5-6200U is a 6th generation dual-core CPU. It is manufactured using 14 nm FinFET process, meaning it’s part of the Ultra-Low Voltage lineup.The CPU is clocked at 2.3GHz, but thanks to the Turbo Boost technology it could automatically increase its clock speeds up to 2.8GHz for a single core and 2.7GHz when two cores are functioning. It is designed using Intel’s Skylake architecture allowing it to have similar performance to Intel Core i7-5500U, which is part of the Broadwell lineup. The CPU boasts four logical cores and 3MB level 3 cache. It consumes 15W of energy and can operate at a maximum temperature of 100 degrees Celsius.

The SoC also integrates Intel HD Graphics 520. Its performance is similar to that of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 820 GPU. The GPU can be clocked at up to 1000MHz. The SoC supports the Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization and AES-NI technologies.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-6200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.20
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.21+0.31%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22+0.63%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.24+1.25%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)442-0.45%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)441-0.68%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)440-0.9%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.21
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.15-0.3%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.78+2.82%
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.73+2.57%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-6200U scored 5.480 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)

The AMD Radeon R5 M315 is an entry-level dedicated graphics card often found in low-end notebooks for multimedia and business. The chip is manufactured on the 28nm node from TSMC containing 320 shader units, 28 ROPs and 112 TMUs clocked at 970 MHz. It’s still unknown whether the GPU is based on GCN 2.0 or GCN 1.2.

The chip is equipped with 2GB of DDR3 VRAM clocked at 1800 MHz making it suitable for some light gaming. However, some of the latest games will be playable only at lower resolution and minimum graphics settings.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/amd-radeon-r5-m315-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)5036
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5207199+42.95%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)12603+150.26%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6322+25.54%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)919
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520380-58.65%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2239+143.63%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1214+32.1%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)3052
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5203125+2.39%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)7253+137.65%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4248+39.19%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)242
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520235-2.89%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)604+149.59%
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329+35.95%

Gaming tests

Although this isn’t a gaming notebook nor does it have a hardware to handle the latest games, the AMD Radeon R5 M315 can handle some light gaming every now and then.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 78 fps 47 fps 28 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 25 fps 18 fps 12 fps

Temperatures

The two-staged stress test doesn’t represent real-life use but gives us a good hint of how the system handles higher loads and how the machine will fare in the long run.

We start with 100% CPU stress test but we saw nothing out of the ordinary. Normal temps, normal clocks. At first, the chip was able to maintain its maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 2.8 GHz but eventually toned down to 2.7 GHz.

Things didn’t change as much, as far as the CPU is concnerned, when we switched on the GPU stress test but the same cannot be said about the GPU. While the CPU temps climbed to 90 °C and maintained maximum operating frequency, the AMD Radeon R5 M315 was going up and down from 870 to 970 MHz, which can be considered as throttling. However, due to the nature of the laptop and its intended use, we can’t really say this is going to be a problem for the end user.

Surface temperatures were abit too high, especially for a business-oriented notebook and the hottest area was around the left side and the center of the keyboard. However, this shouldn’t be of any great concerns since the laptop isn’t and will not be used for gaming or other demanding tasks for long periods of time.

Verdict

Dell decided to go on the safe path with the Vostro 3559 with a familiar design, features and specs. However, that doesn’t mean it’s the best way to handle things in the emerging low-end market. Now, there are far more lucrative offers like some of the HP ProBook 450 G3 configurations or the refreshed ASUS X556UQ notebook with Core i5-7200U and GeForce 940MX GPU. For a few extra bucks, you can even opt for the durable Latitude 3570, which is superior to this one in almost every aspect. You might also want to consider the Acer Aspire E5-575G, which fared pretty well in our tests and might probably be one of the best budget solutions we’ve reviewed so far. A pretty close call with the ProBook 450 G3 actually.

Don’t get us wrong, though, the Vostro 3559 is a pretty good bargain for the small business, but lately, “good” just isn’t enough. Why settle for less when you can have more than just a good touchpad and decent battery life. Our main complaints are the keyboard, build, subpar display quality and probably the inefficient discrete GPU. Still, some of the screen issues can be fixed with our custom profiles – the Health-Guard profile will eliminate the PWM while the Office/Design Work will correct the huge inaccuracies in color reproduction. With that being said, the relatively lower price is the main advantage over its competitors.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2hWaeyS

Pros

  • Good touchpad
  • Relatively low price
  • Decent web browsing runtimes

Cons

  • Display with low contrast and low maximum brightness
  • PWM from 0 to 99% screen brightness (Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • Inefficient GPU
  • Spongy keyboard

MSI Prestige PX60-6QE review – the one stop for gaming and work

$
0
0

The MSI Prestige PX60 is the second notebook we were able to snatch from the company and there are more devices to come in the near future. Anyway, the PX60 is part of the relatively new Prestige lineup, which aims to expand the OEMs business beyond the gaming segment of the market.

So in this regard, the PX60 is basically a rebranded GS60 laptop but loses the aggressive paint job and design. The chassis is rather the same. It’s a compelling choice among other multimedia notebooks like the ASUS N552VX, Lenovo Ideapad 700 sporting similar specs but somehow lower price tag. This might actually be the biggest downside of the PX60 – higher price while offering a subpar TN panel instead of an IPS matrix, which can be found in numerous similarly priced notebooks like the ASUS ROG GL552VW, Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition or the Lenovo Y700.

Nevertheless, the MSI Prestige PX60-6QE has a lot of cool features to offer along with sleek and sturdy design so continue reading to find out whether or not this laptop is worth your hard-earned money.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2h4T99Z

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a standard white box containing all the usual user manuals, AC cord and charging brick.

Design and construction

The overall design and construction of the notebook are mostly on par or even better than what the industry offers at this price range. We’ve got brushed aluminum interior and lid while plastic still makes an appearance at the bottom part of the base and the screen bezels. However, we noticed that some parts of the base and the lid are prone to flexing, although nothing that can be bad for the user experience.

Let’s start with the lid. It’s made of metallic gray brushed aluminum plate, which when pressed in the middle, causes small ripples to appear on the LCD screen. That shouldn’t be alarming as it won’t be an issue during normal use. It appears that the hinges contribute to the overall flexibility of the lid as they are too far apart leaving a big part of the screen unsupported. On the contrary, though, the hinges feel secure, smooth and allow opening the machine with just one hand. They are well-designed despite being plastic. The base also features a barely noticeable indentation so you can lift up the lid easier with your finger. Speaking of the base, the bottom plate is the only big plastic element in this machine. It has two grills on the sides for the loudspeakers and a big vent opening for extra airflow to the hardware.

Now let’s focus on the sides because the laptop has a good number of connectivity options that you can benefit from. The left side holds one grill for the heat, the DC charging port, two USB 3.0 connectors and two 3.5 mm audio jacks for headphones and external microphone. The right side holds another exhaust vent, LAN, DisplayPort supporting 120 Hz Full HD or 60 Hz Ultra HD external monitor, HDMI, SD card reader and an USB-C 3.1 supporting Thunderbolt 3 standard. With all these ports, the PX60 is probably the most equipped laptop at this price. The back side of the notebook includes another two exhaust vents placed near the fans so we expect good cooling properties. All of this comes in a compact 20.05 mm profile.

What’s left is the interior. It features brushed aluminum around the input devices and huge speaker grills above the keyboard. The latter is probably one of the best we’ve used in this class. The Numpad area is slightly smaller but it’s easier to distinguish it without looking. The keys offer deep travel and stiff but clicky feedback. It’s definitely an excellent keyboard all-around and will probably suit not only fast typing users but will also be suitable for gaming on the go. The only downfall is the “Windows” key, which you won’t find in the usual poisition but instead takes a place between the right Ctrl and Alt keys. Sadly, the touchpad isn’t what we’ve expected. The surface feels a bit too rough and if your finger is moist, you might have some trouble dealing with the precision. Also, the mouse clicks are a bit too stiff, although no wobbling occurs while using it. The surface detects gestures and taps accurately.

We easily say that the notebook has one of the best designs considering the price point and the build quality is excellent. There are a few setbacks like the flexible lid and a bit spongy keyboard area but they aren’t ruining the whole experience at all. Also, the weight (2.1 kg) can be considered as a pro when you keep in mind that the PX60 is a hardware-packed 15.6-inch multimedia/gaming machine.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

You will have to go at great length to fully disassemble the MSI PX60 6QE but if you are accessing the internals only for a quick storage upgrade or changing the battery it’s not that big of a hassle. You just have to remove the bottom piece.

img_20161129_160612
img_20161129_160905

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

The notebook boasts the usual 2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot along with a speedy M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe SSD support. The bad news is that some of the configurations ship with already inserted M.2 SATA drives and if you want to change it, flipping the motherboard upside-down is a must.

For instance, our unit came with a Toshiba SATA drive as you can see in the image below.

img_20161129_161840

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot Sandisk THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB (SATA, 2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD WD Blue 1TB (5400 rpm) Upgrade options
img_20161129_160926
img_20161129_161858

RAM

The laptop offers two RAM slots, again located on the other side of the motherboard, right next to the M.2 stick under a small metal plate. Our unit came with one 8GB DDR4-2133 chip while the other slot remained free.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB RAM DDR4-2133
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

img_20161129_161924

Other components

The battery is super easy to remove. Once you’ve opened the bottom cover, just disconnect the battery from the motherboard and lift it up. The unit is rated at 47.31Wh.

img_20161129_161017
img_20161129_161035

The Wi-Fi card is located right next to one of the fans – Intel 3165NGW
img_20161129_160946

Cooling system

The cooling system appears to be pretty solid – two separate cooling fans leading the hot air out with vents placed on both sides of the chassis. We expect excellent cooling performance just by the looks of it.

img_20161129_161939
img_20161129_161942
If you need any information regarding the internals and disassembly, visit our dedicated article.

Display quality

The notebook uses the same TN display found in the Acer Aspire V15 (V5-591G) and the Acer Aspire V15 (V3-575G) manufactured by INNOLUX with model number N156HGE-EAL. Our tests show insignificant difference between the tested models and the MSI PX60 6QE’s matrix making us question the so-called ColorBlast technology presented in Acer’s models but that’s a whole another story.

We have a 15.6-inch diagonal housing a 1080p (Full HD) resolution, 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Of course, there’s a noticeable color under a 45-degree angle due to the use of a TN panel.

We measured a maximum brightness of just 244 cd/m2 in the center and 230 cd/m2 as average across the surface. The maximum deviation is just 11% in the upper left corner while the color temperature is 7420K, which is colder than the optimal 6500K so colors may appear slightly blue-ish. The contrast ratio is just 390:1.

The maximum dE2000 color deviation is just 2.6, again in the upper-left corner. It’s a good result since values above 4.0 are unwanted.

The interesting feature about this laptop is that it offers six different presets for optimizing your multimedia, work or gaming experience.

Most of our tests were performed with the sRGB mode turned on, unless we specify it in the text below.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

As expected, the display covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and 95% of the DCI-P3, which is an excellent result, especially for a TN display.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut with and without our custom “Office/Web Design work” profile.

We created this profile with gamma mode set to sRGB along with target white point D65 and 140 cd/m2 brightness.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

In this regard, we have to point out that MSI’s Gamer and Movie modes are downright useless.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment was able to detect extremely low PWM frequency (200 Hz) and our guess is that even users with not so sensitive eyes will feel some of the negative consequences. Luckily, our Health-Guard profile will eliminate it.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our specialized article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

We’ve compared our Health-Guard profile and MSI’s stock Anti-Blue Reading Mode. Judging by the SDP graph, both profiles offer just about the same experience but the Health-Guard profile takes the lead with better gamma calibration, as we already mentioned above.

Conclusion

As a stand-alone display, the MSI PX60 6QE offers good image quality with 100% sRGB coverage, bright enough for indoor use with strong light source nearby, and relatively accurate color reproduction out of the box. Some of the display presets that MSI offers are pretty useful as well.

However, we can’t get over the fact that other market alternatives are going with IPS displays with overall better image quality with higher contrast, better viewing angles, higher maximum brightness etc. Considering the price point of the product, the MSI PX60 has supbar image quality. We’d also like to warn you about the aggressive PWM the screen uses and the only way to protect yourself from it is to install our Health-Guard profile or turn the brightness up to 100%, which isn’t always the best idea in some working environments.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for MSI PX60 6QE configurations with 15.6″ INNOLUX N156HGE-EAL (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2i01FqR

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good without any noticeable distortions at high and low frequencies.

