Quantcast
Channel: Kroum Nikolov – LaptopMedia.com
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live

Dell Latitude 15 5590 review – the new Core i7-8650U in a business outfit

$
0
0

The device we’re looking at today stays true to its Latitude name and is meant to deliver the perfect business experience. It’s targeted at people whose second wife/husband is their job. Dell promises security and reliability with the Latitude 5590 with their enhanced encryption and claims the device to be MIL-STD 810G compliant. They have also equipped the notebook with the latest and greatest Ultra-Low Voltage chip from Intel – the Core i7-8650U, which offers slightly higher base and turbo clocks (1.9 GHz up from 1.8 GHz on the i7-8550U base and 4.2 GHz up from the 4.0 GHz turbo speeds).

The Latitude series are also blessed with the Dell docking support, which makes expanding your work on more than one screen easy and neat. In addition to that, the Latitude 5590 has an SSD option and 8 GB of DDR4 2400 MHz RAM in its sleeve, as well as a Full HD IPS screen. As always, we shall review the performance and features of this device and check if it justifies the premium price point and how it fares against the vast competition in this branch.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/dell-latitude-15-5590/

Contents

Specs Sheet

Dell Latitude 15 5590 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB M.2 SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
376 x 251 x 23.25 - 20.6 mm (14.80" x 9.88" x 0.92")
Weight
1.88 kg (4.1 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Sleep and Charge
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • Card reader SD 4.0
  • Ethernet lan 10/100/1000 Mb/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac (2x2)
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p HD (74 degrees)
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 2x 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slotNoble lock

Configurations

What’s in the box?

The box doesn’t move away from the modern box trend and contains the usual manuals and guides, as well as a 65W power brick, cable and (surprisingly) a Dell Latitude 5590.

Design and construction

The Latitude 5590 comes in a well build plastic shell that feels sturdier even than some aluminum devices. Whatever angle you look Latitude 5590 at, it just exudes business. The device measures at 376 x 251 x 20.6 mm (14.8″ x 9.87″ x 0.8″) and weights 1.88 kg (4.14 lbs) – not the lightest of the competition but it is too heavy to carry around either.

The body of the device is built on one polycarbonate monocoque, which has a removable bottom panel. The screen itself is mounted by means of the hinges, which can be seen on the outside. They look super sturdy and are one of the strongest points of the notebook.

Opening the lid is tough for using only one hand, however, results in less shakiness in an upright position. The monocoque we were talking about earlier has a cutout for the keyboard, which can be removed easily, as it is held in place by a couple of clips. The typing experience is on point with clicky tactile keys and fast response. In addition to that, the keyboard is equipped with a backlight. Next, we have the touchpad that serves the purpose perfectly, while not being the best one out there. Latitude 5590 also has a joystick mock and two sets of stand-alone mouse buttons, which are legacy from the older Latitude models.

On the port front, we have connectors scattered all over the place. The sides of the device do not have so many openings at the expense of the back. There are two USB ports, one of which is Type-C and supports DisplayPort output, while the other one is a regular Type-A. Next to them, we have the SD card reader that comes with a neat cover, protecting it from dust and particles. The last slot on this side is optional and is dedicated a Smart Card reader.

On the other side are located the audio jack, an optional SIM card slot, as well as a USB 3.0 Type-A and a VGA connector. Next, we turn the device to show us its back, where we see an RJ-45 connector, embedded into the right hinge. Right next to it is the hot air exhaust drill. After that, we have an HDMI connector and another USB 3.0 Type-A port, as well as the power plug, which itself is integrated into the other hinge.

Disassembly and maintenance

The bottom panel of Latitude 5590 is held by only 8 Phillips head screws, meaning that basically everyone would be able to access the internals without any problems. We like that the screws are designed in a way, that when unscrewed they stay attached to the panel, so you won’t lose them – service guys’ worst nightmare.

Once inside, we see a slender design, perfectly fitting the outside of the laptop. Stuff is minimalistic with dark colors, and even the 68Wh battery stickers are made to look of an exquisite quality.

As you can see from the images there is only one heat pipe placed on top of the CPU, so don’t expect any feats from the cooling, although it should be enough to cool an Ultra-Low Voltage CPU.

Right underneath the CPU are located the two RAM DIMMs which support up to 32 GB of memory, and beneath them is the behemoth 68Wh battery.

On the left of the device, we found the Wi-Fi controller, as well as the M.2 SATA SSD drive. Beneath the SSD slot, you can see space dedicated to an HDD drive, although our unit doesn’t have the appropriate connector for the purpose.

