Quantcast
Channel: Kroum Nikolov – LaptopMedia.com
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live

Dell Latitude 14 7480 review – a nice ThinkPad alternative from Dell

$
0
0

If you are seriously considering a premium 14-inch ultrabook for your business, you just can’t miss on the Latitude 14 7480. The notebook offers excellent build quality, long battery life, enough I/O when you get back to the office and, of course, comfortable input devices. But like every laptop out there, the Latitude 7480 has its drawbacks so we are here to take a closer look and try to find them.

When looking for a 14-inch notebook, a few come to mind that are not only more affordable but more powerful as well. For example, the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ and Acer’s Swift 5 are excellent examples of portable and reliable business solutions with everything you’d need from a business laptop. But if you are strictly looking for a business laptop with the trackstick in the middle of the keyboard and the fingerprint scanner for security reasons, well spending so much money on the Latitude 7480 kind of makes sense. Also, if you opt for the more powerful configuration with Core i7-7600U, you can benefit from Intel’s vPro technologies. In this case, the price tag puts in the same category as Lenovo’s iconic ThinkPad T470 notebook, which sports a similar set of features and delivers the same performance. So the question here is, which one is more comfortable for typing, using on the go, is more portable and more importantly, has the better display. We find out in the thorough review below.

You can find the available configurations and their prices here: http://amzn.to/2ibc6Zv

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a standard box containing all the usual user manuals, DVD with drivers, the AC adapter and a power cord.

Design and construction

The Latitude 7480 adopts a minimalistic, strict and clean design without any distractions. The body and the lid are made of aluminum alloy but are covered in slightly rubberized matte paint that helps with the grip, feels great but also is a fingerprint magnet. What surprised us the most, however, is the relatively lower weight and thickness compared to the Lenovo ThinkPad T470. In fact, the Latitude 7480 has larger battery, which should have tipped the scale even further.

Anyway, the lid’s construction is rigid and withstands our bending and torsion tests quite well. Although the lid gives in when pressed in the middle, ripples don’t appear on the LCD screen, which, by the way, offers thin side bezels, lower chin and about average upper bezel so it can integrate the webcam. The single-hinge design provides smooth movements up to 180-degree and keeps the lid firmly in place. Unfortunately, opening the notebook with one hand is impossible. As for the bottom piece, it’s made of aluminum sheet covered in the same matte finish but a thinner layer is applied so you can feel the metal beneath. There are a few vents providing the extra airflow for the cooling system and two grill openings for the loudspeakers.

The sides measure at just 17 mm but accommodate all of the I/O you’d need from a 14-inch or 15-inch laptop. The left side has the DC charging port, USB-C 3.1 (Gen 2) with Thunderbolt and DisplayPort support, full-sized HDMI, and two USB 3.0 connectors along with the smart card reader. The right side offers the much-needed RJ-45 for cable Internet connection, another USB 3.0 connector, a microSD card reader, 3.5 mm audio jack and a SIM card tray for the LTE connectivity. Not only does the laptop provide a wide range of connectivity options but the ports are evenly distributed on the left and right.

The interior is also of high quality as the base doesn’t flex or bend at any point. It’s extremely rigid and feels nice due to the matte soft-touch finish, which again, is a fingerprint magnet. That’s always the downside of these sorts of paints. Anyway, the keyboard is just excellent – long key travel, clicky tactile feedback, discreet LED backlight, slightly concaved keycaps that fit your finger perfectly and all the shortcuts you’d need on a business-oriented laptop. We honestly can’t think of anything bad to say about the keyboard. However, the trackstick’s positioning isn’t ideal. For instance, we found ourselves pressing the left mouse button at the bottom of the trackpad with our palm when using the trackstick. So the latter should be moved upwards or the touchpad should be a single plate without dedicated mouse buttons. Also, the slightly concaved surface below the spacebar obstructs the normal usage of the mouse buttons dedicated to the pointing stick. The touchpad itself, on the other hand, is also near-perfect. It’s responsive, accurate and the mouse buttons provide deep and clicky feedback. Still, the gliding surface of the trackpad isn’t optimal and if your hands are moist, you will have some trouble sliding.

The laptop’s build quality is just superb and it’s exactly what you’d expect from an ultrabook in this price range. Our only small complaint is the overly tightened hinge and the suboptimal placement of the pointing stick and the mouse buttons. In any case, the build should provide excellent durability and comfort for working on the go.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Even though the notebook has no service lids at the bottom, the maintenance and upgrades are hassle-free. There’s no need for a full disassembly – just unscrew all the bolts around the chassis and pry it up gently.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Like most 14-inchers, the Latitude 14 7480 offers only an M.2 SSD slot (located right next to the battery) – no 2.5-inch drive bay, unfortunately. Anyway, SSDs with the 2280 standard fit in while the motherboard itself supports PCIe NVMe SSDs. However, our unit shipped with SanDisk X400 M.2 running on SATA III controller, which is a big let-down since the laptop falls into the premium segment.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB SanDisk X400 M.2 SATA SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

On contrary to storage, the Latitude 7480 comes with two RAM chip slots supporting up to 2x 16GB DDR4-2400. Our configuration, though, sports only one SK Hynix 8GB DDR4-2400 chip leaving the other slot free for an upgrade.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB SK Hynix DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi module is right next to the cooling fan and it’s the well-known Intel 8265NGW.

The battery can be found under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at 60Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design is simple and requires nothing more than a single heat pipe connecting the heat sink to the cooling fan.

Display quality

The panel used for this unit is a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS manufactured by LG with model number LGD0557 (LP140WF7) with 14-inch diagonal. This means that the pixel density is 157 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.161 x 0.161 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

The IPS screen offers excellent viewing angles.

We’ve recorded a maximum brightness of 336 cd/m2 in the center and 313 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 11% maximum deviation. The color temperature on the screen at maximum brightness is 7200K so colors will appear a bit colder than usual – 6500K is the optimal white point. Below you can see how the measurements change at 140 cd/m2 luminance or in other words – 41% brightness.

The maximum dE2000 color deviation is 2.7, which isn’t bad since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted especially when there’s color sensitive work involved. The contrast ratio is good – 1010:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 96% of the sRGB color gamut making it perfect not only for work and general web browsing but for multimedia as well.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 26 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

It appears that the display doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels making it safe to use for long periods of time in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Honestly, we don’t have anything bad to say about the display – it offers high maximum brightness (enough for outdoor use), good contrast, wide sRGB coverage, no PWM across all brightness levels and fairly accurate color reproduction out of the box. All the small hiccups like a bit colder color temperature and a bit deviating gamma curve can be fixed using our display profiles. They make the most of the already excellent panel.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Latitude 14 7480 configurations with 14.0″ LG LGD0557 (LP140WF7) (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2vMfWLM

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good and there’s no loss in quality in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i5-7200U (2-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
GPU Intel HD Graphics 620
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD
Display 14-inch – 1920×1080 (Full HD) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2
Other features
  • 3x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Gen 2, DisplayPort and optional Thunderbolt)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • LAN
  • HDMI
  • card reader (SD, MMC, MS)
  • fingerprint reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 60Wh
Thickness 17 mm (0.67″)
Weight 1.5 kg (3.31 lbs)

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to do a clean install without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Dell’s official support page.

Battery

At first, we weren’t expecting any mind-blowing results but after the tests, the battery life on this thing is just phenomenal. Thanks to the big 60Wh battery and the energy-efficient ULV (ultra-low voltage) Intel Core i5-7200U CPU, the laptop reaches the second position in our battery ranking table with just a few minutes shy to our current leader – the HP Spectre x360 13.

All tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi constantly running, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Impressive score on the web browsing test – 963 minutes (16 hours and 3 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Considerably lower but stil amazing result – 668 minutes (11 hours and 8 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away but it kept on running for more than six hours under heavy workload – 367 minutes (6 hours and 7 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81+4.38%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.63-0.55%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)474
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476+0.42%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525+10.76%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522+10.13%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.47
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.45-0.11%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49+0.11%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.88+2.35%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.405 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 6206265
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6206612+5.54%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468+35.16%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6208257+31.8%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620728
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620783+7.55%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597+119.37%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620998+37.09%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620-
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6203099-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6203674-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620255
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620223-12.55%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432+69.41%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620305+19.61%

Temperatures

The stress test that we use to assess the overall effectiveness of the cooling system isn’t a real world usage scenario but remains as the best way to see how the cooling design handles heavy workloads and how will it fare in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU workload for about an hour and the system was able to utilize the full performance of the Core i5-7200U at 3.1 GHz running at a bit higher than expected temperatures.

Switching on the GPU stress test, however, didn’t result in CPU throttling, which is the usual case, but it did lower the frequency down to 2.9 GHz. Operations seem to be normal even under extended heavy workload without overheating.

We measured the temperature developed on the surface across the interior – only the upper part of the chassis became a bit warm but surely, this won’t happen during normal use. The palm rest will remain cool at all time.

Verdict

The Latitude 14 7480 is one of those devices which quality is their middle name. You may have to pay a little bit of extra money but it’s definitely worth it. You will get in an excellently built compact, rigid 14-inch device with comfortable keyboard and touchpad, except for the trackstick. The latter’s positioning isn’t the best one we’ve seen and definitely needs some improvement in the next generation.

But looks don’t mean anything without a capable hardware. Well, the Latitude 14 7480 has that covered as well. The IPS panel will let you enjoy your favorite movies thanks to the excellent image quality it provides without putting unnecessary strain on your eyes – no PWM across all brightness levels. The best part is that the battery will keep the device running long enough for a full season of your show. At the time of writing of this review, the device reached second position in our battery ranking table.

But that’s not all. Two more things left a big impression. The first one is that the device offers not one but two RAM chip slots available for upgrade. Usually, 14-inch devices come with soldered memory or one RAM chip slot at the very best. And secondly, our particular unit came with an M.2 SATA SSD instead of a PCIe NVMe drive. At this price, we expect PCIe SSD to be a default option and not optional but this may not be true for all regions. Just check before you buy.

The bottom line is, if you are strictly looking for a business-grade notebook, the Latitude 14 7480 is an ideal choice. At this price range, you should consider the Lenovo ThinkPad T470 as an alternative but honestly, the Latitude 7480 still comes on top with a better screen and longer battery life. But if performance isn’t enough for you and the lack of 2.5-inch drive bay is a deal-breaker for you, the more affordable ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ might be a better solution in this case. We also suggest considering the Acer Swift 5 – considerably less expensive device but still comparable to the Latitude 14 7480.

You can find the available configurations and their prices here: http://amzn.to/2ibc6Zv

Pros

  • Excellently built
  • Portable (thin and light)
  • Good input devices
  • Great IPS panel with wide sRGB coverage, high maximum brightness and good contrast
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels
  • The motherboard holds two RAM slots
  • Incredibly long battery life

Cons

  • The trackstick positioning isn’t ideal
  • Pricey
  • Some configurations come with SATA SSD instead of PCIe NVMe SSD

ASUS ROG Strix GL753VE review – what does the 17-inch version offer that the 15-inch doesn’t?

$
0
0

17-inch laptops have always been pricier than their 15-inch counterparts and often we don’t understand why. The bigger chassis doesn’t come with anything more compelling except the bigger screen diagonal. There are the same storage options, no bigger battery or even better cooling. With the 17-inch GL753VE things are slightly different – the price of the laptop is negligibly close to the 15-inch model but only in some regions, like in the USA. In Europe, the price difference is more than €50 and we are still puzzled by why is that.

As we said earlier, the GL753VE comes with identical specs – Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, at least 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory and the usual M.2 SSD + HDD storage configuration. But despite all the similarities, we expect the GL753VE to perform differently in some tests. The battery life is expected to be lower (since the unit is the same but the screen is bigger and requires more power), the cooling performance might be better (due to the extra room in the larger chassis) and the IPS screen will most probably score differently in our tests. We hope that PWM won’t be an issue this time around. Let’s dig in.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2voDgxq

Contents

Retail package

The retail box contains the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and cleaning cloth.

Design and construction

As expected, the GL753VE doesn’t differ from its 15-inch sibling in terms of design, build quality and overall appearance. Only the weight and dimensions set those two apart. While the GL553VE weighs 2.5 kg and measures 30 mm in thickness, the GL753VE goes up to a hefty 2.97 kg and measures 33 mm in height. To be fair, none of these two are actually portable so you really have to ask yourself if the larger screen is worth it.

Anyway, the lid is again made of brushed aluminum with the illuminated ROG logo in the middle. The material isn’t very resistant to pressure and torsion but it’s not so bad compared to its competitors. The screen hinges provide fairly smooth travel and allow the notebook to be opened with just one hand. They also keep the lid stable even when placed on uneven surface. The bottom of the chassis uses a generic roughened black plastic with orange-colored rubber feet and a few grill openings for cool air intake.

The sides come with the some added connectors to the standard set of I/O on the 15-inch model and this is great news because there’s another reason to opt for the bigger alteration. The left side has the usual grill for dispersing the heat, RJ-45 for LAN, HDMI, mini DisplayPort (kudos for that), two USB 3.0 connectors and a USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1). The right side accommodates the optical drive and two more USB 3.0 ports. The SD card reader is placed at the front with the two speakers on each side.

Just like the whole base, the interior is also made of plastic but this one imitates brushed aluminum. Fingerprints stick easily, just like the real deal, but the rigidity isn’t the same. There are some weak points around the touchpad and the center of the keyboard but nothing too alarming. The keyboard is awesome as always – tactile clicky feedback, long key travel and RGB backlight. Unfortunately, though, the same cannot be said about the touchpad – not the most comfortable gliding surface, a bit small for a 17-incher, sluggish and clicks feel a bit too stiff to our taste.

The overall build quality is decent and on par with most of the competition but the thing is that this laptop costs more than its rivals so we expect at least slightly better build quality. Aluminum can be found only on the lid, which isn’t very impressive in terms of rigidity as well. The base uses a bit flexible plastic but none of these issues should pose any problem during normal use. The touchpad is again subpar but the keyboard compensates with excellent feel during gaming and typing. Portability might be an issue for some users as well, although you can’t really expect miracles from a 17-inch gaming machine.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

There are no service covers around the bottom but it can be removed quite easily giving access to all of the internals for upgrade and maintenance. Just make sure you’ve removed all the screws around the bottom including the one hiding beneath the silicone cap in the middle.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As we expected, the notebook comes with a standard 2.5-inch HDD on board and also a free – in our case – M.2 SSD slot supporting PCIe NVMe drives. The 2.5-inch HDD is an HGST 1TB spinning at 7200 rpm. Right next to the HDD, you will find the M.2 SSD slot. But if that’s not enough, you can always replace the optical drive with a caddy with another 2.5-inch drive.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB HGST @7200 rpm Upgrade options
M.2 slot Free (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

Of course, the motherboard holds two RAM chip slots each supporting up to 16GB of DDR4-2400 memory. Our unit arrived with just one 8GB DDR4-2400 chip installed from Samsung.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 Samsung 8GB DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed near the optical drive.

The battery is placed between the screen hinges and it’s rated at

Cooling system

The cooling system hasn’t changed and still uses only one fan and two heat pipes going across the CPU and GPU heat sinks.

Display quality

The ASUS ROG GL753VE uses the same IPS panel as the ASUS ROG Strix GL702VS – an LG-made LP173WF4-SPF3 display with Full HD (1920×1080) resolution. This means that the pixel density is 127 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.1995 x 0.1995 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 69 cm.

The panel provides excellent viewing angles.

We’ve measured a maximum brightness of 377 cd/m2 in the center and 355 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 8% deviation. The color temperature at maximum brightness is 6630K, which is pretty close to the optimal 6500K. As we go along the grayscale, the average color temperature remains close to the optimal – 6670K. You can see how the results change at 140 cd/m2 (37% brightness).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 at 140 cd/m2 is 2.6 in the upper right corner. This is a relatively good result since values above 4.0 are unwanted. The contrast ratio is 1000:1 but goes down to 970:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 88% of the sRGB color gamut making it perfect for multimedia and gaming.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Gaming capabilities (Response time)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 19 ms. That’s a fairly fast response time for an IPS panel.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

The case with this notebook’s display regarding PWM is the same – PWM occurs only sometimes at extremely high frequency (120 kHz) so practically, the panel doesn’t use PWM from 0 to 100% brightness.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SDP) graph.

Conclusion

The presented IPS panel here is of high quality and offers everything you’d need for a good gaming and multimedia experience – high maximum brightness, wide sRGB coverage, high contrast and no PWM across all brightness levels. The only things missing here are the high refresh rate and G-Sync but those are usually intrinsic to high-end gaming laptops so we can let that slide.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS ROG Strix GL753VE configurations with 17.3″ LG LP173WF4-SPF3 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2voDgxq

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

The specs sheet provided below is for the model used in this review. Hardware specification may vary depending on your region.

CPU Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-core, 2.80 -3.80 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400GHz
GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD (7200 rpm)
Display 17.3-inch – 1920×1080 (Full HD) IPS, matte
Optical drive DVD burner
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11a/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 4x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1)
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • LAN
  • HDMI 1.4
  • mini DisplayPort
  • card reader (SD, MMC, MS)
  • customizable LED RGB backlit keyboard
Battery 4-cell 48Wh
Thickness 33 mm (1.29″)
Weight 2.97 kg (6.55 lbs)

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

To be honest, we weren’t surprised by the poor battery performance considering the fact that the GL553VE is a 15-inch laptop with fairly small battery capacity and scored borderline satisfactory while the GL753VE has an identical battery unit that has to light up a considerably bigger IPS display. Our tests confirm that the 48Wh unit just isn’t enough to keep the lights on for longer than we would like. In fact, the endurance of the machine is subpar by any means.

All tests were run with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows power saving mode turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Unsatisfactory web browsing runtime – 260 minutes (4 hours and 20 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Even lower score here and barely enough for a full movie – 145 minutes (2 hours and 25 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

It’s quite unlikely that you will start a gaming session without being close to a power source, but it’s good to know that you can play for more an hour – 73 minutes (1 hour and 13 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.16
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.15-0.12%
ASUS ROG GL752VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-8.21%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.13-0.37%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.14-0.25%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)860
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)860
ASUS ROG GL752VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)830-3.49%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)883+2.67%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)860

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.85
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.89+0.41%
ASUS ROG GL752VW Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.50+6.6%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.99+1.42%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.93+0.81%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7700HQ managed to get 13.399 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)

NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 Ti for notebooks is almost identical to its desktop counterpart but offers different clock rates. What’s more, the Ti variant uses more CUDA cores than the standard GTX 1050 version – 768 vs 640 but both GPUs use the same GP107 chip, which differs from the other NVIDIA high-end solutions. The GP107 chip is manufactured by Samsung, not TSMC, and it’s built on the 14nm node on contrary to the 16nm from TSMC.

Anyway, the GTX 1050 Ti also offers significantly higher clock rates than the normal GTX 1050 versions well 1493 – 1620 MHz vs 1364 – 1493 MHz. This contributes to a significant performance boost over the standard version but the rest of the specs remain the same. The GPU offers 4GB of GDDR5 memory connected via 128-bit interface and transfer rates as high as 112 GB/s.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-4gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)46320
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)46311-0.02%
ASUS ROG GL752VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)30840-33.42%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)47540+2.63%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)48511+4.73%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7575
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7553-0.29%
ASUS ROG GL752VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)4425-41.58%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7493-1.08%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7523-0.69%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)-
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)25293-
ASUS ROG GL752VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)14401-
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)25639-
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)24817-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ROG GL753VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2400
ASUS ROG Strix GL553VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2365-1.46%
ASUS ROG GL752VW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (4GB GDDR5)1278-46.75%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2368-1.33%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2354-1.92%

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 155fps 81 fps 30 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 90fps 60 fps 32 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 59 fps 52 fps 45 fps

Temperatures

Of course, the stress tests don’t really represent real-life usage or even gaming sessions but they get pretty close to the latter. The torture tests are still the best way to assess the overall stability of the cooling system and its longevity.

We started with the CPU stress test for about an hour and we were pretty delighted by the relatively low temperatures that the system was able to provide for the chip. The Core i7-7700HQ was running rock-solid at 3.4 GHz and within the 75-85 °C range. However, we have noted that such big difference in temperatures between cores isn’t good – one of the cores reports 75 °C while the other 85 °C. This might be due to bad thermal paste or heat sink design.

When we ran the GPU stress test, things didn’t change much for the CPU but the GPU didn’t reach its maximum potential. While the GL553VE prioritized GPU performance over CPU clock speeds, the GL753VE did exactly the opposite. In our stress test, the GL553VE utilized the full performance of the GTX 1050 Ti while keeping the CPU lower than its base frequency. The GL753VE, on the other hand, kept the CPU at its base frequency and didn’t push the GPU beyond 835 MHz which is almost half its usual clock speeds. Interestingly, the GTX 1050 Ti’s temperature was exceptionally low at 68 °C so it’s clear that the GPU can go much faster. We are not sure what’s the culprit of the problem here but a future BIOS update might sort this out. It might also be an isolated problem with the unit we got.

Even though the system uses a single fan design, which is insufficient for such powerful hardware, the surface temperatures were even lower than on the 15-inch model. Quite impressive if you ask us.

Verdict

Our opinion on the 17-inch variant doesn’t deviate too much from our initial thoughts on the GL553VE – generally solid all-rounder, which is slightly more expensive than the competition but at least you know what you are getting here. But most of the complaints from the 15-incher remain – questionable build quality, wobbly touchpad, a bit hefty construction and a cooling system that needs improvement (higher inner temperatures).

However, the keyboard is excellent not only for typing but for gaming as well. We also liked the expanded I/O – more connectivity than the 15-inch GL553VE and retains the good picture quality thanks to the excellent IPS panel. We would have appreciated a bigger battery because the 17-inch screen draws considerably more power resulting in less than stellar battery performance.

Anyway, the GL753VE is currently one of the few mainstream 17-inch laptops with GTX 1050 Ti on board so your choice is limited. But is it better compared to its 15-inch sibling or its rivals? Well, ASUS has makes a compelling case with the GL753VE, except the bigger screen, of course – a wider range of I/O, keeps surface temperatures even lower than the GL553VE and the screen doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels. You still have to consider the added weight, dimensions and lower battery life, though, so it’s really up to you if you want the bigger screen.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2voDgxq

Pros

  • Excellent keyboard with customizable RGB
  • Wide range of I/O
  • Very bright IPS panel with wide sRGB, high contrast and optimal color temperature out of the box
  • No PWM across all brightness levels
  • Expanded I/O
  • Keeps the interior cool even under heavy workload

Cons

  • A bit hefty
  • Questionable build quality
  • Subpar battery life
  • GPU throttling under heavy workload, CPU cores maintain largely different temperatures
  • Bad touchpad

Lenovo Ideapad 720s (14-inch) review – the ultraportable ZenBooks finally have a serious competition

$
0
0

We are always happy to get our hands on an exciting device that combines two key features that in other cases are considered to be an oxymoron, like portability and power. Well, the new Ideapad 720s from Lenovo offers it all but at a cost. And we don’t mean the pricing. In fact, the price for the base model is surprisingly low because you get a crisp IPS Full HD panel, a Core i5-7200U CPU, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX GPU with 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM and top things, the device ships with a Samsung PCIe NVMe drive as a default. With specs like these and a price hovering around €1 000, it puts in the same category as the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ. However, Lenovo’s solution has a few tricks up its sleeve that set it apart from the competition.

Lenovo has managed to cram up all this hardware into a tiny and slim 13.3-inch form factor aluminum chassis. So where’s the catch? Well, with the limited airflow and the design limitations of the cooling design, you can’t really expect top-notch performance from both chips – the CPU and GPU. According to our tests, the CPU’s performance is crippled, which might not be a big deal for consumers who are going to use the notebook only for multimedia and office work, but will be a deal-breaker for the more pretentious users wanting the best possible performance from the given hardware. Find out more about the device’s ups and downs in our review.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wCa3nk

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in an extremely small box that looks a hell of a fresh – white with orange accent. The package itself contains the AC charging adapter, user manuals and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

The notebook’s build quality and design match some higher-end models easily with anodized aluminum semi-unibody construction, thin, light, rigid and with premium feel. It makes us wonder how Lenovo managed to stick all that hardware inside and still make it look sexy.

Let’s start with the lid. It’s made of aluminum that withstands bending and torsion quite well. Whereas the single-hinge design provides the much-needed stiffness, which is a common miss with lightweight laptops these days but this time the hinge is too tightly pulled. Opening the machine with just one hand is impossible. On the other side of the lid you will find the 14-inch display exceptionally thin side and upper bezels. Fortunately, the camera is well-positioned and its usefulness isn’t sacrificed like in the XPS 13. The chin, though, appears to be normal in size. The bottom cover is made from the same material – anodized aluminum providing stiffness and some grills for extra airflow and for the loudspeakers.

The sides’ design differs from the previous generation, the Ideapad 710s, and now has flat edges with more connections than we expected – USB 3.0 on the left with the 3.5 mm audio jack and the DC charging port while the right side accommodates another USB 3.0 connector, full-sized HDMI, an SD card reader and a USB-C 3.1 (Gen 2) with Thunderbolt support. The latter is a nice finishing touch and not a common occurrence in this price range. That’s actually one of the features that sets it apart from the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ and other similarly-priced 14-inch solutions – the Acer’s Swift 5 included.

Opening the laptop reveals the flashy and stylish interior, which looks a lot like the Yoga 910. We’ve got anodized aluminum with smooth finish and feels pretty stable because it’s not susceptible to flexing. The keyboard feels clicky and buttons aren’t mushy at all and despite the short key travel, the overall typing experience is great – the tactile clicky feedback compensates for that. The touchpad is another big step forward compared to its predecessor – it’s big, the gliding surface is buttery-smooth, it’s responsive, accurate and mouse clicks are satisfyingly clicky and light.

Apparently, Lenovo took some notes from the previous generation Ideapad 710S and all of its shortcomings are taken care of in this model. The build quality is excellent, the case feels sturdy, elegant, light and thin. Also, the input devices are good and will provide the needed comfortable working experience on the go.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Of course, the ultrabook offers hassle-free access to the internals, although no service lids can be found at the bottom. Anyway, the plate can be lifted up quite easily after all the screws are removed.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

This one is a bit obvious but the laptop comes only with an M.2 SSD slot – without a standard 2.5-inch bay due to the form factor of the device. The M.2 SSD slot needs a 2280 drive and our unit came with one Samsung PM961 PCIe NVMe SSD with 256GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB Samsung PM961 PCIe NVMe SSD SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard doesn’t have soledred memory and relies on a single RAM chip slot supporting up to 16GB of DDR4-2400. The unit we’ve tested has a Samsung 8GB DDR4-2400 RAM. But be aware that the RAM slot is placed under a small metallic shield. First, you have to loosen up the pins that hold it and then lift it up.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 Samsung 8GB DDR4-2400 Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed next to one of the cooling fans and it’s Intel 3165NGW.

The battery appears to be quite generous and it’s rated at 55Wh placed under the wrist rest area.

Cooling system

We were pretty surprised by the cooling system. A setup like this is usually found in gaming laptops but for obvious reasons, this one is quite simpler. Anyway, the cooling design consists of two separated fans connected to both heat sinks via a single thick heat pipe.

Display quality

The Ideapad 720s comes with a 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel manufactured by AU Optronics with model number B140HAN03.5. This means that the pixel density is 157 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.161 x 0.161 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

The screen offers excellent viewing angles from a 45-degree incline.

We were able to measure a maximum of 329 cd/m2 luminance in the center of the panel and 302 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 12% deviation. The color temperature on white screen with brightness cranked up to maximum is 7140K – a little bit colder than the standard 6500K. As we go along the grayscale, the average color temperature drops to around 7000K. You can see how the results change at 140 cd/m2 luminance (81% brightness) in the picture below.

The maximum dE2000 color deviation compared to the center of the screen is 2.7, which is totally fine since values above 4.0 are unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio is pretty high – 1200:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 92% of the sRGB color gamut making it perfect not only for general browsing and office work, but for multimedia as well.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.


The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 25 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment didn’t detect any pulsations no matter the brightness level so this makes the panel safe to use for extended periods of time in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The display offers excellent image quality, especially given the price point of the device. It offers high maximum brightness evne suitable for outdoor use, high contrast ratio, wide sRGB coverage and no PWM across all brightness levels. All of this makes the notebook suitable for work, general browsing and multimedia for extended periods of time.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Ideapad 720s configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN03.5 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2wCKra3

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality isn’t perfect since there are some small distortions at all frequencies – low, mid and high but the maximum volume is impressive.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i7-7500U (2-core, 2.70 – 3.50 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
Display 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • SD card reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 55Wh
Thickness 16.3 mm (0.64″)
Weight 1.58 kg (3.48 lbs)

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official support page.