Specs sheet

Specs listed below are for the tested unit only and may differ from your’s.

Processor Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-core, 2.60 – 3.50 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM up to 32GB (2x 16384MB) – DDR4, 2133 MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD + 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11 ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3 support)
  • webcam
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • DisplayPort (60Hz UHD or 120Hz FHD)
  • SD card reader
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45 (LAN)
  • 4x 2W loudspeakers and a subwoofer
Battery 6-cell, 47Wh
Thickness 20.05 mm (0.79″)
Weight 2.1 kg (4.3 lbs)

Software

The notebook we received was with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) but if you wish to perform a clean install without the usual bloatware, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from MSI’s official support page.

Battery

The battery unit is rated at 47Wh and can support the system away from the charger not more than a few hours, which is kind of disappointing. We usually don’t expect much from a gaming/multimedia machine because they are not optimized for long hours of work without charging but compared to other gaming alternatives, the battery results are subpar. It seems that the quad-core Core i7-6700HQ sips quite a lot juice.

As always, we used the same settings for testing every notebook – Wi-Fi constantly running, Windows power saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

Less than what we’ve expected from a 47Wh unit – 195 minutes (3 hours and 15 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Just about the same score – 205 minutes (3 hours and 25 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery with just 67 minutes (1 hour and 7 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel_Core_i7_logoIntel Core i7-6700HQ represents the Skylake H family and is considered a high-performance chip with high voltage – 45W TDP. This is a step down from its direct predecessor – Core i7-4700HQ, but matches its short-lived predecessor Core i7-5700HQ. The Core i7-6700HQ has four cores ticking at 2.6GHz and can go up to 3.5 GHz for one active core and 3.1 GHz for four active cores. The silicon supports the so-called Hyper-Threading technology that emulates one virtual core for each physical, thus establishing a total of 8 threads.

Furthermore, the chip is manufactured using a 14nm FinFET process and integrates Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU with 24 EU (Executable Units) clocked at 350 – 1050 MHz. The memory controller supports up to 64GB of DDR3 or DDR4 RAM at 1600 or 2133 MHz, respectively. The CPU is suitable for heavy applications and gaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested that has this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.45
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49+0.54%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.47+0.27%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)5.39-27.65%
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.45955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49+0.54%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)824
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)831+0.85%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)833+1.09%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)489-40.66%
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)825+0.12%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)812-1.46%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.67
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.58-0.84%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.57-0.94%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)-
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.66-0.09%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.51+7.87%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-6700HQ managed 12.456 million moves per second. By comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)

geforce_gtx_960m_0The GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5) is located in the high-end graphics card niche, but is used mostly in budget gaming laptops. It is part of the Maxwell family of GPUs. It features 640 CUDA cores or simply – shading units, along with 32 ROPs and 53 texture units. It has 4GB of dedicated VRAM (GDDR5 in this case). The bandwidth of the memory is 80.2 GB/s and the bus is 128-bit wide.

The GTX 960M uses the same GM107 GPU core that we saw in last year’s 860M, but this one is mainly aimed at bumping the notebook’s battery life and adding some extra performance, but that’s not stressed as much. However, the GM107 is clocked a bit higher than last year’s model – 1097MHz of base clock and boost up to 1176MHz. It also supports a resolution of 2048×1536 through the VGA port and 3840×2160 with DisplayPort and HDMI.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-gtx-960m/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)31372
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)31668+0.94%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)30950-1.35%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel HD Graphics 53031744+1.19%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)31768+1.26%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)21325-32.03%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4476
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)4485+0.2%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4365-2.48%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel HD Graphics 5304421-1.23%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4466-0.22%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)3202-28.46%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14464
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)14396-0.47%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14028-3.01%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel HD Graphics 53014632+1.16%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14382-0.57%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)10777-25.49%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
MSI PX60-6QE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1290
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)1287-0.23%
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1332+3.26%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel HD Graphics 5301250-3.1%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1291+0.08%955 EUR- EUR
(-)
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)937-27.36%

Temperatures

The stress test that we perform can’t be a good representation of real-life use because the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load at the same time for such long periods of time, but it’s still an excellent way to assess the cooling capabilities of the machine and the overall stability of the system in the long run.

We start off with 100% CPU load and as you can see in the graph below, the CPU was running at its maximum operating frequency for four active cores and temperatures were relatively low.

When we turned on the GPU stress test, it added a few degrees to the CPU’s temperature but the chip was able to maintain a frequency pretty close to the maximum Turbo Boost while the GPU was able to remain stable somewhere around 77 degrees. At first, the GPU ran at 1201 MHz but we often saw some short drops reaching as low as 900 MHz. No matter how worrying this might sound, it’s actually not that big of a deal since the notebook has been put to an extensive 2-hour long stress test and the cooling system still managed to keep the inner and outer temperatures pretty low.

Speaking of outer temperatures, take a look at the heat map below and see how cool the whole interior is during this massive stress test. The performance of the MSI PX60 6QE in this regard is comparable to the ASUS’ ROG GL552VW, which showed excellent cooling capabilities. Unfortunately, there’s one small downfall – the fans keep spinning even in idle. You can hear them buzzing even if there’s no process running in background.

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 127 fps 111 fps 95 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 61 fps 46 fps 33 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 105 fps 39 fps 15 fps

Verdict

The MSI PX60 6QE is probably your first and only stop for gaming and work, although the former is the order of the day. A bit pricier than some of the current offerings on the market but holds an edge over its rivals with a slew of cool features including USB-C 3.1 with Thunderbolt 3 support and mini DisplayPort aside from all the usual connectors. There’s also a separate 3.5 mm jack for audio and external microphone, which is quite rare for a laptop with this price.

The only thing missing from portraying the whole picture as a gaming/multimedia laptop is the screen. It has some good properties but it’s not IPS and most notebooks costing this much boast IPS displays. If picture quality is one of your top priorities, go check the ASUS N552VX, ASUS ROG GL552VW, Lenovo Y700, Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition and the Dell Inspiron 7559. As you can see, plenty of alternatives. You should also take into account the aggressive PWM (200 Hz), which, of course, can be fixed with our Health-Guard profile.

The lack of IPS panel didn’t stop us from liking the Prestige PX60, though. The build quality is excellent, the keyboard is superb and the touchpad is far from what we are used to seeing in mid-range gaming laptops. It’s also pretty portable and compact without sacrificing performance along the way because the cooling system ensures ideal gaming performance without overheating.

At the end of the day, the MSI PX60 6QE is a pricey, but good all-rounder with a few but noticeable drawbacks in the display department, noise and battery life while excelling in all other aspects.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2h4T99Z

Pros

  • Good build quality
  • Relatively compact and lightweight
  • Excellent keyboard and good touchpad
  • Supports M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs
  • The display offers 100% sRGB coverage
  • Efficient cooling system keeping temperatures low on the outside and inside

Cons

  • Constant fan noise even when idle
  • TN display with low contrast, low maximum brightness and poor viewing angles
  • Aggressive PWM from 0 to 99% brightness (Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • Slightly pricier than its competitors
  • Subpar battery life

HP ProBook 450 G4 review – Intel’s new Kaby Lake CPU’s isn’t the only improvement

$
0
0

HP’s ProBook lineup has been praised for a number of reasons in the past and now we will have to assess the next generation ProBook 450 G4 and see if it holds up to the legacy of ProBooks.

In most aspects, the ProBook G4 keeps what’s good from the previous version while offering slight changes here and there. Hopefully, most of them will turn out to be good but one thing is for sure – the upgrade to the newest Kaby Lake generation of CPUs will be more than beneficial. However, this has affected the price of the notebook and we have some concerns about the higher-end models with Core i7-7500U not being able to compete on the market with TN panels and underpowered graphics processor, which, by the way, should be at least better than last year’s 450 G3 with AMD’s Radeon R7 M340 discrete graphics. On the other hand, we are talking about a business-class model here so if you strictly looking for working, the ProBook G4 is a must-consider option.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2ifHgtJ

Contents

Retail package

The box contains the usual set of user manuals, AC adapter, a cord and the notebook itself.

Design and construction

The whole design concept hasn’t changed dramatically but there are a few notable changes like the touchpad, the surface on the lid and the keyboard feel. Still, we will have to give credit for the reduced weight compared to the previous version 450 G3.

Let’s begin with the usual – the lid. It now changes skin from soft-touch, matte, black plastic surface to a metallic-looking, hard, gray finish. We kind of miss the matte surface since it provides more secure grip but also leaves fingerprints quite visible. The new material doesn’t seem to impress with much sturdiness and feels like the old one – bending the center of the screen isn’t much of a challenge and causes ripples on the LCD screen but probably won’t pose an issue during normal use. Hinges are once again delightful – not overly tightened and allow opening the laptop with one hand only. The bottom plate is once again plastic but on contrary to the 450 G3, the color is gray and fits the overall look without drawing too much attention. Also, the two service lids are replaced with a bigger one.

As for the sides, they remain without any noticeable change compared to the older model. Still measuring around 24 mm, you can find the usual set of ports and still evenly distributed like the old 450 G3. The left side holds the main exhaust grill, DC charging port, HDMI, VGA (for whoever still uses that), USB 3.0, USB-C 3.0, and an SD card reader. Unfortunately, turning to the other side of the notebook reveals only two other USB 2.0 connectors. So there’s one USB 3.0 port missing from the previous version. Instead, its place is taken by the Type-C connector. Anyway, there’s also the optical drive, 3.5 mm audio jack and the LAN port.

The interior is very much the same except for the touchpad. Now instead of using dedicated mouse buttons, there’s a single trackpad area with relatively smooth surface and accurate clicky feedback. It also feels much bigger and definitely more responsive and not as stiff as the one we’ve tested on other HP notebooks like the HP Pavilion 15, Pavilion 17 and the HP Pavilion 15 Gaming. The same goes for the HP Omen 15 (2016) as well. Anyway, the surface around the keyboard is again brushed aluminum with slightly concaved keyboard tray for extra ergonomics. Speaking of the keyboard, it’s pretty much the same but doesn’t actually feel that familiar. The travel of the keys is shorter but the excellent feedback has remained so we can still say it’s still a high-quality keyboard.

Again, we are happy with the design and build quality of the machine, although we remain uncertain of its ability to compete against similarly priced models with a better choice of materials. Yes, not necessarily business-oriented, but still worth considering – Lenovo Ideapad 510, Acer Aspire V3 series or even the Acer TravelMate X349-M, which is in the same ballpark but has a smaller 14-inch screen.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The notebook is super easy to upgrade when it comes to storage and RAM but unlike last year’s model, the ProBook 450 G4 doesn’t offer easy access to the battery so you need to perform a full disassembly to access it.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

Luckily, the ProBook 450 G4 retains the M.2 SATA SSD slot present in the previous generation. It supports 2280 sticks and our unit shipped with one. However, the 2.5-inch drive was nowhere to be found.

Also, the location of the M.2 slot has been moved from right to left.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1002 256GB (SATA, 2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Free Upgrade options

RAM

The laptop supports two RAM slots compatible with DDR4-2133. Our unit came with just one 8GB Samsung chip.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB RAM DDR4-2133
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is found under the main service lid, right next to one of the RAM slots. It’s manufactured by Intel with model number 7265NGW.

The battery – as we mentioned above – has to be accessed after a full disassembly is performed as shown in the photos below. The units itself is rated at 48Wh.

If you need any more information regarding the disassembly process, we suggest heading to our dedicated article.

Display quality

HP’s ProBook 450 G4 swaps last year’s TN panel with a different one and we’ve got the Full HD version. However, some of the results don’t necessarily show better image quality. The ProBook 450 G4 uses a CHI MEI CM15E3 TN display with 1920 x 1080 resolution, 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are poor due to the use of TN panel.

The maximum recorded brightness in the middle is 202 cd/m2 while the average value is 188 cd/m2 with maximum deviation of 11% in the lower center section of the surface. The color temperature is slightly deviating from the optimal 6500K – 7100K so it’s hard to notice the blue-ish tints in some colors. The contrast ratio is rather low – 330:1 before and 270:1 after calibration.