Display quality

Dell Latitude 15 5590 comes with a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with 15.6-inch diagonal, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and 142 ppi. The panel is manufactured by BOE and has a model number NV15N42 and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness 246 nits in the center of the screen and 237 nits as an average across the surface with a maximum deviation of 10%. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is 6800K – just a little colder than the standard 6500K. When we go along the grayscale it comes even closer to the optimal temperature with 6680K. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (81% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. The contrast ratio is very good – 1280:1 before calibration and 1190:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Sadly, Latitude 15 5590’s display covers only 50% of the colors in sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 in CIE1976.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 34 ms. A fairly slow panel to be honest.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Dell Latitude 15 5590’s brightness levels are PWM-adjusted at all levels except the maximum, although it does it at a relatively high frequency, which partially reduces the negative effect.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

The Full HD display of Dell Latitude 15 5590 has an IPS panel which, as usual, results in comfortable viewing angles and good contrast ratio. We could say that the screen is a very good one if it wasn’t for the poor color range – it can display only half of the colors found on the Internet.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Latitude 15 5590 configurations with 15.6″ BOE NV15N42 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Dell Latitude 15 5590’s speakers sound very good. The tones are crisp in the whole range from low to high frequencies.

Software

Dell sells the device (region dependent) with a 64-bit Windows 10 Pro edition onboard and all drivers preinstalled. Anyhow, in case you need to reinstall or upgrade, you can download the necessary drivers here: http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/latitude-15-5590-laptop/drivers

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting turned and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. Dell Latitude 5590 comes with a hefty 68Wh battery, which has enough juice to give you around 10 hours of web surfing time and a pinch over 7 hours of video playback. This should be enough to get you through a busy day just on battery power. Also if you opt to game away from the plug, you’re session will be no longer than two hours.

68Wh, 4-cell
price
606 min.
battery
257 min.-57.6%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$875.19
324 min.-46.5%
48Wh, Li-ion, 6-cell
676 min.+11.6%
678 min.+11.9%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
68Wh, 4-cell
price
429 min.
battery
255 min.-40.6%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$875.19
260 min.-39.4%
48Wh, Li-ion, 6-cell
561 min.+30.8%
692 min.+61.3%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
68Wh, 4-cell
price
122 min.
battery
142 min.+16.4%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$875.19
82 min.-32.8%
48Wh, Li-ion, 6-cell
236 min.+93.4%
111 min.-9%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.9 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – 4.2 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
13897
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel UHD Graphics 620 is a refresh of the HD Graphics 620 found as an integrated solution in many ULV Kaby Lake processors. UHD Graphics 620 is codenamed “Kaby Lake R U GT2” and it’s a part of the Gen 9.5 generation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 has roughly the same performance as HD Graphics 620, depending on the other components in the system. UHD Graphics 620’s performance is similar to AMD Radeon R5 M420X and NVIDIA GeForce 910M/920M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gameplay recordings with Intel UHD Graphics 620

Storage performance

The Latitude 5590 uses Toshiba’s KSG60ZMV256G M.2 SATA SSD with 256 GB. Its speeds are typical for a SATA device – 540.3 MB/s Read and 349.1 MB/s Write speeds, which is not on par with the NVMe drives, but is definitely better than a regular HDD solution.

Gaming tests

You can enjoy some gaming on the Latitude 5590, but in order to do so, you need to sacrifice a lot of eye candy and even turn the resolution down in the case of GTA V for example.

DOTA 2 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings)
Average FPS 59 fps 31 fps – fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 28 fps – fps – fps
Min FPS 17 fps – fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we are trying to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when it renders a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

The new Core i7-8650U has a base frequency of 1.9 GHz and reaches up to 4.2 GHz in Turbo mode. We found that the CPU inside our unit is idling at a relatively low 32C. When we started the test there was a short burst around the 3.4-3.5 GHz, when the frequency dropped to around 3.2 GHz and finally, after reaching a threshold of 88C, the frequencies plummeted to 2.6 GHz, rendering the Latitude 5590 unable to utilize the higher clock speed of its Core i7-8650U.

From then on to the end of the second-minute mark the frequencies stabilized at 2.6 GHz as well as the temperature fluctuating between 72C and 73C.