Battery

The battery life of the Lenovo Ideapad 720s isn’t amazing but left us with a pretty good impression. For instance, the video playback time was way more than we expected – exceeding the one of web browsing. We found that pretty interesting since most of the time, web browsing consumes less power than video playback. Anyway, the score the Ideapad 720s reached was a bit lower than the one of its direct competitor, the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ, and considerably lower than the Acer Swift 5. Still, we can call it decent and good enough for the asking price. These scores are achieved by a rather big 55Wh battery.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty good web browsing score – 443 minutes (7 hours and 23 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Surprisingly a bit higher result on the video playback test – 523 minutes (8 hours and 43 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can handle a little over three hours under heavy workload – 196 minutes (3 hours and 16 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.24
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81+17.59%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.63+12.04%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.59+10.8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65+12.65%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)440
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525+19.32%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522+18.64%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)469+6.59%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476+8.18%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)18.98
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49-7.85%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.88-5.8%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)19.20+1.16%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.42-8.22%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 5.555 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)

geforce-940m-3qtrThe NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but paired with a faster GDDR5 memory and slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M. However, some OEMs will still choose to use the cheaper DDR3 version of the GPU.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. Again, the memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM. It still supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole GPU is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse through our GPU ranking to see where the Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

For more information about the GPU, follow this link: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)13137
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468-35.54%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6208257-37.15%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 5207225-45%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 6206580-49.91%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2095
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597-23.77%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620998-52.36%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 520880-58%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 620765-63.48%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6203674-
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 5203329-
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 6203088-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)634
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432-31.86%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620305-51.89%
Acer TravelMate X349-M Intel HD Graphics 520272-57.1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 620220-65.3%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 111 fps 87 fps 70 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 82 fps 38 fps 22 fps

Temperatures

The extreme stress tests that we perform cannot be taken as a representation of real-life use especially on an ultrabook like this one because the general user won’t be able to reach 100% CPU and 100% GPU usage at the same time for such long periods of time. However, this remains as the most effective way to assess the cooling capabilities and the overall stability of the cooling system in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU load for about an hour. We noticed that the Core i7-7500U reached its maximum frequency of 3.5 GHz for the first few seconds and then immediately dropped down to 2.7 GHz, which is the base operating frequency. It seems that the system isn’t able to fully utilize the performance of the processor for some reason.

Fortunately, though, after turning on the GPU stress test as well, we didn’t notice any thermal throttling of the CPU or GPU. The GeForce 940MX ran at its maximum frequency for a while and dropped around its base clock speeds for the rest of the test. The CPU ran at relatively low temperatures, considering the nature of the test and the device’s class, of course. Whereas the GPU, it ran a little bit too hot to our liking hitting 75 degrees Celsius.

In any case, temperatures on the surface didn’t go above normal (given the form factor and the purpose of the laptop) so it’s safe to say that you won’t experience any overheating during normal use or even during light gaming.

Verdict

The Ideapad 720s turned out to be a great all-rounder and a rare occurrence in this price range. The only real direct competitor that we can think of is the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ. There are some things that Lenovo’s solution does better and in some cases, the ZenBook is a better choice. However, in terms of design, build quality and display – they appear to be pretty similar.

Anyway, back to the Ideapad 720s. It boasts an excellently-built chassis with fairly compact dimensions, low weight and good input devices that can get the work done in on the go. We are also pleased with the number of connectivity options like full-sized HDMI, plenty of USBs – including a USB-C Thunderbolt (something you can’t really take for granted in this price range and the ZenBook UX410UQ doesn’t offer) and an SD card reader.

But as always, attempts of cramming up a powerful hardware inside a tiny chassis end up with crippled performance or overheating. In this case, it’s the first one. The CPU wasn’t able to reach its full potential, although to be fair, we’ve tested a pre-production sample so this might not be an issue for the end units. Anyway, you will notice very loud (high-pitch) cooling performance under load but if you limit the usage to general work and web browsing, you shouldn’t worry about that. With the ZenBook UX410UQ’s case, the cooling fan didn’t stop spinning even when idle, so there’s always a trade-off. It depends on what you are willing to sacrifice for the portable chassis.

Finally, we want to address the display and battery life – both are great, there’s no doubt about that. The IPS panel provides excellent viewing experience (negligibly close to the ZenBook UX410UQ’s one) and doesn’t use PWM from 0 to 99% brightness. And with a little help from our “Design and Gaming” profile, the color accuracy is vastly improved. As far as battery performance is concerned, it falls a little bit short to the ZenBook UX410UQ and the Swift 5 but it’s great, nonetheless.

So if you are willing to overlook some of the flaws, this powerful 14-inch fellow can easily be your compact daily driver capable of almost anything. Still, if you need the extra storage, slightly better battery life and you absolutely want the best-in-class display, the ASUS ZenBook UX410 might be the one for you.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wCa3nk

Pros

  • Premium and solid build
  • Compact and portable with thin screen bezels (14-inch machine inside a 13-inch chassis)
  • Excellent IPS display
  • No PWM across all brightness levels
  • Powerful hardware given the asking price and the form factor
  • Plenty of I/O including Thunderbolt 3
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Warm and noisy under load
  • The system can’t utilize the full performance of the CPU
  • Glossy but non-touch screen

Lenovo ThinkPad T570 review – thin, light, reliable, enduring

$
0
0

The ThinkPad T570 remains as a classic, even though it was released just a few months prior to this review. But why classic then? Well, it carries a brand new chassis, which appears to be lighter and thinner than its predecessor, packs the latest hardware but at the same time retains the iconic ThinkPad appearance and feel. The AccuType style keyboard is good as always, the touchpad is nearly perfect and you can still take advantage of the TrackPoint for easier mouse navigation.

But what about all the important stuff the usual business consumer is looking for, like reliability and battery life? As usual, we test the limits of the cooling system, although the Intel Core i5-7200U isn’t all that demanding and overheating is out of the question. And as far as battery life is concerned, we expect at least slightly better endurance compared to the 14-inch model due to the overall bigger battery capacity. In any case, that’s something that can be easily fixed since the notebook features a 32Wh internal battery plus an additional 24Wh external one. You can always opt for a bigger external battery like the 48Wh or the 72Wh options available from Lenovo but more on that later in the full review below.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wJcyEe

Contents

Retail package

The ThinkPad T570 comes in a standard package containing the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord. Also, the external/secondary battery isn’t installed on the machine and can be found separately in the box.

Design and construction

As we already pointed out, the ThinkPad T570 doesn’t really differ all that much from the classic T-series notebooks we’ve seen so far and it’s just a bigger version of the T470 that we reviewed earlier. But, of course, with the bigger screen comes a full-sized keyboard (including the Numpad). But in reality, the T570 doesn’t feel so much bigger than its smaller 14-inch sibling. The side bezels of the screen appear to be slightly slimmer so this might be one of the reasons.

Anyway, the lid uses the same slightly rubberized finish for better grip and also feels more premium this way. The downside, however, is that smudges are prominent and dust builds up easily. In any case, the material feels strong – bending and twisting is almost impossible even when great force is applied. Probably the only slightly weak point is the lower bezel due to the narrow hinges. Speaking of which, they seem pretty stable and look quite durable in the long run because they are made of aluminum. Unfortunately, though, the hinges are so tightly pulled that opening the lid with one hand is not possible but we also noticed that the screen remains firmly in place even when working on unstable surface.

The sides of the laptop offer the same port distribution and design compared to the 14-inch T470 variant and unfortunately, no extra connectors. We think it’s logical to expect at least an extra USB from a bigger form factor but we can let that one pass because it carries all the needed I/Os anyway. The left side comes with a standard USB 3.0 port along with a USB-C 3.1 (Gen 2) with Thunderbolt 3 support. The DC charging port and the main exhaust vent are also placed on the left whereas the right side holds the rest of the ports – 3.5 mm audio jack, SD card reader, two USB 3.0, HDMI and an RJ-45 for LAN. Luckily, gone are the days of clunky old ThinkPads because the T570 fits all that hardware in a 20.2 mm package – that’s just about the height of the 14-inch model as well.

The interior doesn’t surprise us with anything new – excellent AccuType keyboard with slightly shorter than usual travel but delightful clicky tactile feedback while the keycaps are slightly concaved for maximum comfort when typing. We are also pretty satisfied by the big nature of the keyboard because it’s extended to its maximum – as far as the chassis allows. The touchpad is absolutely identical to the 14-inch version – good gliding surface, extra responsive, accurate with light mouse clicks. The latter, however, is conditional. If you reach to the upper half of the touchpad and try to press the mouse button, you will feel that it becomes stiffer and stiffer as you go towards the upper end. It gets in the way sometimes but luckily for the hardcore ThinkPad users, the TrackPoint is still available while the provided left, middle and right mouse buttons (under the spacebar) are well-placed and feel extremely comfortable to use. Moreover, the area around the keyboard and the touchpad is in the traditional ThinkPad fashion – slightly roughened black plastic that looks cheap but feels rigid at the same time. Only when strong pressure is applied you can see the keyboard and the wrist rest area sinking. It’s nothing you should worry about because it doesn’t really make any impact on the user experience.

The ThinkPad T570 covers all of the essential points a business-oriented notebook should have – excellent input devices, strong and durable chassis with compact and lightweight design while delivering all of the essential connectors. Quite frankly, we don’t have any major complaints about the device’s casing except a few minor improvements we would like to see in the next generation. First, the touchpad should be “clickable” across the whole surface, the hinges should be firm and stealthy without being so tightly pulled like these – opening the laptop with one hand should be possible.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Similarly to the 14-inch model, the T470, the T570 doesn’t have dedicated service hatches on the bottom. However, reaching the hardware inside is super easy and hassle-free. It requires only some unscrewing here and there as well as the removal of the external battery, which is rated at just 24Wh but can be swapped with a bigger battery from Lenovo if needed.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

One of the biggest disappointments here is the limited storage options. Although the T570 is a full-fledged 15-inch laptop, it lacks a 2.5-inch drive bay, which is swapped by a metal plate holding a 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD as shown in the photos below. Flipping the plate revealed a thermal paste and a 256GB Samsung PM961 drive.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB Samsung PM961 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

At least, Lenovo hasn’t skipped on the memory slots – they are two and support up to 2x 16GB of DDR4-2400 memory. The unit we’ve tested came with only one 8GB RAM chip manufactured by Samsung.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed near the external battery and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The internal battery is a bit bigger than the external one and it’s rated at 32Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design is pretty simple – just one small heat pipe connecting the cooling fan to the heat sink.

Display quality

The T570’s display uses a 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel manufactured by LG with model number LP156WF9-SPF1. The pixel density of the screen is 142 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

The maximum brightness we were able to record is 282 cd/m2 in the center of the screen while the average across the surface is 281 cd/m2 with just 6% deviation. The color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness aligns with the optimal 6500K.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen at 100% brightness is 2.7, which is relatively good since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted. The contrast ratio is excellent 1100:1. You can also see how the values change at around 140 cd/m2 luminance.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers just 51% of the sRGB color gamut making it suitable for general browsing and office work but it’s not exactly “multimedia material”.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

It appears that the display doesn’t is PWM-free across all brightness levels making it safe to use for long periods of time in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin, and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

If it was a mid-range business laptop, like the ThinkPad E570, for example, we won’t be complaining about the display but since this is a high-end notebook, we expected high-quality IPS panel as well. It does have some good properties like high contrast ratio and doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels but the limited sRGB coverage and relatively low maximum brightness cripple the user experience. It appears that the 15-inch version of the laptop suffers from the same issue that the 14-inch T470 does.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo ThinkPad T570 configurations with 15.6″ Innolux N140HCA-EAB (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2vGa851

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i5-7200U (4-core, 2.50 – 3.10 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8096MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 620
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 3x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45
  • SD card reader
  • Smartcard reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 24Wh external + 32Wh integrated
Thickness 20.2 mm (0.8″)
Weight 1.975 kg (4.35 lbs)

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official website.

Battery

While the basic 14-inch configuration ThinkPad T470 sports an integrated 24Wh battery along with an external 24Wh unit, the 15-inch model offers a bigger base 32Wh unit and the same removable 24Wh one. At first glance, this may seem an incremental update that would be compensated with the bigger 15.6-inch diagonal but apparently, the results from our tests suggest otherwise. The ThinkPad T570 impresses with much better battery runtimes compared to its smaller 14-inch sibling and way above average endurance compared to other 15-inch laptops.

Of course, all tests were performed using the same conditions as always – Wi-Fi turned on, Windows battery saving feature turned on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty good web browsing score – 550 minutes (9 hours and 10 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Considerably lower but still a good result – 453 minutes (7 hours and 33 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can last three hours under heavy load – 192 minutes (3 hours and 2 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.66
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65-0.27%
HP EliteBook 850 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.75+2.46%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)3.36-8.2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.66

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476
HP EliteBook 850 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)518+8.82%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)452-5.04%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)475-0.21%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.42
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.45+0.17%
HP EliteBook 850 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.60+1.03%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U (2-cores, 2.4 - 3.0 GHz)19.43+11.54%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.44+0.11%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.350 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel HD Graphics 6206603
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6206612+0.14%
HP EliteBook 850 G4 AMD Radeon R7 M465 (2GB GDDR5)12248+85.49%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 5206109-7.48%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)21597+227.08%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel HD Graphics 620792
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620783-1.14%
HP EliteBook 850 G4 AMD Radeon R7 M465 (2GB GDDR5)1736+119.19%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520791-0.13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)3493+341.04%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel HD Graphics 620-
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6203099-
HP EliteBook 850 G4 AMD Radeon R7 M465 (2GB GDDR5)5484-
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 5203163-
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)11041-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad T570 Intel HD Graphics 620222
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620223+0.45%
HP EliteBook 850 G4 AMD Radeon R7 M465 (2GB GDDR5)531+139.19%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520217-2.25%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)1033+365.32%

Temperatures

The stress test isn’t the best way to represent real-life usage but it’s still the only way to determine the overall stability and effectiveness of the cooling design in the long run. In any case, the laptop isn’t made for long and extreme workload so don’t take the results below so critically.

As usual, we started with 100% CPU load for an hour. The CPU’s temperatures were relatively low and for most of the time, the system was able to support the chip at its maximum frequency for two active cores – 3.1 GHz. We also have to note that the system’s cooling fan was pretty silent even under prolonged heavy workload.

We turned on the GPU stress test after the initial hour and the CPU’s temperatures didn’t change at all while the frequency dropped by another 100 MHz. This is a good sign because apparently, the cooling system is able to support 100% CPU + 100% GPU load without resorting to downclocking. The chip is able to utilize the full performance of the CPU and the iGPU without a sweat. The fan speed remained at its previous state while staying pretty silent.

And as expected, the temperatures on the surface were low with the only warm area around the center of the keyboard. Still, the digits shown in the heat map below will be much lower under normal use.

Verdict

To our surprise, the 15-inch model from the series isn’t much different from its 14-inch sibling. It doesn’t really offer anything more considering the bigger chassis – storage options are the same, the I/O is identical but on the contrary, the internal battery offers slightly bigger capacity, which in turn delivers better endurance overall.

Our opinion of the input devices remain the same as well – comfortable, clicky keyboard with long key travel, excellent TrackPoint positioning and usability and a bit too stiff clickpad. Lenovo practically used the same set of input devices as the 14-inch T470. Build quality is right up there with the rest of the high-end buisness laptops feeling quite sturdy and reliable in the long run – no corners cut here.

But our main complaint regarding the screen remains – relatively dimmer than most IPS panels and covers just half of the sRGB color gamut. This is downright unacceptable for a laptop at this price range, even if it’s a business-oriented notebook. We’ve seen practically the same image quality delivered by the considerably less expensive Lenovo ThinkPad E470 and E570 and we actually praised them for that. But a notebook that starts at around $1 000, we definitely can’t let that one slip by.

However, if display quality isn’t of such great importance to you and working outdoors won’t be on daily basis (the screen is a bit dim for outdoor use) and the storage limitation of just one M.2 SSD slot (no 2.5-inch drive in a business-oriented 15-inch laptop, really?) will suit your needs, then you should definitely consider the T570 as your next daily driver. One of the most important features like build quality, input devices, battery life and oevall reliablity are still the main order of the day for the ThinkPat T-series.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wJcyEe

Pros

  • Sturdy case and fairly portable for a 15-incher
  • Excellent keyboard, comfortable TrackPoint, good touchpad (with a small exception)
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels
  • Dual-battery system with hot swap support and the external battery can be upgraded
  • Good battery runtimes even with the stock setup
  • Silent and reliable cooling solution

Cons

  • The clickpad is a bit too stiff in some areas
  • Pricey
  • Low-quality IPS panel (low maximum brightness, just half sRGB coverage)
  • Doesn’t have a 2.5-inch bay (you can either have an M.2 SSD or a 2.5-inch drive)

ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ review – thin, light, powerful

$
0
0

ASUS’ ZenBook UX series has always attracted a lot of attention and it’s easy to see why. All of the ultrabooks from this lineup offer a fairly powerful hardware combined with excellent battery life, good multimedia capabilities in a thin and light package. What’s not to like, right? Well, just like everything life, the ZenBook UX310UQ isn’t for everyone and it really depends on what you are willing to sacrifice along the way.

Just like the 14-inch UX410UQ, the 13-inch UX310UQ offers an ULV (ultra-low voltage) CPU like the Core i7-7500U, a discrete graphics solution – NVIDIA GeForce 940MX with 2GB of DDR3 memory and blazingly fast M.2 PCIe NVMe storage support, although our units arrived with regular M.2 SATA SSDs. Of course, the usual amount of memory is 8GB of DDR4-2400 and the 13.3-inch display offers a bright IPS solution suitable for multimedia. We were pretty impressed by the battery life and overall user experience that the UX410UQ carries but what about the smaller 13-inch installment? Is it any better or is it worse? Well, in most cases the 14-inch version is a better choice so continue reading to find out why.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2vLvKl6

Contents

Retail package

The package contains the usual user manuals, AC adapter and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

The design and choice of materials are familiar. Nothing has changed compared to its predecessor and its bigger 14-inch sibling. There’s one thing that should be noted, though – the screen bezels appear to be thicker when compared to the ones of the UX410UQ, which makes the overall size of the machine mostly same. In this case, you might as well go for the 14-inch version since you get a slightly bigger screen in the same body.

Anyway, the lid consists of a fairly thick brushed aluminum sheet with concentric texture that is once again stable and hard to twist. The surface is prone to smudges but because of the metallic color, they aren’t so prominent. The single-hinge design provides good stability, smooth movement and keeps the lid firmly in place. It also allows you to open the notebook with one hand. The bottom piece is made of anodized aluminum, it’s clean with no big grills – only two small grills are found towards the front for the speakers.

The sides are remarkably thin measuring at just a little over 18 mm and accommodate the usual set of ports you’d find on a 15-inch device. The connectors are also well distributed on the left and right. Really convenient. The left side holds the 3.5 mm audio jack, a full-sized HDMI port, USB 3.0, and an USB 3.1 (Gen 2) connector as well. On the right, you can see two USB 2.0 connectors and the SD card reader. The USB 3.1 Gen 2 connector is a nice finishing touch because you can extend the I/O with a decent amount of plugs via USB-C hub.

As the rest of the chassis, the interior incorporates anodized aluminum surface providing good stability in the keyboard area and around the palm rest section. The keyboard once again feels somehow spongy – each key press feels like you are pressing a tight spring – but that doesn’t really affect the typing experience in a big way. It just takes some time adjusting. Besides, we found the travel distance more than decent and the clicky feedback satisfying. The keyboard backlight is discreet while the layout is standard and provides all the needed shortcuts. The touchpad is also really nice with excellent gliding surface, light mouse clicks, accurate and responsive. There’s nothing bad we can say about it really.

To sum things up, the ZenBook UX310UQ’s chassis’ choice of materials is not only great but also makes it portable (18 mm thin)), light (just 1.4 kg) and sturdy. The hinge appears to be stable while the input devices can definitely get the work done on the go.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The bottom piece comes off easily and gives access to all of the internals. And as expected, the ZenBook UX310UQ packs absolutely the same hardware as its bigger 14-inch UX410UQ sibling.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

The laptop comes not only with the standard M.2 SSD slot but also packs a 2.5-inch drive slot available for upgrade. Anyway, the M.2 drive slot is taken by a 256GB Micron SATA SSD. We would have appreciated a PCIe NVMe SSD but this might just be a regional issue.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB Micron M.2 SATA SSD (2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD Free Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard packs 8GB of integrated DDR4-2400 memory but our unit packs another upgradable 4GB DDR4-2400 chip as well.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 SK Hynix 4GB DDR4-2400 Upgrade options

Other components

Intel 8265NGW takes care of the Wi-Fi connection.

And the same battery is found inside the 13-inch model – 48Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling solution is also identical and relies on just one small heat pipe going across both chips and connecting the cooling fan to the heat sinks.

Display quality

The ultrabook uses a familiar 13.3-inch Ful HD (1920×1080) IPS panel from AU Optronics with model number B133HAN02.7. The latter can be found in the ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360, however, this one is largely different from the one we’ve tested before. Anyway, the pixel density remains 166 ppi and pixel pitch of 0.153 x 0.153 mm is still at hand. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 50 cm.

The screen offers excellent viewing angles.

We were able to measure a maximum brightness of 368 cd/m2 in the center and 353 cd/m2 as average across the surface. This means that this version of the panel is about 40% brighter than the previous one we’ve tested on the ZenBook UX360. The maximum deviation regarding backlight uniformity is just 6%. We’ve recorded slightly colder than usual color temperature at maximum brightness – 7280K. But as we go along the grayscale, the color temperature falls down a little – 7000K but still colder than the optimal 6500K. Below you can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (about 48% brightness).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the display is just 1.7, which is a pretty good result since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio is also excellent – 1200:1 before profiling and 1000:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Again, we got much better result here than the other version of the panel – 94% coverage of the sRGB color gamut. That’s almost double the coverage.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 22 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

And here’s the one thing in common between the ZenBook UX360 panel and this one – both use PWM but only below 100 cd/m2 (30% brightness). This means that in the most common brightness range, your eyes won’t experience any issues with screen flickering. But keep in mind that we strongly recommend keeping the brightness level above 30% at any time since the frequency of the emitted light is extremely low and “aggressive”.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

At first, we were disappointed to find out that both ultrabooks share the same panel as the ZenBook UX360 uses a somehow budget type of IPS panel and we expect a higher quality display on the ZenBook UX310UQ. To our surprise, this is probably a revised version of the panel scoring excellently in our tests. The display is not only good for the usual browsing and office work, but potentially for multimedia and color-sensitive work on the go (thanks to our custom profiles that bring dE2000 down to just 1.7).

In any case, you can enjoy an IPS panel with high maximum brightness suitable for outdoor use, excellent contrast ratio and wide sRGB coverage. PWM is present only below 100 cd/m2 making the panel safe to use for long periods of time (as long as you keep the brightness level above 30%).

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS ZenBook UX310 configurations with 13.0″ AUO B133HAN02.7 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2eJckGt

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is on par with the competition – we’ve got clear lower frequencies and small deviations in the mid and high range.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i7-7500U (2-core, 2.70 – 3.50 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 12GB (1x 4096MB + 1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SATA SSD
Display 13.3-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac 2×2, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • SD card reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 48Wh
Thickness 18.35 mm (0.73″)
Weight 1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)

ASUS ZenBook UX310 configurations

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

The laptop sports a 48Wh battery that might not seem a lot but for a 13.3-inch casing and hardware that’s not so demanding, the unit keeps the lights on for quite some time. The Core i7-7500U CPU and the 13-inch IPS panel are the main components drawing so much power but still manage to keep the notebook running for longer than expected. The results from the web browsing and video playback are more than satisfactory.

And interestingly, the 14-inch ZenBook Ux410UQ scored better in both battery tests and the only reason we could think of is the panel. Although the 13-inch screen should draw a bit less power, it seems that the panel itself is the culprit here. Keep in mind, though, that these are just assumptions.

Of course, all tests were run using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty good result on the web browsing test – 420 minutes (7 hours).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Higher than expected video playback score – 448 minutes (7 hours and 28 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that almost three hours under heavy workload – 171 minutes (2 hours and 51 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.83
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81-0.52%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.63-5.22%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.39-11.49%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.24-15.4%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.22-15.93%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525+0.57%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)488-6.51%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)440-15.71%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482-7.66%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.55
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49-0.34%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.88+1.88%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.02+2.68%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)18.98+8.15%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.78+7.01%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.888 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 940MX (2GB DDR3)

The NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but with slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. The memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 2GB of DDR3 VRAM. It supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole graphics card is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-2gb-ddr3/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8400
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468+0.81%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6208257-1.7%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6208272-1.52%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)13137+56.39%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5205009-40.37%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1601
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597-0.25%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620998-37.66%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6201023-36.1%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2095+30.86%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520732-54.28%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6203674-
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6203731-
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5202451-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)430
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432+0.47%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620305-29.07%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 620390-9.3%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)634+47.44%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520137-68.14%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 111 fps 70 fps 51 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 85 fps 57 fps 13 fps

Temperatures

Keep in mind that the stress tests that we perform don’t represent real-life usage but remain as one of the most reliable ways to assess the overall stability and effectiveness of the cooling system in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU load for about an hour. At first, the chip was able to reach its maximum operating frequency of about 3.5 GHz and shortly after that, dropped down to 3.0 GHz and stayed there for good. Temperatures were relatively low.

After turning on the GPU stress test, the Core i7-7500U toned down to 2.9 GHz while reaching temperatures just below 85 °C while no GPU throttling occurred – the 940MX was running at about 1188 MHz, although a little hot – 76 °C.

Interestingly, the interior remained exceptionally cool throughout the whole test.

Verdict

While the laptop sounds great on paper, there are some things you really need to consider before buying it. First, the thin and light design combined with the powerful hardware has its price and this time it’s noise emissions. The cooling fan is always spinning even if you are not using laptop and it just sits idle. Secondly, there’s already a better version of the notebook that makes this one obsolete – the UX410UQ is nearly identical regarding hardware, build, dimensions, weight, input devices, storage options and performance but packs a slightly larger 14-inch display, somehow longer battery life and slightly better screen. We honestly can’t think of a reason to choose the 13-inch UX310UQ option.

In any case, you will be impressed by the build quality, feel, input devices, battery life, performance and upgrade options. On contrary to most ultrabooks, this little fellow packs an M.2 SSD slot alongside a 2.5-inch drive and even one memory slot available for an upgrade.

So if you are looking into solid and portable all-rounder at a decent price and the ZenBook UX310UQ happens to be on your “want” list, then we strongly recommend looking into the ZenBook UX410UQ and the recently released Lenovo Ideapad 720s. Both pack a tough punch but only one will suit most of your needs.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2vLvKl6

Pros

  • Premium (all-aluminum) and solid build
  • Light and portable
  • Decent keyboard, good touchpad
  • Excellent screen
  • No PWM above 100 cd/m2
  • Offers the upgradability of a 15-incher (M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD + 2.5-inch HDD/SSD and one RAM slot)
  • Good battery life
  • Great value

Cons

  • The cooling fan doesn’t stop spinning even at idle
  • Not the best cooling solution for a CPU and discrete GPU configuration (applies to the 940MX configurations only)
  • No compelling reason to opt for the 13-inch variant – the 14-inch UX410UQ is the smarter choice

ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE review – ASUS’ answer to the MacBok Pro 15 and XPS 15

$
0
0

With the latest generation of CPUs and GPUs from Intel and NVIDIA on the mobile front, OEMs started a race – who will build the fastest, yet the thinnest and most portable notebook. We’ve seen some great design and performance from the latest generation of Apple’s MacBook Pro 15 and Dell’s XPS 15. But what if you get roughly the same specs and performance and put it on a much more affordable package? That’s exactly what ASUS has managed to achieve with its latest ZenBook Pro UX550VE – a successor to the well-received ZenBook Pro UX501 and a worthy competitor to the MacBook Pro 15 and XPS 15.

Costing around €300-350 less than its direct competitor, the XPS 15, you’d expect that there are some compromises along the way. But at first glance, there’s nothing wrong or fishy about the UX550VE – solid metal chassis, high-end hardware, thin-bezel IPS panel with good multimedia properties, long battery life and comfortable input devices. For some time now, ASUS has often been associated with excellently built ultrabooks while pricing them lower than the competition. And with the UX550VE, ASUS doesn’t disappoint – Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, up to 16GB of DDR4-2400 memory, up to 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD and an optional 4K UHD IPS touch-enabled display. Where’s the catch? Find out in the thorough review below.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wZR8k0

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a relatively big package with plenty of goods inside the box. Aside from the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord, the laptop is accompanied by a neat cable tie, a USB-A to RJ-45 for LAN connectivity, a cleaning cloth and a carrying bag.

Design and construction

Our unit shipped with that signature obsidian blue color (or Royal Blue as ASUS calls it) that looks not only elegant but different as well. As we said earlier, the notebook features an all-aluminum chassis – the lid is brushed while the rest of the body is anodized with chamfered edges. The metal chassis hasn’t reflected so much on the weight as the UX550VE weighs the impressive 1.8 kg and measures just 18.9 mm in height – that’s mighty impressive for a 15-inch laptop. However, the XPS 15 and the MacBook Pro 15 are still thinner than ASUS’ solution but it’s not really so apparent. All three weight approximately the same.

Starting with the lid, the ZenBook UX550VE carries the iconic concentric brushed aluminum plate on top with ASUS’ illuminated logo. You just can’t mistake it for another brand. The aluminum plate provides decent stability and bends ever so slightly, yet it’s still acceptable given the thickness of the device. It’s also fairly resistant to torsion probably thanks to the wide singe-hinge design. Speaking of which, it provides quite sturdy operation without using both hands to open the laptop but as you go towards the end, the hinge becomes pretty stiff. This will definitely suit the touch-enabled versions well. What’s more, the side bezels of the screen measure at just 7.3 mm while the upper one and the lower chin are slightly thicker. Of course, the XPS 15 still holds the crown in this regard but the compromise is the awkwardly placed webcam. The bottom of the chassis features anodized aluminum without any vents for cool air intake, only two out of four speakers are placed at the bottom.