The maximum dE2000 (color deviation) is 3.4 while values above 4.0 are unwanted. Refer to the image below for more information.

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

We found the sRGB coverage slightly below the average for this price range – 49%, which means that less than half of the colors can be reproduced by the screen.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut with and without our custom “Office/Web Design work” profile.

The “Office/Web Design Work” profile has been created with a target color temperature equal to 6500K, gamma set to sRGB mode and 140 cd/m2 luminance.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 14 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

We were pleased by the results from our tests because the equipment recorded high-frequency PWM only below 60 cd/m2 while the rest of the brightness levels were PWM-free. Just make sure you use the laptop above 51% brightness and you are set for long hours of work without any eye strain.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

HP ProBook 450 G4’s Full HD TN panel doesn’t surprise us with good picture quality, nor does it show any significant – or any improvement for that matter – compared to last year’s model in this regard but there’s one big change here that’s worth mentioning – the absence of PWM above 51% brightness.

This will ensure comfortable work during long hours in front of the screen and besides, most users looking for a budget business notebook don’t need flawless IPS panels for multimedia or work. If need a better all-rounder with crisp IPS panel, we suggest looking for the similarly-priced Lenovo Ideapad 510.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP ProBook 450 G4 configurations with 15.6″ CHI MEI CM15E3 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hbZMqZ

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good and there’s no significant distortion in low or high frequencies.

Specs sheet

Processor Intel Core i7-7500U (2-core, 2.70 – 3.50 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2133 MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD + 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel, matte
Optical drive Yes
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n (2×2), Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.0
  • webcam
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • SD card reader
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • RJ-45 (LAN)
Battery 3-cell, 48Wh
Thickness 24.4 mm (0.96″)
Weight 2.04 kg (4.5 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for the writing of this review and if you also wish to perform a clean install, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from HP’s official support page.

Battery

Despite the small change in battery capacity from last year’s model, the 48Wh unit on the ProBook 450 G4 proved to be more than enough to keep the system running for long periods of time. The new alteration scored more than 30% better than its predecessor thanks to the optimised Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U processor.

As always, all battery tests were performed using the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

Way above the average result that we’ve expected – 500 minutes (8 hours and 20 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Significantly lower but still surprisingly good result – 400 minutes (6 hours and 40 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery with just 213 minutes (3 hours and 33 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.95
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.24-17.97%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD A8-7410 (2-cores, 2.2 - 2.5 GHz)2.09-47.09%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63-8.1%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.21-18.73%
Acer Aspire E5-572G Intel Core i7-4712MQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.3 GHz)6.57+66.33%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.20-18.99%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)521
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)440-15.55%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD A8-7410 (2-cores, 2.2 - 2.5 GHz)332-36.28%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)486-6.72%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)442-15.16%
Acer Aspire E5-572G Intel Core i7-4712MQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.3 GHz)727+39.54%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444-14.78%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.45
HP ProBook 450 G3 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.73+18.8%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD A8-7410 (2-cores, 2.2 - 2.5 GHz)26.5+51.86%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.5+0.29%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.15+15.47%
Acer Aspire E5-572G Intel Core i7-4712MQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.3 GHz)13.24-24.13%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.21+15.82%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.946 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)

The NVIDIA GeForce 930MX chip is based on the same 28nm process as the whole Maxwell family and uses the GM108 chip as the previous GeForce 930M GPU. However, some alterations have allowed for the GeForce 930MX to perform better than its predecessor.

Now the 930MX GPU supports GDDR5 memory, although not every OEM will use it and the most commonly found versions are with DDR3 VRAM. Furthermore, the GeForce 930MX is clocked higher (1019 – 1176 MHz) and this alone will bring the performance closer to the GeForce 940M. But most of the specs remain the same – 384 CUDA cores, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs and 64-bit memory interface.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-930mx-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)9106
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6322-30.57%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)6322-30.57%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)9057-0.54%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5207199-20.94%
Acer Aspire E5-572G NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)8764-3.76%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)5036-44.7%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)1570
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1214-22.68%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)1214-22.68%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)1658+5.61%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520380-75.8%
Acer Aspire E5-572G NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)1608+2.42%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)919-41.46%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)5070
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4248-16.21%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)4248-16.21%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)5685+12.13%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5203125-38.36%
Acer Aspire E5-572G NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)-
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)3052-39.8%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)443
HP ProBook 450 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329-25.73%
HP ProBook 455 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340 (2GB DDR3)329-25.73%546 EUR- EUR
(-)
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)455+2.71%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520235-46.95%
Acer Aspire E5-572G NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)438-1.13%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)242-45.37%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 118 fps 87 fps 62 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 40 fps 30 fps 21 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 64 fps 23 fps – fps

Temperatures

Our series of stress tests are not the best representation of real-life use but at the same time, they give us a good glimpse of how the system will perform in the long run. It’s also a good way to determine the stability of the cooling system under heavy load.

We start with 100% CPU load for an hour. The CPU was able to reach its maximum operating frequency of 3.5 GHz for less than a minute and then slowly declined to 3.0 GHz, which is still within the limits of the CPU. Even temperatures were relatively low as the monitoring software showed 68 °C.

We started the GPU stress test as well and temperatures did rose up to 79 °C while the GPU maintained stable 71 °C. At first, the graphics card was able to reach its maximum potential but then returned to its base frequency of 1019 MHz. No throttling occurred during the whole test.

Temperatures on the surface were also pretty low so even under heavy load, the cooling system will provide smooth and cool performance.

Verdict

The new HP ProBook 450 G4 delivered even more than we expected. It brings a slightly altered design, which isn’t prone to smudges and fingerprints anymore, but retains the good choice of materials and feel. Maybe it’s not a big improvement compared to the previous version but it’s definitely not a step back either. If anything, there’s a small decline in weight and size over the ProBook 450 G3. Moreover, the ProBook 450 G4 introduces the already excellent keyboard from the last generation while revamping the touchpad, which offered nothing less than good experience. It’s nowhere near the Pavilion 15’s stiff and almost unusable touchpad.

What really matters, though, is under the hood. With the new Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U processor, the HP ProBook 450 G4 offers elevated performance and more power on the go away from the charger. The shift from the AMD Radeon R7 M340 to the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX is another welcomed change as the GPU is suitable not only for multimedia but for some light gaming as well. Not to mention the much-appreciated support for M.2 SATA SSDs, which is a rare find in this price range.

But not all is perfect. As always, there’s still something more to ask for. For instance, the lack of another USB-A 3.0 connector is a big miss and the image quality is somehow subpar even for a budget business laptop. The latter is compensated with the lack of PWM above 51% (60 cd/m2) brightness, though.

Do we still recommend the HP ProBook 450 G4? For sure! Fortunately, the laptop still sits on the top of our list of budget-friendly business solutions and it won’t be going away anytime soon.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2ifHgtJ

Pros

  • Sturdy and practical design
  • Excellent input devices
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM from 51% brightness (60 cd/m2) and above
  • Supports M.2 SATA SSDs
  • Excellent battery life

Cons

  • Only one USB-A 3.0 connector
  • Screen with low contrast and narrow sRGB coverage
  • The battery isn’t user-accessible anymore

Lenovo Ideapad 310 review – a decent budget all-rounder

$
0
0

In this review, we are going to focus on one of Lenovo’s new budget offers from the consumer Ideapad family – the Ideapad 310. It’s a decently designed affordable 15-inch solution with generally new hardware but not necessarily future-proof. However, the Ideapad 310 is an excellent everyday workforce on the go due to its seemingly rigid construction, comfortable keyboard and stealth hinge.

Unfortunately, it’s hard to miss some of its similarly priced direct competitors like the Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) or the ASUS X556UQ, all of which offer the same CPU, if not better, and a considerably faster GPU – the GeForce 940M or 940MX. It’s hard to compete with the GeForce 920M for sure. But are there any other reasons to consider buying the Ideapad 310 over the aforementioned laptops? Let’s find out.

You can see most of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2hjQ326

Contents

Retail package

The box containing the laptop didn’t come offer anything out of the ordinary – just the usual user manuals, the AC cord and charging adapter.

Design and construction

The notebook offers clean in generally simplistic design and plastic is the main choice for the build. Its weight and height are average for its class (22.9 mm and 2.2 kg) but at least rigidness isn’t sacrificed for the most part that is..

The silver-colored lid makes the laptop look a bit more sophisticated and resembles anodized aluminum plate. Although, it bends under pressure but not enough to make any difference in practice. Still, we recommend not leaving any heavy objects not to damage the LCD screen. So the laptop has a single-hinge design that feels pretty stealth, smooth and not overly tightened. The weight distribution allows the notebook to be opened using only one hand, whereas the bottom features hard, rugged, black plastic, which we are all used to seeing on most laptops. It doesn’t quite complete the whole design concept but at least feels sturdy enough to withstand some hard handling. There are some big vent openings placed on it along with two service hatches for easier upgrade. We will address this later in the review.

The sides are black, flat and adopt the same black plastic as the bottom piece. Measuring just around 22.9 mm, they don’t seem to miss out on any major connectivity options and the distribution seems fine. On the left we got the DC charging connector, VGA, LAN, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm audio jack and an SD card reader while the right side features only two USB 2.0 connectors and the optical drive.

The interior, however, is a whole another story. It’s sturdy from top to bottom except for the very middle of the keyboard, which sinks in a little but only under strong pressure and won’t be any problem in practice. The touchpad area is rather small for a 15-inch form factor and the mouse keys are slightly stiffer to our taste but perform well. The keyboard, on the other hand, feels really comfortable with the well-known AccuType design. The travel distance of the keys is average but the stiff feedback at the beginning of the movement makes up for accurate, fast and comfortable typing experience.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The Ideapad 310 offers fairly easy upgrade via the service lids on the bottom. But if wish to access the cooling fan or the battery, a full disassembly is required.

img_20161116_162429

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD

The notebook uses only one 2.5-inch HDD without the M.2 SSD option. The HDD is located under the small service hatch in the lower left corner. Our unit shipped with 1TB WD Blue drive spinning at 5400 rpm.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD 1TB HDD WD Blue Upgrade options

img_20161116_162448

RAM

The bigger service lid offers access to the RAM slot and the Wi-Fi card. Our unit came with the only RAM slot occupied by a Samsung 8GB DDR4-2133 chip but there’s another one soldered to the motherboard – 4GB DDR4-2133. This means that the maximum memmory allowed by the motherboard is 12GB.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB RAM DDR4-2133

img_20161116_162543

Other components

As we already mentioned, the Wi-Fi card is located right next to the RAM chip and it’s made by Lenovo itself with model number SW10A11648.

img_20161116_162535

If you need to access the battery, though, you have to perform a full disassembly. This requires the optical drive to be removed, along with all the screws around the bottom and under the service covers. Also, watch out for the cables attached right next to the Wi-Fi card. The unit is rated at 30Wh.

img_20161116_162737
img_20161116_163222
img_20161116_163134

If you need any more information regarding the disassembly process, we suggest heading to our dedicated article.

Display quality

We took the time to test two versions of the Ideapad 310 – one with Core i5-6200U and one with Core i5-7200U and both use different panels. This is helpful to those of you who can’t make a decision between the two versions of the laptop, so let’s clear things out.

The Core i5-6200U model that we tested features a Full HD TN display with 1920 x 1080 resolution, 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. It’s manufactured by BOE with model number NT156FHM-N31 while the Core i5-7200U version offers again BOE-made display with model number N156BGA-EB2 but sports HD (1366×768) resolution.

Since both displays are TN, viewing angles are poor.

The HD display offers 198 cd/m2 brighntess in the middle and 190 cd/m2 as average with just 10% deviation – lower right corner. Whereas the Full HD variant delivers 188 cd/m2 maximum brightness in the center of the screen and 187 cd/m2 average across the surface with 11% deviation – again in the lower right corner.

The color temperature of the HD display is 7000K with 410:1 contrast ratio before calibration and 360:1 after. The second display (the Full HD version) offers closer to the optimal color temperature – 6800K and slightly higher contrast – 470:1 before calibration and 450:1 after calibration.