During the final 13 minutes of this torture test, we saw a little increase in clock speeds at the beginning and then slowly going back to 2.6 GHz realms, before establishing at 2.5 GHz with all-time lows of 2.4 GHz and an average for the whole test shy above 2.6 GHz, which is not the best result. Anyhow, we should keep in mind that those are extreme conditions and such a behavior won’t occur during day to day usage. Temperature-wise, the Latitude 5590 maintained adequate package temperature values, giving an average of 73C.

Lastly, we measured relatively cool temperatures on the outside of the device.

36.7°C
31.9°C
26.3°C
33.9°C
29.6°C
24.2°C
21.8°C
22.1°C
21.9°C

Verdict

Dell is a company with huge traditions in portable enterprise and business computers. One of its main rivals is Lenovo (formerly IBM) with its ThinkPad series and the ThinkPad L570 in particular. More challenge in this category is found in the face of HP’s EliteBook.

One of the main features of the Latitude 15 5590 is the new Intel Core i7-8650U processor which offers slightly higher clocks than the Core i7-8550U. As we saw in the benchmarks, there is hardly any difference between the two CPUs, and that is mainly because of the nature of the devices they are inside of. A turbo clock boost of 200 MHz in a business laptop is completely useless, in our opinion, given the results we encountered. If we were to compare that machine to Dell’s own XPS 13 9370, we would see not only that the Dell scores better in the CPU department, but in the GPU game, it totally defeats the Latitude 5590.

Anyway, if we juxtapose the Latitude 5590 not to an exquisite device such as the XPS 13, but more like to – Lenovo V330, we could see that there is more or less an improvement. All in all, we cannot say with certainty whether the CPU is worth the upgrade or not, but when we test more devices with this processor, we are going to update the information.

Another feature that acts like a double-edged sword is the display of the Latitude 5590. Of course an IPS panel is never unnecessary, given the high contrast ratio and good viewing angles but here the screen itself is not the best on the market, especially at this price point – it lacks half of the colors in the sRGB gamut (those you can see on Internet and HD television) and not only that but it appears to use PWM for all brightness levels, which is fixed, of course, by our Health-Guard Profile.

Pros

  • All-new Core i7-8650U onboard
  • Good and tough design
  • IPS display
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • PWM-adjusted for all brightness levels (fixed by our profiles)
  • Displays only 50% of sRGB colors

MSI GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro review – slimmer than the slimmest (ft. GeForce GTX 1060)

$
0
0


You know what is really annoying? Why is it so that for a true gaming laptop to be a good one, it has to be bulky and fancy looking, so as to house all pipes and fans, as well as appeal to young and nerdy gamers (no offense)? Of course, it’s great that the stereotype for “gaming on a laptop” is already dead, since the arrival of Pascal GPUs to the mobile market. But haven’t you ever dreamt of a notebook on which you can play your favorite title then close it, put it in your backpack and go to get a cup of coffee or something, without pumping your biceps and shoulders, while walking.

Well, today we’re looking at that type of a revolutionary gaming laptop – the MSI GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro which combines a lot of power, delivered by Intel Core i7-7700HQ CPU and a GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card, in a 17.7 mm profile, weighing 1.8 kg, bettering even the 14-inch Razer Blade. The unit we’re going to review today features a Full HD 120 Hz panel, claiming 3ms reaction time delivered only by a TN panel for better or for worse.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/msi-gs63vr/

Contents

Specs Sheet

MSI GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), 120 Hz, TN
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD PCIe + 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
380 x 249 x 17.7 mm (14.96" x 9.80" x 0.70")
Weight
1.80 kg (4 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3
  • 3x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 2.0
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Displayport mini
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard RGB
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

View more laptops...

What’s in the box?

Once again the chaps from MSI have done an amazing job in presenting their product, as GS63VR 7RF comes in a sleek black box that has a huge red MSI logo printed on top of it. When you open it up, you’re met by the laptop itself, as well as a compartment for the charging cable. When you lift the bad boy you’ll lay eyes on the charging adapter itself, accompanied by some usual manuals and set up guides, and of course the mandatory MSI drivers.

Design and construction

Design-wise, the GS63VR 7RF is truly spectacular – this is thin. Whether it will prove a serious drawback or not, you’ll find out in the performance part, so now let’s focus on what we see on the surface. The device measures at 380 x 249 x 17.7 mm (14.96″ x 9.80″ x 0.70″) and weighs only 1.8 kg (4 lbs)! Despite its 17.7 mm profile, it feels sturdy. Тhis statement is further backed up by the use of aluminum for almost every part of the body except the bottom panel, and the display frame.