Although thin enough to impress, the sides still maintain functionality. Measuring just below 19 mm and sporting chamfered edges, the UX550VE offers pretty much everything you’d need from a 15-inch laptop in terms of connectivity. On the left, you will find the DC charging port, full-sized HDMI and not one but two USB-C 3.1 supporting Thunderbolt 3. On the right, you can rely on the 3.5 mm audio jack, microSD card reader and two USB-A 3.0 ports.

Opening the lid reveals a familiar interior – fairly stable anodized aluminum sheet with glass covered touchpad and a comfortable keyboard, although, we were surprised to see that the Numpad block is missing since it’s a 15-inch device. Anyway, the chassis continues to give an impression of a stable design, although we found only one relatively weak spot – right in the center of the hinge, the sheet gives in under small amounts of pressure. Nothing worth considering in real-world conditions but we felt obligated to note that since it’s a high-end device. The rest of the interior appears to be rock-solid.

The keyboard feels nice and delivers about 1.5 mm of travel but we felt like it’s a little bit less. To compensate for the shorter travel, the keys offer tactile and audible clicky feedback making the whole typing experience very pleasant. Also, each key has a small indentation for added comfort. The LED backlight is white and has several brightness levels each being pretty discreet and we didn’t notice any annoying light bleed. And as for the trackpad, it has silky smooth glass surface registering each gesture, swipe and drag accurately. Mouse clicks are light, clicky, deep and don’t get in the way of dragging and dropping.

All in all, the UX550VE is has an excellently built chassis with virtually no downsides. Even though it costs considerably less than the competition, the overall build quality is on par. Still, the carbon fiber on the XPS 15 kind of makes the whole user experience a bit elevated and Apple’s simplistic and impeccable design still comes on top of all. Nevertheless, the UX550VE is definitely a bang for the bucks, especially if you are willing to spend so much on a 15-incher.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

As before, the ZenBook UX550VE offers easy access to the internals but not thanks to dedicated service lids. The bottom plate comes off easily once you remove all the screws and pry it up.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Unfortunately, storage is limited only to a single M.2 SSD, which in our case is a Samsung PM961 PCIe NVMe SSD with 512GB capacity. Probably due to design limitations, the laptop skips on the 2.5-inch drive bay in favor of a bigger battery.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 512GB Samsung M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

To our surpise, the notebook has no available RAM slot for upgrade and instead relies on soldered RAM chips (it can be found under the small metal plate). The configuration we’ve tested had just 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory. This is a considerable drawback especially for a 15-inch laptop.

Other components

Next to one of the cooling fans, you can find the Intel 8265NGW Wi-Fi adapter.

The battery is located under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at the whopping 73Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling system looks pretty solid – two big heat pipes connecting both fans and heat sinks. Speaking of which, the GPU heat sink is familiar in design – often found in high-end gaming laptops. Too bad that even this isn’t enough to keep the internals cool during heavy workload.

Display quality

The display uses a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with matte finish manufactured by Innolux with model number N156HCE-EN1. The 15.6-inch diagonal means 142 ppi pixel density and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

In the center of the screen, we’ve recorded a maximum brightness of 337 cd/m2 and 316 cd/m2 as average across the surface with a maximum deviation of 14%. The color temperature at maximum brightness on a white screen is 7260K, which means that colors will appear slightly colder than usual. As we go along the grayscale, the color temperature remains approximately 7200K. You can see how values change at 140 cd/m2 (56% brightness) below.

The maximum dE2000 color deviation at 56% brightness is 4.0, which isn’t really good if you consider doing color-sensitive work on this screen. Contrast ratio, however, is excellent – 1200:1 before calibration and 1000:1 after.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The panel covers 92% of the sRGB color space making it suitable for multimedia as well.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 21 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

And here’s the one thing in common between the ZenBook UX360 panel and this one – both use PWM but only below 100 cd/m2 (30% brightness). This means that in the most common brightness range, your eyes won’t experience any issues with screen flickering. But keep in mind that we strongly recommend keeping the brightness level above 30% at any time since the frequency of the emitted light is extremely low and “aggressive”.

Although we’ve detected PWM from 0 to 29% brightness, we consider the display practically harmless in this regard because you will most probably end up using it way above 85 cd/m2. And even if you go below that point (if you are in a pitch black room, for example) the frequency of the emitted light is too high and may not affect everyone – only users with sensitive to PWM eyes.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The presented IPS display is excellent for work, browsing, gaming and multimedia. It offers wide sRGB coverage, high contrast, high maximum brightness and has no PWM above 29% brightness. The only problems we’ve encountered were the slightly colder color temperature, deviating gamma curve and inaccurate color reproduction but all of this can be fixed with out custom profiles.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE configurations with 15.6″ Innolux N156HCE-EN1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2wmA9q7

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good – there’s enough clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-core, 2.80 – 3.80 GHz, 6MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
Display 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • HDMI
  • microSD card reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 73Wh
Thickness 18.9 mm (0.74″)
Weight 1.84 kg (4.05 lbs)

ASUS ZenBook UX550 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writing of this review so if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official website.

Battery

Although considerably cheaper, the ASUS ZenBook UX550VE beats both of its competitors (the MacBook Pro 15 and XPS 15) when it comes to battery life. We were really impressed by the battery runtimes as the laptop pulled off almost a record-breaking web browsing result falling short only to the Dell Inspiron 15 7567 in the 15-inch class. It’s really funny how this 15-inch ultrabook with Core i7-7700HQ and a Full HD IPS panel was able to run for such long periods of time thanks to its surprisingly big 73Wh battery.

All tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi always running, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows power saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Outstanding battery score on this test – 715 minutes (11 hours and 55 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Sensibly lower but still an excellent score – 532 minutes (8 hours and 52 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can run for more than three hours under heavy workload – 215 minutes (3 hours and 45 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.18
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 Intel Core i7-4720HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.6 GHz)7.02-14.18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.28-11%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)7.60-7.09%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)856
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 Intel Core i7-4720HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.6 GHz)781-8.76%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)810-5.37%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)856

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)10.67
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 Intel Core i7-4720HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.6 GHz)10.15-4.87%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.89+2.06%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.95-6.75%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7700HQ managed to get 13.335 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful PCs, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)

NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 Ti for notebooks is almost identical to its desktop counterpart but offers different clock rates. What’s more, the Ti variant uses more CUDA cores than the standard GTX 1050 version – 768 vs 640 but both GPUs use the same GP107 chip, which differs from the other NVIDIA high-end solutions. The GP107 chip is manufactured by Samsung, not TSMC, and it’s built on the 14nm node on contrary to the 16nm from TSMC.

Anyway, the GTX 1050 Ti also offers significantly higher clock rates than the normal GTX 1050 versions well 1493 – 1620 MHz vs 1364 – 1493 MHz. This contributes to a significant performance boost over the standard version but the rest of the specs remain the same. The GPU offers 4GB of GDDR5 memory connected via 128-bit interface and transfer rates as high as 112 GB/s.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-4gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)47697
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)30705-35.62%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) AMD Radeon Pro 450 (2GB GDDR5)16922-64.52%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)39122-17.98%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7482
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)4225-43.53%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) AMD Radeon Pro 450 (2GB GDDR5)2741-63.37%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6203-17.09%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)-
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)13700-
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) AMD Radeon Pro 450 (2GB GDDR5)9014-
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)19909-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2231
ASUS ZenBook Pro UX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2GB GDDR5)1272-42.99%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016) AMD Radeon Pro 450 (2GB GDDR5)951-57.37%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1644-26.31%

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 103 fps 73 fps 40 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Max (Check settings)
Average FPS 74 fps 50 fps 27 fps

Temperatures

The stress tests that we perform can’t be taken as a good representation of real-life use of the machine since even normal gaming session can’t put 100% CPU and GPU load at the same time for such long periods of time but it’s still the best way of assessing the overall stability and effectiveness of the cooling system in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU stress test for an hour. The results show that the Core i7-7700HQ ran a bit too warm but was able to sustain its maximum operating frequency for four active cores – 3.2 GHz. Usually, configurations with this processor tend to keep temperatures around 80 degrees or less.

When we turned on the GPU torture test as well, the CPU and the GPU started throttling. The Core i7-7700HQ’s frequency dropped down to 1.8 GHz, which is way below its base frequency while the GTX 1050 Ti didn’t go anywhere it’s minimum frequency either – 1177 MHz. Often when cooling designs have trouble keeping up with the powerful hardware clock down the CPU or GPU but not both at the same time. In this case, the ASUS ZenBook Pro UX550VE’s cooling system proved to be quite insufficient for the given hardware. Also, the GTX 1050 Ti ran a little bit too hot.

The inner temperatures have affected the temperatures on the surface as you can see from the heat map below. Still, the palm rest area remained cool. Also, we noticed that the cooling fans keep running even when the notebook is idle or during normal office work.

Verdict

The ASUS ZenBook UX550VE is a no-brainer if you are looking for an affordable Dell XPS 15 or Apple MacBook Pro 15 alternative but obviously, you will have to deal with some setbacks along the way like insufficient cooling capabilities, always running cooling fans and a bit flexible interior. In addition, you are stuck with only one M.2 SSD and no RAM chip slots – you have to deal only with the soldered memory. This is also true for the MacBook Pro 15 but we expected more from ASUS, come on…

Anyway, if we put aside these inconsistencies, we are mostly impressed by the premium feel of the machine, excellent input devices, great IPS display (with practically no PWM) and outstanding battery life. The all-aluminum chassis with chamfered edges and brushed surface give the ZenBook Pro UX550VE a distinct look and feel while the long battery life will let you enjoy your favorite movies and almost get you through a full workday on a single charge. However, we strongly recommend that you consider our custom profiles as they improve color accuracy, gamma and color temperature.

So at the end of the day, if you are willing to spend a little bit more on such laptop, the XPS 15 or the MacBook Pro 15 are better choices but if you are not so pretentious and can overlook some of the issues (especially if you are not going to play demanding games or use it for continues heavy workload), the ZenBook Pro UX550VE is actually the smarter choice.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2wZR8k0

Pros

  • Generally good build quality
  • Light and portable for a 15-inch device
  • Good input devices
  • Excellent IPS display
  • No PWM above 85 cd/m2 (29%) brightness
  • Outstanding battery life
  • Two Thunderbolt 3 connectors
  • Relatively affordable compared to some of its rivals

Cons

  • Poor cooling solution
  • Cooling fans run even when the laptop is idle and during normal office work
  • No availble RAM slots (only soldered memory)
  • There’s a noticeable flex on the interior
  • There are no configurations with 2.5-inch HDD/SSD slots

HP Omen X laptop review – highly-customizable mobile gaming rig

$
0
0

With the mainstream HP Omen laptops, such as the Omen 15 (2017) and Omen 17 (2017), it’s time for the high-end enthusiast Omen X. While the Omen 17 is a great deal, in our opinion, the Omen X takes things up a notch and focuses on features that only hardcore gamers and enthusiasts will appreciate – overclocking the CPU, GPU and RAM, improved cooling design with plenty of heat pipes and cooling fans (instead of an optical drive) and fully-customizable mechanical keyboard with macro keys and RGB illumination.

Surely, the notebook isn’t designed to take on the ASUS ROG Zephyrus or Acer’s Predator Triton 700 but instead invades the territory of the beefy Alienware 17 R4, Acer Predator 17 X and the Lenovo Legion Y920. However, we find the Omen X a different breed due to its highly-customizable “nature”, the inclusion of a really good mechanical keyboard and a bit more… let’s say conservative design approach, which in our opinion is much better than the usual flashy gaming design. Still, the machine offers just about everything you’d expect from a high-end gaming laptop also found in its rivals – a factory overclocked Intel Core i7-7820HK CPU, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (or 1070), 32GB of DDR4-2400 memory (unlocked for overclocking here), two M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slots, one 2.5-inch HDD slot and two screen option – 4K UHD IPS or Full HD IPS with 120 Hz refresh rate. Either way, you can enjoy the buttery-smooth gaming experience thanks to the built-in G-Sync feature. Find out more in the thorough review below.

DISCLOSURE: We received an early engineering sample from HP and thus the unit we used for the review isn’t suitable for a full review so we decided that we will publish only a potion of the full review. We will update it once we get our hands on a retail unit.

The notebook isn’t on sale yet but when it is, you can find the availalbe configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yb5hLl

Contents

Retail package

The box in which the Omen X came, had only the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord. We don’t know for sure whether the full retail package will come with more accessories.

Design and construction

The notebook is anything but portable. Tipping the scale at 4.35 kg and measuring at approximately 40 mm at its thickest point including the silicone feet, the device is comparable to the Alienware 17 R4 and the Acer Predator 17 X – differences are negligible, although the Alienware 17 R4 is considerably thinner. Anyway, we are glad to report that HP has used aluminum in most areas and was able to compensate the added weight and thickness with rigidity. We hope the cooling performance is just as good.

From a visual standpoint, the Omen X retains the design signature of its more affordable siblings – the Omen 15 and Omen 17. The lid is made of anodized aluminum and patterned metal sheets with Omen’s illuminated logo in the middle and two LED strips forming an “X”. This time around, however, all LED-illuminated ornaments are customizable thanks to the RGB lighting. Anyway, pressing the middle of the screen results in bending but interestingly, no ripples appear on the LCD screen. So in practice, this shouldn’t be an issue. Opening the lid reveals a familiar piston hinge design – they can be found in the ultra-thin HP Spectre 13. This means that the hinges feel quite similar as well – smooth linear travel, allow opening the device with one hand and stable positioning of the screen. We also found the whole lid to be quite resistant to torsion. And as for the bottom – it’s entirely made of plastic and it’s covered in rectangular-shaped grills along with two big vents on the sides for additional airflow – whether they are for cool air intake or dispersing the heat.

One of the most exciting things about the Omen X, however, is the expanded I/O. The notebook offers way beyond the bare minimum of connectivity and it’s also well-distributed along the sides. On the left, you can find just one USB 3.0 connector, the 3.5 mm audio jack and another 3.5 mm port for an external microphone. The right side accommodates the SD card reader and another USB 3.0 connector. The DC charging port is right next to the right grill, which might be awkward in some cases. In any case, the Omen X keeps the big guns on its back – RJ-45 for LAN, not one but two USB-C 3.1 connectors supporting Thunderbolt 3, one mini DisplayPort, another USB 3.0 port and a full-sized HDMI 2.0A connector supporting external displays with HDR. The latter will most probably be deciding factor for you if you already own an HDR-capable monitor. Moreover, it’s hard to miss the customizable RGB LED strip at the back and the huge grills for dispersing the heat on each side.

Moving onto the interior, we find a stable brushed aluminum sheet that doesn’t give in under pressure at all. Unfortunately, though, as all black and brushed finishes, this one is a fingerprint magnet as well. Anyhow, the most impressive feature we have here is the RGB-illuminated keyboard. Through the Omen Command Center, you can pick any color or any effect you’d like. There’s also a column of six macro keys positioned on the left, a full set of Fn shortcuts including an Omen-branded key that brings up the Omen Command Center app and full-sized isolated arrow keys. Regarding the feel of the keys – it’s nothing short of some full-sized desktop keyboards. We are pleased with relatively long key travel and satisfying audible and tactile feedback thanks to the tactile bump. With all being said, we think highly of the keyboard not only for gaming but for typing as well. And as for the touchpad, well it’s pretty much the same as the one on this year’s Omen 17, which means, of course, comfortable mouse keys, responsiveness, smooth gliding surface and accurate.

If you are able to overlook the weight and overall size of the notebook, the Omen X offers some neat features like mechanical keyboard, plenty of I/O, relatively easy upgradeability and rigidness.

Display quality

The Omen X comes with exactly the same panel as its slightly smaller 17-inch sibling – the HP Omen 17 (2017). They both share the AUO B173HAN01.4 (AUO149D) Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with 120Hz refresh rate and support for G-Sync. So we already know what to expect from the panel – excellent image quality, buttery-smooth gaming experience and some small issues that need to be corrected using pre-calibrated profiles.

Anyway, as all 17.3-inch Full HD panels, this one offers 127 ppi pixel density, 0.1995 x 0.1995 mm pixel pitch. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 69 cm.

The display offers excellent viewing angles.

Our equipment detected a maximum brightness of 330 cd/m2 in the middle of the screen and 333 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 5% deviation. The color temperature is close to the optimal but will still make colors appear slightly colder or blue-ish – 7040K. As we go along the grayscale, we observe similar average color temperature of about 6970K and you can also see how values change at 140 cd/m2 (71% brightness).

The maximum dE2000 color deviation is 1.4 at 73% brightness, which is an excellent result since values above 4.0 are unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio seems to be a bit lower than expected – 840:1 before calibration and 780:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

As expected, the display covers 92% of the sRGB color gamut making it ideal for gaming and multimedia.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 23 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

And here’s the one thing in common between the ZenBook UX360 panel and this one – both use PWM but only below 100 cd/m2 (30% brightness). This means that in the most common brightness range, your eyes won’t experience any issues with screen flickering. But keep in mind that we strongly recommend keeping the brightness level above 30% at any time since the frequency of the emitted light is extremely low and “aggressive”.

Of course, our equipment once againd didn’t detect any PWM across all brightness levels. This means that even users with sensitive eyes shouldn’t have any problems after long gaming sessions.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Although there were slight deviations from the results taken from the previously tested AUO B173HAN01.4 (AUO149D) panel, the viewing experience is excellent due to the wide sRGB color gamut coverage, decent contrast, high maximum brightness and the absence of PWM. The high refresh rate (120Hz) combined with NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology makes the gaming experience even better.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP Omen X configurations with 17.3″ AUO B173HAN01.4 (AUO149D) (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2h5QqdH

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i7-7820HK (4-core, 2.90 – 3.90 GHz, 8MB cache)
RAM 32GB (2x 16384MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8GB GDDR5X)
HDD/SSD 512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
Display 17.3-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 3x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3)
  • HDMI 2.0a
  • mini DisplayPort
  • 2x 3.5 mm jacks for audio and external microphone
  • SD card reader
  • RJ-45 for LAN
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery unknown for now
Thickness 40 mm (1.57″)
Weight 4.35 kg (9.60 lbs)

CPU – Intel Core i7-7820HK

The Core i7-7820HK is part of Intel’s latest generation Kaby Lake processors sporting an improved 14nm+ manufacturing process allowing for slightly higher clock speeds and better efficiency, although the performance per clock hasn’t changed since this is practically the same microarchitecture as the one used for the previous Skylake chips.

Anyway, the Core i7-7820HK offers higher operating frequency than its Core i7-6820HK predecessor – 2.9 – 3.9 GHz (for four active cores the Turbo Boost frequency drops to 3.5 GHz or 3.7 GHz for two active cores) vs 2.7 – 3.6 GHz but keeps most of the features like Hyper-Threading, (4/8 core/thread design), 8MB LL cache, a dual-channel DDR4-2400 or DDR3L-1600 memory controller and a TDP of 45W including the iGPU. Speaking of which, the processor integrates an Intel HD Graphics 630 chip clocked at 350 – 1150 MHz.

The most noticeable feature of this processor is the unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking and usually OEMs provide the needed software for doing so. In the end, the processor’s maximum frequency can be increased depending on the notebook’s cooling system.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7820hk/

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8GB GDDR5X)

The GeForce GTX 1080 is the top-shelf GPU from NVIDIA’s Pascal generation (except for the Titan X Pascal, of course) built upon 16nm TSMC process, which is a huge leap over the last generation (Maxwell), which featured a 28nm node. Anyway, the new architecture allows better thermals, efficiency and considerably higher clock speeds than its direct predecessor the GTX 980. Also, for the first time, NVIDIA has made the difference between the desktop and the mobile variants of the Pascal GPUs mostly unnoticeable in real-life use, although there’s a slight difference according to synthetic benchmarks.

CUDA cores (2560), ROPs (64) and TMUs (213) are identical to the desktop variant of the GTX 1080 since they are based on the same GP108 chip including the memory controller, which is the highlight of the new graphics card because it features the next generation of GDDR5X memory developed by Micron allowing higher memory bandwidth on a 256-bit interface clocked at 10 000 MHz. However, there’s a small difference in the base clock speeds – 1566 – 1733 MHz for the laptop version and 1607 – 1733 MHz for the desktop variant. Both frequencies can be altered depending on the manufacturer and the cooling system’s performance.

The GPU’s power consumption is rumored to be around 165W making it suitable only for large 17 or 15-inch machines with high-performance cooling system. In addition, the graphics card delivers new and exciting features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection, refined H.265 video encoding, etc.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-8gb-gddr5x/

Estimated performance and overclocking

One of the main features that HP is bragging about the Omen X is overclocking and overall performance. Unfortunately, we can’t really say anything about overclocking at this point but we sure expect some significant performance gains over the stock clock speeds of the CPU and GPU. We are also pleased to see that memory is overclockable as well. We will make sure to check out these features once the final units arrive.

In the meantime, we can have a pretty accurate guess on how the system will perform with the Core i7-7820HK and the GTX 1080. We’ve already reviewed a laptop with this setup – the Acer Predator 17 X (GX-792). So we are pretty sure that results from synthetic benchmarks and gaming tests won’t be much different from the ones listed in the Predator 17 X review.

Early verdict

It’s too early to draw any conclusions about the new Omen X since we weren’t able to perform our full sets of tests like battery life, performance and cooling capabilities. However, we are can be sure about the blazingly fast performance of the setup as a whole, the excellent viewing experience and the good build quality.

The performance of the system without overclocking should be really close to the already tested Core i7-7820HK + GTX 1080 systems on the market while the 120Hz IPS panel with G-Sync support should deliver immersive gaming experience even on the go. Build quality is also its strong suit while the chassis adds neat mechanical keyboard, cool customizable RGB LEDs around the chassis (including the keyboard) and a wide variety of connectivity options including not one but two USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports. Our main complaint at this point is the hefty chassis – it’s pretty damn thick and heavy even for a 17-inch laptop. Nevertheless, we can let that one slip by if the cooling system performs well.

The notebook isn’t on sale yet but when it is, you can find the availalbe configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yb5hLl

ASUS ASUSPRO B9440 review – ASUS’ first official attempt at business-oriented laptops

$
0
0

When we talk about business-grade laptops, the primary OEMs that come into mind will probably be Dell, HP and Lenovo’s legendary ThinkPad series. But what about ASUS? The company has been around for quite some time now but doesn’t have a strictly business lineup to call of its own. The closest thing to a business notebook is the ZenBook Pro lineup as it offers some additional multimedia features as well. With the ASUSPRO B9440, everything changes.

The ASUSPRO B9440 focuses on all that’s important for the mass business user – portability, rigidity, battery life, and input devices. In fact, the company claims the B9440 is the lightest 14-inch notebook on the market measuring at just 1.05 kg and just 15 mm thick with super thin screen bezels – just 5.4 mm on the sides and top. This easily puts it in the 13-inch category but what are the trade-offs here? Usually, such thin and light devices tend to cut some corners when it comes to cooling the 15W TDP processor, which in this case is the Core i7-7500U and skip a few connectors along the way. Unfortunately, the B9440 makes on exception here and even lacks a webcam, which for some users will be a deal-breaker. What else? We find out in our extensive review below.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2xhmAdO

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a standard ASUS box with the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord. The bonus here is the carrying bag.

Design and construction

Our first impression of the laptop is the incredibly rigid case, portable dimensions and low weight. But how ASUS made that possible? According to the OEM, the device uses an incredibly robust military grade magnesium alloy – MIL-STD 810G.

You can definitely tell that there’s more than the conventional plastic coating when testing the lid. Pressing the middle where the logo is placed doesn’t result in severe flex and doesn’t cause any ripples to appear on the screen. However, we found that due to the thin design, the whole screen is susceptible to twisting yet again, we didn’t notice any visible distortions on the LCD screen. Despite the low weight of the base, the screen hinge is perfectly balanced allowing the notebook to be opened with just one hand. Once you open up the ultrabook, the protruding part of the lid gives the whole base a 7-degree incline for more comfortable typing experience. ASUS claims that the tilted base puts less stress on the user’s wrists, neck and overall positioning of the body. We don’t know about that but it really is rather pleasant to use. The bottom piece is made of the same material as the rest of the notebook and features only two small grills on the sides for the loudspeakers.

The sides are just 15 mm thin and as we already mentioned, skip most of the conventional ports. On the left, you will only find the 3.5 mm audio jack while both USB-C connectors are placed on the protruding lid on the both sides. We could have gone easy on ASUS for including only USB-C connectors if only they were Gen 2 or Thunderbolt 3. It appears, however, that both ports are just Gen 1 so there’s limited expandability with a USB-C hub. At least one of them supports video output while charging the device is possible only using the left one.

The interior continues to impress with rigidity and gives in only big amounts of pressure in the middle section of the keyboard. Speaking of which, it features barely noticeable curved keycaps with plenty of travel (1.5 mm) and clicky tactile feedback. Typing on the keyboard is a delight and pretty much the same goes for the touchpad. All gestures, swipes and clicks are registered correctly while the gliding surface is buttery-smooth. Our only minor complaint would be the positioning of the fingerprint reader – it’s located in the far upper right corner.

To sum things up, ASUS has made an incredibly portable yet robust business laptop offering excellent working experience on the go thanks to the comfortable keyboard and touchpad. However, in search of extreme portability, the company has ditched the conventional connectors leaving just two USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) ports and due to the extremely thin bezels – no room was left for the webcam. With all being said, we question the decision made to cut so many practical features from the chassis in favor of portability.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Accessing the hardware inside is rather easy – you just need to remove the bottom panel by unscrewing all the bolts and then you can proceed with your cleaning or upgrading.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As expected, the ultrabook carries only an M.2 SSD slot and our unit came with a 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 SSD with 512GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 512GB Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

Unfortunately, the laptop comes only with soldered RAM and can’t be further upgraded so make sure you get a configuration that suits your needs.

Other components

The Wi-Fi module is located near one of the loudspeakers and, of course, it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The battery takes a strange shape but this way it utilizes the unused space inside the chassis. It’s rated at 48Wh and according to our tests it’s enough for a pretty solid endurance.

Cooling system

The cooling design is super simple – short heat pipe connecting the cooling fan and the heat sink. According to our stress tests, it’s fairly sufficient for normal office work and general browsing.

Display quality

The ASUSPRO B9440 uses the same IPS panel as the recently reviewed Lenovo Ideapad 720s – AU Optronics B140HAN03.5. The display offers Full HD (1920×1080) resolution, 157 ppi and 0.161 x 0.161 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

The maximum brightness in the center of the screen is 339 cd/m2 and 313 cd/m2 is the average across the surface with 15% maximum deviation. Color temperature at maximum brightness is 6730K and it’s pretty close to the standard 6500K. And as we go along the grayscale, the color temperature doesn’t change too much, in fact it is closer to the optimal – 6650K. You can see how values change at 56% (140 cd/m2) brightness in the image below.

The maximum dE2000 (color deviation) at 140 cd/m2 is 3.9, which is borderline acceptable since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is invovled. The contrast ratio is really high – 1400:1 and 1200:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

As expected, the display covers 92% of the sRGB color gamut making it suitable for multimedia as well.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 25 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Of course, the display doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels so it’s safe to use for long periods of time in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

There are no apparent problems with the display and it suits the higher price of the product. The wide sRGB coverage, high maximum brightness, the excellent contrast ratio and the absence of PWM make the laptop’s screen suitable for long hours of work and multimedia and pleasant experience in the outdoor environment.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUSPRO B9440 configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN03.5 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2xPX0j1

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The notebook features Harman Kardon-tuned speakers and offer good clarity in the high frequencies but this changes in the mids and lows.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Processor Intel Core i7-7500U (2-core, 2.70 – 3.50 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 620
HDD/SSD 512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
Display 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1 with support for power delivery and display output)
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1)
  • 3.5 mm audio jack
  • fingerprint reader
  • keyboard LED backlight
Battery 48Wh
Thickness 15 mm (0.59″)
Weight 1.05 kg (2.31 lbs)

ASUS ASUSPRO B9440 configurations

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) for the writin of this review so if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

Running a 14-inch Full HD IPS panel with Intel Core i7-7500U processor supported by a 48Wh battery, we expect long battery life. Fortunately, the ASUSPRO B9440 delivered excellent endurance, which is absolutely essential for every business-grade laptop. The video playback time was a bit lower than expected but more than enough for more than one movie at a time.

All tests were performed using the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, battery saving feature switched on and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Excellent battery runtime – 657 minutes (10 hours and 57 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Considerably lower score on the video playback but still good – 460 minutes (7 hours and 40 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can run for more than three hours under heavy workload – 227 minutes (3 hours and 47 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/657

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.66
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.22-12.02%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.80+3.83%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65-0.27%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65-0.27%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)534
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482-9.74%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)526-1.5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476-10.86%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)474-11.24%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.51
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.78+7.25%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.46-0.29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.45-0.34%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.47-0.23%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.695 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 is a direct successor to the integrated HD Graphics 520. The latter is found in ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the 6th Generation (Skylake) of chips while the former is in the 7th (Kaby Lake) generation of CPUs.