The color deviation isn’t too high on both displays with the HD panel scoring 2.4 and the Full HD one reaching as high as 2.8. Values above 4.0 are unwanted.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

There’s no significant difference between both displays as the HD panel covers 51% of the sRGB gamut while the Full HD variant offers 50% coverage.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut with and without our custom “Office/Web Design work” profile.

The “Office/Web Design Profile” uses gamma in sRGB mode, 140 cd/m2 brightness and D65 white point.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 18 ms on the HD display and 13 ms on the Full HD variant.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Here’s where both panels get really different as the HD display uses PWM only at really low brightness levels and will me suitable for long hours of work without puting any unnecessary strain to one’s eyes.

The Full HD panel, on the other hand, uses PWM from 0 to 99% brightness but with high frequency, which reduces the negative impact to some extent and some users might not notice it.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

Both panels have pretty similar properties, with the small exceptions of resolution and PWM. They are mostly on par with what the industry offers and will be suitable for general office work and browsing. If you need a similar-speced laptop with better image quality, we suggest opting for the Ideapad 510. It’s just a tad more expensive but it’s definitely worth it.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Ideapad 310 configurations with 15.6″ BOE N156BGA-EB2 (HD, 1366 × 768) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2i253Bb

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

And as for the Full HD (1920×1080) TN version BOE NT156FHM-N31, you can find all the profiles below.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

These specs apply for the tested unit only

CPU Intel Core i5-7200U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 12GB (1x 8096MB + soldered 1x 4096MB) – DDR4, 2133 MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 1TB of HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch – 1366 x 768 (HD) TN, glossy
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • webcam
  • microphone
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • 4-in-1 card reader (MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC)
  • RJ-45
  • stereo loudspeakers with Dolby Audio
Battery 30Wh
Thickness 22.9 mm (0.90″)
Weight 2.2 kg (4.8 lbs)

Software

We used a fresh install of Windows 10 (64-bit) for our review and we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official website if you are planning to perform a clean install yourself.

Battery

Due to the low battery capacity of just 30Wh, we can’t really expect any record-breaking results. However, the results appear to be even lower than expected. It seems that the Core i5-7200U CPU can do so much in terms of energy efficiency.

As usual, all tests were run with these settings: Wi-Fi running constantly, Windows power saving feature switched on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

Slightly below average result – 267 minutes (4 hours and 27 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Just about the same runtime – 276 minutes (4 hours and 36 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery scoring just 95 minutes (1 hour and 35 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.66
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22-12.02%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)2.76-24.59%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)484
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)441-8.88%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)400-17.36%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.66
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.78+17.67%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 Intel Core i3-6100U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.3 GHz)23.14+31.03%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.393 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)

The NVIDIA GeForce 920MX is a 920M refresh with slightly increased performance and now supports GDDR5 memory, although, most notebook will still ship with the 2GB DDR3 standard for low-end GPUs.

The 920MX is based on the GM108 Maxwell GPU on the 28nm node, but with a number of disabled shading units. While the GM108 features 384 CUDA cores, the 920MX uses only 256 of those with 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The memory capacity is 2GB using DDR3 and connected via 64-bit interface.

The GPU itself is clocked at 1072 MHz with 1176 MHz boost clock while the memory is clocked at 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective). The TDP of the GPU is rated at around 16W and will most probably deliver performance similar to the GeForce 930M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-920mx-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)8074
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)12603+56.09%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)8504+5.33%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)1327
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2239+68.73%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)1520+14.54%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)4646
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)7253+56.11%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)5250+13%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)408
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)604+48.04%
Dell Vostro 14 5459 NVIDIA GeForce 930M (2GB DDR3)422+3.43%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 101 fps 61 fps 46 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 32 fps 25 fps 17 fps

Temperatures

This test doesn’t represent real-life usage since the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load at the same time for more than a few minutes but it helps us assess the cooling system and the stability of the notebook in the long run. Also, we have to note that we ran the stress test on the Core i5-6200U version and we doubt there will be any significant difference between the this and the Core i5-7200U model in terms of cooling capabilities.

When we ran the CPU stress test at first, things appeared to be pretty normal with the CPU running cool and reaching the maximum 2.7 GHz frequency for four active cores.

But when we ran the GPU torture test as well, the CPU toned down to 2.3 GHz, which is still in the normal realm but the GPU throttled after some time, even though the GPU’s temperature was pretty low. Anyway, we can’t consider this as a major issue because the notebook isn’t designed for such long and intensive workload.

Temperatures on the surface were fine as well so users won’t have to worry about the heat.

Verdict

The Lenovo Ideapad 310 is okay in most aspects. For the asking price, you get the latest generation Intel Core i5 or Core i7 processor paired with NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, which can be considered as slightly underpowered compared to other alternatives on the market but does its job well. Also, gaming is possible… conditionally. For a few extra bucks, you can snatch the more powerful Ideapad 510, which also boasts an IPS panel making the multimedia experience far better.

Speaking of the display, you won’t find any significant difference between the Full HD and HD variants but for those with sensitive eyes, we suggest optin for the less-detailed HD display as it doesn’t flicker from 70 cd/m2 (48%) and above. Our tests confirm that the specs are on par with what the industry offers at this price range. Nonetheless, if you still want to opt for the Full HD display, you can just install our Health-Guard profile and forget about it.

The build qality is relatively good – no surprises here as well. However, we were especially delighted by the comfortable keyboard. We are happy to see that Lenovo once again starts to put some effort in its low-end laptops when it comes to input devices.

At the end of the day, the Lenovo Ideapad 310 is your average daily driver for your browsing and office work but don’t expect it to work long hours away from the charger. It’s really hard to recommend it among the vast variety of budget solutions, especially when laptops like the Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) and the Lenovo Ideapad 510 stand out so much. Also, if you intend to use it for business, we suggest looking elsewhere. For example, the Dell Vostro 5459 or our all-time favorite HP ProBook 450 G4.

You can see most of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2hjQ326

Pros

  • Decent design and build
  • Good keyboard
  • The HD panel doesn’t use PWM above 48% (70 cd/m2)

Cons

  • Slightly below average battery life
  • The Full HD variant uses PWM from 0 to 99% brightness (the Health-Guard profile fixes that)

Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) review – a big step forward

$
0
0

At the beginning of this year, we published a review of the Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) mid-range laptop with some great specs and excellent usability for the asking price. And here we are with the latest alteration of the notebook at the end of this year. The new F5-573G model offers not only a prominent – and much-welcomed – visual upgrade but also packs the latest hardware Intel and NVIDIA can offer right now.

The new changes in the Aspire F 15 allow for a big performance leap along with changed screen. The previous model’s screen was somehow underwhelming even for the asking price, but today’s model will surprise you with some excellent screen properties for a TN panel. With this, the Aspire F 15 could be the best lower mid-range all-rounder currently available capable of gaming as well. Let’s see what else the machine has to offer.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2iIv59o

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a standard Acer box with all the user manuals included. You will also find the usual AC cord and charger.

Design and construction

The design of the current iteration hasn’t been changed completely but offers some noticeable visual and practical updates to the casing. The previous model had a pretty interesting choice of materials with the main one being plastic imitating some kind of fabric, like denim. This way the notebook stands out but fails to win over some of the most pretentious users. It wasn’t really everyone’s cup of tea. Luckily, the new chassis rights all wrongs with a completely different approach, which is rather common but more widely accepted.

The lid is no longer plastic and instead, now offers sturdy black brushed aluminum plate. It barely bends when pressed but it’s susceptible to twists. Nothing that will ruin the overall experience, though. The hinges are well tightened while still allowing the opening of the lid with just one hand. As for the bottom piece of the machine – it’s mostly the same except for the added service covers for easier access to some of the hardware. Kudos for that.

The sides are mostly the same, although the newer generation adds less than a millimeter of thickness (28.45 mm from 27.94 mm). On the left, we find the main exhaust grill, one USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) connector, LAN, VGA, HDMI and two USB 3.0 ports. While on the right, you will see only one USB 2.0 port, the 3.5 mm audio jack, and the optical drive.

Probably the interior is the only thing that hasn’t gone through any changes. We still have the brushed aluminum surface around the input devices, which is prone to smudges and fingerprints. It also feels fairly stable and pleasant to touch. The keyboard offers comfortable ergonomic keys with long travel and typing on them is a pleasure. Kind words go for the touchpad as well – clicky, stable, accurate and has good gliding surface. Probably one of the best aspects of this notebook.

If the first generation of Aspire F 15 didn’t suit you in terms of design and durability, the new generation fixes all that was wrong. We end up with excellently built, good looking chassis with comfortable and responsive input devices. The only small drawbacks that we can think of are the slightly awkward positioning of the connectors (some peripherals will get in the way when working on the machine since they are too close to the edge) and the lack of LED keyboard illumination, although the latter isn’t very common in this price range.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The full disassembly of the notebook is pretty easy and the access to the commonly upgradeable uptions is even easier. Unlike the last generation, the new Aspire F 15 offers a big service lid giving you access to storage and RAM.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 SATA SSD

Quite surprisingly, the new Aspire F 15 offers not only the usual 2.5-inch HDD – which in our case is Seagate 1TB – but also has an M.2 SATA SSD slot supporting 2280 sticks. Our unit came with pre-installed Samsung PM871 drive.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD 1TB HDD WD Blue Upgrade options
M.2 SATA SSD Samsung PM871 256GB M.2 SATA SSD Upgrade options

RAM

Under the service cover, you will find two RAM slots as well. In our case, they are both occupied by SK Hynix 8GB DDR4-2133 chips.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB RAM DDR4-2133
Slot 2 8GB RAM DDR4-2133

Other components

Full disassembly is required in order to reach the Wi-Fi card. It’s Intel-made with model number 3165NGW.

The battery is located in the upper part of the chassis and it’s rated at 62Wh. Quite easy to replace.

Cooling system

The cooling system is quite simple – just two copper heat pipes connecting the main heat sink to the cooling fan. It seems that it does its job quite well.

If you need any more information about the disassembly process, please visit our dedicated article.

Display quality

Interestingly, the Acer Aspire F5-573G shares the same Full HD TN panel with another two Acer-made laptops from the upper mid-range segment – the Aspire V15 (V5-591G) and the Aspire V15 (V3-575G). They boast the so-called ColorBlast technology assuring full coverage of the sRGB gamut but since the MSI PX60-6QE is paired with the same display showing mostly the same performance, we can easily say that this “technology” is actually a quality TN panel with good properties. We are talking Innolux N156HGE-EAL.

Nevertheless, this shift is more than welcomed because one of the main drawbacks from the previous version was the lackluster display. Anyway, the usual specs for 15.6-inch 1080p display apply – 142 ppi, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

The display offers poor viewing angles due to the nature of TN panels.

The maximum recorded brightness in the middle of the screen is 219 cd/m2 and 213 cd/m2 across the surface, which means only 7% deviation. The color temperature is exactly 7500K or in other words, 1000K more than the optimal D65. Colors will appear slightly blue-ish or just “colder”. The contrast ratio is fairly low – 350:1.

The maximum color deviation (dE2000) is 1.8 – an excellent result considering that values above 4.0 are unwanted.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Quite expectedly, the display covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and 96% of the DCI-P3. That’s an excellent result especially for a notebook at this price range featuring a TN display.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut with and without our custom “Office/Web Design work” profile.

The “Office/Web Design Work” profile has been created with a target color temperature equal to 6500K, gamma set to sRGB mode and 140 cd/m2 luminance.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

And here’s where this particular panel differs from the previous ones we’ve tested. While the others had PWM from 0 to 99% brightness, the Aspire F5-573G’s display flickers even at 100%. At least, the frequency of the emitted light is slightly higher than usual (1 kHz), which significantly reduces the negative impact on one’s eyesight. However, you can always use our Health-Guard profile that eliminates the PWM, which would be of great help in this particular situation.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

While this display can’t fit the price range of the previously mentioned Acer Aspire laptops and the significantly higher-priced MSI PX60-6QE, it sure does make a great impression in this price range. The previous Acer Aspire F5-572G suffered from poor picture quality but the new F5-573G fixes that and exceeds our expectations with an excellent TN panel. Some of the properties need further adjustment like PWM, gamma, white point and color accuracy but our profiles aim to fix all of this. Otherwise, the PWM and low contrast will me problematic for some users.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) configurations with 15.6″ INNOLUX N156HGE-EAL (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2iIv59o

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The stereo sound appears to be good without any noticeable distortions in high and low frequencies.