The lid that houses the beautiful 120 Hz Full HD screen is super thin itself and opens at 180 degrees. We are pleased to see that when we open it up there is a full-sized mechanical keyboard with a relatively long key travel for a laptop this thin. Reappearance makes the fully adjustable RGB backlight.

Above the keyboard, we find a grill that goes from one end to the other and houses some speakers, as well as a light that indicates when the device is on or off. Interesting here is that when you lift the computer up to some light source you can see that the fans inside, and they are not one, nor two, but three!

Enough for them, now let’s move to the bottom of the keyboard where we are met by the first setback of this otherwise brilliantly designed laptop – the touchpad. It is rather uncomfortable to use, as the buttons are very tight and at right clicks, it gives a ‘nice’ little squeaking sound, plus the whole surface on the right feels a bit bendy.

Port-wise, this notebook is very well prepared. On the left, we have an RJ-45 connector accompanied by an SD card reader as well as a total of three USB 3.0 Type-A ports and two Hi-Fi 3.5 mm jacks – one for headphones and one for a microphone, respectively. On the other side is located the charging plug right next to a mini-DisplayPort. Further down the road, we have an HDMI connector, as well as a Thunderbolt 3 port and a regular USB 2.0 Type-A.

The Stealth Pro line-up doesn’t fall short of the other gaming devices of MSI, and also has a lot of holes and vents on its bottom. Similar to the GE73VR Raider series it has grills on the sides and at the back, which means it has four heat spreaders placed in the top corners of the gaming notebook.

Disassembly and maintenance

First, we want to apologize for not presenting a full teardown of this device. Since we use retail units for our reviews and we don’t want to risk ruining them in the process. This leads us to a, let’s say, warning – as the MSI GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro is no ordinary gaming laptop, the manufacturers obviously had to take an extraordinary approach in order to achieve this lightness and thickness.

The disassembly begins simply with unscrewing a total of 15 Phillips head screws that hold the back panel in place. After you pinch the clips and remove the cover you’ll start to find some sense in our words. At first – nothing strange – fans, battery, HDD, but at second glance you can’t see the SSD and you figure out that the motherboard is upside down.

The image below contains the 65Wh battery with its three cells clearly visible through the black plastic wrapping.

Next, we have the WLAN card and the RGB keyboard controls right next to it connected via ribbon cable to the motherboard.

In the final picture of the internals we got, you can see the 1TB HDD, which is optional and on some devices the bay may remain free.

Even though we didn’t completely disassemble the MSI GS63VR 7RF, we did some research on the Internet and found out that in order to access the M.2 SSD slot and the RAM modules you need to remove the whole motherboard, as the fans and the heat spreaders are coming down too.

The disassembly itself is not hard, but it is risky as you’re going through a labyrinth of ribbon cables, connectors, and screws. Also, you need to remove the battery and the hard drive (if one is present in your system) after that you have to get rid of the Wi-Fi adapter and all fragile cables on the way. Finally, when you unscrew the motherboard, you’re going to find two RAM DIMMs and a single M.2 slot that supports PCIe NVMe ultra-fast storage devices.

Display quality

The MSI GS63VR 7RF comes with a Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel with a 15.6-inch diagonal, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and 142 PPI. The panel is has a model number Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are uncomfortable, however, they seem better than those of many TN panels.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of 351 nits in the center of the screen and 328 nits as an average across the surface with an unacceptably high maximum deviation of 21% in the lower right corner (falling to 280 nits). The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is quite cold – 7330K and it goes even further away from the optimal 6500K as we go along the grayscale – 14000K – rather bluish light, which is fixed by our profiles. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (42% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. We measured a surprisingly high contrast ratio of 1230:1 (1000:1 after calibration)

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Here we can see the strongest point of the new TN panels, used by MSI – it covers 100% of the sRGB color gamut and moreover, it spreads to the DCI-P3 to cover 96% of it, rendering the screen perfect for gamers who seek lively and vibrant image.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 9 ms – a speed which will adore hard-core gamers.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

We detected PWM until 95 nits, however, the frequency was high enough (26 KHz) to be comfortable for extended periods of use.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.
You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusions

MSI GS63VR 7RF’s 120 Hz screen is really pleasant for gamers, as it has a very fast panel with high brightness and contrast levels and exceptional color reproduction with the colors being saturated and attractive to the eye. We have to note that our Gaming and Design profile greatly affects color accuracy. In addition to that it has a wide range of PWM-free brightness levels, making it suitable for long gaming sessions even in dark conditions. However there are some setbacks, unfixable by our profiles which are due to the nature of TN panels – poor viewing angles. It also suffers from nonuniformity in the luminance aspect which itself is not of a great concern for gamers.