Intel’s HD Graphics 620 uses the GT2 version of the graphics chip with 24 EUs (Execution Units) reaching as high as 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz. However, the maximum operating frequency depends on the CPU, whether it’s the Core i3-7100U or the Core i5-7200U or the Core i7-7500U. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller. Its performance should be enough for multimedia activities, light applications and gaming on really low resolution and minimum graphics settings.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel HD Graphics 6208347
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5205009-39.99%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6207494-10.22%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6206612-20.79%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 6206265-24.94%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel HD Graphics 6201014
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520732-27.81%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6201004-0.99%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620783-22.78%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620728-28.21%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel HD Graphics 620-
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5202451-
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 6203699-
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 6203099-
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS ASUSPRO B9440UA Intel HD Graphics 620295
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520137-53.56%
Dell XPS 13 (9360, Kaby Lake) Intel HD Graphics 620302+2.37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470 Intel HD Graphics 620223-24.41%
Dell Latitude 14 7480 Intel HD Graphics 620255-13.56%

Temperatures

Of course, the stress tests don’t represent real-life usage since the notebook isn’t made for extended workload but it’s still the best way to assess the overall effectiveness and stability of the cooling system in the long run.

At first, the system was able to utilize the full performance of the Core i7-7500U at 3.5 GHz for a while but then the chip’s clock speeds went down to 2.7 GHz. Usually, notebooks with ULV processors are able to keep the maximum boost speed for four active cores (3.2 GHz) during the full first hour but the ASUSPRO failed to do so.

Turning on the GPU stress test caused the CPU to throttle but that’s usually normal for systems with iGPUs. This way the CPU gives enough headroom for the HD Graphics 620 to perform.

We’ve also measured temperatures on the surface – only the left side and the upper left corner of the interior became a bit warm but nothing too serious.

Verdict

At first, we thought that the ASUSPRO B9440 is just another extremely thin and light device that goes a long way to sacrifice the usual stuff like battery and performance. However, we were surprised to see both being resolved – the Core i7-7500U shows little to no difference in performance compared to other notebooks while battery life is just great.

Even rigidity is pretty good – despite the thin and light construction, the ASUSPRO B9440 offers a robust case with small and barely noticeable exceptions. Pretty much the same goes for the keyboard and touchpad – great working experience on the go. Speaking of experience on the go, the 14-inch IPS display makes the ultrabook suitable not only for work but for entertainment as well and more importantly, doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness so it’s safe to use for long periods of time.

Still, there are some notable drawbacks that this simplistic and portable design require. For starters, the notebook doesn’t have the usual set of ports and both USB-C connectors are just Gen 1. Secondly, the webcam is missing, which is not only a standard feature for all notebooks without exceptions but also a must-have component in strictly business-oriented laptops – something the ASUSPRO B9440 aims to be.

And by the end of the day, is it still worth it, considering all the trade-offs and the current price? Probably not, unless you demand this exceptionally portable piece of machinery. In any other case, you can add just a few more grams, a few millimeters (barely noticeable in our opinion) and you can get the latest alteration of the XPS 13 (9360) or we can even go further with the HP Spectre 13, which fails at everything the ASUSPRO is good at but offers two Thunderbolt 3 connectors and it’s still amazingly thin and light. Smarter alternatives would be the 14-inch Acer TravelMate P648, the Lenovo ThinkPad T470 or the Dell Latitude 14 7480 and even the Apple MacBook Pro 13. All of which put usability before portability, yet they remain in the ultra-portable category.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2xhmAdO

Pros

  • Thin, light, portable
  • Durable chassis with MIL-STD 810G standard
  • Comfortable keyboard and touchpad
  • Excellent IPS panel
  • No PWM across all brightness levels
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Really limited I/O
  • Hard to utilize CPU Turbo Boost frequencies at times
  • No webcam
  • Some units come with SATA 3 M.2 instead of PCIe NVMe

Dell XPS 13 (9365) 2-in-1 review – the good old XPS 13 but more versatile

$
0
0

Following the trend of 2-in-1s, Dell decided to release a version of one of its best ever notebooks, the XPS 13. The award-winning device took the tech market by a storm and despite its “bulky” price, it was praised by a number of reviewers and tech websites, ours included. Totally deserved, though. With every minor update, the XPS 13 returned better in every way – more powerful and with more stamina.

But what about the 2-in-1 version? Well, it’s practically the same XPS 13 but with a 360-degree rotatable hinge offering versatility – something the main version of the XPS 13 doesn’t have. And by doing so, Dell has done everything in their power to sacrifice as few features as possible, but is it enough? Is it enough to beat the competition with this steep price while the likes of Lenovo Yoga 900S and ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360 offer mostly the same specs for a fraction of the price?

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2xDzPaB

Contents

Retail package

The retail package is fairly standard offering the usual user manuals, the AC adapter, power cord and the notebook in a minimalistic black box. There’s also a handy USB-C to USB-A adapter included in the package as well since the laptop has only USB Type-C connectors.

Design and construction

We’ve already been here more than once. Our opinion of the XPS 13 2-in-1 isn’t any different from the standard 13-inch version because it sports exactly the same chassis with the only difference being in the hinge design.

While we are extremely happy with the build in the previous versions, there are some notable drawbacks when using the same design for a 2-in-1 device. To be more specific, we are referring to the chamfered edges of the aluminum parts on the lid and bottom. When you place the device in tent mode, for example, the lack of rubber or silicone edges will cause the aluminum to wear off faster than usual. It’s also less secure in tent mode because of the slippery nature of the aluminum.

However, the rest of the design and choice of materials fits the premium price tag of the device. We’ve got carbon fiber base slightly showing through the transparent matte paint on top combined with excellent touchpad and keyboard experience. There are things, however, that might not appeal to some users. For example, the keyboard feels a bit shallow but the clicky feedback compensates for that. We still consider it as an outstanding keyboard while the touchpad is a bit stiff when using the mouse buttons. Also, the gliding surface might get in the way when your fingers are slightly moist.


In terms of portability, the XPS 13 2-in-1 goes even further compared to its standard counterpart. The weight is still around 1.2 kg but the sides of the laptop are slightly slimmer now – from 8 to 13.7 mm compared to 9-15 mm on the normal XPS 13. But along with the thickness, the 2-in-1 version cuts down on connectors as well. We have one USB-C 3.1 connector supporting DisplayPort on the left and another USB-C 3.1 port supporting Thunderbolt 3 (4 lanes of PCIe Gen 3) on the right. Dell has included a USB-C to USB-A adapter in the package, which is nice but you are still limited to just one USB connector when charging. The device can be charged on both USB ports so if you need some extra peripherals attached, you should grab one of the USB-C hubs available. Anyway, the rest of the I/O are the 3.5 mm audio jack and a microSD card reader.

Don’t get us wrong, though, Dell really made some effort to implement the existing design to fit the 2-in-1 form factor. There are some cool details of the device when using it in the various modes. One of them is the rubberized finish around the keyboard, which definitely helps against sliding in presentation mode, while the magnetic snap keeps the screen secured in one place when going full tablet mode. The hinges also feel pretty stable, stealth and prevent the wobbling effect to some degree when using the touchscreen in standard laptop mode.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

There aren’t many upgrade options inside the XPS 13 9365 but if you are looking to upgrade the storage, you can do it yourself without much hassle. The bottom piece comes off easily after you remove all the screws around the bottom and the one hiding beneath the hatch in the middle with the XPS logo on it.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Expectedly, the device comes with just an M.2 SSD placed under a what seems to be a small copper plate. Under it, we found a Toshiba PCIe NVMe SSD with 256GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280) Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard comes with soldered RAM chips so you have to decide whether or not the standard 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory will suit you or you will need more in the future because upgrading is impossible.

Other components

The battery takes up most of the space inside the chassis and it’s rated at 46Wh.

Cooling system

Since the notebook uses a passive cooling solution, the cooling system consists of just a big copper heat sink.

Display quality

The device’s display uses a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS touchscreen and the panel used here is Sharp SHP146A (LQ133M1, V6V6D) with 13.3-inch diagonal. This means that the pixel density is 166 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.153 x 0.153 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 53 cm.

The IPS panel provides excellent viewing angles.

It appears that the display has some kind of Content Adaptive Brightness Control (CABC), which cannot be turned off so it’s possible that some of the results from the tests are a bit off but in general, values should be fine.

The maximum brightness that we were able to record is extremely high – 439 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 392 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 16% deviation. This brightness is comparable to some smartphones, which is an excellent result. Anyway, the color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is close to optimal – 6880K and it remains the same as we go along the grayscale. You can see how values change when we set the display at 32% brightness (140 cd/m2).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 is 3.9, which is just borderline acceptable because values above 4.0 are usually unwanted especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio is excellent – 1200:1 (1050:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 92% of the sRGB color gamut making it suitable for multimedia as well.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 23 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment recorded PWM below 120 cd/m2 (28% brightness) so as long as you keep the slider above that level, you shouldn’t feel eyestrain. But if you go below 120 cd/m2, aggressive light pulsations at 1 kHz will occur.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The display’s quality is excellent and suitable for work, web browsing and multimedia. It offers wide range of sRGB coverage, really high contrast ratio and extremely high brightness. The latter will assure excellent outdoor working environment. Keep in mind, though, that there’s PWM below 120 cd/m2 (28%) brightness so we strongly recommend not going below that mark as aggressive (1 kHz) pulsations will affect even users who don’t have sensitive eyes. Also, if you are looking for accurate color reproduction, this particular panel doesn’t excel in this department but our custom profiles bring the dE2000 at 1.1 or in other words, exceptionally accurate color reproduction.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 (9365) configurations with 13.3″ Sharp SHP146A (LQ133M1, V6V6D) (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2xyjYbC

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Sound quality is good, there’s enough clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Processor Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-core, 1.30 – 3.60 GHz, 4MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – LPDDR3, 1866MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 615 (integrated GPU)
HDD/SSD 256GB M.2 SSD (PCIe NVMe, 2280)
Display 13.3-inch – FHD (1920×1080) / QHD+ (3200×1800) IPS touch, glossy
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11 ac, Bluetooth 4.2
Other features
  • 1x USB 3.1 (DisplayPort, DC-In)
  • 1x USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3, DC-In)
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • microSD card reader
  • keyboard backlight
Battery 46 Wh, 4-Cell Battery
Thickness 8-13.7 mm (0.32-0.54″)
Weight 1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)

Dell XPS 13 9365 configurations

Software

The laptop shipped with pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) and we used it for our review. However, if you wish to get rid of all the bloatware and perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Dell’s official website.

Battery

This is a very interesting topic because the endurance of the XPS 13 2-in-1 strongly depends on the display configuration. If you opt for the Full HD version, you can expect great battery performance but if you go with the QHD+ variant, which we’ve tested, you can see that the extremely low 4.5W TDP of the Core i7-7Y75 processor won’t be able to compensate. You will get average to suboptimal battery life at best, considering the price point of the XPS 13 2-in-1, it’s rather unacceptable. We are also disappointed to see such a big drop from a 60Wh battery on the standard model to 46Wh on this version when the chassis’ dimensions didn’t change as much. Maybe it was just one of the trade-offs Dell had to make in the 2-in-1 variant.

Anyway, all tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature switched on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Subpar battery endurance – 350 minutes (5 hours and 50 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Pretty much the same result on the video playback test – 347 minutes (5 hours and 47 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can run for more than two hours under heavy workload – 132 minutes (2 hours and 12 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is a dual-core SoC from the Kaby Lake-Y family manufactured on the 14nm node. It’s designed for ultra-thin convertibles, notebooks. The chip is a direct successor to the Core m7-6Y75 from the Skylake generation and Intel claims the improved so-called 14nm+ architecture brings the Core i7-7Y75 closer to the mainstream Core i7 lineup so that’s why the company renamed it.

However, most of the specs remain the same with a slight boost in clock speeds and now sports the newer Intel HD Graphics 615 iGPU. The dual-core CPU is clocked at 1.3 – 3.6 GHz and thanks to the Hyper-Threading technology, the chip works with four instead of two threads, which significantly increases the multi-core performance. The SoC also has a DDR3L/LPDDR3 dual-channel memory controller.

As far as the iGPU is concerned, it consists of 24 EU (Execution Units) and runs on clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz utilizing the available memory. It also supports native hardware decoding like H.265/HEVC with 10-bit color depth and Google’s VP9 codec used for YouTube. The whole SoC is rated at 4.5W including the GPU and the memory controller but can be adjusted by the OEM. Due to the extremely low TDP, the chip is usually implemented with a passive cooling solution.

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)2.91
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m7-6Y75 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.1 GHz)3.08+5.84%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.39+16.49%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)2.34-19.59%
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)2.37-18.56%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)1.87-35.74%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)357
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m7-6Y75 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.1 GHz)379+6.16%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)488+36.69%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)397+11.2%
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)400+12.04%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)-

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)17.22
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m7-6Y75 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.1 GHz)21.82+26.71%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.02+4.65%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)25.78+49.71%
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)25.07+45.59%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel Core m5-6Y54 (2-cores, 1.1 - 2.7 GHz)25.94+50.64%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7Y75 scored 4.311 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 615

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 615 is a low-end integrated graphics unit found in Y-series Kaby Lake processors. It incorporates 24 EUs (Execution Units) like all GT2 units and can be clocked at up to 1050 MHz while the base frequency is 300 MHz. With these specs, the chip is integrated into KBL-Y processors rated at 4.5W TDP, including the memory controller.

Since the iGPU is using the same architecture as before, the most noticeable feature would be the full hardware acceleration of the H.265/HEVC Main10 and Google’s VP9 codecs. With this, Intel aims to improve the overall energy efficiency and performance of the iGPU.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-615/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel HD Graphics 6154968
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 5155166+3.99%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6208272+66.51%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5154333-12.78%
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6155511+10.93%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 5154132-16.83%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel HD Graphics 615663
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515617-6.94%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6201023+54.3%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515437-34.09%
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615640-3.47%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 515544-17.95%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel HD Graphics 615-
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 5152194-
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6203731-
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 5152106-
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6152400-
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 5151844-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell XPS 13 9365 Intel HD Graphics 615192
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515194+1.04%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 620390+103.13%
ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA Intel HD Graphics 515102-46.88%
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615197+2.6%
Lenovo Yoga 900s Intel HD Graphics 515195+1.56%

Temperatures

Obviously, the XPS 13 9365 isn’t made for long hours of heavy workloads and the stress tests that we perform don’t represent real-life usage but it’s still the best way to see how the utilizes the CPU.

We started with a simple CPU stress test for about an hour. The Core i7-7Y75 ran at around 2.8 – 3.0 GHz for a while but then slowly went down to 1.7 GHz. Still, it didn’t go near the 3.6 GHz Turbo Boost mark.

Starting the iGPU stress test resulted in CPU throttling, as usual, because this way the compute cores give the iGPU enough headroom to perform.

The inner temperatures didn’t result in overheating around the interior but we would have gladly traded a few more degrees for higher CPU clocks.

Verdict

In the end, Dell was able to port all the cool features about the good old XPS 13 with fewer trade-offs than we expected. The build quality is superb – it feels tight, light, thin and premium. The input devices are comfortable to use and will definitely get the work done on the go but we are disappointed to see just two USB-C connectors, one of which will most probably be used for charging. At least one of them supports the Thunderbolt 3 standard and gives plenty of I/O expansion with a little help of a dongle.

As far as display quality goes, it’s impeccable as usual – wide sRGB coverage, extremely high maximum brightness and high contrast ratio. Color accuracy could be better but our profiles take care of that. The only thing you should be aware of is the presence of PWM below 120 cd/m2, although our Health-Guard profile takes care of the screen-flickering. And, of course, if you are opting for the QHD+ version, you are bound to have short battery life.

Unfortunately, though, if you are looking for a good multi-core performance, the XPS 13 9365 won’t be the best fit for you because it doesn’t utilize the full potential of the Core i7-7Y75. It’s good but not enough.

If you are interested in similarly priced alternatives, we recommend the Dell Latitude 13 7370 or the considerably more powerful HP Spectre x360 13. Other more affordable options include the Lenovo Yoga 900S and the ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360.

You can find some of the available models here: http://amzn.to/2xDzPaB

Pros

  • Excellent build quality
  • Thin, light, portable chassis
  • Good input devices
  • Great IPS screen with extremely high brightness
  • Presumably good battery life on the FHD version

Cons

  • The system can’t utiliza the full performance of the SoC
  • Aggressive (1 kHz) PWM up to 120 cd/m2 (our Health-Guard profile takes care of that)
  • The QHD+ version has subpar battery life
  • Rather limited I/O

Lenovo Yoga 520 (Flex 5) (14-inch) review – the Yoga 720 on a budget with little to no trade-offs

$
0
0

With the higher price of the new Yoga 520, compared to the older Yoga 510, we get not only apparent visual improvement but also a much better chassis, more comfortable input devices, improved portability and, of course, more powerful hardware. This is the stepping stone to the Yoga 720 and sells for roughly $150 less with the same processor. Interestingly, though, the trade-offs that come with the lower price tag aren’t as many as you might think and maybe not that important to some users.

While the Yoga 520 is offered in a variety of configurations, we got the most affordable one with the Core i3-7100U CPU. We also have an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD support on board, 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory, a 14-inch touch Full HD IPS panel with reasonably thick bezels and the sides accommodate pretty much all the interfaces you’d want from a laptop including a full-sized HDMI port. Surely there must be some drawbacks so continue reading to find out more about the Yoga 520.

You can find the available models here: http://amzn.to/2xaEZal

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes with the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and a stylus pen.

Design and construction

The first thing we’ve noticed when holding the Yoga 520 is the plastic used for exterior and how noticeably heavier it is compared to the Yoga 720 (1.74 kg vs 1.3 kg). However, this hasn’t reflected on the overall sturdiness in a bad way. We found the build quite firm, rigid and solid. Another proof that you don’t always need metal to make the chassis look and feel good at the same time.

Starting with the lid – it’s made of plastic that imitates anodized aluminum and it’s incredibly resistant to torsion and pressure. Even when strong pressure is applied, the panel just doesn’t give in. The hinges also feel pretty tight – in fact, a little bit too tight to our liking because you can’t open it without using both hands and even if you do use both of your hands, there isn’t some sort of indentation to help you lift the lid up. This has eliminated the unnecessary sway when using the touchscreen in laptop mode to some extent but it’s still there and you can see it. Speaking of the screen, its bezels aren’t so thin as the ones on the Yoga 720 but still admirable – probably the lower chin could have been a bit smaller. As for the bottom, it uses the same plastic as the lid and has one long grill used for cool air intake.

The sides are just below the 20 mm mark (19.9 mm to be exact) and offer more than we could ask for in terms of I/O. The left side comes with the DC charging port, full-sized HDMI, one USB 3.0 connector, another USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) port and a 3.5 mm audio jack. On the right, you will find another regular USB 3.0 port, the SD card reader and the power button.

As we move to the interior, the device starts to give the impression of a premium ultrabook. The interior uses a slightly roughened anodized aluminum sheet – a lot like the one used for the Yoga 720. It’s really rigid and doesn’t give in when pressed at all – all areas around the keyboard and touchpad feel rock-solid. As far as the keyboard and the touchpad are concerned – they are just excellent. We are pretty sure that Lenovo used the same ones in the Yoga 720 and that’s definitely a good thing. The keyboard is clicky, comfortable and offers decent key travel while the touchpad’s surface is silky-smooth and produces light clicks. All swipes and gestures are registered correctly as well.

To be honest, we didn’t find anything to complain about the laptop’s build and design. It’s so good that we could have been easily fooled by the price tag – the notebook’s overall appearance and design are inherent to a much more expensive 2-in-1s – sturdy construction, aluminum interior with chamfered edges and excellent input devices.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

We have only good news about the Flex 5 – it’s super easy to disassemble and offers a fair amount of upgrade options. You just need to remove all the screws around the bottom and gently pry it up.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

We were pretty surprised by the fact that the notebook comes with an M.2 SSD slot and a 2.5-inch HDD bay. Our unit, however, had only one 256GB Intel M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD installed but we are not sure that all regions will come with a PCIe NVMe-enabled drive. Probably the budget-oriented configurations will ship with SATA.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB Intel M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot Free Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard holds just one RAM chip slot, which in our case is taken by an SK Hynix 4GB DDR4-2400 chip.

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is placed near one of the hinges and it’s Qualcom QCNFA435.

Cooling system

The cooling design is quite simple – it consists of just one short heat pipe and a small heat sink.

Display quality

The laptop uses a 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS touchscreen manufactured by AU Optronics with model number B140HAN04.2. The pixel density is 157 ppi and a pixel pitch of 0.161 x 0.161 mm, which means that the screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 56 cm.

The screen has excellent viewing angles.

We were able to measure a maximum brightness of 270 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 253 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 10% deviation. This means that the display is just bright enough for work in the office but due to the glossy finish, it won’t be very comfortable for outdoor use. The color temperature at maximum brightness is 6720K making it pretty close to the optimal 6500K. But as we go along the grayscale, the color temperature becomes a bit warmer – 6360K. You can see how values change at 140 cd/m2 (85% brightness).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen at 85% brightness is 2.3, which just fine since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted. The contrast ratio is 1350:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

As expected, the sRGB color gamut coverage is rather limited – 50% so it won’t be able to reproduca practically half of the color that appear on the web and movies.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 24 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, the display doesn’t use PWM at any brightness level making it virtually harmless in this regard. It shouldn’t cause any discomfort during long hours of work.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Although the display quality isn’t perfect – rather limited sRGB coverage and relatively low maximum brightness – the panel will do just fine for work and general web browsing. In fact, the high contrast and the absence of PWM are things worth considering, especially at this price range. They are like an added bonus.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Yoga 520 (Flex 5) configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN04.2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2yhUxhz

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is decent – there are not apparent distortions in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Processor Intel Core i3-7100U (2-core, 2.40 GHz, 3MB cache)
RAM 4GB (1x 4096MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card Intel HD Graphics 620 (integrated GPU)
HDD/SSD 256 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD (2280)
Display 14.0-inch – FHD (1920×1080) IPS touchscreen, glossy
Optical drive
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 2x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 (Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • microSD card reader
  • keyboard backlight
Battery 36Wh
Thickness 19.9 mm (0.78″)
Weight 1.74 kg (3.84 lbs)

Lenovo Flex 5 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install without all the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official support page.

Battery

Compared to the Yoga 720, the Yoga 520 has considerably less battery capacity (36Wh vs 48Wh) so it’s only logical that the latter drags behind in terms of endurance. But unfortunately, more than we expected – the Yoga 520 scored way under the average for its price range.

All tests were performed with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Less than average web browsing score – 319 minutes (5 hours and 19 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Surprisingly higher result than the web browsing one but still not enough – 352 minutes (5 hours and 52 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming but it’s good to know that it can handle a little over hour and a half – 105 minutes (1 hour and 45 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i3-7100U

The Core i3-7100U is a dual-core mobile CPU from Intel’s Kaby Lake family of chips. It’s a direct successor to the Intel’s Skylake generation Core i3-6100U but since the difference between the Kaby Lake and Skylake architectures isn’t big, the expected performance jump is marginal. Both, the Core i3-6100U and Core i3-7100U, are built using 14nm FinFET manufacturing process.

The Core i3-7100U retains the same features as before, such as the so-called Hyper-Threading technology allowing the CPU to work with 4 threads instead of using just the two physical cores. The newer alteration of the CPU is also rated at 15W TDP but offers a small 100 MHz clock jump compared to its predecessor. Now the base frequency is 2.4 GHz and still no support for Turbo Boost.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i3-7100u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)2.81
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.63+29.18%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.24+15.3%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81+35.59%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)405
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522+28.89%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)440+8.64%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525+29.63%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)23.01
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.88-22.29%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)18.98-17.51%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49-23.99%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i3-7100U scored 4.952 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 6205237
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6208257+57.67%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)13137+150.85%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468+61.7%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620564
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620998+76.95%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2095+271.45%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597+183.16%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620-
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6203674-
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620176
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620305+73.3%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)634+260.23%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432+145.45%

Temperatures

The usual stress tests don’t represent real-life usage because the general user won’t be able to ramp up the CPU and GPU use all the way up to 100% but it still the best way to determine the overall effectiveness and stability of the cooling system.

Starting with the CPU stress test – the chip reached its maximum clock speeds of 2.4 GHz while maintaining reasonable temperatures.

Switching on the GPU stress test didn’t result in CPU throttling and the iGPU added a few more degrees.

Of course, the interior didn’t heat up at all and stayed cool throughout the whole test.

Verdict

The Yoga 520, or also known as the Flex 5 in the US, is an excellent budget convertible with less compromises than we expected. It has excellently built chassis that has the premium looks and feel at the same time, the input devices are great and pretty much all the I/O is right there, despite the smaller 14-inch form factor.

Also, the Full HD IPS screen isn’t bad – it has high contrast ratio and doesn’t use PWM at any brightness level making it suitable for long working hours. However, as you go up the configurations, the screen becomes rather “dull” for the asking price. Models with Core i5-7200U and Core i7-7500U will drag behind some of its competitors when it comes to image quality due to the limited sRGB coverage – just 50% – and the relatively low maximum brightness, which isn’t enough for comfortable outdoor use. Also, battery life can be considered as subpar as there are plenty of other 14-inch laptops with better endurance.

In the end, if you are not strictly looking for a convertible, you’d be better off with the similarly-priced Lenovo Ideapad 720s, ASUS ZenBook UX410 or the Acer Aspire Swift 5 as they all outperform the Yoga 520 in terms of image quality and endurance. But if you are looking for a more affordable alternative, you might want to consider the Ideapad 520s as well. In any case, the Flex 5 is an adequate choice as long as you are willing to make a small compromise with the screen and a big one with the battery life.

You can find the available models here: http://amzn.to/2xaEZal

Pros

  • Good build quality
  • Great input devices
  • Decent IPS display for the more budget-oriented configurations
  • The panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • A lot of upgradability options for a 14-inch device (2.5-inch HDD + M.2 SSD slot + RAM slot)

Cons

  • Subpar battery life
  • The display appears to be a bit dim and color-deficient for the more expensive configurations with Core i5 and i7

Acer Nitro 5 review (AMD configuration) – absurdly cheap AMD-powered gaming laptop

$
0
0

Acer’s Nitro 5 lineup seems like a strange addition to the gaming family since there are already low-end gaming configurations under the Aspire VX 15 brand. In any case, the Nitro 5 has more in common with the mid-range Acer Predator Helios 300 notebooks rather than the VX 15 due to its cooling design, chassis and overall construction. And while the case looks good and appears to be more solid than the VX 15, the Nitro 5 incorporates a poorly-designed cooling solution with both cooling fans stuck on one side. We’ve seen the same done in the Helios 300 and the Lenovo Y520 and it’s needless to say we weren’t pleased with the results.

On the hardware front, Acer is shipping the Nitro 5 in various configurations and most of them include the Core i5-7300HQ and the Core i7-7700HQ CPUs paired with a GTX 1050 or 1050 Ti. However, we thought the AMD configuration will spark more interest in our readers because it’s the first AMD-powered gaming laptop in a long time and it costs just $799, yet still comes with an IPS panel. And besides, we’ve already tested several GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti configurations so performance won’t be much different. Let’s see how the new but old AMD FX-9830P CPU and the Polaris-based AMD RX 550 GPU will fare against Intel and NVIDIA’s entry-level gaming hardware.

You can find the available models here: http://amzn.to/2yqpGQ4

Contents

Retail package

There’s nothing special inside the box – just the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

Despite the usual color scheme that the Acer Nitro 5 adopts, the slightly darker tone of the red and Acer’s black logo on the back of the lid give the machine a more distinct look and appearance. Plastic is the main order of the day but the lid is now made of brushed aluminum, which is a nice change of pace compared to the VX 15 lineup. Also, it gives the Nitro 5 a more sophisticated and clean look. But when it comes to portability, the Nitro 5 doesn’t surprise us – it weighs just about what you’d expect from a 15-inch gaming laptop (2.4 kg) while measuring 27 mm in height, which is a considerable decrease in thickness compared to the VX 15.

Let’s continue with the build itself. As we already said, the lid receives the brushed-aluminum treatment with a pretty clean look and black Acer logo in the middle. Pressing the middle results in slight bending but the whole lid isn’t very resistant to torsion – our twisting attempts resulted in quite a noticeable deformation. Also, due to the hinge spacing, the lower chin of the display remains unsupported and it’s easily flexed. But in reality, this might not be such an issue for most users and given the price point of the Nitro 5, it’s mostly on par with what the competition offers. As far as the hinges go, they offer smooth and linear travel allowing the notebook to be opened with just one hand. The bottom uses the usual slightly roughened black plastic with two small service lids for the HDD and RAM upgrades while the grills provide cool air intake for the cooling system.

The sides come with the usual set of ports and are well-distributed on the left and right side. The left comes with the RJ-45, USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1), HDMI, USB-A 3.0 and an SD card reader. While the right side features only the DC charging port, the 3.5 mm audio jack and two USB 2.0 connectors. This way most of the cables won’t get in the way while gaming with your mouse on the right. And on the back, you can see quite familiar grill design (hint: Helios 300) with the only opening on the left.

The interior features the same silky-smooth plastic finish that attracts fingerprints and smudges like crazy but it definitely feels nice. It’s also fairly rigid with the exception being around the touchpad area where even small amounts of pressure result in noticeable flex. The keyboard and the touchpad compensate for that, though. The former features well-spaced keys with decent key travel, slightly concaved keycaps and tactile feedback. Typing on it is great but might not suit everyone when it comes to gaming. This is, however, what the industry offers at this price range anyway. The touchpad also feels pretty good and will most definitely get the work done on the go but we would have appreciated a bit lighter clicks.