Specs sheet

The specs sheet provided below is for the model used in this review. Hardware specification may vary depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i7-6500U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4-2133
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch (39.62 cm) – 1920×1080 (Full HD) TN, matte
Optical Drive DVD burner
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11аc, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen 1)
  • webcam
  • microphone
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45
  • VGA
  • SD card reader
Battery 4-cell, 62Wh
Thickness 28.45 mm (1.12″)
Weight 2.412 kg (5.32 lbs)

Software

Our notebook came with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) and we used it for our review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS or your notebook didn’t ship with Windows, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

Along with all the visual and hardware upgrades, the new version also packs some serious battery capacity of 62Wh. The last alteration had a 37Wh unit, which lead to unsatisfactory results. So the 68% increase in battery capacity translates into a massive 121% jump in web browsing runtimes. This is probably the only reason since the CPU (Core i7-6500U) and the display (Full HD, TN) are shared in both configurations we’ve tested.

All tests were performed with the usual settings – Windows power saving feature turned on, Wi-Fi running all the time and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

net

Outstanding battery runtime – 575 minutes (9 hours and 35 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

movie

Although slightly lower, the 471 minutes (7 hours and 51 minutes) score is still an excellent result.

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

game

As always, we run this test only for evaluation reasons since there won’t be any users who start a gaming session away from the power cord but the results are pretty good nonetheless – 183 minutes (3 hours and 3 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i7-6500U

corei7Intel Core i7-6500U is part of the Skylake generation processors and it’s entitled to the ULV lineup (ultra-low voltage) with 14nm FinFET manufacturing process. It has two cores that support Hyper-Threading technology resulting in up to 4 threads. The chip is a direct successor to the Core i7-5500U Broadwell CPU expecting slightly better performance with emphasis on the power efficiency features.

The CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and can go up to 3.1 GHz for one active core or 3.0 GHz for two active cores. Also, the silicon includes an Intel HD Graphics 520 iGPU that sports 24 Execution Units ticking at 300 MHz and can go up to 1.05 GHz. The whole SoC supports DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory in a dual-channel array. So the whole chip is rated at 15W TDP including the memory controller and the integrated graphics thus making it suitable for 11-inch notebooks or bigger. It also supports the cTDP down feature and the OEM can lower the TDP to 7.5W.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63
ASUS X550VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)5.34+47.11%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.95+8.82%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)2.14-41.05%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)483
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)486+0.62%
ASUS X550VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)479-0.83%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)521+7.87%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)316-34.58%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.45
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.5+0.29%
ASUS X550VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)14.49-16.96%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.45
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel Pentium 3825U (2-cores, 1.9 - 1.9 GHz)29.80+70.77%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-6500U reached 6.124 million moves per second. By comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB GDDR5)

geforce_gtx_960m_0Announced back in 2015, the GeForce GTX 950M GPU is part of NVIDIA’s Maxwell family and it’s a direct successor to the 850M GPU. It’s manufactured in 28nm and can be found in two variants – with standard DDR3 VRAM and with GDDR5.

Aside from the memory difference, both variants largely the same specs – GM107 GPU core clocked at 914 MHz going up to 1124 MHz using 128-bit (5000 MHz effective clock) GDDR5 memory. Also, the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs remain unchanged but the use of GDDR5 boost the performance of the GPU significantly.

The GTX 950M with GDDR5 memory should perform much better than its DDR3 counterpart and 15% slower than the GTX 960M making it an ideal choice for budget-friendly 15-inch or 17-inch laptops.

Some of the features include 6th generation PureVideo HD (VP6) video engine for better decoding performance of H.264 and MPEG-2 files.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-950m-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)21620
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)9057-58.11%
ASUS X550VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)25691+18.83%
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)9106-57.88%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)3786-82.49%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)3414
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)1658-51.44%
ASUS X550VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)3613+5.83%
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)1570-54.01%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)442-87.05%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)10927
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)5685-47.97%
ASUS X550VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)11667+6.77%
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)5070-53.6%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)1544-85.87%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)1013
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-572G) NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2GB DDR3)455-55.08%
ASUS X550VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)1042+2.86%
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)443-56.27%
Acer Aspire E15 (E5-573) Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)139-86.28%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 110 fps 91 fps 80 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 50 fps 36 fps 25 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 79 fps 32 fps – fps

hitman-2016

HITMAN (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 37 fps 20 fps – fps

We’ve noticed that the current NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB GDDR5) performs slower than usual. However, we didn’t record any thermal throttling so it might be from the early testing sample we’ve received from Acer.

Temperatures

The stress tests that we perform aren’t exactly the best way to represent real-life use. But it does help us assess the cooling design and the stability of the system in the long run.

We start off with 100% CPU load for an hour. The processor was able to keep its maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 3.0 GHz for two active cores during the first part of the test.

When we turned on the GPU stress test, temperatures rose quite a lot and the CPU toned down to 2.7 GHz, which is still in the Turbo Boost range. The GPU was also able to perform to its fullest, although both chips (the CPU and GPU) were running quite hot.

Despite the higher inner temperatures, the chassis on remained cool on the surface with the only area being a tad warm is the center of the keyboard.

Verdict

Hands down, one of the best mid-range devices we’ve tested so far. The build quality is good with an excellent choice of materials. The typing experience is just a delight with the only thing missing being the LED illumination. We also have to give credit to the big and responsive touchpad. However, portability isn’t its strongest suit.

What the Aspire F5-573G fails to deliver in terms of portability, compensates with excellent performance and a cooling system to support it. Moreover, for the given relatively small price, you can benefit from the powerful GTX 950M with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, an energy-efficient Core i5 or Core i7 CPU from the ULV lineup and plenty of storage that includes an M.2 SATA SSD. Speaking of energy consumption, the new F5-573G boasts a significantly bigger battery pack that boosts the overall endurance of the machine with the whopping 121% making it one of the most balanced mid-range solutions when it comes to price, performance, build quality and endurance.

Finally, we want to comment a bit on the screen. It’s definitely a huge step in the right direction compared to the previous generation because now the Aspire F 15 boasts a 100% sRGB coverage and decent overall properties for a TN panel. However, the relatively low-frequency PWM, which is present in all brightness levels, might be a deal-breaker for some. Luckily, our Health-Guard profile eliminates this issue.

All in all, the new Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) succeeds where the previous model failed while standing on some solid key selling points beating the competition with ease. It’s definitely a bang for the bucks. Still, there are some similarly-priced alternatives on the market like the ASUS X550VX, which drags behind when it comes to battery life and image quality. And then, there’s the Lenovo Ideapad 510, which offers superior IPS panel but fails to deliver the Acer Aspire F 15’s performance.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2iIv59o

Pros

  • Solid build quality and good design
  • Good keyboard and touchpad
  • Excellent price/performance ratio
  • Good TN panel with 100% sRGB coverage
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Supports M.2 SATA SSDs

Cons

  • Lack of keyboard LED backlight
  • The screen uses PWM at 1 kHz from 0 to 100% brightness (our Health-Guard profile fixes that)

Lenovo Ideapad 510 review – good multimedia experience has never been so affordable

$
0
0

The Lenovo Ideapad 510 might seem like the average budget-oriented notebook at first but actually, the device has a lot more to offer than its competitors and the difference is in the details. It comes as a breath of fresh air after the Ideapad 310, which lacked several key features for its asking price but if you are willing to spend just a few dollars extra, we strongly recommend the Ideapad 510 over the lower-end Ideapad 310.

Why? Because it sports the same hardware as the similarly priced ASUS X556 and the Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) – Intel Core i5-7200U (or Core i7-7500U), 8GB of DDR4-2133 RAM and a GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3) GPU running the graphically intensive task. What sets the Ideapad 510 apart from its rivals, though, is the Full HD IPS panel. The latter makes it a very lucrative offer, especially if you are looking into the multimedia-centric segment of the market. We can easily say it’s just a much better version of the old Lenovo Z51-70, which had similar aesthetics and hardware but lacked the crisp IPS display. Now let’s dig deep into this budget gem right here and find out more about it.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2iFmcAy

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in the usual boxing with the well-known user manuals and AC adapter.

Design and construction

As we already stated, the Ideapad 510 is visually similar to the old Z51-70 but feels much more refined now with better choice of materials. It’s also relatively lightweight and slim tipping the scale at 2.2 kg and measuring just 22.9 mm in height. Of course, most of the chassis uses plastic but it doesn’t feel cheap to touch and the aluminum interior makes up for great feel and stability during work.

Plastic is used for the lid. It has that slightly rugged, yet soft matte finish and under direct light can be mistaken for an anodized aluminum plate due to the metallic paint. And even though it’s plastic, it’s not that easy to bend but under bigger pressure ripples appear on the LCD screen. Though, it’s nothing to worry about during normal exploitation. The lid is held by a single-hinge design, which feels sturdy, stealth with linear travel and allows opening the laptop with just one hand all the way down to 180 degrees. As for the bottom piece, it’s made of the usual hard black plastic we are used to seeing in a number of laptops. It’s identical to the one on the Ideapad 310 with the small service hatch for the HDD and the rest of the upgradeable hardware.

The sides are relatively thin but still adopt the bare minimum of ports you’d expect. They are also evenly distributed on the sides with DC, VGA, HDMI, 3.5 mm audio jack, SD card reader and USB 3.0 positioned on the left and the optical drive along with another USB 3.0 and a USB 2.0 on the right. This clears up some room on the right side for the mouse, for example, if the working space is tight. We noticed one build flaw, though. The plastic side that meets with the aluminum plate in the interior is slightly protruding on top. When you rest your arms during typing you can feel the sharp edge on your wrists.

This brings us to the interior and input devices. The surface is made of anodized aluminum, which is kind of a fingerprint magnet but cleaning it isn’t that big of a hassle. And one of the things that really made us like the Ideapad 510 is the super comfortable keyboard. It won’t surprise you with long key travel but it will sure as hell win you over with a stiff and pleasant feedback. Quite suitable for fast and accurate typing. We are also pleased to see dedicated media control buttons making an appearance over the Numpad area of the keyboard. You can also benefit from the keyboard LED backlight, which is very well-integrated. The only thing ruining the excellent typing experience is the protruding edge around the interior that we talked about. Unfortunately, the touchpad is a bit of a let-down as the trackpad area is too small and the gliding surface will be problematic when your fingers are moist or when more precision in your movements is required. The mouse keys feel a little bit too stiff as well.

There’s not much we can complain about the Ideapad 510 considering its affordable price point. We’ve got pleasant design, good choice of materials, simplistic looks, excellent keyboard, and what appears to be a very reliable single-hinge design. We would really appreciate, though, that the successor of the Ideapad 510 will include a bigger single trackpad plate and no protruding edges around the interior.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The Lenovo Ideapad 510 is super easy to upgrade but if you want to clean up the fans or change the battery, a little more patience is required. There are two maintenance lids for easy access to storage and RAM sticks.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD

As a representative of the lower mid-range segment of the market, the notebook doesn’t have an M.2 SSD slot and instead relies only on a 2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD 1TB HDD WD Blue Upgrade options

RAM

The other, slightly bigger lid, gives access to the RAM chip slot. The only RAM slot is taken by a 4GB Samsung DDR4-2133 stick while the motherboard holds another soldered chip with 4GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 4GB RAM DDR4-2133

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is located right next to the RAM chips and it’s different from the one we saw in the Ideapad 310. It’s an Intel 3165NGW.

If you need to access the battery, though, you have to perform a full disassembly. This requires the optical drive to be removed, along with all the screws around the bottom and under the service covers. Also, watch out for the cables attached right next to the Wi-Fi card. The unit is rated at 30Wh, although Lenovo claims it’s a 39Wh battery.

You can visit our full disassembly article if you need more information.

Display quality

While the Kaby Lake and Skylake versions of this laptop feature Full HD IPS panels, they use different brands. The Kaby Lake configuration, which we are currently reviewing here, sports a BOE NV156FHM-N42 display with 1920 x 1080 resolution, 142 ppi pixel density and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

The same panel is used in the higher-end Ideapad 700 and the similarly-priced Yoga 510 but there’s a difference when it comes to specs. The presented variant in this notebook has higher contrast ratio, slightly better color reproduction out of the box and a tad higher PWM frequency while the rest is just about the same. This is due to the fact that the Ideapad 510 comes with a pre-calibrated panel straight out of the OEM so be careful when applying our profiles. The one’s in this review are specifically tailored for the Ideapad 510 and will not work properly on the previously mentioned Ideapad 700 and Yoga 510.