Buy our profiles

MSI GS63VR 7RF configurations with 15.6″ Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

MSI GS63VR 7RF sounds well enough in the mid and high frequencies, although it has some deviations in the lows.

Software

MSI provides a disk with all drivers and features needed when you install or if you reinstall your Windows operating system, but if you lose it or need the latest drivers, we’ve got you covered: https://www.msi.com/Laptop/support/GS63VR-7RF-Stealth-Pro#down-driver

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. The 65Wh battery unit on the MSI GS63VR 7RF is a bit larger than that found on some of its direct competitors, although it is outlasted in most of the tests. Despite that fact, we have to note that achieving more than 6 hours of web browsing time and a shy over two hours of gaming on a 120 Hz screen is truly spectacular.

price
367 min.
battery
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299.94
389 min.+6%
56Wh, 4-cell
$1279.99
600 min.+63.5%
60Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
$1488.98
350 min.-4.6%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
310 min.
battery
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299.94
326 min.+5.2%
56Wh, 4-cell
$1279.99
432 min.+39.4%
60Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
$1488.98
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
130 min.
battery
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299.94
94 min.-27.7%
56Wh, 4-cell
$1279.99
175 min.+34.6%
60Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
$1488.98
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor to the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP, and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)

NIVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1060 GPU aims to be the mid-tier graphics card from the Pascal generation offering similar or even better performance than last year’s flagship models like the GTX 970M and 980M. However, the GPU will be used in high-end laptop configurations.

The graphics card is based on the GP106 chip built on the 16nm FinFET manufacturing process from TSMC paired with up to 6GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 8000 MHz effective on a 192-bit interface. The GPU also features the same amount of CUDA cores as its desktop counterpart (1280) and it’s clocked at slightly lower frequencies – 1404 – 1670 MHz.

Depending on the cooling solution, the GPU can be found in large 17 and 15-inch notebooks but some slimmed-down 14-inch notebooks are also an option. The TDP of the GPU is somewhat lower than the last generation GTX 970M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

MSI GS63VR GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the MSI GS63VR models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GS63VR model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$1449
price
11744
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1449
price
3668
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1449
price
2812
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1449
price
2145
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Storage performance

Although it is region-dependent, the SSD that our unit was equipped with is of 256 GB capacity, is made by Samsung and bears a model number PM871A. It reached sequential Read and Write speeds of 551.9 MB/s and 517.5 MB/s, respectively which is around 3-4 times faster than a regular HDD.

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 150 fps 107 fps 58 fps
Min FPS 60 fps 54 fps 25 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 84 fps 76 fps 65 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 133 fps 93 fps 48 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 70 fps 64 fps 55 fps
Min FPS 56 fps 53 fps 45 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we show you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Let’s start with reminding you of the base and Turbo core clocks of Intel Core i7-7700HQ – 2.8 GHz and 3.8 GHz, respectively. Although the processor was idling at relatively cool 38°C, it quickly sky-rocketed to 96°C for just under 30 seconds of extreme load. We are glad that MSI has planned everything here adequately and gave the processor a lot of headroom before it turns the speed down, given the obviously low cooling potential spacing-wise. The frequencies were jiggling between 3.1 GHz and 3.4 GHz.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

As we continue to the second-minute mark, this fluctuation began to establish around the 2.9 GHz – just a tip over the base frequency. We also noticed that the temperature was now stable in between scorching and inflammable at around 95°C.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

For the entire period of torturing the poor Core i7-7700HQ, we noted minor throttling on some occasions on cores One and Two. However, the average clock speed was 2.9 GHz at an average CPU temperature of 95°C, as 96°C was obviously the target temperature beyond which the system was going throttle.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

By default, the GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5) has a maximum boost clock of 1670 MHz, which our unit was never able to achieve, even at the beginning of the test. After capping at just under 1600 MHz it gradually dropped to just beneath 1500 MHz, giving an average of 1486 MHz. We even noticed some throttling, as you can see in the chart. In addition to that, the maximum temperature was 82°C, and despite this, we’re sure it won’t get to these high values during casual gaming. It’s worth noting that this device tends to get really hot on the inside which is inevitable, given the thin profile of the laptop.

Along the surface though temperatures remained relatively stable. Yes – warm, but on no occasion hot. So you don’t need to worry about your fingers.