Pretty much all the issues the Nitro 5 has with the build quality are linked to the budget nature of the laptop. Still, we can see a noticeable improvement over the VX 15 and hopefully, it won’t cause any problems in practice. It’s well-made overall.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

If you need to access only the 2.5-inch drive and the RAM slots, there’s no need to remove the whole bottom – the laptop has two small service lids giving access to both. However, if you need to install an M.2 SSD, change the battery or just clean it up the cooling fans.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As we’ve already mentioned, the 2.5-inch drive can be accessed by removing the small service lid. Our unit came with 1TB WD Blue HDD spinning at 5400 rpm. But if you need to install or change the M.2 SSD, you have to remove the whole bottom cover to access it.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB WD Blue HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

Both RAM slots are located under the service hatch supporting up to 32GB (16GB each) of DDR4-2400 memory.

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is right next to the cooling fan – Qualcomm Atheros QCNFA344A.

The battery is placed under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at 48Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling system appears to be insufficient for more powerful configurations but it did well with the current one. The reason for this is the two stuck together cooling fans and the small heat pipes that can’t disperse the heat effectively.

Display quality

The Acer Nitro 5 uses an already familiar panel – LG LP156WF6-SPK6 – a 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel also found in the Acer Predator Helios 300 (15-inch). The pixel density is 142 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The panel can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good.

We’ve recorded a maximum brightness of 286 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 269 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 12% maximum deviation. However, we’ve noticed that the panel gets pretty dim when it’s off the charger – 104 cd/m2 to be exact. This is a rather annoying problem that we hope Acer will resolve with a future update or release because we didn’t notice the Predator Helios 300 having the same issue. Anyway, color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is almost perfect – 6510K but as we go along the grayscale, it’s usually around 6350K. You can see how values change at 142 cd/m2 or in other words – 55% brightness.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center is 2.8, which isn’t bad as values above 4.0 are usually unwanted. The contrast ratio is excellent – 1180:1 (1090:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers just 53% of the sRGB color space so basically half of the web-based colors and those that are used for HDTV won’t be reproduced.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 22 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

As expected, the display doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness making it safe to use in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

While this panel wasn’t a good fit for the considerably more expensive Acer Predator Helios 300, the LG-made IPS display fits well into this budget gaming category on the Acer Nitro 5. Yes, it might be color-deficient but it’s way better than a lackluster TN panel. The bonus here is the high contrast ratio, the absence of PWM and reasonable maximum brightness while plugged in. A big letdown is the maximum luminance when used off the charger.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer nitro 5 configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN04.2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2xTiryt

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good, there’s enough clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Processor AMD FX-9830P (4-core, 3.0 – 3.7 GHz, 2MB cache)
RAM 8GB (1x 8192MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 550 (4GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 1TB HDD @5400 rpm
Display 15.6-inch – FHD (1920×1080) IPS panel, matte
Optical drive
Connectivity LAN 10/100/1000 Мбит/сек, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0
Other features
  • 1x USB 3.0
  • 2x USB 2.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 (Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • 3.5 mm combo audio jack
  • SD card reader
  • keyboard backlight
Battery 48Wh
Thickness 27 mm (1.06″)
Weight 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs)

Acer Nitro 5 configurations

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

Unfortunately, due to the problem with the maximum brightness when the notebook isn’t plugged in, we were only able to run our tests at 104 cd/m2 brightness (since this is the maximum luminance without the notebook being plugged) instead of 120 cd/m2 giving the Nitro 5 an unfair advantage over its competition. In any case, the battery life appears to be decent and the seemingly insufficient 48Wh battery unit actually does its job pretty well.

The rest of the settings like Wi-Fi being turned on and Windows battery saving feature remain.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty good result on the web browsing test – 485 minutes (8 hours and 5 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Keeping up with most gaming laptops at this price range – 320 minutes (5 hours and 20 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle a little over hour and a half – 101 minutes (1 hour and 41 minutes).

CPU – AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a 45W TDP SoC from the 28nm Bristol Ridge generation of AMD APUs with 4 compute cores and 8 graphics cores branded Radeon R7 GPU. Although the chip was announced mid-2016, the processor gained speed in 2017. Clocked at 3.0 – 3.7 GHz, the chip should be going against Intel’s quad-core 45W TDP lineup but falls short in multi-core performance due to the lack of alternative to Intel’s Hyper-Threading technology and in addition, features just 2MB of Level 2 cache.

Still, the chip is the most powerful AMD APU and brings support for the usual I/O and dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Regarding the Radeon R7 iGPU, it sports 512 shader units clocked at up to 900 MHz and according to AMD, it should bring better graphics performance than some low-end dedicated GPUs.

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD FX-9830P (4-cores, 3.0 - 3.7 GHz)3.48
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.15+134.2%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.14+133.91%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.19+135.34%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD FX-9830P (4-cores, 3.0 - 3.7 GHz)431
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)888+106.03%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)860+99.54%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)887+105.8%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD FX-9830P (4-cores, 3.0 - 3.7 GHz)21.80
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.78-55.14%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.93-54.45%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.82-54.95%

GPU – AMD Radeon RX 550 (4GB GDDR5)

The Radeon RX 550 GPU is based on the Polaris 12 architecture utilizing the 14nm FinFET manufacturing process. Due to the improvements in the 500-series GPUs over the 400-series, the new models allow higher clock speeds – 1100 – 1183 MHz. And although the chip features 640 shaders, the RX 550 uses only 512 of them.

The chip integrates a 128-bit memory bus, 4GB of GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 7000 MHz effective clock speed. The whole TDP of the chip should be slightly lower than 50W since the desktop variant is rated at 50W. The RX 550 supports the usual features like DisplayPort 1.3 / 1.4, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync, DirectX 12 and Vulkan.

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) (4GB GDDR5)29467
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37702+27.95%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)48511+64.63%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)45341+53.87%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) (4GB GDDR5)4547
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6099+34.13%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7523+65.45%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7981+75.52%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) (4GB GDDR5)-
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)19656-
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)24817-
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)25717-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Nitro 5 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) (4GB GDDR5)1358
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1757+29.38%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2354+73.34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7567 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2411+77.54%

Gaming tests

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 33 fps 24 fps 18 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 52 fps 38 fps 17 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 25 fps 23 fps 21 fps

Temperatures

As usual, we ran the stress test that we always perform, which, by the way, can’t be taken as real-life usage scenarios but it always gives us a fair estimate of how the cooling system handles heavy workloads such as games sometimes.

We started with 100% CPU usage for about an hour and the FX-9430P ran at solid 3.5 GHz with all active cores but unfortunately, the sensors weren’t able to report the operating temperature at the moment. Still, this is a good result since the chip kept its boost frequency up the whole time.

After an hour had passed, we turned on the GPU stress test as well. The CPU’s frequency fell down to a more comfortable 3.2 GHz – but still within the boost frequency range (3.0 – 3.7 GHz) – but the exceeded its maximum operating frequency – 1275 MHz. We’ve noted, however, that the RX 550 ran a little bit warm – 79 °C. The most important thing, however, is that neither the CPU or the GPU throttled at any point.

Fortunately, the inner temperatures didn’t result in high outer temperatures and the palm rest area remained cool throughout the whole test.

Verdict

Gaming on a budget? As always, AMD configurations are one of the most lucrative ones in the lower-end spectrum of the market and the Acer Nitro 5 proves it. It’s really hard to come across a capable gaming machine with for just $799, however, a quick search on Acer’s website shows an Intel/NVIDIA build that costs just as much with Core i5-7300HQ and GTX 1050. So the real question is, which one is better?

Although the AMD Radeon RX 550 gets close to the GTX 1050 in terms of gaming performance, the AMD FX-9830P falls short even to the Core i5-7300HQ, let alone the fact that the CPU has been released over a year ago. This means that opting for the Intel/NVIDIA configuration is actually the smarter choice due to the considerably better compute power of the Core i5-7300HQ CPU. Also, we’ve had our fair share of compatibility issues with the AMD drivers and the GTA V greet us with a warning saying that the CPU’s performance might not be enough for running the game smoothly.

But despite all the usual AMD-related issues you might have, there are some key selling points that the Nitro 5 has in general. For example, the Full HD IPS panel is rarely found in this price range and will satisfy the needs of every casual gamer and should do just fine for multimedia consumption on the go, especially when you consider the absence of PWM. But be aware of the brightness issue we’ve encountered – the display is really dim without being plugged to a power source. The build quality is better than average and the input devices are comfortable to use on the go.

Finally, the cooling system seemed to have done its job pretty well even during our long and heavy stress test – neither the CPU or the GPU throttled while the latter was running surprisingly cool. We are not sure, however, if the Intel/NVIDIA version will do just as well with the same cooling design, which, by the way, proved to be quite bad in numerous other cases – Acer Predator Helios 300, Lenovo Legion Y520, etc.

You can find the available models here: http://amzn.to/2yqpGQ4

Pros

  • Decent build
  • A slightly more simplistic design approach with less flashy appearance
  • Fairly comfortable input devices
  • Full HD IPS display
  • The panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • Reliable cooling solution (at least for the AMD configuration)

Cons

  • The display becomes really dim (just 104 cd/m2) when the notebook isn’t plugged in
  • The CPU is less powerful than its competitors and too old to be included in a 2017 build
  • The Radeon RX 550 can’t beat the GTX 1050 in the same price range

Lenovo Legion Y920 review – solid performance, cool features, clunky design

$
0
0

Lenovo’s Y920 notebook, now branded as Legion Y920, has come a long way since its first release but not from design standpoint. The real upgrade here comes with the hardware inside. Now packing the latest generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GPU and the best gaming overclockable CPU Intel can offer – the Core i7-7820HK. More importantly, the Y920 retains the most iconic features that make this gaming beast stand out – mechanical per-key RGB backlit keyboard, incredibly rigid construction, unusual but practical design and one key for factory overclocking on the go.

Even though the Lenovo Legion Y920 appears to be a solid gaming machine, it still has a long way to go and overtake some serious competition on the market. With the recently reviewed HP Omen 17 (2017) and one of our all-time favorites, the Acer Predator 17, Lenovo’s high-end gaming solution will have some hard time competing, especially at this hefty price. What’s Lenovo’s secret weapon here? Find out in the thorough review below.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yav1cR

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a huge Legion-branded black box containing all the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord. In addition, Lenovo has provided red WASD keycaps that you can change whenever you want your movement keys to be highlighted

Design and construction

As we already mentioned, the new Legion Y920 doesn’t offer anything new in the design department. The chassis is mainly made of brushed aluminum and soft-touch matte plastic. Probably due to the all-metal design, the notebook tips the scale at the impressive 4.4 kg and measures at 36 mm in height – digits that are comparable to the bulky Acer Predator 17 but considerably higher than the ASUS ROG GL702VS and HP’s new Omen 17 (2017).

Starting with the lid, we immediately notice the extreme rigidity of the brushed aluminum plate. There’s only the distinguishable Legion logo in the middle and two glossy side strips (and Lenovo’s logo, of course) that stand out but the rest is just plain brushed metal finish. Pressing the middle barely bends the panel while our twisting attempts barely resulted in any flex – probably due to the wide single hinge design. Speaking of which, we think that it’s a bit overly tightened in the beginning of the travel because it poses a challenge to open the machine at first and then fails to keep the screen in place when moving the machine around. It seems that the lid is a bit too heavy for the hinge to support it in unstable environment. In any case, we appreciate the overall rigidity of the lid. The bottom hasn’t been changed as well – brushed aluminum plate with plenty of grill openings for airflow and the subwoofer.

Although the sides don’t add any more connectors compared to the previous generation, it sure does offer a big upgrade – all USB-A ports are now 3.0. But the port distribution remains the same – convenient. The left side accommodates the full-sized DisplayPort, HDMI, RJ-45 LAN, USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt) and two standard USB-A 3.0 ports. The right side comes with the other two USB-A 3.0 connectors, SD card reader and a set of 3.5 mm jacks for external microphone and headset.

The interior and the sides are actually the same soft-touch matte plastic which means that there are no sharp or protruding edges. However, the material is a bit of a fingerprint magnet but it’s not the only one used for the whole interior. We meet again the red speaker grills on top with an LED strip along with the faux leather finish on the palm rest. The latter is slightly elevated allowing your palms to rest comfortably while typing or gaming. It also makes the overall usability of the notebook more comfortable despite the large front lip. The rigidity isn’t sacrificed as well – pressing any part of the interior doesn’t give in at all – it just feels rock-solid.

Anyway, the same keyboard layout makes a return – small Numpad block with the arrow keys below it and the four macro keys to the far left of the keyboard. Right next to the ESC key, you will find the lever switch for the fast overclocking feature but we will address this later. Despite the fact that the keyboard is excellently optimized for gaming (it features the same layout as the Y720), there are some things that may not appeal to the general user. For example, the distinguishable audible clicky feedback of the mechanical switches is there but the tactile feedback won’t be enough for some typers. You might even say they are a bit mushy but that’s more of a personal preference. In any case, you will be able to enjoy the usual features most mechanical switches offer and that’s fast response time and long lifespan. As for the touchpad, we didn’t like it so much. Sure, there are some notable perks like LED-illuminated edge, smooth gliding surface and light mouse clicks but the noticed a bit “sluggish” behavior and more importantly, a lot of the left mouse clicks were registered as right ones, which is quite annoying at times.

At the end of the day, the Legion Y920 didn’t bring any big changes to the design and overall appearance so opinion stays the same – sturdy and rock-solid build with a good choice of materials – especially the finishing touch of the faux leather on the palm rest and the mechanical keyboard. But, of course, like most gaming machines out there, the Legion Y920 is on the hefty side – weighs a lot and is very thick. In addition, the touchpad feels lacking and the screen carries a little bit too much bezel – it can be distracting sometimes.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

There are no service lids for easy access but the bottom piece can be removed quite easily – just unscrew all the bolts holding it and pry it up. This will give you access to all of the internals available for upgrade.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Storage configuration is quite generous – two M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slots and a standard 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay. The unit we’ve tested shipped with two Samsung SM961 (2280) M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs with 512GB capacity each working in RAID 0 mode while the HDD was WD Blue with 1TB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 512GB Samsung SM961 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD Upgrade options
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 2 512GB Samsung SM961 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB WD Blue HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard holds not two but four RAM slot, although, only two of them are easily accessible. If you want to go all the way up to 64GB of DDR4-2400 memory, you will need to detach and flip the motherboard around in order to access the other two. Our unit, however, shipped with 32GB of DDR4-2400 memory from Micron.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 16GB Micron DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 16GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 3 Free Upgrade options
Slot 4 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is right next to the 2.5-inch drive bay and it’s Killer E2500.

The battery is placed under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at the whopping 90Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design looks like a beefed up version of the old one. It consists of two large cooling fans with metal blades and two huge heat sinks connected to them via one shared and two separated heat pipes. By the looks of it, it can handle pretty much everything you throw at it and our extreme stress tests confirm that.

Display quality

The notebook features an updated version of the last year’s model – an LG-made 17.3-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with model number LP173WF4-SPF5. The pixel density is 127 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.1995 x 0.1995 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 69 cm.

The laptop has comfortable viewing angles due to the IPS nature of the panel.

The maximum brightness we were able to record is 408 cd/m2 in the middle and 380 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 11% maximum deviation. This means that the display can get really bright. The color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is 6420K – almost aligns with the optimal 6500K so the deviation is virtually unnoticeable to the naked eye. As we go along the grayscale, though, the color temperature becomes close to 6340K – slightly warmer than usual. Below you can see how values change at 140 cd/m2 (76% brightness).

The maximum dE2000 color deviation compared to the center of the screen at 76% brightness is 3.3, which is rather acceptable since values above 4.0 are unwanted. The contrast ratio is good – 970:1 before calibration and 960:1 after.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

So the presented panel covers a reasonable 89% of the sRGB color gamut making it suitable for gaming and multimedia purposes.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 19 ms – fairly fast for an IPS panel.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, we didn’t detect harmful light pulsations so it’s safe to say that the display is flicker-free. Our equipment, however, was able to detect small pulsations at some brightness levels but they were at extremely high frequency anyway.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Yet again, the Legion Y920 offers excellent IPS panel with high maximum brightness, wide sRGB coverage and good contrast ratio. It’s also flicker-free, has 75 Hz refresh rate and incorporates the much-needed G-Sync technology but at the same time, it feels a bit lacking at times. Don’t get us wrong, the display is great but we feel like we can get a bit more for the money. There are plenty of other similarly-priced alternatives at this high-end gaming segment with 120 Hz panels or at least UHD options. In addition, the anti-reflective surface is actually pretty bad and you can sometimes see the keyboard’s LED illumination bouncing back from the screen ruining the whole viewing experience.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Legion Y920 configurations with 17.3″ LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2yav1cR

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is really good – enough clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Processor Intel Core i7-7820HK (4-core, 2.90 – 3.90 GHz, 8MB cache)
RAM 32GB (2x 16384MB) – DDR4, 2400MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)
HDD/SSD 2x M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs in RAID 0 + 1TB HDD @5400 rpm
Display 17.3-inch – FHD (1920×1080) IPS panel, anti-glare
Optical drive
Connectivity Killer Gigabit Ethernet, Killer Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1
Other features
  • 4x USB 3.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 (Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3)
  • DisplayPort
  • HDMI
  • RJ-45
  • 2x 3.5 mm audio jacks for external microphone and headphones
  • SD card reader
  • RGB keyboard backlight
Battery 6-cell, 90Wh
Thickness 36 mm (1.42″)
Weight 4.4 kg (9.7 lbs)

Lenovo Legion Y920 configurations

Software

We used the already installed Windows 10 Pro for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install on your machine, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Lenovo’s official support page.

Battery

Despite the impressive 90Wh unit inside, the laptop barely survives for a few hours even during browsing or video playback. The main reason for this is the big 17.3-inch Full HD IPS panel, the demanding Core i7-7820HK processor and, of course, the always-on GTX 1070 GPU. The latter doesn’t support NVIDIA Optimus (switchable graphics) feature since the laptop is equipped with a G-Sync technology that doesn’t get along with it, at least for now.

All tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Barely lasted for 276 minutes (4 hours and 36 minutes) on the web browsing test.

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

The video playback test score wasn’t all that different – 233 minutes (3 hours and 53 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle a little over an hour – 81 minutes (1 hour and 21 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7820HK

The Core i7-7820HK is part of Intel’s latest generation Kaby Lake processors sporting an improved 14nm+ manufacturing process allowing for slightly higher clock speeds and better efficiency, although the performance per clock hasn’t changed since this is practically the same microarchitecture as the one used for the previous Skylake chips.

Anyway, the Core i7-7820HK offers higher operating frequency than its Core i7-6820HK predecessor – 2.9 – 3.9 GHz (for four active cores the Turbo Boost frequency drops to 3.5 GHz or 3.7 GHz for two active cores) vs 2.7 – 3.6 GHz but keeps most of the features like Hyper-Threading, (4/8 core/thread design), 8MB LL cache, a dual-channel DDR4-2400 or DDR3L-1600 memory controller and a TDP of 45W including the iGPU. Speaking of which, the processor integrates an Intel HD Graphics 630 chip clocked at 350 – 1150 MHz.

The most noticeable feature of this processor is the unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking and usually OEMs provide the needed software for doing so. In the end, the processor’s maximum frequency can be increased depending on the notebook’s cooling system.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7820hk/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 Intel Core i7-7820HK (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)8.91
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-15.94%
HP Omen 17 (2017) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.12-8.87%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) Intel Core i7-6820HK (@ 4 GHz) (4-cores, 2.7 - 4.0 GHz)7.72-13.36%
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.32-17.85%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 Intel Core i7-7820HK (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)912
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)827-9.32%
HP Omen 17 (2017) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)891-2.3%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) Intel Core i7-6820HK (@ 4 GHz) (4-cores, 2.7 - 4.0 GHz)852-6.58%
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)815-10.64%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 Intel Core i7-7820HK (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)9.21
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.27+22.37%
HP Omen 17 (2017) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)10.75+16.72%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) Intel Core i7-6820HK (@ 4 GHz) (4-cores, 2.7 - 4.0 GHz)9.99+8.47%
ASUS ROG G752VS Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)10.8+17.26%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7820HK managed to get 14.655 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)

2016-06-02-image-33The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the second fastest mobile GPU after the GTX 1080. It’s part of NVIDIA’s Pascal generation of GPUs and unlike previous releases, the company finally closes the gap between mobile and desktop graphics processors and that’s why there’s no “M” in the branding of Pascal GPUs. All thanks to the 16nm TSMC manufacturing process of the GPU, which allows better thermals and overall performance in a smaller form factor. That’s a big technology jump compared to the 28nm Maxwell generation.

Compared to its desktop counterpart, the GTX 1070 doesn’t differ too much. They share an identical number of ROPs (64) and identical memory – 8GB GDDR5 with 256-bit bus clocked at 8000 MHz. However, there’s a minor difference in clock speeds – the laptop GPU ticks at 1443 MHz and can go up to 1645 MHz while the desktop variant is running at 1506 MHz – 1683 MHz. To compensate to some extent, the laptop 1070 carries more CUDA cores (2048 vs 1920) and slightly more TMUs (170 vs 120).

Due to its performance, thermals and power consumption, which is believed to be 10W more than the GTX 980M, the GPU is suitable for large 17-inch laptops with the appropriate cooling solution.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-8gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)71473
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)84191+17.79%
HP Omen 17 (2017) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)76987+7.71%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)66709-6.67%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)100753+40.97%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)17208
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)15485-10.01%
HP Omen 17 (2017) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)15553-9.62%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)9319-45.84%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)17159-0.28%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)-
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)47767-
HP Omen 17 (2017) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)48197-
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)30780-
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)55642-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo Legion Y920 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4194
Acer Predator 17 (G9-793) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4160-0.81%
HP Omen 17 (2017) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4770+13.73%
Alienware 17 R3 (Late 2015) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4GB GDDR5)2963-29.35%
ASUS ROG G752VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)4731+12.8%

Overclocking

Just like the previous generations of the Y-series notebooks, the Legion Y920 also comes with a Turbo switch lever for fast and easy overclocking on the go. Switching on the Turbo function applies the overclocked profile of the CPU and the GPU. The Core i7-7820HK gets a boost up to 4.1 GHz (3.7 GHz with four active cores) but the GTX 1070, on the other hand, receives just a small bump in clock speeds – from 1443 to 1483 MHz on the base clocks and from 1645 MHz to 1695 MHz on the boost frequencies.

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 133 fps 78 fps 57 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 98 fps 93 fps 88 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 136 fps 75 fps 51 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, Ultra (Check settings)
Average FPS 93 fps 82 fps 54 fps

Temperatures

Although the stress tests that we perform do not represent real-life usage, it’s still a good way to determine whether or not the cooling system is good enough to handle the powerful hardware without pushing it to thermal throttling and overheating.

When we turned on the CPU stress test, the Core i7-7820HK ran at 3.7 GHz . Temperatures, however, were a bit higher than usual – a bit over 90 °C but at least the system was able to utilize the full performance of the overclocked Core i7-7820HK.

After an hour had passed, we turned on the GPU stress test as well – the CPU’s clock speeds slowly went down to 3.1 GHz, which is still within the Turbo Boost range while temperatures didn’t change as much. The GTX 1070, on the other hand, ran at pretty cool temperatures (72 °C) while hitting 1708 MHz at first before slowly making its way down to 1620 MHz. That’s pretty impressive for such demanding hardware. Usually, GTX 1070 and 1080 GPUs run close to 80 °C on other gaming laptops.

We’ve also measured the temperatures on the surface and found them to be more than acceptable so it’s safe to say that you won’t feel any discomfort even during the most intense and time-consuming gaming sessions. However, we’ve noticed that the cooling fans were a bit loud.

Verdict

The Legion Y920 excels in almost every area in which gaming laptops should – it has great build quality, premium materials, unique features like mechanical keyboard with customizable RGB LED illumination, a neat faux leather palm rest area, good IPS display with G-Sync support, overclocking capabilities, reliable cooling system and plenty of storage options for your gaming and multimedia library (2x M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slots (RAID 0 configurations are possible) + 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay).

However, just like every product out there, it has its downsides. For starters, the touchpad feels somehow sluggish and mouse clicks are not registered correctly. And despite the overall good image quality that the display offers, the what seems to be an “anti-glare” coating does just about the opposite – even the keyboard illumination bounces back and remains pretty visible on the screen’s surface. And those bezels are way too thick to our taste – they appear kind of distracting at times. Finally, we would have really appreciated a higher refresh rate paired with that sweet G-Sync technology. For example, the Alienware 17 R4, the ASUS ROG GL702VS and the new HP Omen 17 (2017) have 120 Hz display options, all of which are close in terms of pricing. The rest of the complaints are mostly related to gaming laptops in general, which were not solved in the Y920 – it’s pretty hefty and has subpar battery life. In return, however, you get excellent performing cooling system that handles the overclocked hardware even under extreme conditions.

So do we recommend the Legion Y920 over the competition? As always, it really depends on what you are looking for. The 17-inch gaming laptop segment is oversaturated and everyone can find the one that suits them best – it depends on what you are looking for. Each one comes with its own unique features and most certainly, the Legion Y920 impresses with cool mechanical keyboard, functional design (in most cases) and well-built cooling solution. In any case, you should also look into the alternatives like Acer Predator 17, Alienware 17 R4, HP Omen 17 (2017) and the ASUS ROG GL702VS as the most recent GTX 1070 bearer.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yav1cR

Pros

  • Rock-solid construction with premium materials
  • Good mechanical keyboard with customizable RGB backlight
  • Good IPS panel with 75 Hz refresh rate, G-Sync and great multimedia properties
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • Supports two M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs in RAID 0 and has additional 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay
  • A bit loud but effective cooling solution
  • Above average sound quality

Cons

  • Hefty and bulky
  • The touchpad doesn’t feel right
  • The screen has bad anti-glare coating and distractingly thick bezels
  • Limited screen options (only 1080p 75 Hz)

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) review – ultra-thin and stylish laptop with an amazing display

$
0
0

At the annual mobile technology conference IFA held in 2016 Acer announced for the first time its Spin series. Back then it impressed everyone with its portability and exquisite design and now it is time to take a look at the successor which has the same name. This review is dedicated namely to it – the new generation Spin 7.

This Acer model stands out among the most mobile computers on the market with its simple and stylish black aluminum body with thickness of only 11 mm and weight of 1.2 kg. The fan-less cooling of the machine gives us opportunity to enjoy complete silence while doing our everyday tasks. The 14-inch 360-degree rotating display allows us to use the device in three modes – normal laptop, presentation mode, and tablet.

Acer Spin 7 offers wireless communication via WiFi module Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 that supports Bluetooth 4.1.

You can find some of the available models HERE.

Contents

Retail package

The laptop came well packed in a box. The package offers the standard 20 W AC charging adapter, model ADP-45PE B, that provides 20V voltage and 2.25A currency. The power cord a USB 3.0 Type-C socket. In the package, you will also find user manuals and the tablet itself.

Design and construction

The laptop is equipped with a sturdy aluminum-magnesium chassis, which consists of an upper lid and a bottom TFT panel respectively. The surface is smooth and pleasant to touch, painted in black but it is easily stained by fingerprints. There is almost no bending in the lid or chassis, the construction is tight and stable. Acer Spin 7 is light and compact at the same time. Its weight is only 1.2 kg, while its thickness – 11 mm, making it one of the thinnest laptops on the market.

With its new generation, Spin by Acer offer us a new look at the looks of a modern mobile computer. The 14-inch touch screen display embedded in a body for a 13-inch laptop fits very well. In addition, the bezels around the display thin only 7 mm give it a stylish and complete look. At the bottom part, there are no openings for laptop components service but this issue is solved by unscrewing the six screws that hold the entire bottom lid and thus we get full access to the inside of the laptop.

The hinges are not so tight but they are stable enough to keep the display in its position and it won’t change even when there’s shaking. The closed lid snaps to the body with magnets but the connection is not very strong.

Overall, the keyboard is nice, the keys have a slightly concave shape, they are pleasant to feel and react well. The keyboard lacks backlight. Anyway, the touchpad is big and comfortable for work. The touchpad buttons and the touchpad itself have short key travel.

The touch sensitive panel of the display works very well. As mentioned above, there is a touch screen which features Corning Gorilla Glass. It has good sensitivity in the peripheral areas, it is very smooth and keeps its sensitivity even after leaving fingerprints on it. The Acer Spin 7 display is able to open at 360 degrees and become a tablet. Especially this quality is one big plus for those that want to use the laptop in their lap sitting or lying down.

One last aspect that deserves our attention, as far as the body is concerned, are the input/output ports. On the right side of the laptop you will see 2 x USB 3.0 Type-C ports and an audio jack. In the left part are located only the power on/off button and the volume controls. One USB 3.0 Type-C port is used to plug in the charging adapter and then only the other USB 3.0 port remains available. If we use a wired mouse and plug it into this port, we are basically left with no free USB port for connecting other peripheral devices such as an external hard drive or flash drive. Considering this, it is not a bad idea to purchase a USB Type-C hub which will give us as many extra USB ports as you need.

Cooling system

The laptop features a passive fan-less cooling which is realized by means of a copper plate. The cooling system is well designed and manages to handle its task. Further down in the review you will see the result of its work.

Upgrade options

The storage devices are limited by the size of the device so you can only take advantage of a M.2 SSD slot (2242 size). In our case, we received the laptop with 256GB SSD KINGSTON RBU-SNS4180S3/256GG.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 slot 256GB KINGSTON RBU-SNS4180S3/256GG Upgrade options

Display quality

The display of Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) has a Full HD panel with an IPS matrix with model number AUO B140HAN03.2. The diagonal is 14-inch (35.56 cm), while the resolution is 1920 x 1080p. In addition, the aspect ratio is 16:9, pixel density – 157 ppi, pixel pitch – 0.161 х 0.161 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal to or greater than 56 cm (from this distance the eye stops distinguishing individual pixels and is normal for a laptop).