The display offers good viewing angles due to the use of IPS matrix.

We were able to record a maximum brightness of 264 cd/m2 in the middle of the screen and 239 cd/m2 as average across the surface. This is a slightly higher than usual deviation of 20% more prominent in the lower left corner. The color temperature is 6200K and it’s pretty close to the optimal 6500K but colors will appear slightly warmer than usual. The contrast ratio is really high – 1370:1 before calibration and 1310:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display is able to reproduce 54% of the sRGB color gamut, which is a good result for a notebook in this price range.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut with and without our custom “Office/Web Design work” profile.

The “Office/Web Design Work” profile has been created with a target color temperature equal to 6500K, gamma set to sRGB mode and 140 cd/m2 luminance.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 31 ms. You might notice the so-called ghosting effect during movies or fast-paced games.

re

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment was able to detect screen flickering from 0 to 99% brightness but at higher than usual frequency – 21.2 kHz. This means that only users with extra sensitive eyes will feel the negative impact. If you want to fully get rid of the PWM, though, we suggest using our Health-Guard profile, which eliminates the flickering.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

We are astonished by the image quality this budget all-rounder has to offer. We have near optimal color temperature out of the box, relatively accurate color reproduction, slightly above average maximum brightness and extremely high contrast ratio. The sRGB coverage could have been higher but we are getting a little bit too picky for this price point. We can easily say that it’s damn near impossible to find a similarly-priced laptop with IPS screen.

The only serious drawback would be the use of PWM from 0 to 99% brightness but this can be easily fixed with our Health-Guard profile. The rest of our profiles will improve the color accuracy, gamma and color temperature for a much better multimedia experience.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Ideapad 510 configurations with 15.6″ BOE NV156FHM-N42 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hUPdZR

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The stereo loudspeakers are good with enough clarity in the low and high frequencies with virtually impossible to detect distortions.

Specs sheet

The specs below apply for the tested model only and may differ from your’s

CPU Intel Core i5-7200U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2133 MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD up to 1TB of HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch – 1920 x 1080 (FHD) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • webcam
  • microphone
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • 4-in-1 card reader (MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC)
  • RJ-45
  • stereo loudspeakers with Dolby Audio
Battery 30Wh
Thickness 22.9 mm (0.90″)
Weight 2.2 kg (4.8 lbs)

Software

We used a freshly installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for the writing of this review. If you wish to perform a clean install as well, we suggest downloading the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official website.

Battery

After the disassembly, we found out that the battery unit listed on Lenovo’s website isn’t right. Either there are other configurations with 39Wh units or Lenovo has listed wrongly. Anyway, our unit is supplied with a 30Wh unit, which explains the poor battery life in our tests. The machine’s new much-improved energy-efficient Kaby Lake Core i5-7200U wasn’t able to deliver a satisfactory battery performance.

Of course, all tests were performed using the usual settings – Wi-Fi constantly running, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for to automatically browse through over 70 websites.

We got below average results on the web browsing test – 240 minutes (4 hours).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Even lower runtime on the video playback test – 200 minutes (3 hours and 20 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

As expected, the gaming test took a toll on the battery scoring just 85 minutes (1 hour and 25 minutes) of play time.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.54
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.66+3.39%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22-9.04%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63+2.54%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD A10-8700P (4-cores, 1.8 - 3.2 GHz)2.27-35.88%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.63+2.54%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)481
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)484+0.62%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)441-8.32%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)483+0.42%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD A10-8700P (4-cores, 1.8 - 3.2 GHz)348-27.65%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)486+1.04%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.78
Lenovo Ideapad 310 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.66-0.67%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.78+16.87%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.45-1.86%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD A10-8700P (4-cores, 1.8 - 3.2 GHz)28.32+59.28%
Dell Inspiron 5559 Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.2-3.26%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.891 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 940MX (4GB DDR3)

The NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but paired with a faster GDDR5 memory (in some cases) and slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M. However, some OEMs will still choose to use the cheaper DDR3 version of the GPU.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. Again, the memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 4GB of DDR3 VRAM. It still supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole graphics card is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-4gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB DDR3)8670
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)8074-6.87%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)12603+45.36%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)21620+149.37%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)7567-12.72%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)4619-46.72%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB DDR3)1637
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)1327-18.94%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2239+36.77%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)3414+108.55%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)1179-27.98%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)918-43.92%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB DDR3)5532
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)4646-16.02%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)7253+31.11%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)10927+97.52%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)3902-29.46%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)3216-41.87%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Ideapad 510 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB DDR3)433
Lenovo Ideapad 310 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX (2GB DDR3)408-5.77%
Acer Aspire E 15 (E5-575G) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)604+39.49%
Acer Aspire F 15 (F5-573G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)1013+133.95%
Dell Inspiron 5555 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)260-39.95%
Dell Inspiron 5559 AMD Radeon R5 M335 (2GB DDR3)248-42.73%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 75 fps 40 fps 32 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 25 fps 18 fps 13 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 37 fps 12 fps

Temperatures

The stress test that we perform can’t be taken as a good representation of real-life use because the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU load, especially for such long periods of time. Still, this is a good way to assess the cooling system’s performance under load and the reliability of the notebook in the long run.

We start off with 100% CPU load for an hour. The chip maintained pretty low temperatures while being able to utilize its full performance at 2.7 GHz with two active cores.

When we switched on the GPU stress test, though, we saw a significant increase in temperatures but the CPU was still able to maintain the base 2.5 GHz clocks. The GPU also did well at 77 °C and utilizing its full potential with 1176 MHz clock speeds.

We were also glad to see that the surface temperatures weren’t high as well. The left side of the keyboard tray got slightly warm but only after continuous heavy workload.

Verdict

If you are looking for a decent daily driver with a touch of multimedia capabilities, the Ideapad 510 should be your first choice for sure. The notebook’s build quality doesn’t amaze but it’s good, nonetheless. You can surely benefit from the excellent keyboard with LED backlight but we were kind of disappointed by the touchapd and the build inconsistencies in the interior. There’s that protruding sharp edge where your palms rest.

However, the notebook compensates with excellent IPS panel delivering outstanding image quality for its price with the only deal-breaker for some being the use of PWM. The latter can be avoided by using our Health-Guard profile, though. As far as the rest of the hardware goes, it delivers enough computing and graphics power to run the latest games on low or medium settings. If Lenovo used the GDDR5 version of the GeForce 940MX GPU, we ould have seen 20 to 30% better gaming performance. For instance, the direct rival Acer Aspire E5-575G offers better performance in this regard but lacks the crisp IPS panel. If you are willing to spend a little bit more, you can get the feature-packed refreshed Acer Aspire F5-573G with a faster GeForce GTX 950M GPU with GDDR5 VRAM. But then again, you will be sacrificing the IPS panel.

Clearly, the IPS display is the key selling point of the product and we fully understand those of you who would sacrifice battery life and performance if you want the best in class multimedia experience.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2iFmcAy

Pros

  • Good keyboard
  • Decent overall build with a small exception
  • Portable
  • Excellent IPS panel for the asking price

Cons

  • Subpar battery life
  • Protruding edge around the keyboard area
  • The screen uses PWM from 0 to 99% brightness (the Health-Guard profile fixes that)

Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) review – hefty but solid as always

$
0
0

Throughout 2016, Acer released a large number of Predator 15 and Predator 17 machines all of them offering various screen options and more importantly – different GPUs. It’s quite normal considering the fact that mid-2016 the company released a desktop-grade GTX 980-powered notebook, which went obsolete in just a few months when the OEM released its GTX 1070 and 1080-powered Predator 17.

However, if all of the above are a little over your pay grade, Acer got you covered. This hefty beast here packs a GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5) and costs way lower than its more powerful siblings. Unfortunately, though, since the notebook was released just before Intel announced its Kaby Lake quad-core CPUs, the G5-793 missed that train. We can expect a refresh in the near future, probably. But in terms of real-life performance, the Core i7-6700HQ will do just fine. But what about the rest – display quality, cooling capabilities? If the more affordable Predator 17 inherits most of its perks from the GTX 1070-powered version that we reviewed, we expect excellence.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2jAnLwZ

Contents

Retail package

Despite the G5-793 being the most affordable Predator packing a Pascal GPU right now, the packaging is still “premium”. It comes in a big black box with all the usual user manuals, DVD with drivers, AC adapter and power cord.

Design and construction

In terms of design, the G5-793 is identical to the previously reviewed G9-793 with GTX 1070 with a small decline in weight and the rear grill for the cooling keeps the old design from the previous generation of Predator 17. This one weighs 4.2 kg opposed to the 4.27 kg G9-793 with GTX 1070. The thickness remains the same – around 40 mm.

Once again, we must address the most annoying issue with this design concept – the overcrowded right side of the laptop. The most commonly used ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.0, RJ-45 and USB-C 3.1 are positioned on the right where all the cables might obstruct normal usage of an external mouse when space is scarce. While on the left, you will see the optical drive, which might be the main limitation of the port placement. Who’s still using that anyway?

Otherwise, the build quality hasn’t changed. Acer still used the polycarbonate matter finish with 40% fiberglass sheets underneath delivering extra stiffness and rigidity. The hinge feels extra solid and since the base is heavy enough, it keeps the laptop in place while opening it with one hand. The single-hinge design stretches across the whole width of the base assuring stability and stealthiness.

As we continue with the interior, we see only one significant change over the GTX 1070 and 1080 version, which isn’t a deal-breaker, but it’s a miss nonetheless. We are talking about the keyboard LED backlight. The more powerful variants offer customizable RGB LED illumination through Acer’s Predator Sense app but here, we are stuck with two zones – red for the keyboard and blue for the Numpad area. If you remember, the first Predator 17 notebook that came out with GTX 980M featured the same LED backlight. Still, this doesn’t take away the comfort and pleasure of typing on this keyboard. The key travel is good, the clickiness of the buttons offer excellent tactile feedback and they don’t seem mushy at all. Downright one of the best keyboard on a gaming machine we’ve used. In general, the touchpad is the same – responsive, good gliding surface and clicky mouse buttons. If the latter were slightly bigger it would have been much appreciated.

And since the notebook is packing a GTX 1060, which doesn’t require all that cooling power, we can easily say that this 17-incher can’t compete against some more portable alternatives like the ASUS ROG GL702 or Gigabyte’s P57WV6 for example. Nevertheless, we can expect more than excellent cooling performance considering the airflow that this case will provide.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Most of the upgrades can be done using the service lid provided on the bottom of the chassis. The disassembly process is identical to the one of the Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) but there are a few key differentiating aspects.

img_20161003_132604
img_20161003_132723

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

We reviewed the base model, which doesn’t feature an SSD and relies only on the 2.5-inch HDD. We also found out that this alteration of the Predator 17 featues only one M.2 SSD slot supporting PCIe NVMe drives in 2280 size, while the more expensive variants have two slots. However, we really doubt that you will easily find an M.2 22110 SSD, which is the second option on the G9-793, so it’s not that big of a deal anyway.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2280 M.2 slot Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD HGST 1TB 7200 rpm Upgrade options

img_20161003_132735

img_20161003_132753
img_20161003_132806
img_20161003_133603

RAM

The motherboard can hold up to 64GB of DDR4-2133 RAM but our unit came with three free slots and only one being taken by an SK Hynix 16GB chip.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 16GB DDR4-2133 RAM Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options
Slot 3 Free Upgrade options
Slot 4 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The rest of the hardware that’s replaceable is the Wi-Fi card. This time around it’s Killer Wireless 1535.

The battery is pretty easy to change after the whole bottom of the laptop is removed. It’s rated at 88.8Wh – no change over last year’s generation.

img_20161003_135318

Cooling system

The cooling system hasn’t been changed and since the system handles GTX 1070 and 1080 perfectly, we doubt it will have any problems with the GTX 1060.

img_20161003_135541
img_20161003_135536

IF you require more instructions, you can visit our full disassembly article here.