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) has comfortable viewing angles. We offer photos for image quality evaluation.

We’ve recorded a maximum brightness level of 313 cd/m2 in the center and 295 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 11% maximum deviation. The color temperature on while screen and maximum brightness is 7360 K, cooler (more blueish than the standard one in sRGB (6500К) light. The average color temperature (measured in the center of the display for the different grayscale levels with factory settings) is 7250K .

Below you can see how the measurements change at 140 cd/m2 luminance or in other words – 40% brightness (White level = 144 cd/m2, Black level = 0.12 cd/m2). Below the gamut graphics is also shown and the color temperature is measured for the different degrees of grayscale.

We’ve also measured the dE2000 color deviation across the surface of the screen and the maximum value was 3.1. It’s not bad considering that usually anything above 4.0 is unwanted.

The contrast ratio is high – 1200:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 91% of the sRGB color gamut.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

You can compare the results with the factory settings (on the left), and with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile on the right.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

You can compare the results with the factory settings (on the left), and with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile on the right.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 25 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) display doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels. It provides comfort for the eyes in the considered aspect and accordingly conditions for continuous work without unnecessary eye strain.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

The following graph shows the spectral distribution of the emitted light on a white screen and a brightness of approximately 140 cd / m2. You can compare the results with the factory settings (on the left) and with the “Health-Guard” profile on the right.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN03.2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found HERE.

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) has stereo sound and supports the DOLBY AUDIO technology for music, movies and games. The laptop provides very good quality in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet refers to this particular model – configurations may differ depending on your region.

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) technical specifications table

Acer
-19%
Old price $1199.99
$970.00
you save $230 (-19%)
from Amazon
Display
14.0”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
RAM
8GB DDR3
Dimensions
325 x 230 x 11 mm (12.80" x 9.06" x 0.43")
Weight
1.20 kg (2.6 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • Card reader SD
  • Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack Combo headphone/mic port
Features
  • Web camera HD webcam
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Acer Spin 7 (SP714) configurations

Software

For the writing of this review, we used the pre-installed Windows 10 (64-bit) but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official website.

Battery

Acer has chosen a 4-cell battery with a capacity of 48 Wh, which does what it is designed for well enough. We conduct all tests with Power saving mode and screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Slightly disappointing but not bad result considering the thickness of the device – 223 minutes (3 hours and 42 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

The machine lasted even less – 214 minutes (3 hours and 34 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

188 minutes is a very good result for gaming load, although the laptop is not at all designed for this.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is a dual-core SoC from the Kaby Lake-Y family manufactured on the 14nm node. It’s designed for ultra-thin convertibles, notebooks. The chip is a direct successor to the Core m7-6Y75 from the Skylake generation and Intel claims the improved so-called 14nm+ architecture brings the Core i7-7Y75 closer to the mainstream Core i7 lineup so that’s why the company renamed it.

However, most of the specs remain the same with a slight boost in clock speeds and now sports the newer Intel HD Graphics 615 iGPU. The dual-core CPU is clocked at 1.3 – 3.6 GHz and thanks to the Hyper-Threading technology, the chip works with four instead of two threads, which significantly increases the multi-core performance. The SoC also has a DDR3L/LPDDR3 dual-channel memory controller.

As far as the iGPU is concerned, it consists of 24 EU (Execution Units) and runs on clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz utilizing the available memory. It also supports native hardware decoding like H.265/HEVC with 10-bit color depth and Google’s VP9 codec used for YouTube. The whole SoC is rated at 4.5W including the GPU and the memory controller but can be adjusted by the OEM. Due to the extremely low TDP, the chip is usually implemented with a passive cooling solution.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7y75/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)2.47
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)2.37-4.05%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.22+30.36%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.22+30.36%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN Intel Core i7-4510U (2-cores, 2.00 - 3.10 GHz)-

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)337
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)400+18.69%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444+31.75%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)482+43.03%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN Intel Core i7-4510U (2-cores, 2.00 - 3.10 GHz)-

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel Core i7-7Y75 (2-cores, 1.30 - 3.60 GHz)31
Acer Swift 7 Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2-cores, 1.2 - 3.2 GHz)25.07-19.13%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.08-35.23%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel Core i7-6500U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.78-39.42%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN Intel Core i7-4510U (2-cores, 2.00 - 3.10 GHz)-

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 615

Intel’s HD Graphics 615 is a low-end integrated graphics unit found in Y-series Kaby Lake processors. It incorporates 24 EUs (Execution Units) like all GT2 units and can be clocked at up to 1050 MHz while the base frequency is 300 MHz. With these specs, the chip is integrated into KBL-Y processors rated at 4.5W TDP, including the memory controller.

Since the iGPU is using the same architecture as before, the most noticeable feature would be the full hardware acceleration of the H.265/HEVC Main10 and Google’s VP9 codecs. With this, Intel aims to improve the overall energy efficiency and performance of the iGPU.

You can find all available laptops with Intel HD Graphics 615 here:
http://amzn.to/2hfKAcT

You can browse through our GPU ranking to see where the Intel HD Graphics 615 stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-615/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel HD Graphics 6155570
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6155511-1.06%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5207207+29.39%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5205009-10.07%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)-

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel HD Graphics 615657
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615640-2.59%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520389-40.79%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520732+11.42%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)-

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel HD Graphics 615-
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 6152400-
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 5203134-
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 5202451-
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) Intel HD Graphics 615204
Acer Swift 7 Intel HD Graphics 615197-3.43%
Dell XPS 13 (9350, Late 2015) Intel HD Graphics 520237+16.18%
HP Spectre 13 (2016) Intel HD Graphics 520137-32.84%
ASUS ZenBook UX303LN NVIDIA GeForce 840M (2GB DDR3)-

Temperatures

We conducted a CPU, GPU, as well as memory test to assess the overall stability of the cooling system and its longevity in the long run. You should keep in mind, however, that there won’t be such load of all components during everyday use. During the entire test, the CPU kept its maximum operating frequency of 1.3 GHz of the two cores. There was also no CPU throttling.

We also measured the temperatures in different points across the body surface. As you can see from the image below, there is nothing worrying. We can say that the cooling system is doing very well.

Verdict

In conclusion, we can say that Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51) is a very good laptop model that combines a high-quality aluminum body, powerful CPU and touch screen display.

Its IPS touch screen is an essential plus with good contrast levels, comfortable viewing angles and not bad color range. We see impressively high maximum brightness levels, high contrast ratio and wide sRGB coverage. Combined with our profiles, the notebook can also be used for color sensitive work on the go. The laptop is very comfortable for carrying around thanks to its thin profile and light weight.

Additionally, Corning Gorilla Glass protects the machine well from hits without interfering with the beautiful laptop design.

You can find some of the available models HERE.

Pros

  • Good build quality
  • Touch screen rotating at 360 degrees
  • The display covers 91% of sRGB/ITU-R BT.709
  • The panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness across all brightness levels
  • Thin and light for a 14-incher
  • Decent keyboard and large touchpad
  • Good wireless network

Cons

  • Body surface prone to smudges
  • Lack of enough input/output ports
  • Not so affordable price
  • Relatively short battery life

Dell Inspiron 15 7570 review – a bit pricey multimedia laptop with Intel’s 8th Generation CPU behind the wheel

$
0
0

If you are into premium looking multimedia notebooks with a little extra power under the hood, Dell’s got you covered with their latest release in the Inspiron family – the Inspiron 15 7570. Although a bit pricier than some of the alternatives on the market, the laptop leads the pack with several distinctive features like all-aluminum chassis, USB-C supporting (Gen 2) DisplayPort and a Core i7-8550U CPU, which is part of Intel’s latest 8th Generation processors.

Other hardware includes an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slot in addition to the 2.5-inch HDD bay, 15.6-inch Full HD IPS display and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX discrete GPU sporting 4GB of GDDR5 memory and although the latter will affect overall gaming performance, we still feel like that the newer GeForce MX150 chip would have been a better fit, especially given the price point. Still, there are plenty of other details that the specs sheet can’t disclose like real battery life, image quality of the display etc. Find out in the thorough review below.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yZqFmq

Contents

Retail package

The retail package contains all the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

We can’t really see any striking similarities between the Inspiron 7570 and other Dell models but you can definitely guess that this is a Dell-made machine. Aluminum is the main order of the day and the chamfered edges around the lid and touchpad give the device a more sophisticated and premium feel. In terms of portability, though, the notebook doesn’t break any records – it weighs around 2.16 kg, which is fine but not really that impressive. Still, a thickness of 18.8 mm is pretty good.

As we’ve already mentioned, the lid comes with anodized aluminum sheet with machined edges and Dell’s logo in the middle. Bending the middle results in slight deformation while our twisting attempts didn’t result in severe flexing – quite the opposite actually. The whole lid feels firm and solid and the same goes for the hinges, although they are way too tight to our taste. In fact they are so tightly pulled that opening the notebook is a challenge and the absence of indentation makes matters worse. On the other hand, the hinges keep the screen firmly in place in unstable environment and allow a 180-degree opening. As for the bottom, it’s made of the same material with a big grill for dispersing the heat and two smaller ones for the loudspeakers.

Even though the sides are quite thin, the laptop doesn’t compromise in I/O – the left comes with a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 connector supporting the DisplayPort standard, a full-sized HDMI, two USB 3.0 ports and a 3.5 audio jack. This means that you can hook up to two external displays at the same time – great for productivity. Switching to the right side, we see the RJ-45 LAN port, another USB 3.0 port and the SD card reader. The port distribution is rather good and cables won’t get in the way while using an external mouse.

The interior is in line with the notebook’s exterior and incorporates the same anodized aluminum finish. It feels pretty solid all around the keyboard and the touchpad and the power button is well-separated from the keyboard. Speaking of which, it’s centered and misses on the Numpad block for maximum comfort while typing. The layout is in typical Dell fashion – island-style keys with plenty of separation, clicky feedback and reasonably long travel. As far as the clickpad is concerned, we have some mixed feelings because we are not quite sure everyone will like it – the surface is slightly roughened instead of smooth gliding-friendly finish and the mouse clicks lack tactile feedback. However, it’s responsive and accurate so it will definitely get the work done on the go. Again, not everyone will like it.

All in all, the Inspiron 7570’s chassis justifies the higher price because it offers premium, simplistic and clean look while being extra stable and robust. It might not impress with low weight but it’s pretty thin and falls into the “portable” category for sure. Also, the keyboard feels really good and subjectively, the touchpad is comfortable as well. Still, some users will probably prefer the good old mouse.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The bottom is made of a whole piece without any dedicated service covers but it is still super easy to remove and access the internals.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As expected, the laptop comes with an M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slot and another 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay as well. The former also supports Intel’s latest Optane technology if you are on a budget but still want a better HDD performance out of the system. Anyway, the unit we’ve tested came with a 256GB 2280 M.2 SATA SSD from Sandisk from the X400 series. This is rather disappointing since the laptop is in the price range of PCIe NVMe drives. And as for the HDD, it’s Seagate with 1TB capacity and spinning at 5400 rpm.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB SanDisk X400 M.2 SATA SSD (2280) Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB Seagate HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard comes with two RAM slots and in our case, they are both occupied by two 8GB DDR4-2400 Apacer chips. You can always upgrade up to 32GB of DDR4-2400 memory, though.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Apacer DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 8GB Apacer DDR4-2400 Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is the commong Intel 7265NGW and it’s placed next to the cooling fan.

The battery is also in its usual place – under the wrist rest area – and it’s rated at 42Wh.

Cooling system

As our stress tests confirmed, the cooling solution doesn’t quite fit the CPU + discrete GPU configuration and some throttling may occur during heavy workloads but most of the time should be fine. It consists of just one small and short heat pipe going through both heat sinks and connecting to the cooling fan.

Display quality

The IPS display used for the notebook is manufactured by BOE with model number BOE06B4 (84V7R NV15N35) with 15.6-inch diagonal, matte finish and Full HD (1920×1080) resolution. The pixel density is 142 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good due to the IPS panel.

The maximum brightness falls a bit short compared to its competitors – 234 cd/m2 in the middle and 232 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 6% maximum deviation. The color temperature at maximum brightness is 7070K so colors will appear slightly colder than usual. And as we go along the grayscale, the color temperature becomes even colder compared to the optimal 6500K – 7140K. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 brightness (60%).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 is just 1.6 compared to the center of the panel at 140 cd/m2 (60% brightness), which is an excellent result since values above 4.0 are usually unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio is exceptionally high – 1370:1 before calibration and 1290:1 after profiling.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The sRGB coverage is disappointing for a multimedia laptop at this price range – just 53%. Basically, this means that half of the web-based and HDTV colors will be missing.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 31 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the panel uses PWM from 0 to 99% screen brightness and the frequency of the light pulsations is pretty low (1 kHz) and falls into the “aggressive PWM” category. We strongly recommend keeping the brightness level at 100% at all times or just use our Health-Guard profile, which takes care of the issue.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Our verdict of the panel is rather negative since there are plenty of issues, most of which cannot be fixed with our custom profiles. The panel fits more into the budget-friendly category but it’s too “dull” for an upper-mid-range multimedia laptop like the Inspiron 7570. It has pretty high contrast ratio but the rest of the specs set it behind – limited sRGB coverage, low maximum brightness and uses PWM for regulating screen brightness. But at least, the latter can be fixed with our Health-Guard profile.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Inspiron 15 7570 configurations with 15.6″ BOE BOE06B4 (84V7R NV15N35) (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2yZqFmq

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good – the speakers provide clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Dell Inspiron 7570 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD + 1TB HDD
M.2 Slot
1x PCIe NVMe M.2 slot (2280, M-key)
RAM
8GB DDR4
Dimensions
361 x 244 x 18.8 mm (14.21" x 9.61" x 0.74")
Weight
2.16 kg (4.8 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 3x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), DisplayPort
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Dell Inspiron 15 7570 configurations

Battery

When it comes to battery life, we have some mixed feeling about the Inspiron 7570’s performance. On one hand, the rather small 42Wh handles pretty well the Core i7-8550U CPU during web browsing but fails to deliver the expected video playback runtimes. It might be due to the still unoptimized Intel UHD Graphics 620 drivers or an entirely different problem. In any case, the results are in and they show excellent web browsing runtimes and suboptimal video playback score.

All tests were run with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

We got some really good readings on the web browsing test – 534 minutes (8 hours and 54 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

The video playback test returned a surprisingly low result – 216 minutes (3 hours and 36 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2015’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.


Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload a little over an hour – 131 minutes (2 hours and 11 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-8550u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 Intel Core i7-8550U (4-cores, 1.80 - 3.7? GHz)7.56
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.18+8.2%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.63-51.98%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81-49.6%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.24-57.14%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 Intel Core i7-8550U (4-cores, 1.80 - 3.7? GHz)956
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)910-4.81%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522-45.4%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525-45.08%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)440-53.97%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 Intel Core i7-8550U (4-cores, 1.80 - 3.7? GHz)9.75
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.81+0.62%
Acer Swift 5 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.88+83.38%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49+79.38%
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)18.98+94.67%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-8550U managed to get 12.765 million moves per second. For comparison, one of the most powerful computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)

geforce-940m-3qtrThe NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but paired with a faster GDDR5 memory and slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M. However, some OEMs will still choose to use the cheaper DDR3 version of the GPU.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. Again, the memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM. It still supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole GPU is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse through our GPU ranking to see where the Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

For more information about the GPU, follow this link: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB GDDR5)12212
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37928+210.58%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6208257-32.39%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468-30.66%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)13137+7.57%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB GDDR5)2119
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6173+191.32%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620998-52.9%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597-24.63%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2095-1.13%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB GDDR5)-
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)-
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 6203674-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Inspiron 7570 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (4GB GDDR5)567
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1804+218.17%
Acer Swift 5 Intel HD Graphics 620305-46.21%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432-23.81%
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)634+11.82%

Temperatures

Of course, the stress tests that we perform don’t represent real-life usage but it’s still the best way to determine the overall effectiveness and stability of the cooling system in the long run. Also, it gives us a good idea of how well the system utilizes the hardware’s performance.

Starting with the CPU stress testing, the brand new Core i7-8550U ran at 3.5 GHz for a second, then kept it stable at around 3.3 – 3.4 GHz and after a while, it gradually went down to 2.6 – 2.8 GHz while running at a toasty 90-93 °C.

Turning on the GPU stress test resulted in immediate GPU throttling – the chip didn’t go above 405 MHz while running relatively cool at 68 °C. The CPU went down to 2.4 – 2.5 GHz at that point but no throttling occurred.

Interestingly, the interior remained cool throughout the stress test and most importantly, the palm rest area stayed frosty.

Verdict

The Dell Inspiron 15 7570 stands as an upper-mid-range all-rounder or multimedia-centric laptop but unfortunately fails to deliver in some key areas in which you’d expect that a notebook at this price range would not have troubles with. From design standpoint, the laptop has a simplistic, clean, robust and all-aluminum build with good keyboard and decent touchpad.

Also, the relatively small battery life delivers good web browsing runtimes probably due to the well-optimized Core i7-8550U chip but we saw suboptimal video playback score and we are unsure of why is that. Still, the performance of the new Core i7-8550U is pretty impressive so we can’t wait to see how the rest of the market adopts the new generation of Intel’s chips.

Finally, we want to address the elephant in the room – the screen. Although there’s nothing particularly wrong with the display, except the low-frequency PWM used for regulating brightness, the rest of the properties make it an unfit solution for this price range. As a multimedia-centric laptop, we expected higher sRGB coverage and higher maximum brightness. In addition, the GeForce 940MX GPU should have been replaced with an MX150 but the latter won’t make such a big difference in the end, on contrary to the display.

So unless you are strictly looking for the new generation of Intel’s processors in an elegant package, we strongly recommend the ASUS Vivobook Pro N580VD as an alternative due to its higher performance and better image quality. Other similarly-priced but with 14-inch solutions with better displays are the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ, Acer’s Swift 5 or the Lenovo Ideapad 720s.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yZqFmq

Pros

  • Robust all-aluminum chassis with clean and simplistic look
  • Good keyboard, decent touchpad
  • Fairly portable for 15-incher
  • Has great web browsing runtime
  • A good amount of connectivity options including USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 with DisplayPort output

Cons

  • Subpar videoplayback battery performance
  • The GPU could have been better for the price
  • The screen is rather dull (low brightness, narrow sRGB coverage)
  • The panel uses aggressive PWM for regulating screen brightness (our Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • The GPU throttles under heavy workload, although it runs pretty cool

Lenovo Yoga 720 (13-inch) review – a worthy Yoga member with some performance struggles

$
0
0

With the increasing demand of 13-inch laptops, Lenovo releases a what seems to be a well-balanced option with versatile experience – the Yoga 720. It aims to fill the gap between the mid-range Yogas and the Yoga 910 while leaning more towards the upper-mid-range to high-end. Its key selling points are, of course, flexibility, portability, screen quality, battery life and connectivity via two USB-C connectors, one of which supports Thunderbolt 3. Unfortunately, though, the standard display interfaces like HDMI or mini DisplayPort are missing so you should rely on the Thunderbolt 3 expandability via external dongle.

In any case, the pricing of this thing appears to be somewhat reasonable, especially the base model, which we are reviewing – Intel Core i5-7200U CPU, 8GB of DDR4-2133 memory, Intel HD Graphics 620 iGPU, 13.3-inch Full HD IPS touchscreen, fairly big 48Wh battery and all of this crammed inside a portable, premium and rigid chassis. So what’s not to like? As with every device released, there are some trade-offs along the way that OEMs had to do. Read the full review to find out which corners Lenovo had to cut.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2zqpZYt

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a luxurious stone-gray box containing all the usual user manuals, power adapter and a stylus.

Design and construction

The whole laptop is made of aluminum with machined edges here and there giving the device a more premium feel. Despite the all-aluminum chassis, the Yoga 720 weighs at the impressive 1.3 kg and measures at just 14.3 mm. What puzzled us, though, was the hinge design. The Yoga 720 seems to have abandoned the iconic watchband hinges we found so neat on other Yoga devices but at least that hasn’t reflected on the overall stability of the screen.

Anodized aluminum is the main order of the day all around the device and the lid is no exception. It’s clean, simplistic and features only the Yoga logo in the upper left corner. The material itself delivers good rigidity and doesn’t give in under pressure even in the middle section. Our twisting attempts resulted in barely noticeable deformation as well. Opening the device is possible only with two hands as the hinges are tightly pulled. At least this prevents some of the unwanted sway of the screen when using the touchscreen in laptop mode. Speaking of the screen, it has quite a thin side and upper bezels, which reduce the overall size of the machine – close to a 12-inch device.

The connectivity of the device is rather limited due to its form factor but it should be more than enough for the casual user. The left side offers one 3.5 mm audio jack and two USB-C 3.1 connectors one of which is used for charging and supports the Gen 1 standard (5 Gbps) while the other complies with the Thunderbolt 3 standard. This means that this port can be used for display output, ultra-fast data transfer and much more as long as you purchase the right dongle. The right side comes only with a single USB-A 3.0 connector and a power button next to it. Unfortunately, the SD card slot is nowhere to be found.

The interior aligns with the notebook’s overall design with stable anodized aluminum sheet. No matter which part of the interior we press, there’s no noticeable flex and gives the impression of a rigid base. The keyboard is in the usual Lenovo AccuType fashion and each key press results in a satisfying clicky tactile and audible feedback. This compensates for the rather short key travel and makes up for a comfortable typing experience overall. Our only small complaint towards the layout would be the absence of media control Fn keys. Anyway, the touchpad offers buttery-smooth gliding surface with light mouse clicks and accurate responsiveness to gestures, swipes and clicks.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

As all ultrabooks out there, there are no dedicated service lids for easy access to the internals but that doesn’t mean it’s hard to gain access to the hardware. You just have to remove all the screws around the bottom and gently pry it up.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Of course, the laptop comes only with an M.2 2280 SSD slot and in our case, the drive is Samsung PM961 PCIe NVMe with 256GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB Samsung PM961 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD(2280) Upgrade options

RAM

Unfortunately, memory cannot be replaced or upgraded. The RAM chips are soldered to the motherboard so you have to decie whether or not 8GB of DDR4-2133 memory will suit you or you will need to opt for 16GB.

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is located next to one of the cooling fans and it’s Qualcomm QCNFA344A.

The battery isn’t necessarily huge but it does its job fairly well – it’s rated at 48Wh.

Cooling system

To our surprise, the cooling system consists of not one but two cooling fans both of which have separate heat pipes connected to the CPU’s heat sink.

Display quality

The Lenovo Yoga 720 features a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS display from LG with model number LP133WF4-SPB1. The pixel pitch for this 13-inch panel is 0.153 x 0.153 mm while the pixel density is 166 ppi. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 53 cm.

The Yoga 720 has comfortable viewing angles due to the IPS panel.

We’ve measured peak brightness of 327 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 301 cd/m2 as average across the surface making up for a fairly high maximum deviation of 19%. The color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is 6010K – colors will appear slightly warmer than they should. As we go along the grayscale, the average color temperature becomes 5780K – ever warmer. You can see how these values change at 81% (145 cd/m2) brightness.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen is 4.6, which is higher than the acceptable value of 4.0. You should take this into consideration when color-sensitive work is involved. Anyway, the contrast ratio is high – 1010:1 before calibration and 910:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 88% of the sRGB color space, which is enough for the usual office work, web browsing and even multimedia.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 22 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment didn’t detect any PWM throughout all brightness levels – there were just small pulsations at extremely high frequencies (130 kHz) here and there but won’t matter in practice.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The display is a rather good fit considering the price point and the purpose of the device – it has reasonably high maximum brightness, fairly wide sRGB coverage and good contrast ratio. It’s also harmless to your eyes since it doesn’t use PWM for regulating brightness. Our only complaint would be the suboptimal color reproduction but our custom profiles can definitely improve this area.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Yoga 720 configurations with 13.3″ LG LP133WF4-SPB1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2yppRs2

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Lenovo YOGA 720 (13") technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
13.3”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB PCIe NVMe SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2133 MHz (soldered)
Dimensions
310 x 213 x 14 mm (12.20" x 8.39" x 0.55")
Weight
1.25 kg (2.8 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Power Delivery (PD)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3, Power Delivery (PD), DisplayPort
  • Card reader
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone dual array microphone
  • Speakers 2 x 1W, JBL
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Lenovo Yoga 720 (13″) configurations

Battery

To our surprise, the 48Wh battery unit impressed us with pretty good endurance, especially on the web browsing test and it appears that it’s just enough to make it into the top 10 in our battery ranking. Even the energy-sipping Full HD IPS display couldn’t keep the device from running for more than 11 hours straight.

Of course, all tests were performed with our usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and the Windows battery saving feature switched on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

The result from the web browsing test is great – 690 minutes (11 hours and 30 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Way lower but still good satisfactory result – 481 minutes (8 hours and 1 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload a little over three hours – 191 minutes (3 hours and 11 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)2.98
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.24+8.72%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.81+27.85%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)2.81-5.7%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.39+13.76%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)386
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)440+13.99%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)525+36.01%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)405+4.92%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)488+26.42%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.01
Lenovo ideapad 720S Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)18.98+5.39%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.49-2.89%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel Core i3-7100U (2-cores, 2.4 GHz)23.01+27.76%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)18.02+0.06%

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.405 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel HD Graphics 6205387
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)13137+143.86%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)8468+57.19%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 6205237-2.78%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6208272+53.55%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel HD Graphics 620842
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2095+148.81%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)1597+89.67%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620564-33.02%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6201023+21.5%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel HD Graphics 620-
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)5220-
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620-
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 6203731-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo YOGA 720 (13″) Intel HD Graphics 620264
Lenovo ideapad 720S NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)634+140.15%
ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB DDR3)432+63.64%
Lenovo Flex 5 (14″) Intel HD Graphics 620176-33.33%
HP Spectre x360 13 Intel HD Graphics 620390+47.73%

Temperatures

For every laptop we review, we run the usual stress tests on the CPU and GPU to see how the cooling system handles heavy workloads and how will it fare in the long run after years of usage. Still, this method of testing doesn’t represent real-life usage.

We started off with 100% CPU load for about an hour and from the very beginning, the Core i5-7200U CPU wasn’t able to reach its Turbo Boost frequency range. The second we turned on the stress test, the chip clocked down to 2.5 GHz.

After an hour had passed, we turned on the GPU stress test as well and the CPU cores kept a frequency of 2.5 GHz for a while but then toned down to 1.5 GHz. This is usually normal since the CPU cores give some headroom for the iGPU to perform.

Temperatures on the surface were pretty much normal given the nature of the stress test and the purpose of the device.

Verdict

Our rating would have been almost perfect if it wasn’t for this rather important issue with the CPU. According to the synthetic benchmark tests and the stress test, the Core i5-7200U CPU wasn’t able to reach its maximum potential and we are not sure why is that. We’ve tested even thinner laptops that were able to utilize the Turbo Boost frequency range without any issue. And the Yoga 720 even has not one but two cooling fans.

Anyway, aside from the CPU performance issue, the notebook is just great – it’s well-built while keeping the weight and dimensions pretty low for 13-inch device. This is mainly thanks to the all-aluminum case and the thin screen bezels that reduce the dimensions overall. We were surprised, however, that Lenovo used normal 360-degree hinge design instead of their iconic watchband hinge. They probably use it only for their high-end devices.

As far as the display is concerned – it’s just a little above average – it isn’t anything special but it fits the device’s profile perfectly. You get fairly wide sRGB coverage, high contrast and high maximum brightness with no PWM. All of these properties make it ideal for work, browsing and even multimedia. Our only issue with it is the color inaccuracy but our custom profiles like the “Design and Gaming” profile can take care of that.

Finally, the users getting the laptop for business would be happy to know that the keyboard and the touchpad will get the work done on the go – they are really comfortable to use. In addition, the battery life is impressive so you won’t have to charge the device several times a day when you are moving around all the time and even if the I/O isn’t enough for you, the Thunderbolt 3 connector gives you plenty of headroom, which is rather unexpected given the price tag of the Yoga 720.

And even though the Yoga 720 is a great device, you might want to consider some of the alternatives like the ASUS ZenBook UX310UQ / UX410UQ or the Lenovo Ideapad 720s, although they won’t give you that 360-degree rotatable hinge flexibility, the performance is much better. And as a more affordable solution, we suggest looking into the Lenovo Yoga 520 (Flex 5) as well.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2zqpZYt

Pros

  • Rigid case
  • Light and portable with thin screen bezels
  • Good input devicse
  • Good IPS screen
  • The panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • Battery life is great
  • Features a USB-C Thunderbolt 3 connector

Cons

  • The CPU can’t utilize the Turbo Boost frequencies
  • The display offers poor color accuracy out of the box and significant deviation compared to the center

ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD review – the best N-series multimedia laptop from ASUS so far

$
0
0

The N-series from ASUS has long been praised for their balanced hardware (maybe the CPU is a bit of an overkill but still…), excellent multimedia properties (good screen and high-quality audio) and now, the VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD needs to prove itself as a worthy successor to the N552VX. And in most cases, the laptop stands out, although it fails to impress in some other key areas like noise emissions and battery life.

Luckily, the new N580VD keeps what’s good from the previous generation but boasts the latest hardware currently from NVIDIA and Intel on board in a much slimmer and tinier chassis. Dimensions and weight were always a considerable drawback with the N-series and now with the new addition to the lineup, ASUS aims to fix that. However, we have some concerns about cooling performance and battery life. Usually, smaller chassis limit the cooling performance and can’t hold a decently-sized battery. We hope the Core i7-7700HQ and the GeForce GTX 1050 will run cool under load.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2ywXlqf

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a small box containing all the usual stuff – AC adapter, power cord, user manuals and a cable tie.

Design and construction

As we already stated, the N580VD has gone through some major changes with the most noticeable ones being the weight and dimensions. Now sporting a smaller overall case, the N580VD can be called “portable”. In fact, the laptop is surprisingly lightweight tipping the scale at just 1.85 kg and measuring just above 19 mm in height (19.2 mm to be exact). In addition, the case now incorporates more aluminum than plastic and retains the general sturdiness of the device. Oh, and the bottom piece now matches the color of the interior and exterior and thus, it’s more aesthetically pleasing than the previous two generations.

The lid – it’s still made of brushed aluminum but the concentric circles are missing this time around. We kind of miss them – that’s one of the distinctive features of some of the ASUS laptops. Anyway, pressing the center of the lid results in slight bending but nothing too serious about it. On the other hand, we found it to be quite prone to twisting probably due to the thin plastic bezels that support the screen. As for the single hinge design, it appears to be well-made providing smooth travel and allows opening the device with just one hand. Still, we noticed some minor sways when touching the screen, which might be problematic for the touch-enabled version. Moving to the bottom, we find a plastic surface imitating anodized aluminum matching the lid and interior. There are three small grills for cool air intake and two openings for the stereo loudspeakers.

As we go around the sides, we see more than we could ask for in terms of connectivity from a 15-inch device. The left side houses the DC charging port, RJ-45 for LAN, USB 3.0, full-sized HDMI and a USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) also supporting a display output. This one comes as a substitute to the mini DisplayPort found on the previous generation. And as for the right side, it accommodates two more USB-A 2.0 connectors (we wish one of them was 3.0) a 3.5 mm audio jack and an SD card reader.

Opening the laptop reveals clean and simplistic looks as usual. The material is swapped with brushed metal surface and machined edges around the clickpad. Unfortunately, though, despite being made of aluminum, the interior still flexes in the upper part of the keyboard and near the spacebar. It won’t be a deal-breaker for most users but the previous generation felt a little bit sturdier in this regard. Moreover, the keyboard feels like a small downgrade too. Don’t get us wrong though, it offers nice and clicky tactile feedback, discreet LED illumination and well-spaced keys but the long key travel and big Numpad block will definitely be missed. The arrow and the Numpad keys are so small and crammed up that they feel a bit awkward to use. Fortunately, the clickpad remains stable, responsive, clicky and features a smooth gliding surface.

We can definitely say that the new VivoBook has proven itself as a worthy successor to the multimedia N-series and for the first time, we see significant changes in the overall design resulting in increased portability while retaining fairly stable construction.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

THe disassembly process of the notebook is pretty easy as long as you know how to detach the bottom piece. Just remove all the screws at the bottom and try prying it up with a thin plastic tool at the back where the vents are placed. That’s where the plate detaches much easier.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As usual, the laptop comes with a standard 2.5-inch HDD and an M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slot. The latter is empty in our reviewed unit but the 2.5-inch bay was secured by Seagate 1TB HDD.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB Seagate HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

As expected, the motherboard supports two memory slots, one of which in our case was taken by a Samsung 8GB DDR4-2400 stick.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter can be found near the M.2 SSD slot and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The battery is rather small – rated at just 47Wh, it’s not that effective with the given energy-sipping hardware.

Cooling system

The cooling system is pretty simple and uses a familiar design for powerful notebooks – two separated cooling fans and two big heat pipes going across the heat sinks.

Display quality

The notebook uses a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel from LG with model number LP156WF6-SPP2. At 15.6-inch diagonal, the pixel density is 142 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good since it’s an IPS panel.

We’ve measured a maximum brightness of 313 cd/m2 in the middle and 283 cd/m2 as average across the surface with maximum deviation of 19%, which is a bit high to our standards. The color temperature at maximum brightness on white screen is 7430K, which means that colors will appear colder than they should. Moving along the grayscale, the color temperature moves a little closer to the optimal (6500K) – 7330K. You can see how these values change at 63% brightness (141 cd/m2).

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen at 63% brightness is 5.2. Usually anything above 4.0 is considered high deviation, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrast ratio is good – 1010:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Our tests show that the screen covers 87% of the sRGB, which is pretty much on par with the competition at this price range and will be enough for multimedia and gaming.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 25 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the panel uses high-frequency PWM for regulating screen brightness. However, only users with sensitive eyes might feel the effects at 21 kHz and if you are one of those users, we suggest using our Health-Guard profile that eliminates PWM.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The ASUS N-series have never disappointed us in terms of image quality and the VivoBook N580VD delivered what we’ve expected as well. Yes, sure, the panel could have been a little bit brighter but the contrast ratio is good and the sRGB coverage is more than decent. Our only serious complaint would be the color deviation out of the box and the PWM used for regulating luminance. Our “Design and Gaming” profile, however, will fix the color deviation and the “Health-Guard” profile will take care of the PWM.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS VivoBook N580VD configurations with 15.6″ LG LP156WF6-SPP2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2ywXlqf

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality on this thing is amazing. The clarity and the fullness in the low, mid and high frequencies is just outstanding and enough to call the VivoBook N580VD an excellent all-round multimedia device.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 technical specifications table Also known as ASUS N580VD-EB76

Acer
-4%
Old price $1049.00
$1009.00
you save $40 (-4%)
from Amazon
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB M.2 SATA SSD + 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm
M.2 Slot
M.2 PCIe NVMe 2280 (M key) See photo
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
380 x 256 x 19 mm (14.96" x 10.08" x 0.75")
Weight
1.85 kg (4.1 lbs)
Body material
Plastic / Polycarbonate, Aluminum (Aluminum)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 2x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera HD webcam
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

ASUS VivoBook Pro N580VD configurations

Software

We used a fresh install of the Windows 10 OS for the writing of this review and if you wish to do the same, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official website.

Battery

We didn’t expect any record-breaking results from the VivoBook N580VD due to its high-voltage CPU, energy-sipping Full HD IPS panel and fairly low battery capacity – just 47Wh. However, the results from our web browsing and video playback tests show just about average battery endurance considering the price range and the purpose of the laptop.

All tests, of course, were run with the same settings as always – Wi-Fi constantly running, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows power saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty average result here – 326 minutes (5 hours and 26 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Interestingly, a bit higher than expected result – 372 minutes (6 hours and 12 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload a little over an hour – 86 minutes (1 hour1 and 26 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7700hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.18
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)7.49-8.44%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.15-0.37%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.14-0.49%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)910
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)812-10.77%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)888-2.42%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)860-5.49%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.81
ASUS N552VX Intel Core i7-6700HQ (4-cores, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz)11.51+17.33%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.78-0.31%
Lenovo Legion Y520 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.93+1.22%

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)

The GeForce GTX 1050 GPU for laptops is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs featuring a brand new architecture design but on contrary to the rest of the GPUs from NVIDIA’s lineup, the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti feature a Samsung-made FinFET 14nm chip instead of the TSMC 16nm found in the GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. The graphics card is based on the GP107 chip paired with 4GB of GDDR5 memory via 128-bit interface.

Since the GTX 1050 is quite dependent on the cooling design, its performance may vary but if the laptop handles the GPU well and shouldn’t be much different from its desktop counterpart. Anyway, the GPU operates at relatively high frequencies (1354 – 1493 MHz) but incorporates the same amount of CUDA cores (640) while the memory is clocked at 7000 MHz (effective). These specs ensure a huge performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. For instance, the GTX 1050 performs better than the GTX 960M and can be compared to the GTX 965M’s capabilities while running at similar to the GTX 960M’s TDP of around 40-50W.

However, along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, improved H.265 encoding, and decoding.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-4gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37928
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)21325-43.78%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37702-0.6%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)48511+27.9%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6173
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)3202-48.13%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6099-1.2%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)7523+21.87%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)-
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)10777-
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)19656-
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)24817-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1804
ASUS N552VX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4GB DDR3)937-48.06%
Acer Aspire VX 15 (VX5-591G) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1757-2.61%
Lenovo Legion Y520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB GDDR5)2354+30.49%
GTA-V-benchmarks
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 99 fps 60 fps 35 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 70 fps 49 fps 24 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 38 fps 35 fps 31 fps

Temperatures

All stress tests that we perform can’t be taken as a representation of real-life use since 100% CPU + 100% GPU load for nearly two hours is virtually impossible in real-world scenarios but it remains as the most effective way to assess the overall stability and effectiveness of the cooling system, especially in the long run.

We kicked things off with 100% CPU load for about an hour – the Core i7-7700HQ ran at fairly decent temperatures while utilizing the maximum clock speeds for four active cores (3.5 GHz) for a while but then slowly went down to around 3.1 GHz, which is still within the Turbo Boost range.

Switching on the GPU stress test didn’t result in throttling at all. The CPU clocked down to near base operating frequency – 2.9 GHz, while the GTX 1050 ran at more than its maximum potential – 1582 MHz. Inner temperatures were a bit high but this is rather normal considering the nature of the torture test.

We’ve also measured how warm the surface gets during these stress tests. The only “hot” area was above the center of the keyboard where the main exhaust vents are placed. Also, the middle section of the keyboard was rather warm but more importantly, the palm rest area was cool throughout the whole test. We can definitely conclude that the cooling design does its job really well considering the powerful hardware and thin chassis.

Verdict

The ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD is a tremendous leap forward compared to what seems to be its predecessor – the ASUS N552VX, except in terms of image quality. The presented panel here drags behind its predecessor in terms of brightness, color accuracy and sRGB coverage although, the latter won’t be noticed, especially with a naked eye, since the difference is merely a few percents. Still, we can’t get past the fact that the display uses PWM for regulating screen brightness so using our Health-Guard profile might be the smart thing to do if you experience fatigue or other kinds of effects from the high-frequency PWM.

In all other areas, the VivoBook Pro N580VD excels – it has the looks without sacrificing rigidity, it’s pretty portable and lightweight, it has a decent amount of I/O and the input devices are great. Compared to some GTX 1050-powered alternatives on the market, the laptop is slightly pricier but you pay for the better build quality and overall better IPS display. Yet, if you are willing to settle for the Core i5-7300HQ, which doesn’t make any difference compared to the Core i7-7700HQ when it comes to gaming, this machine is a bang for the bucks. Also, the sound quality is ideal for your daily multimedia needs.

And finally, the cooling system appears to handle the hardware pretty well, especially when you take into account the thin and light chassis. Our extreme stress test shows that the cooling design should be reliable in the long run as well. And although battery life is improved compared to the previous generation, it definitely isn’t something to be proud of.

There aren’t many powerful multimedia solutions at this price range that we can think of so we might as well compare it to other GTX 1050-powered notebooks, which happen to be gaming-oriented. The Acer Aspire VX 15 and the Lenovo Legion Y520 are right up there but to our surprise, the VivoBook N580VD seem to beat them all in terms of efficiency, image quality and portability.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2ywXlqf

Pros

  • Good build – aluminum design and rigid construction
  • Thin and portable chassis
  • Comfortable input devices
  • Above average IPS display
  • Excellent audio quality
  • Reliable cooling system
  • Good price/performance ratio

Cons

  • Battery life could be better
  • The display uses PWM for regulating brightness (our Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • Noticeable color and brightness deviation compared to the center of the screen

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510/X510) review – a decent solution in an already over-saturated mid-range multimedia segment

$
0
0

ASUS recently released a number of new notebooks in the low to mid-range segment of the market almost all of which, however, impress with good value for the asking price. In this review, we will take a look at the ASUS VivoBook S15 – a what seems to be a well-balanced mid-range notebook with plenty of power to run some of the modern games in low settings while delivering pretty good multimedia experience thanks to the IPS panel and decent sound quality. In addition, the VivoBook S15 impresses with fairly light and thin chassis without missing too much on the I/O.

While all of this seems great, be aware that some of the configurations sport TN panels and not IPS and the LED-backlit keyboard is optional. In any case, for around $800 you get an energy-efficient Core i7-7500U CPU, fairly powerful discrete GeForce 940MX GPU with 2GB of DDR3 – enough for light gaming and multimedia – and an M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slot in addition to the standard 2.5-inch HDD bay. In this configuration, the S510UQ aims to displace the ASUS X556UQ while upgrading the chassis and the display. And compared to other similarly priced alternatives, the VivoBook S15 impresses with better value overall. Read the full review to find out the pitfalls of the notebook.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yDnhBd

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a standard package containing all the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord.

Design and construction

In terms of design, the laptop looks and feels like the old X556 series but manages to keep the weight around 1.65 kg and an approximate thickness of 17.9 mm – a noticeable improvement. In addition, the plastic used for this build feels a bit more robust and way better looking.

The lid is the first thing that draws the similarity between the old X550-series and the S15 – it’s still made of plastic and features that iconic concentric circle pattern. Pressing the middle results in slight bending and barely noticeable ripples on the LCD screen. It’s also fairly resistant to torsion. Speaking of the screen, we are impressed by the thin side bezels and to be honest, the upper one and the bottom chin are pretty narrow as well. This distinctive feature, which ASUS markets in its website, really gives the laptop a more premium look. The single-hinge design feels reasonably stable but probably a bit overly-tightened at the beginning – you’d need both hands to open it up. The bottom is also made of plastic but this time it matches the color of the exterior and successfully imitates anodized metal finish.

As we go around the sides, we find the usual set of I/O that is well-distributed. On the left, you can see two USB 2.0 connectors and an SD card while the right side holds the DC charging port, one USB 3.0, full-sized HDMI, 3.5 mm audio jack and one USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) connector.

Opening the machine reveals a familiar interior that feels somewhat cheap mostly due to the keycaps of the keyboard. They feel kind of roughened and the keys provide a bit shorter than usual travel but compensate with an adequate tactile feedback. Too bad the LED illumination is optional and isn’t a standard here. The material around the keyboard and the touchpad, though, is smooth, strongly imitates anodized aluminum and it’s rather stable. All areas, except the one right next to the center of the hinge, feel solid and don’t give in under pressure. And finally, as far as the touchpad goes, it’s definitely one of the best clickpad designs we’ve used in the price range. It has good gliding surface and works with light mouse clicks. Also, it doesn’t feel sluggish and gestures work pretty well.

Overall, the ASUS VivoBook S15 sports a well-built case with only a few drawbacks that are otherwise inherent to this segment of the market. Our criticism isn’t strong and should be taken as a recommendation for the next generation. You will be happy with the compact, light and fairly sturdy chassis providing all the usual I/O and comfortable enough input devices for some work on the go. The thin screen bezels and clean simplistic look of the machine are an added bonus.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Since there are no service lids, you will have to remove the whole bottom plate, which is rather easy but a bit tricky. Make sure you’ve removed all the screws including the ones hiding under the rear silicone feet as shown in the photos below. Then start prying it up with a thin plastic tool from the rear grills – that’s where the plate comes off easily.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

The laptop comes with the usual 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay and an M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slot but in our case, only the former was occupied by a standard 1TB HDD. The M.2 slot is located right next to the hard drive.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB HDD @5400 rpm Upgrade options

RAM

Good news about the RAM configurations – the motherboard holds two memory slots that can go up to 16GB of DDR4-2400 each. Our unit, however, featured just one 8GB DDR4-2400 SK Hynix stick.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter can be found near the cooling fan and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The battery isn’t the biggest we’ve seen in such laptop (42Wh) so it’s only logical that the battery scores are just about average.

Cooling system

The cooling system consists of just one big heat pipe going across both heat sinks – the CPU and GPU. So we weren’t surprised that the system sustains higher than normal temperatures at heavy workloads.

Display quality

The laptop uses an LG-made IPS panel with Full HD (1920×1080) resolution with model number LP156WF9-SPK2. The pixel density is 142 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm so it can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good since it’s an IPS panel.

The maximum brightness we were able to record is 255 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 243 cd/m2 as average acorss the surface with 17% maximum deviation in the upper right corner. The color temperature on white screen at maximum luminance is 7800K – colder than usual so colors will appear slightly colder/blue-ish. As we go along the grayscale, the color temperature becomes closer to the optimal 6500K but still colder than it should be – 7480K. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (74%) brightness.

The maximum color deviation compared to the center of the screen is 4.4, which is a bit higher than the acceptable 4.0 value. This should be taken into consideration when color-sensitive work is involved. THe ocntrast ratio is pretty good – 1000:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The sRGB color gamut according to our equipment is 55% so almost half of the colors on the web and on HDTV will be missing but that’s rather normal considering the price point of the laptop.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 24 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, the panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness so it’s safe to use in this regard for long periods of time.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

As expected, the VivoBook S15 is a budget-oriented multimedia machine so some sacrifices should be maed along the way. The good news is that the display quality is good although, the laptop uses a budget IPS panel, which is always a preferable choice overa a TN display anyway.

Don’t get us wrong, though, the screen is fine – it’s bright enough to offer comfortable working experience indoors, it has high contrast ratio and doesn’t use PWM for regulating brightness. The only considerable drawback here is the limited sRGB coverage and if it’s of great importance to you, we suggest opting for a pricier solution altogether.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510/X510) configurations with 15.6″ LG LP156WF9-SPK2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2zxa3Tv

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is overall fine in the low, mid and high frequencies with just small deviations.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) technical specifications table Also known as ASUS VivoBook S510/X510

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
1TB HDD, 5400 rpm
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
361 x 244 x 18 mm (14.21" x 9.61" x 0.71")
Weight
1.70 kg (3.7 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI 1
  • Card reader SD, SDHC
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera VGA
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers Stereo 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S150/X510) configurations

Software

We used a fresh install of the Windows 10 Pro for the writing of this review so if you wish to do the same, we suggest downloading all of the needed drivers from ASUS’ official website.

Battery

As to be expected, the notebook doesn’t impress with battery endurance due to the relatively low capacity of just 42Wh but still, it scored just about the average for the price range.

All tets were perfomed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows power saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Pretty average result here – 350 minutes (5 hours and 50 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Almost identical score on the video playback test – 348 minutes (5 hours and 48 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload a little over two hours – 126 minutes (2 hours and 26 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.91
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)8.18+109.21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.79-3.07%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.66-6.39%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)910+74.33%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)527+0.96%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)475-9%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.38
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.81-43.56%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.61+1.32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.44+0.35%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.850 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)

geforce-940m-3qtrThe NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but paired with a faster GDDR5 memory and slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M. However, some OEMs will still choose to use the cheaper DDR3 version of the GPU.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. Again, the memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM. It still supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole GPU is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse through our GPU ranking to see where the Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

For more information about the GPU, follow this link: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)12518
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)37928+202.99%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 AMD Radeon R7 M445 (2GB GDDR5)9939-20.6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)21597+72.53%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)2239
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6173+175.7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 AMD Radeon R7 M445 (2GB GDDR5)1625-27.42%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)3493+56.01%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)-
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)-
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 AMD Radeon R7 M445 (2GB GDDR5)5385-
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)11041-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)623
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1804+189.57%
Dell Inspiron 15 5567 AMD Radeon R7 M445 (2GB GDDR5)444-28.73%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2GB GDDR5)1033+65.81%

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 85 fps 79 fps 70 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 75 fps 34 fps 19 fps

Temperatures

Of course, the stress tests can’t be taken as a representation of real-life scenarios because even gaming can’t put so much stress on the CPU and GPU all at once for long periods of time but remain as the most reliable way to assess the overall effectiveness and stability of the cooling system in the long run.

We started off with 100% CPU load for about an hour. The Core i7-7500U utilized its Turbo Boost frequency for a short period of time before settling between 3.0 and 3.1 GHz, which is still within the Turbo Boost range.

Switching on the GPU stress test resulted in CPU throttling but the GeForce 940MX sustained its base operating frequency although, running way too hot – 84 °C. Even high-performance gaming notebooks don’t reach such high GPU temperatures.

Fortunately, though, the inner temperatures didn’t result in overheating around the interior as you can see from the heat map below.

Verdict

The ASUS VivoBook S15 seems like a decent all-rounder for the asking price but there are some considerable drawbacks that need to be considered and, of course, the alternatives on the market.

The build quality is good despite the all-plastic exterior and interior, which in return reduces the overall weight of the device significantly. The VivoBook S15 impresses with portable dimensions – mainly thanks to the thin side bezels of the screen – and relatively low weight for a 15-inch device. The port selection isn’t limited as well and we find the input devices fairly comfortable to use on the go. The missing LED illumination is a letdown, though.

The display quality is overall nice and we really like that ASUS went for the budget IPS option rather than sticking to the TN alternatives that are usually inherent to laptops in this ballpark. The absence of PWM and the high contrast ratio are a big plus but the limited sRGB coverage might not suit everyone’s needs.

When it comes to performance, though, the hardware is fully capable of handling the usual office work, general browsing, multimedia and conditional light gaming. We do have to note, however, that the cooling system sustains higher than normal temperatures under stressful loads – gaming included.

Nonetheless, the price tag of the configuration with the 940MX poses a serious question whether or not it’s worth your hard-earned cash. The price difference between the ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD with the Core i5-7300HQ processor and the VivoBook S510UQ that we reviewed is negligible while the former has aluminum build, considerably more powerful hardware, more reliable cooling system and much better screen quality. Other 15-inch alternatives with similar hardware and displays are the Dell Inspiron 15 5567 (configurations with IPS), the more business-oriented Lenovo ThinkPad E570 and the Lenovo Ideapad 520 as a direct competitor.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yDnhBd

Pros

  • Good build overall
  • Light and portable for a 15-incher
  • Nice touchpad, fairly decent keyboard
  • Average IPS panel but with high contrast and no PWM

Cons

  • No keyboard LED illumination
  • The cooling system keeps inner temperatures high under load

Dell Precision 5520 review – the XPS 15 for professionals

$
0
0

The XPS series from Dell have been praised for their extraordinary design, build quality paired with performance. This has been proven to be a successful approach to the premium business segment and looks like Dell wants to bring the same concept into its professional mobile workstations. With the Precision 5520 (and its predecessor, the 5510), it’s clear to see that the lineup is receiving the XPS treatment and that’s probably a good thing.

Although the XPS 15 and the Precision 5520 look exactly the same, there are several key differences even in the design department. The XPS 15 remains as a slightly more portable option as the Precision 5520 sports a bit thicker chassis so a better cooling can be provided, especially since the laptop will have to handle long and heavy workloads. The second thing is obviously the hardware – the XPS family receives the mainstream Intel Core i7-7700HQ CPU and NVIDIA’s latest GeForce 1050 GPU, while the Precision 5520 takes care of the strictly business-oriented share of the market with Intel Core i7-7820HQ and the Quadro M1200 GPU with 4GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory. But if you want to go even further, Dell is offering the Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 and v6 – their latest mobile processors for workstations. As far as screen options are concerned, the laptop can be configured with a standard Full HD IPS display and a 4K UHD one as well. We will focus on the (probably) the most sought after configuration with the Core i7-7820HQ, Quadro M1200 and the standard Full HD IPS panel. Even with this “mid-range” configuration, the price of the laptop is nearly €2 500 so is it worth your hard-earned money? We find out in the full review below.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yR4JNt

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a similar to the XPS 15 black “premium” box with the usual user manuals, AC adapter and power cord.

Design and construction

As we already said, there’s no major difference between the XPS 15 and the Precision 5520 when it comes to appearance. Both cases combine the anodized aluminum, soft-touch matte silicone finish for the interior and carbon fiber base, which threads can be easily seen.

The lid consists of a thick anodized aluminum sheet with absolutely no flex and bending. We still complain, however, about the overly tightened hinge – both hands are always needed to open the notebook. But on the other hand, this assures stable working environment and no screen sway, especially when working on the touch-enabled version. Opening the screen reveals once more the extremely thin screen bezels that are the main contributing factor of the small chassis. This has enabled Dell to incorporate a 15.6-inch screen inside a typical 14-inch body. The only real issue with this design is the awkward webcam placement. And as for the bottom of the chassis, it sports the same aluminum sheet with a big grill for cool air intake.

The sides remain the same – soft-touch matte plastic with all connectors that you’d need – USB 3.0, HDMI, USB-C 3.1 with Thunderbolt 3 support and the 3.5 mm audio jack on the left and a single USB 3.0 port and an SD card reader on the right. The small button for indicating battery level is still here as well. And the only real change here is the overall thickness of the machine – while the XPS 15 goes from 11 mm up to 17 mm at its thickest point, the Precision 5520 measures at 21 mm – barely noticeable to be honest.

Probably the most iconic part of the laptop is the interior – slightly transparent soft-touch matte finish on top of the carbon fiber composite. Not only does this choice of material give a distinct look of the laptop, it doesn’t add to much weight and doesn’t take away the sturdiness of the chassis. Our only complaint is that the surface is a huge fingerprint magnet so frequent cleaning is a must. Fortunately, Dell hasn’t changed the input devices as well – excellent keyboard with a bit short (1.3 mm) travel but satisfying clicky tactile feedback paired with a big trackpad registering every gesture, swipe and click accurately.

From a device that costs this much, we weren’t expecting anything less, to be honest. The device inherits the stunning simplistic looks of the XPS series as well as the impeccable build quality. The main key selling point of this powerful workstation is its portability.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Just like the XPS 15, the Precision 5520 isn’t equipped with service lids and to access all of the internals, you’d need to remove the bottom plate, which is rather easy anyway. Just remove all the screws on the bottom including the one located under the metal lid in the middle.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Similar to the XPS 15 configurations, the Precision 5520 comes with either big battery and just M.2 SSD slot or with 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay, smaller battery and M.2 slot. The unit we reviewed had the smaller 56Wh battery with the 2.5-inch slot being occupied by an SK Hynix SATA SSD with 512GB capacity. The M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slot was available for upgrade.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 Free Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 512GB SK Hynix SATA SSD Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard comes with two available RAM slots each supporting up to 16GB of DDR4-2400 memory each. The unit we’ve reviewed came with a single SK Hynix 16GB DDR4-2400 chip.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 16GB SK Hynix DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed in the upper left corner (with the bottom of the machine facing upwards) and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

As we already said, the notebook comes with a 56Wh battery unit placed under the palm rest area.

Cooling system

The cooling design isn’t much different from the XPS 15 – in fact, it’s absolutely identical – two heat pipes go across both heatsinks and connect the cooling fans placed on both sides. And despite the fact that the cooling system looks reliable, the thin chassis makes the cooling pretty hard due to the limited airflow. Our stress tests confirm that.

Display quality

The Full HD version of the machine comes with the same 1080p IPS panel from Sharp as the one we found in the XPS 15 (9560). However, there are some key differences in the unit we’ve tested. The panel’s model number is SHP1453 (LQ156MQ) and has 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

We’ve measured a maximum brightness of 404 cd/m2 in the center of the panel and 393 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 6% deviation. The color temperature is a little colder than it should be at maximum brightness – 7600K and it does become a tad colder as we go along the grayscale. You can see how values change at 34% brightness (140 cd/m2) in the image below.

The maximum dE2000 color deviation at 34% brightness is 2.0 – a good result since values a above 4.0 are unwanted, especially when color-sensitive work is involved. The contrrast ratio is 1600:1 and comes down to 1300:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

While the sRGB coverage of the XPS 15 was 95%, here our equipment measured 98%, which is pretty close to the sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 standard meaning it can achieve exceptionally low dE2000 after calibration.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 26 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

We didn’t detect PWM above 25% brightness (100 cd/m2) but even if you go under that, the frequency of the emitted light is too high to make any difference to the general users. Only those who have extra sensitive eyes may feel the negative impact.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

As always, we weren’t expecting anything less than stellar properties from the IPS panel on the Precision 5520. It clearly is designed for professionals who look for something reliable that can get the work done on the go. The display covers almost all of the sRGB color gamut, has really high contrast ratio, it’s exceptionally bright and doesn’t use PWM above 25% brightness making an excellent choice during long hours of work. And in some cases, with a little help from our “Design and Gaming” profile, the notebook can be used for color-sensitive work as well.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510/X510) configurations with 15.6″ LG LP156WF9-SPK2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2zxa3Tv

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is pretty good – the highs, mids and lows are clear and crisp.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Dell Precision 15 5520 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
M.2 Slot
M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slot See photo
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
357 x 235 x 11.1 mm (14.06" x 9.25" x 0.44")
Weight
1.78 kg (3.9 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum, Carbon
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot
  • Battery-status button

Dell Precision 15 5520 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 Pro for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Dell’s official support page.

Battery

The battery life on this power-sucking machine is just phenomenal but it really depends on the configuration you choose. If you choose to go with the extra storage, battery capacity will drop significantly to 56Wh, which usually comes with the Full HD panel whereas the 4K UHD variant is powered up by a 97Wh so things seem to be balanced out. In any case, we were pretty surprised by the outstanding web browsing runtimes even with the energy-sipping Core i7-7820HQ 45W TDP processor.

All tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature switched on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Excellent web browsing score – 800 minutes (13 hours and 20 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Significantly lower video playback runtime but still pretty decent – 400 minutes (6 hours and 40 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload almost two hours – 117 minutes (1 hour and 57 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7820HQ

The Core i7-7820HQ is a high-performance quad-core processor based on the 14nm Kaby Lake generation of processors from Intel sharing most of the features with the Core i7-7820HK while being more consumer-oriented since it lacks overclocking.