Display quality

The notebook’s display features the same panel used in the previous generation Predator 17X – LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF2 offering Full HD (1920×1080) resolution in a 17.3-inch diagonal, which means the pixel density is 127 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.1995 x 0.1995 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 69 cm.

What’s interesting, the panel seems to offer better image quality than what we’ve seen before out of the box and only small are adjustments are needed. Probably Acer did some hardware calibration before using the panel again.

Viewing angles are excellent under a 45-degree incline.

This alteration shows slightly better results when it comes to brightness levels. We recorded a maximum brightness of 374 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 363 cd/m2 as average across the surface with only -6% deviation. The color temperature is pretty close to the optimal – 6400K and colors will appear slightly warmer but it will be undetectable by most users.

As for dE2000 color deviation, the maximum value that we’ve detected is 1.9 in the lower right corner of the screen. This is an excellent result since values above 4.0 are unwanted.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Just like before, the screen scored 90% on the sRGB coverage test, which is good enough for good multimedia and gaming experience.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

We’ve created a profile with 140 cd/m2 luminance, D65(6500K) white point and 2.2 gamma.

As you can see from the previous tests, the stock calibration of the display is pretty good but gamma levels need a little fixing because dark parts of the image will appear darker. This is easily fixed by installing our Office & Web Design pre-calibrated profile.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 25 ms. A typical result for an IPS panel. Only pretentious gamers will notice the so-called ghosting effect during fast-paced games.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

As expected, our equipment wasn’t able to detect any pulsations so we consider the panel flicker-free.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

It’s good to see that the lower price hasn’t affected the screen quality of the GTX 1060-powered Predator and uses an excellent IPS panel. In fact, we were surprised by the balanced color temperature and accurate color reproduction out of the box. We think that Acer has taken some time to adjust some of the properties of the display since it differs from the one we’ve tested on the Predator 17X, although, the model is exactly the same. Still, if you want to squeeze out the maximum of the display, we suggest purchasing our custom-tailored display profiles.

Even if not, you still get some of the sweet perks this panel has to offer like 75Hz refresh rate, G-Sync native support and, of course, no PWM across all brightness levels.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) configurations with 17.3″ LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2j6eSy8

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

We found the sound quality pretty good and couldn’t detect any noticeable sound distortions at low and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The specs sheet provided below is for this model only and may vary depending on your region or configuration.

CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-core, 2.60-3.50 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM 16GB (1x 16384MB) – DDR4, 2133MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 17.3-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical Drive Super-multi DVD
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 4x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Type-C (Thunderbolt 3 support)
  • dual-zone LED keyboard backlight with different zones
  • HDMI
  • DisplayPort
  • RJ-45
  • SD card reader
  • 3.5 mm jacks for microphone and headphones
  • 6 programmable macro keys
  • 4x built-in loudspeakers + subwoofer
  • native G-Sync support
Battery 8-cell, 88.8Wh / 6000 mAh
Thickness 40 mm (1.57″)
Weight 4.27 kg (9.41 lbs) + 931 g (2.05 lbs) charging brick

Software

The notebook shipped with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) and we used it for our review. If you wish to install the OS on your own, we suggest downloading all the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

Since this is a laptop featuring a GPU from NVIDIA’s Pascal generation and supports native G-Sync on the built-in display, the notebook’s battery life is subpar. WHy is that? Because for now, the so-called Optimus feature doesn’t support the current implementation of G-Sync and thus the notebook doesn’t use the iGPU, which in this case is the Intel HD Graphics 530, for the less demanding tasks like video playback and web surfing. And as you can see from the reuslts below, the 88Wh battery just can’t keep up with this energy-sipping hardware. However, the notebook scores slightly better than the GTX 1070-powered variant that we’ve tested since the GTX 1060 has significantly lower power consumption.

All the tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving featur turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

net

Not the worst result we’ve seen but it’s definitely less than what we’ve expected from a 88Wh unit – 310 minutes (5 hours and 10 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

mov

Significantly lower result than the web browsing test – 262 minutes (4 hours and 22 minutes). That should be more than enough for a full movie.

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

game

It’s quite unlikely that you will start a gaming session without being close to a power source, but it’s good to know that you can play for more an hour – 67 minutes (1 hour and 13 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-6700HQ

corei7Intel Core i7-6700HQ represents the Skylake H family and it’s considered as a high-performance chip with high voltage – 45W TDP. This is a step down from its direct predecessor – Core i7-4700HQ but matches its short-lived predecessor Core i7-5700HQ. The Core i7-6700HQ has four cores ticking at 2.6GHz and can go up to 3.5 GHz for one active core and 3.1 GHz for four active cores. The silicon supports the so-called Hyper-Threading technology that emulates one virtual core for each physical and thus establishing a total of 8 threads.

Furthermore, the chip is manufactured using 14nm FinFET process and integrates Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU with 24 EU (Executable Units) clocked at 350 – 1050 MHz. The memory controller supports up to 64GB of DDR3 or DDR4 RAM at 1600 or 2133 MHz respectively. The CPU is suitable for heavy applications and gaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-6700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.47
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49+0.27%
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.28-2.54%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)7.83+4.82%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)833
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)827-0.72%
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)806-3.24%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)933+12%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.23
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.27+10.17%
ASUS ROG GL502VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.01+7.62%
Acer Predator 17X Intel Core i7-6820HK (4-cores, 2.7 - 3.6 GHz)9.13-10.75%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-6700HQ managed to get 12.317 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)

NIVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1060 GPU aims to be the mid-tier graphics card from the Pascal generation offering similar or even better performance than last year’s flagship models like the GTX 970M and 980M. However, the GPU will be used in high-end laptop configurations.

The graphics card is based on the GP106 chip built on the 16nm FinFET manufacturing process from TSMC paired with up to 6GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 8000 MHz effective on a 192-bit interface. The GPU also features the same amount of CUDA cores as its desktop counterpart (1280) and it’s clocked at the same frequencies – 1506 – 1708 MHz.

Depending on the cooling solution, the GPU can be found in large 17 and 15-inch notebooks but some slimmed-down 14-inch notebooks are also an option. The TDP of the GPU is somewhat lower than the last generation GTX 970M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-6gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)76678
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)84191+9.8%
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)84437+10.12%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)76639-0.05%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)11562
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)15485+33.93%
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)16225+40.33%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)11937+3.24%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)35996
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)47767+32.7%
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)51253+42.39%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)40266+11.86%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Predator 17 (G5-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)3653
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4160+13.88%
ASUS ROG GL502VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4126+12.95%
Acer Predator 17X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (8GB GDDR5)3487-4.54%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 228 fps 215 fps 174 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 113 fps 99 fps 87 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 129 fps 93 fps 38 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 110 fps 86 fps 35 fps

Tom Clancy’s The Division Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 159 fps 84 fps 19 fps

Temperatures

This stress test was downright boring but we don’t mean that in a bad way. Since we’ve tested the laptop under extreme conditions with significantly more powerful hardware, we expected more than excellent cooling performance. And here’s where the Predator 17 (G5-793) takes the lead over its more compact direct rivals. The big chassis paid off with some extra airflow and exceptionally low outer temperatures. Of course, the CPU and GPU didn’t throttle as well.

Anyway, we must note that this isn’t a good representation of real-life use because even the most graphically-intense games or apps can’t generate 100% CPU and 100% GPU usage for such long periods of time. However, it’s still a good way to assess the cooling capabilities of the system in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU load for an hour only to find out that the system was able to utilize the full performance of the chip, which is 3.1 GHz with four active cores, without breaking a sweat. Even temperatures were kind of low.

When we turned on the GPU stress test, things changed but not drastically, The CPU’s temperatures rose but didn’t cause thermal throttling. What’s interesting, the GPU was able to utilize its maximum clock speeds at first but after a while returned to its base clock of 1506 MHz without going over 64 °C, which is extremely low temperature for a GPU in a laptop.

Outer temperatures were also really low even after extremely heavy workload for more than two hours. You can see the heat map below.

Verdict

Even though the Predator 17 (G5-793) is the most affordable configuration, Acer didn’t cut any corners with it. You still get that premium feel and build with really rigid materials accompanied by the excellent input devices. There’s only one small feature that’s missing compared to the higher-end GTX 1070 and 1080 variants and that’s the customizable LED backlight. Nonetheless, this shouldn’t be a deal-breaker for most users.

In reality, the only difference between the more expensive variants is the GPU. Moreover, the pricing seems right and still plays in the ballpark of one of the most affordable GTX 1060-powered laptops. Then you might ask, what’s the trade-off here?

Well, compared to the ASUS ROG GL702, Gigabyte P57WV6 or one of MSI’s slimmed-down powerhouses, the Predator 17 is quite hefty and bulky. In return, however, you get outstanding cooling performance with really low inner and outer temperatures due to the extra airflow that the chassis provides. And, of course, you get that subpar battery performance that you get with every GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080-equipped laptop due to the missing support for NVIDIA Optimus (switchable graphics).

Finally, a few words for the display. At first, we thought the panel will have the same properties as the one on the Predator 17X with GTX 980 but we were wrong. While both machines share the same IPS panel, the one on the Predator G5-793 seems pre-calibrated and carries almost none of the drawbacks we’ve discovered before. And combined with the fast 75Hz refresh rate and silky-smooth G-Sync technology, this laptop makes no compromise in this regard.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2jAnLwZ

Pros

  • Excellent build quality
  • Good input devices
  • Excellent pre-calibrated IPS panel with 75Hz refresh rate and G-Sync support
  • The display doesn’t use PWM
  • Outstanding cooling performance

Cons

  • Hefty and bulky
  • Poor battery life
  • The right side is overcrowded with ports

Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) review – a new breed of budget gaming laptops

$
0
0

With the premium gaming laptops out of the way, it’s time to turn our heads to the more affordable solutions on the market. And, of course, Acer is one of the first to offer such laptop. The new Aspire VX 15 is what seems to be a blend between last year’s Aspire V 15 Nitro Black Edition and a Predator 15 but design isn’t everything and these claims couldn’t be further from the truth. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, though.

While the Aspire V 15 Nitro Black Edition was a more balanced aim between portability, build quality and hardware, the VX 15 is strictly performance-oriented. It doesn’t feature the fancy nanoimprint lithography process for the casing, nor does it offer the slimmed-down body the V 15 has. It’s all about the power here. Still, we are pretty impressed by the rigidness and usability of this device with only minor setbacks that most users probably won’t have any problems settling with them.

In this review, however, we will be looking at one of the most affordable variants of the VX 15 with a GTX 1050, Core i7-7700HQ CPU, Full HD TN display and 8GB of DDR4-2133 RAM with a starting price of just a little over $799 (because the $799 base model comes with a Core i5-7300HQ). There will be a GTX 1050 Ti-powered version down the road and we will be reviewing that one as well. For now, let’s see what the most affordable configuration has to offer.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2jtqFXb

Contents

Retail package

The retail package doesn’t offer anything out of the ordinary – the usual set of user manuals, DVD with drivers and the device’s AC cord and power adapter.

Design and construction

You can’t really expect all-premium build for a gaming laptop costing less than $1 000 but with the right touch of materials and build, you can get a pretty decent chassis. That’s what Acer was able to achieve here with only minor inconsistencies that we are going to address in this review. Portability is another thing that has been sacrificed but not as much as we expected. The scale tips at 2.6 kg while the profile measures at 32 mm. That’s considerably higher than the V 15 Nitro Black Edition, although the refreshed version with GTX 1050 Ti or GTX 1060 might come close to that.

Acer chose plastic as the main material for the laptop, even though the lid looks brushed aluminum but it is in fact plastic. Fingerprints stick easily while the logo and the red stripes on the sides strongly resemble the Predator 15 and 17’s design. The main difference here is that the stripes and the logo are not illuminated and the latter is the Acer’s logo rather than the Predator’s. The material itself isn’t really rigid and it’s susceptible to twisting and bending. Even small pressure causes ripples to appear on the LCD screen. However, most users won’t have a problem with that in practice. As far as the hinge design is concerned, we must admit that we were pretty surprised. Usually, Acer’s laptops rely on the usual double-hinge setup but the VX 15 sports only one big hinge with a V-shaped bottom chin on the screen. Opening it with one hand is possible but sometimes the base flops a little when lifting the lid. Anyway, the bottom piece of the device sports two grills for the stereo loudspeakers while the cooling fans and the heat pipes receive dedicated vent openings for extra air flow.