In any case, it offers the much-needed Hyper-Threading technology, it has Intel’s HD Graphics 630 iGPU on board and supports dual-channel DDR4-2400/DDR3L-1600 memory but it’s clocked at a slightly higher frequency than the standard Core i7-7820HK – 2.9 – 3.9 GHz. However, for four active cores, the CPU’s frequency drops to 3.5 GHz and 3.7 GHz for two active cores.

Just like all high-performance quad-core processors from Intel, the whole chip is rated at 45W including the Intel HD Graphics 630 iGPU and the memory controller.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7820hq/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 Intel Core i7-7820HQ (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)8.28
Dell Precision 15 3520 Intel Core i5-7440HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)6.39-22.83%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)7.60-8.21%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 Intel Core i7-7820HQ (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)911
Dell Precision 15 3520 Intel Core i5-7440HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)541-40.61%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)856-6.04%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 Intel Core i7-7820HQ (4-cores, 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)9.75
Dell Precision 15 3520 Intel Core i5-7440HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.98+2.36%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) Intel Core i7-7700HQ (4-cores, 2.8 - 3.8 GHz)9.95+2.05%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7820HQ scored 13.986 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – NVIDIA Quadro M1200 (4GB GDDR5)

The NVIDIA Quadro M1200 is a professional-grade mobile GPU based on the GM107 chip Maxwell generation with 640 shader units. This means that it’s fairly similar to the consumer-grade GTX 960M GPU and it’s a direct successor to the Quadro M1000M. It also sports 40 TMUs, 16 ROPs and 4GB of 128-bit GDDR5 memory clocked at 1253 MHz. (5012 MHz effective). The chip is clocked at 991 MHz and can go up to 1150 (Boost) MHz.

Although it’s pretty similar to the mainstream GeForce GTX 960M, the Quadro M1200 uses more advanced drivers optimized for stability and performance in CAD, DCC and CGI applications. In terms of power consumption, the GPU should be around 32.5W TDP.

You can browse through our GPU ranking to see where the Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

For more information about the GPU, follow this link: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-quadro-m1200/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 NVIDIA Quadro M1200 (4GB GDDR5)30330
Dell Precision 15 3520 NVIDIA Quadro M620 (2GB GDDR5)23815-21.48%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)39122+28.99%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 NVIDIA Quadro M1200 (4GB GDDR5)4218
Dell Precision 15 3520 NVIDIA Quadro M620 (2GB GDDR5)3222-23.61%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)6203+47.06%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 NVIDIA Quadro M1200 (4GB GDDR5)-
Dell Precision 15 3520 NVIDIA Quadro M620 (2GB GDDR5)10159-
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)19909-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Dell Precision 15 5520 NVIDIA Quadro M1200 (4GB GDDR5)1281
Dell Precision 15 3520 NVIDIA Quadro M620 (2GB GDDR5)995-22.33%
Dell XPS 15 (9560) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)1644+28.34%

Temperatures

The stress tests that we perform can’t be taken as a representation of real-life use but they remain as the most reliable way to assess the overall performance and stability of the cooling system in the long run.

As usual, we started off with 100% CPU load for an hour. At first, the processor was running at its maximum operating frequency for four active cores (3.5 GHz) but shortly after started to fluctuate between 3.1 – 3.5 GHz. Also, temperatures were a bit higher than we would like them to be but still, this can’t be considered as thermal throttling. It does show, however, that the cooling solution isn’t able to keep up with the demanding hardware during heavy workloads.

Switching on the GPU stress test after an hour resulted in CPU throttling at around 2.1 GHz (2.9 GHz is the base operating frequency) while the GPU didn’t even reach its base frequency. Running at just 69 °C, the Quadro M1200 was floating around 500 MHz most of the time. Although in other cases this shouldn’t be an absolute deal-breaker, in this situation where the Precision 5520 should be able to handle heavy workloads – due to the nature of the laptop – it should be taken into consideration for sure.

Interestingly enough, temperatures on the surface didn’t go too far. The only warm spot is in the upper center of the keyboard near the screen hinge.

Verdict

The Dell Precision 5520 checks almost all boxes for a professional 15-inch workstation. Using the base principles of the XPS lineup, the Precision 5520 is one of the most portable and well-designed workstations we’ve ever come across. With the use of high-quality premium materials, the laptop is not only super rigid but also thin and light. And thanks to the thin screen bezels, the machine fits into the 14-inch category with ease. The input devices are comfortable as well and we are not talking only about work on the go. We weren’t expecting anything less with this price tag, though.

The notebook continues to impress with exceptional image quality thanks to the Sharp IPS panel and when paired with our custom profiles, the machine can be used for color-sensitive work as well. In addition, the absence of PWM above 100 cd/m2 makes it perfect for long working sessions. Speaking of which, you can also do that on battery since the Precision 5520 delivers outstanding web browsing runtimes for such powerful 15-inch device.

Finally, we want to address the elephant in the room – how well does the cooling system handles the powerful hardware considering the thin and light design of the chassis. Unfortunately, not very well, at least according to our extreme stress tests. The CPU can’t sustain its maximum operating frequency for long periods of time (understand more than 10-15 minutes) and when the GPU is running at 100% alongside the CPU, it throttles massively. In most situations, this shouldn’t be an issue but when long hours of rendering or just other types of heavy workload is involved, the Precision 5520 just isn’t able to deliver.

In any case, if you are not looking to substitute for your desktop workstation and the price isn’t a deciding factor, the Precision 5520 is one of the best high-end solutions out there offering exceptional user experience, feel and good short-term burst performance.

You can find some of the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yR4JNt

Pros

  • Premium all-aluminum build with carbon fiber base
  • Thin, light, portable chassis
  • Good input devices
  • Excellent IPS display (conditionally suitable for color-sensitive work) – high peak brightness, extremely high contrast, wide sRGB coverage
  • The panel doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • Outstanding battery runtimes

Cons

  • The cooling system can’t withstand heavy workloads for long periods of time (near 100% CPU and GPU usage)
  • Pricey

Lenovo ThinkPad L570 review – clunky but reliable

$
0
0

To be honest, Lenovo has over-saturated the business segment with so many models that it’s hard to keep up with them. The good news is that there’s a model for everyone but we are still puzzled by the existence of the L-series. The one we got is the ThinkPad L570 and offers pretty much all the features an upper mid-range to higher-end business notebook would offer but it’s a little bit too clunky for a 2017 device in our opinion. In any case, the laptop surprises with extraordinary battery life, comfortable working experience overall and plenty of I/O, although USB-C is nowhere to be found. In short, it’s a remake of a 2010-ish notebook.

On top of the usual Intel Core i7-7500U CPU, integrated graphics, 8GB of DDR4-2400 RAM and 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, the laptop comes with a Full HD IPS panel if you opt for the more expensive variant but we are disappointed to see an HD TN panel as a default at this starting price. And as it seems, there are regions that are stuck with only an FHD TN panel so we strongly recommend that you look closely to what you are buying – not all models come with Full HD IPS. In any case, we suggest looking into the ThinkPad E-series, which are reasonably priced notebooks with great specs but lack the SmartCard and ExpressCard readers, which might be the only deal-breaker here.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2A4oAH9

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a standard package with the usual user manuals, power cord and charging brick.

Design and construction

The design might be considered as “unattractive” or even clunky and we can agree to some extent – the design goes way too much into the ThinkPad classic appearance (including the thick base) but fortunately doesn’t disappoint in build quality. We found the case to be pretty sturdy, although at a cost – it weighs 2.38 kg and it’s a little over 30 mm thick. That size and weight are usually intrinsic to 15-inch gaming laptops that carry a big cooling system while the chassis provides enough headroom for the hardware to perform.

The lid doesn’t make any exception and looks clunky as hell – hard roughened plastic finish on top with the usual ThinkPad logo in the lower right corner. Opening the lid reveals reasonably sized bezels. The plastic on the back isn’t too easy to bend but it does cause ripples to appear on the LCD panel when pressed while also being fairly resistant to torsion. As for the hinges, they provide smooth travel, firm grip over the lid and make the notebook possible to open with just one hand. The bottom piece features the same roughened plastic and provides some vent openings for the air intake.

The sides of the machine are pretty thick and the port distribution is rather good. On the left, you will find a mini DisplayPort, VGA, a standard USB 3.0 connector, an ExpressCard reader and the standard SD card slot. On the right, there are two USB 3.0 ports, a SmartCard reader, the 3.5 mm audio jack and the optical drive. The remaining USB 3.0 connector is on the back of the machine.

The interior continues the same design concept and uses the same material – doesn’t feel premium but doesn’t attract fingerprints as well. Pressing the various regions of the surface result in slight bending – mostly in the middle of the keyboard – but there’s nothing to worry about during normal usage. The keyboard itself features the usual AccuType design with slightly concaved keycaps while the keys provide long and tactile feedback. The TrackPoint is in its usual fashion and it’s a good replacement of the standard clickpad provided below. The latter, of course, provides comfortable experience on the go – no wobbling, registers swipes, gestures and clicks accurately.

So overall, yes, the case is a bit clunky, heavy and thick but provides decent stability, excellent input devices and plenty of I/O.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The good thing about the ThinkPad L570 is that you can access practically everything by only removing the big service cover. There’s no need for a full disassembly for anything. All upgrades and swaps can be done under the service cover.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

To our surprise, the notebook features only an M.2 SSD slot or you can swap it out for a 2.5-inch drive but you can’t have both. This is rather disappointing since the ThinkPad L570 is business-oriented 15-inch laptop and having both options at the same time has become a standard nowadays. Anyway, the M.2 SSD slot, in our case, is taken by a PCIe NVMe SSD from Intel with 256GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB Intel M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot Free Upgrade options

RAM

The motherboard holds two RAM chip slots one of which is taken by a single Samsung 8GB DDR4-2400 chip but you can go as far as 32GB of DDR4-2400.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is also easily accessible and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The battery unit is user-replaceable and can be released with the two lever switches. The unit is rated at 48Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design is quite simple – a small heat pipe connected to the cooling fan and the CPU heatsink.

Display quality

The Lenovo ThinkPad L570 features a Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel from Innolux with model number N156HGA-EAB. Since it measures 15.6 inches, the display has a pixel density of 142 ppi and a pixel pitch of 0.18 x 0.18 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are poor due to the TN panel.

The maximum brightness that we measured is 220 cd/m2 while the color temperature at maximum brightness is exceptionally high – 11000K. This means that colors will appear noticeably blue-ish/cold. Our custom profiles take care of the issue and reduce the color temperature to a more optimal 6500K.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The laptop’s screen covers just 50% of the sRGB color gamut so it’s not suitable for multimedia – only for general browsing and office work.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 13 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, the PWM that we detected is absent above 60 cd/m2 but even if you go under 60 cd/m2, for whatever reason, the frequency of the emitted light is pretty high so it might not affect all users – only those with extra sensitive eyes.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

It’s rather common for budget business-oriented laptops to come with TN panels but the ThinkPad L570 includes a particularly bad display with exceptionally inaccurate colors, high color temperature, it’s color deficient, too dim but at least doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness. With a little help from our custom profiles, though, the color temperature, gamma and color accuracy are greatly improved.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo ThinkPad L570 configurations with 15.6″ Innolux N156HGA-EAB (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2A4oAH9

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is decent and we couldn’t find any noticeable distortions in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Lenovo ThinkPad L570 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), TN
HDD/SSD
256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
M.2 Slot
M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
377 x 255 x 28-31 mm (14.84" x 10.04" x 1.10")
Weight
2.38 kg (5.2 lbs)
Body material
Polycarbonate, ABS Plastic
Ports and connectivity
  • 4x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Displayport mini
  • Card reader MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone dual array microphone
  • Speakers 2 x 1.5W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot
  • Spill-resistant keyboard, MIL-STD-810G military certification

Lenovo ThinkPad L570 configurations

Battery

Battery life on this thing is just amazing. Although the unit sports just 48Wh battery, the energy-efficient Intel Core i7-7500U and the not so demanding Full HD TN panel work well together and provide even full workday away from the grid depending, of course, on the type of usage. This ranks the notebook among the most durable 15-inch machines we’ve tested.

All tests were performed under the usual conditions – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows’ battery saving feature switched on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Oustanding battery runtime – 676 minutes (11 hours and 16 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

A little bit lower but still impressive result – 561 minutes (9 hours and 21 minute).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload for almost four hours – 236 minutes (3 hours and 56 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.80
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.95+3.95%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.20-15.79%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)3.21-15.53%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)522
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)521-0.19%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)444-14.94%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)442-15.33%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.65
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.45-1.13%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.21+14.5%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel Core i5-6200U (2-cores, 2.3 - 2.8 GHz)20.15+14.16%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i7-7500U scored 6.873 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 is a direct successor to the integrated HD Graphics 520. The latter is found in ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the 6th Generation (Skylake) of chips while the former is in the 7th (Kaby Lake) generation of CPUs.

Intel’s HD Graphics 620 uses the GT2 version of the graphics chip with 24 EUs (Execution Units) reaching as high as 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz. However, the maximum operating frequency depends on the CPU, whether it’s the Core i3-7100U or the Core i5-7200U or the Core i7-7500U. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller. Its performance should be enough for multimedia activities, light applications and gaming on really low resolution and minimum graphics settings.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel HD Graphics 6207394
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)9106+23.15%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)5036-31.89%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5207199-2.64%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel HD Graphics 620998
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)1570+57.31%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)919-7.92%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520380-61.92%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel HD Graphics 620-
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)5070-
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)3052-
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 5203125-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
Lenovo ThinkPad L570 Intel HD Graphics 620301
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)443+47.18%
Dell Vostro 15 3559 AMD Radeon R5 M315 (2GB DDR3)242-19.6%
Dell Latitude 15 3570 Intel HD Graphics 520235-21.93%

Temperatures

The two-stage test doesn’t represent real-life usage but it’s still the best way to assess the overall stability of the cooling design and its effectiveness.

After one hour of CPU stress testing, the software showed low temperatures and full utilization of the CPU cores – at first, the Core i7-7500U ran at 3.4 GHz and shortly after went down to 3.0 – 3.1GHz. What got our attention, though, is the extremely quiet operation of the cooling fan even under extreme workload.

Turning on the GPU stress test forced the CPU to throttle in order to give enough headroom for the iGPU to perform. It’s absolutely normal for such a laptop.

Temperatures on the surface were within normal range and the cooling fan remained pretty silent during the whole test.

Verdict

If we don’t get too picky, we can easily say that the ThinkPad L570 is an excellent budget business solution but it’s rather hard considering the current alternatives on the market including HP’s ProBook 450 G4. Build quality-wise, the L570 feels solid a bit clunky at first sight and a little bit too hefty but delivers ideal user experience due to the excellent input devices – both, the keyboard and the touchpad are great.

However, we would have really appreciated a bit better display, even if it’s going to be TN. This one has only one con and it’s the absence of PWM above 60 cd/m2 luminance. The rest of drawbacks like low maximum brightness, particularly inaccurate color reproduction, limited sRGB coverage and extremely high color temperature will mess even with the least pretentious user out there. Luckily, our custom profiles can fix some of the problems like color accuracy, gamma and color temperature.

But despite all that, the ThinkPad L570 excels in some key areas that will be much appreciated by some users – it has great battery life, plenty of I/O and it’s extremely easy to upgrade or replace most of the hardware, including the battery. Speaking of hardware, we would like to point out that the laptop comes only with an M.2 SSD slot or a 2.5-inch drive – you can’t have both. That’s a big miss, especially for a 15-incher.

So would we recommend the ThinkPad L570? It really depends on how much you are willing to give up for one of the best in class battery life and input devices. On the other hand, we strongly recommend looking into the HP ProBook 450 G4 as well since it’s the more balanced solution. Another similar solution is Dell’s Latitude 15 3570.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2A4oAH9

Pros

  • Fairly rigid
  • Excellent input devices
  • Wide range of I/O
  • The screen doesn’t use PWM above 60 cd/m2
  • Outstanding battery life

Cons

  • Subpar TN display with too cold color temperature, inaccurate color reproduction, limited sRGB coverage and low maximum brightness
  • Hefty chassis, clunky appearance
  • Either M.2 SSD or 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, no room for both

HP ProBook 640 G3 review – pricey but reliable and enduring

$
0
0

Looking at the new HP ProBook 640 G3 reminds us of the good old ProBook 440 G3 that we reviewed a while back which is probably a good thing until you look at the price tag. The pricier ProBook 640 G3 offers little improvement and a tad more features than its more affordable alternative but most of you wouldn’t really notice the difference. That’s why we would like to help you out with your purchase and see if the notebook is worth your hard-earned money.

The ProBook 640 G3 aims at the more conventional business user looking for a reliable solution without the needless distractions. It offers the standard hardware like Intel Core i5-7200U CPU, integrated Intel HD Graphics 620 GPU, 8GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD and a 14-inch Full HD TN panel. Also, the notebook doesn’t surprise with an unusual design or portable dimensions. It looks clunky on the outside but provides a good working experience on the go. Of course, for the asking price, you’d really want to consider alternatives such as the Lenovo ThinkPad E470 or our all-time favorite Acer TravelMate X349-M. But if you are not strictly looking for an entirely business-oriented machine, the ASUS ZenBook UX410UQ is also in the same ballpark.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yb7PsF

Contents

Retail package

The box containing the HP ProBook 640 G3 comes with the usual user manuals, DVD with drivers, the AC adapter and power cord.

Design and construction

Subjectively, the ProBook 640 G3’s design won’t appeal to everyone unless you are specifically looking for an upgrade from a previous ProBook. It’s also pretty hefty compared to other alternatives on the market tipping the scale at 1.95 kg and measuring at 27 mm thickness. That’s a whole lot for a 14-incher. However, the laptop compensates with a sturdy build that should last for years to come.

The lid retains the slightly rubberized finish for extra grip and HP’s glossy logo in the middle. The material doesn’t feel strong enough to withstand big pressure and it causes some ripples to appear on the LCD panel but it did pretty well on our twisting attempts due to the wide and stable hinges. Speaking of which, they provide smooth, stealth and linear travel and make opening the laptop with one hand possible. We definitely liked them. And as for the bottom, it’s made of the usual hard, slightly roughened, plastic and one big vent opening for better airflow.

The sides disappointed us to some extent. All of the I/O is stuck on the right side so imagine if you use them all when working on a desk – all the cables will be sticking out on the right side. Of course, this won’t be a problem for some users but we feel it’s important to mention this. On the left, however, you will find only the smart card reader, the optical drive and the main exhaust vent. There’s also a VGA connector located on the back side, if you ever find yourself needing those. The right, as we already mentioned, is overcrowded with all the ports you’d normally use – connector for the docking station, SIM card tray for LTE connectivity, LAN, two USB 3.0, one USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1), 3.5 mm audio jack and instead of an HDMI, HP has decided to include a DisplayPort. That’s probably a good thing but we would have really appreciated an HDMI output instead of VGA.

We are puzzled, however, by the fact that the interior on the much cheaper HP ProBook 440 G3 had a brushed aluminum surface while the one presented here imitates anodized aluminum but it’s still plastic. Fortunately, this doesn’t take away the sturdiness and we are quite satisfied by the rigidness of the palm rest area and the keyboard tray. There are just small visible deformations under great pressure. You will also notice the NFC sticker indicating that there’s an NFC chip integrated under the palm rest area, which is a neat feature if your smartphone supports the tech. In any case, we found the keyboard and the touchpad to be extremely comfortable. The keys provide a shorter than we would like travel but compensate with excellent tactile and clicky feedback. The backlight is discreet and usable while the trackstick is well-positioned. Moreover, the touchpad along with both sets of mouse buttons, feel great – satisfying light clicks and the trackpad area is responsive, accurate with fairly good gliding surface. The only thing that we miss is probably the middle button that we usually find on Lenovo’s ThinkPad laptops. It’s really useful for scrolling when using the trackstick.

All in all, the ProBook 640 G3 offers good build quality, sturdy construction and good hinge design with the only small drawback being the slightly flexible lid in the center. We also think that the device is pretty hefty and clunky for a laptop with a price tag around $1 000. What will attract the general business user, however, are the excellent input devices.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Quite surprisingly, the laptop doesn’t have dedicated service covers but it’s quite easy to disassemble the machine, nonetheless. You just have to remove all the screws around the bottom and then gently pry it up.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

Although the laptop provides a standard 2.5-inch HDD/SSD bay along with an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slot, the latter obstructs the former and the other way around. We are always frustrated to see both slots included in a notebook where only one can be used at a time. Our unit arrived with Intel PCIe NVMe SSD with 256GB capacity. However, if you want to use your SSD along with a hard drive, you can always swap the optical drive for a caddy and insert a 2.5-inch HDD in there.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB Intel M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD Upgrade options
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot Free Upgrade options

RAM

Of course, the RAM chip slots are two and one of them is taken by a Micron 8GB DDR4-2400 stick but if needed, you can go up to 32GB (2x 16GB) DDR4-2400.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB Samsung DDR4-2400 Upgrade options
Slot 2 Free Upgrade options

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed right above the M.2 SSD and it’s Intel 7265NGW.

The battery unit is under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at 46W.

Cooling system

The cooling system is rather simple and consists of just one cooling fan connected to the heatsink with a short heat pipe.

Display quality

The display uses a CHI MEI CMN14C0 TN panel with Full HD (1920×1080) resolution inside a 14-inch diagonal. The pixel density is 157 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.16 x 0.16 mm. The screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from a distance equal or greater than 55 cm.

Viewing angles are poor, as expected, due to the TN display.

We were able to record a maximum brightness of 332 cd/m2 in the center and 323 cd/m2 as average across the surface of the display with a maximum of 14% deviation. That’s a pretty strong result for a TN panel – usually IPS screens reach such brightness levels. The color temperature at maximum brightness is pretty close to the optimal – 6460K but as we go along the grayscale, the average color temperature is 11600K – extremely cold/blue-ish color reproduction is expected. Our custom profiles take care of this issue. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (74% brightness).

The maximum color deviation (dE2000) at 74% brightness compared to the center of the screen is 3.3, which is rather fine as values above 4.0 are unwanted. The contrast ratio is extremely low – 340:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Interestingly, the display covers 80% of the sRGB color gammut and suggest of higher than usual quality of the TN panel.

Below you will see practically the same image but with the color circles representing the reference colors and the white circles being the result. You can see main and additional colors with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% saturation inside the sRGB gamut pre and post calibration.

The “Design and Gaming” profile is created at 140 cd/m2 brightness, D65 (6500K) white point and optimal gamma in sRGB mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 17 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the display uses aggressive (low-frequency – 200 Hz) PWM for regulating brightness so we strongly recommend using the notebook at 100% brightness because PWM isn’t present at maximum luminance or just use our Health-Guard profile that eliminates screen flickering.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

We are mostly disappointed by the display because at this price point, we were expecting a budget IPS panel at the very least. However, we are presented with a panel that’s better than most TN displays out there with wide sRGB coverage and high maximum brightness but the extremely low contrast ratio, limited viewing angles and aggressive PWM bring down the score significantly. And when you add the extremely inaccurate color reproduction and white balance, the display becomes less attractive.

Fortunately, our Health-Guard profile will take care of the PWM while the Design and Gaming profile will fix the color inaccuracies, gamma and white point.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP ProBook 640 G3 configurations with 14.0″ CHI MEI CMN14C0 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2A4oAH9

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

In the low, mid and high frequencies, the loudspeakers provide fairly clear sound but the maximum allowed volume is rather low.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

HP ProBook 640 G3 technical specifications table

Acer
-4%
Old price $1119.00
$1076.55
you save $42 (-4%)
from Amazon
Display
14.0”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), TN
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe (M key) See photo
RAM
1x 8GB DDR4
Dimensions
340 x 237 x 27 mm (13.39" x 9.33" x 1.06")
Weight
1.95 kg (4.3 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • VGA 1
  • Displayport full
  • Card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (2x2)
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack 3.5 mm jack
  • 1 docking connector
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Lenovo HP ProBook 640 G3 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 Pro for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS without the bloatware, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from HP’s official support page.

Battery

The upside of using a TN panel for a business notebook is the energy saving. TN panels tend to draw considerably less power than their IPS counterparts and thus resulting in better battery runtimes. The Probook 640 G3’s score in the web browsing and the video playback tests put it on the top of our battery rankings with one of the best scores in the 14-inch class. Some users will definitely appreciate the extended battery life instead of a high-quality IPS panel. Interestingly enough, though, the battery isn’t as big as we thought it is. The unit is rated at just 46Wh but proves to be enough to supply the system with enough power to get you through the day with a single charge and that’s a lot for a laptop.

All tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

Web browsing

In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.

Oustanding battery runtime – 764 minutes (12 hours and 44 minutes).

Video playback

For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.

Unexpectedly, the video playback runtime is similar – 753 minutes (12 hours and 33 minutes).

Gaming

We recently started using F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Of course, the laptop isn’t made for gaming, especially away from the power source but it’s good to know that it can handle heavy workload for more than five hours – 323 minutes (5 hours and 23 minutes).

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

Results are from the Cinebench 11 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.68
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)3.95+7.34%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)3.65-0.82%

Results are from the NovaBench CPU test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)480
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)521+8.54%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)476-0.83%

Results are from the Photoshop test (lower the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.40
HP ProBook 450 G4 Intel Core i7-7500U (2-cores, 2.7 - 3.5 GHz)17.45+0.29%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel Core i5-7200U (2-cores, 2.5 - 3.1 GHz)17.42+0.11%

Fritz

Fritz is a chess benchmark that tests the computing capabilities of the CPU with various chess moves. The Intel Core i5-7200U scored 6.353 million moves per second. In comparison, one of the most powerful chess computers, Deep(er) Blue, was able to squeeze out 200 million moves per second. In 1997 Deep(er) Blue even beat the famous Garry Kasparov with 3.5 to 2.5.

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Results are from the 3DMark Cloud Gate (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel HD Graphics 6206570
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)9106+38.6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 6206580+0.15%

Results are from the 3DMark Fire Strike (G) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel HD Graphics 620766
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)1570+104.96%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 620765-0.13%

Results are from the 3DMark (Sky Diver) test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel HD Graphics 620-
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)5070-
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 6203088-

Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 test (higher the score, the better)

Laptop Results Result
difference
Price Price
difference
HP ProBook 640 G3 Intel HD Graphics 620223
HP ProBook 450 G4 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX (2GB DDR3)443+98.65%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 Intel HD Graphics 620220-1.35%

Temperatures

Although the laptop isn’t made for extended and extreme workloads, we ran the usual stress tests on the CPU and iGPU to see how the cooling system performs and is it reliable enough to withstand long hours of use over time.

As usual, we start off with 100% CPU load for an hour. The Core i5-7200U reached its maximum operating frequency for two active cores and stayed there. Temperatures were in the safe zone while the cooling fan stayed exceptionally silent during the whole hour.

After switching on the GPU stress test, the CPU’s frequency dropped to around 2.2 GHz so it can give enough headroom for the iGPU (Intel HD Graphics 620) to perform. The system didn’t ramp up the cooling fan and it remained silent until the end of the test.

As expected, temperatures on the surface were also low since the Core i5-7200U isn’t such a demanding CPU. What really surprised us is the silent operation of the cooling system even under heavy workload. During normal use, though, the fan was completely silent.

Verdict

To put thing simple and clear, the ProBook 640 G3 is an excellent business-oriented machine rightfully defending the name of the ProBook lineup. However, it does that at a fairly high price. Yet again, it focuses on what’s important and what the general business user would want.

The build quality is really good, despite using only plastic, and the input devices are excellent. Portability is a bit of a miss, though, as there are plenty of other more portable 14-inch solutions out there at the same price. The I/O is another mixed bag – plenty of connectors but they are all stuck on the right so all of the cables might get in the way sometimes. The inclusion of 4G LTE connectivity is another great plus to consider.

As far as battery life goes, thanks to the energy-efficient TN display and CPU, the laptop has killer battery life – one of the best in class. And speaking of screen, the latter is a big disappointment considering the price tag of this thing. The maximum brightness is pretty high, especially for a TN panel, the sRGB coverage is okay but we cannot overlook the aggressive PWM, extremely bad color accuracy, surprisingly bad color temperature and low contrast ratio. Nevertheless, the PWM, color accuracy and white point can be fixed using our profiles but you can never escape the poor contrast and bad viewing angles.

And finally, the limited storage upgradability will most likely be a deal-breaker for some. You can only go with an M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD or 2.5-inch HDD/SSD but not both at the same time. It’s funny how a considerably more portable 14-inch laptop like the ASUS ZenBook UX410 packs both slots and also has superior image quality. Although in an entirely different category, we honestly can’t think of a reason why you would go for the ProBook 640 G3 instead of the ZenBook UX410. The Acer Swift 5 is another great 14-inch option in the same ballpark when it comes to pricing. Still, if you are looking for a more classical business approach, the Lenovo ThinkPad E470 would be a much better option with superior IPS display, slightly more portable and similar overall user experience.

You can find the available configurations here: http://amzn.to/2yb7PsF

Pros

  • Good build quality
  • Great input devices
  • The display has high brightness and decent sRGB coverage for a TN panel
  • Outstanding battery life
  • Plenty of I/O, including 4GB LTE connectivity

Cons

  • Display with limited viewing angles, extremely low contrast and inaccurate color reproduction (our profiles take care of the latter)
  • Aggressive PWM (200 Hz) (our Health-Guard profile fixes that)
  • A bit hefty for a 14-incher
  • Pricier than the competition
  • The M.2 SSD obstructs the insertion of a 2.5-inch HDD/SSD and vice versa
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live