The sides are probably the only irritating part of the design. And we don’t refer to the 32 mm thickness. No, that’s quite okay for the asking price. We are talking about the impractical port placement. Almost all ports are stuck on the right side where cables might obstruct normal usage of an external mouse. The left accommodates only the SD card reader, one USB 2.0, the 3.5 mm audio jack and the DC charging connector. Whereas the right side offers all the usual ports like LAN, two USB 3.0, HDMI and a USB-C 3.1 Gen1 connector for speedier data transfer. The back side features two big vent openings for the cooling system that look quite stylish and appear to be efficient as well. They are painted in red and stand out giving the machine a more distinct look. If you ask us, the whole design and the choice of color is way too familiar but it’s cool, nonetheless.

The interior is also made of plastic but it’s quite different from the one used for the lid and base. It’s silky smooth to touch, attracts a lot of fingerprints and smudges and feels quite rigid. The finish feels almost identical to the interior on the ASUS ROG GL552VW. Anyway, the keyboard offers decent key travel while requiring a little bit more force in the beginning of the travel. Keys feel clicky with good tactile feedback but we question the effectiveness of this approach during gameplay. The red LED backlight isn’t too bright to distract you from the screen in a dark room but it’s barely noticeable when there’s light in the room. We welcome the highlighted WASD keys and the big arrow buttons as well. And as for the touchpad, we can only say good things about it. While last year’s Aspire V 15 Nitro Black Edition touchpad quality was subpar, the clearly more affordable VX 15 doesn’t compromise in that. Yes, sure, the surface isn’t the best for precise movements and gliding but it’s accurate and responsive enough not to get in the way. You can definitely get some work done without resorting to an external mouse.

In general, the notebook may seem a bit hefty but in return, you get decent cooling capabilities, mainly robust construction and generally cool-looking design. At this price range, we can definitely say it’s a win.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Although the notebook doesn’t have a service cover, the bottom piece comes off easily and gives access to the most commonly upgraded/replaced hardware – RAM, storage, battery, Wi-Fi card.

Storage upgrade options – 2.5-inch HDD, M.2 slot

We reviewed the base configuration with no M.2 SSD installed but we found that the connector supports three different sizes. As you can see from the image below, there’s room fo the standard 2280 stick, 2260 or 2242. Also, we tried out an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD but the system wasn’t able to recognize it.

There’s also the usual 2.5-inch HDD manufactured by Toshiba with 1TB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Free M.2 slot Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Toshiba 1TB HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard can hold up to 32GB of DDR4-2133/2400 RAM but our unit came with one 8GB DDR4-2400 Micron chip while the other slot was free.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB DDR4-2133 RAM Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is located near the right cooling fan and it’s manufactured by Qualcomm. The model is Atheros QCNFA344A.

The battery unit is rated at 52.5Wh and can be easily spotted in the lower part of the base.

Cooling system

The cooling design consists of two cooling fans separated near both ends of the chassis connected to the heat sinks with heat pipes. Our temperature tests determined that it’s absolutely sufficient for a GTX 1050 but we will wait and see how it will get along with the pricier GTX 1050 Ti version.

Display quality

The notebook features a Full HD 15.6-inch TN panel with model number NT156FHM-N41 manufactured by BOE. With a resolution of 1920 x 1080, the pixel density is 142 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Since this is a TN panel, viewing angles are narrow.

We measured the maximum brightness of the display and turned out to be just 183 cd/m2 in the middle and 182 cd/m2 as average across the surface with only 9% deviation. The color temperature is 6500K and perfectly aligns with the standard D65 white point. The contrast, however, is just 300:1.

The maximum dE2000 that we were able to record is also pretty low – 2.2. This means that the color deviation across the surface is pretty negligible in this case.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

In this case, the display covers just 50% of the sRGB gamut, which means that half of the colors on your screen will be missing.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

We’ve created a profile with 140 cd/m2 luminance, D65(6500K) white point and 2.2 gamma.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the Office & Web Design profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the Gaming & Movie Nights profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 14 ms. This is a fast laptop TN panel and usually twice as fast as some IPS alternatives.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse Width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the panel uses PWM for regulating screen brightness and the latter is missing only at 100% brightness.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

It’s clear that the notebook’s price forced Acer to keep the cost low in some aspects while excelling in performance. Unfortunately, the biggest sacrifice you have to deal with is the lackluster TN panel with low maximum brightness, narrow viewing angles, low sRGB coverage and exceptionally low contrast ratio. It also uses PWM from 0 to 99% brightness.

However, the latter can be easily fixed by installing our Health-Guard profile, which will eliminate the screen flickering. The other two profiles will improve visibility while gaming/watching movies and enhance color accuracy.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) configurations with 15.6″ BOE NT156FHM-N41 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen, which can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2jB7uIj

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office work and web design

Office work / Web design

If your field is office work or web design, or you just want your monitor's color set to be as accurate as possible for the Internet color space, this profile will prove to be useful.

$4.96
Buy Now
Gaming or movie nights

Gaming or Movie nights

We developed this profile especially for occasions on which you spend a lot of time in front of your monitor with some games or watching movies – it will be easier for you to discern fine nuances in the dark.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health protection

Health-Guard

This profile reduces the negative impact of pulsation and the blue spectrum, securing your eyes and body. You still get a pitch-perfect color image, albeit slightly warmer.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good with enough clarity in the low and high frequencies. You can see for yourself in the graph below.

Specs sheet

The specs sheet provided below is for this model only and may vary depending on your region or configuration.

CPU Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-core, 2.80-3.80 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8096MB) – DDR4, 2133MHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (5400 rpm)
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) TN, matte
Optical Drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen 1)
  • keyboard backlight
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45
  • SD card reader
  • 3.5 mm jack
Battery 3-cell, 52Wh
Thickness 32 mm (1.26″)
Weight 2.6 kg (5.73 lbs)

Software

We used a clean install of Windows 10 (64-bit) for the writing of this review and if you wish to perform a clean install yourself as well, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

Fortunately, the GTX 1050-equipped notebook supports NVIDIA’s Optimus feature for switchable graphics and the battery life appears to be slightly above average for a gaming laptop at this price range. The 52Wh unit is sufficient enough to support the Core i7-7700HQ with its integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 for long periods of time during web browsing and video playback.

All tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving option turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty good result for a gaming laptop – 375 minutes (6 hours and 15 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Considerably lower but still good result – 316 minutes (5 hours and 16 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

It’s quite unlikely that you will start a gaming session without being close to a power source, but it’s good to know that you can play for more an hour – 111 minutes (1 hour and 51 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.15
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-8.1%
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.45-8.59%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.47-8.34%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)5.39-33.87%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)888
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)831-6.42%
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)825-7.09%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)833-6.19%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)489-44.93%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.78
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.58+8.18%
ASUS ROG GL552VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.66+9%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.57+8.08%
Dell Inspiron 7559 Intel Core i5-6300HQ (4-cores, 2.3 - 3.2 GHz)-

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)

The GeForce GTX 1050 GPU for laptops is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs featuring a brand new architecture design but on contrary to the rest of the GPUs from NVIDIA’s lineup, the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti feature a Samsung-made FinFET 14nm chip instead of the TSMC 16nm found in the GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. The graphics card is based on the GP107 chip paired with 4GB of GDDR5 memory via 128-bit interface.

Since the GTX 1050 is quite dependent on the cooling design, its performance may vary but if the laptop handles the GPU well and shouldn’t be much different from its desktop counterpart. Anyway, the GPU operates at relatively high frequencies (1354 – 1493 MHz) but incorporates the same amount of CUDA cores (640) while the memory is clocked at 7000 MHz (effective). These specs ensure a huge performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. For instance, the GTX 1050 performs better than the GTX 960M and can be compared to the GTX 965M’s capabilities while running at similar to the GTX 960M’s TDP of around 40-50W.

However, along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, improved H.265 encoding, and decoding.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-4gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37702
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)31668-16%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)31768-15.74%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)30950-17.91%
Dell Inspiron 7559 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)31744-15.8%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6099
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)4485-26.46%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4466-26.77%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4365-28.43%
Dell Inspiron 7559 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4421-27.51%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)19656
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)14396-26.76%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14382-26.83%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14028-28.63%
Dell Inspiron 7559 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)14632-25.56%

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1757
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition (VN7-592G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)1287-26.75%
ASUS ROG GL552VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1291-26.52%919 EUR- EUR
(-)
Lenovo Y700 (15-inch) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1332-24.19%
Dell Inspiron 7559 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1250-28.86%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 124 fps 122 fps 101 fps

f1-2015-game

F1 2015 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 85 fps 64 fps 47 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 96 fps 61 fps 19 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 70 fps 48 fps 19 fps

Temperatures

The usual 2-hour stress test can’t be a good representation of real-life use but it offers a good insight of how the system handles heavy workloads and how the notebook will fare in the long run after years of use.

We start off with 100% CPU load for an hour. The notebook was able to utilize the full performance of the chip, which is 3.8 GHz, for less than a minute but eventually went down to 3.4 GHz. This is normal as the new Kaby Lake CPUs work differently with the Turbo Boost speeds compared to the previous generations. At first, the CPU bursts the maximum allowed frequency and then goes back to a more bearable and sustainable level in order to preserve power and work within decent temperatures. Anyway, the test shows relatively decent operating temperatures at 3.4 GHz as you can see in the screenshot below.

After an hour, we turned on the GPU stress test as well. Temperatures rose significantly so the CPU had to return to its base operating frequency of 2.8 GHz so it can give enough headroom for the discrete GPU to perform. Speaking of which, we were surprised by the relatively low operating temperature of the GTX 1050 – 69 °C, while maintaining above normal operating frequency – 1683 MHz. That’s way above the base 1493 MHz frequency.

While the inner temperatures of the CPU and GPU were within normal bounds, we were surprised to see the surface around the keyboard getting warm or in this case – hot. The wrist rest area was cool enough not to cause any discomfort but the center and upper center of keyboard reached 50 °C. We doubt these temperatures will be the same during gaming but these parts will remain warm during normal use.

Verdict

It’s all about performance and the latest generation Pascal GPU and Intel’s 7th Generation Kaby Lake processors here. The notebook packs impressive specs for the asking price and delivering performance that cannot be matched by last year’s entry-level and mid-range gaming laptops with GTX 960M like the Aspire V 15 Nitro Black Edition, the Lenovo Y700 or the ASUS ROG GL552VW, which all happen to be priced just around the VX 15. Even from a design standpoint, the chassis appears to be sturdy, well-built and doesn’t go too far from what the industry offers right now. But what the Aspire VX 15 doesn’t have, which the others do, is the IPS panel.

Our tests confirm that the TN panel used for this laptop is suitable for entry-level everyday laptops and it’s really hard to recommend it for multimedia and gaming – the main purposes for this machine. Moreover, the display uses PWM at all brightness levels (except 100%) so there’s another reason not to like it. Of course, our Health-Guard profile fixes that. If you happen to really want this notebook, we suggest pairing it with an external monitor for optimal gaming/multimedia experience.

Other things such as keyboard, touchpad and battery life are above the average. We liked both input devices while the battery capacity seemed sufficient to get some work done away from the charger. However, we remain skeptical of the cooling performance because, during our extensive stress test, the center and the upper part of the keyboard got pretty warm. During normal gameplay, those temperatures won’t be that high but will still cause some kind of discomfort to the user. Still, no thermal throttling occurred, which is the most important thing here.

In the end, the Acer Aspire VX 15 is one of the best budget gaming laptops right now despite some of its apparent drawbacks. We really hope that the upcoming variant with GTX 1050 Ti will be equipped with a decent IPS panel as Acer promised. This will surely make it one of our top choices for an entry-level to mid-range gaming machine.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2jtqFXb

Pros

  • Decent build and design
  • Excellent price/performance ratio thanks to the latest generation Intel CPU and NVIDIA Pascal GPU
  • Above average battery life for an entry-level gaming notebook
  • Above average battery life for an entry-level gaming notebook
  • Supports M.2 SATA SSD

Cons

  • Unsatisfactory TN panel
  • The display uses PWM from 0 to 99% screen brightness (the Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • There’s noticeable heat dispersion across some parts of the interior during heavy load
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live