36.2°C
44.5°C
39.3°C
36.6°C
42.7°C
39.3°C
28.7°C
31.1°C
32.5°C

Verdict

Well… how shall we start?! This is definitely not the next ordinary gaming laptop – no, no, no! We don’t have aggressiveness. Instead, it shows class. These days more and more people use mobile devices for gaming instead of the big power-hungry tower beasts. And truly what is the point of a mobile device if it is enormous and difficult to carry around unless you are the Hulk or Chuck Norris. Here a new realm is born – the realm of thin, light, simple gaming notebooks and the MSI GS63VR 7RF is definitely the king of this realm with its 17.7 mm and 1.8 kg. Even the smaller 14-inch Razer Blade cannot beat that. The only device that comes real close to this is the monstrous ASUS ROG Zephyrus, although it is in a different league.

Despite the obvious size and cooling limitations, the laptop is completely useful and very competitive with other devices with a similar setup. It ended up even performing better in gaming and raw performance than Acer Aspire V 15 (VN7-593G), for example. One major setback that separates the GS63VR 7RF from the rest is the price. Despite the uniqueness of the notebook, a lot of people would prefer to get a heavier and bulkier device if that is going to save them a couple of hundred dollars, with the notable mention here – Lenovo Legion Y720

Next, we have the screen – nowadays a 120 Hz display is a must-have in the gaming laptop segment. It really lets you immerse yourself in the game you are playing, and a lot of people, including us, will prefer a Full HD high refresh rate panel to a 4K 60 Hz one. In addition to that, the 15.6-inch display of MSI GS63VR 7RF is super punchy and vibrant with its 100% sRGB color coverage and spreading further to 96% of the DCI-P3 scheme. It is also very bright and has an unusually high contrast for a TN panel. It’s worth mentioning that our Gaming and Web design profile brings the colors of the screen a lot closer to reality with the dE dropping from 11 down to just 2.2. Sadly, unlike the Legion Y720, you have to be prepared for poor viewing angles.

Battery life is good for a gaming device, as it will get you through more than 6 hours of browsing the Web, and more impressively, it can give you two hours of gaming away from the plug – on a 120 Hz screen – now that’s a stunner. However, we noticed that when battery saver is “On”, vSync automatically kicks in, hence the good gaming battery test result.

Inevitably, this kind of devices is doomed to have disadvantages. First of all, the heat – while it manages competitive and playable framerates it tends to get very hot on the inside, although the surface temperatures were surprisingly adequate, never exceeding 45°C. Another drawback we encountered with our unit was the questionable build quality. As we had no problems with the device itself, there were some awkward sounds coming from the palm rest area, both when you place your hands on top of it and when you right-click the touchpad.

All in all – it’s a special device that performs on point, has a beautiful screen and reasonable battery life but is a bit pricey for our likings.

View more laptops...

Pros

  • Fast and capable, despite the cooling limitations
  • Champion in mobility
  • Excellent TN panel with 100% sRGB coverage (96% DCI-P3) and 120Hz refresh rate
  • PWM-adjustment is not aggressive, hence less disturbing
  • Good enough battery life

Cons

  • Poor viewing angles for this kind of device
  • A bit pricey for a 15.6-inch gaming notebook
  • Questionable build quality
  • Difficult to upgrade

MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro review – gaming performance in a classy suit

$
0
0

Once again we have a Stealth Pro product on our table. This line-up of gaming devices impresses with minimal thickness and weight while maintaining a level of performance on par with bulkier, casually styled gaming notebooks. Last time we reviewed the GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro configuration, featuring Intel’s proven Core i7-7700HQ and GeForce GTX 1060 and 120 Hz Full HD screen. Today we are looking at the 17.3-inch version of this particular device, which has a model name GS73VR 7RF, and slightly different design.

The larger model features a slightly higher profile and weighs a little more than the 15.6-inch version, which we hope will lead to cooler internals. In this review, you will find out whether the larger size has addressed the weak points of the GS63VR 7RF and if you can rely on it to achieve decent performance, while hopefully keeping down noise levels.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/msi-gs73-stealth-pro/

Contents

Specs Sheet

MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO technical specifications table

Acer
Not available
Display
17.3”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), 120 Hz, TN
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD PCIe NVMe + 2TB HDD, 5400 rpm
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
412 x 285 x 20 mm (16.22" x 11.22" x 0.79")
Weight
2.43 kg (5.4 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum, Plastic
Ports and connectivity
  • 3x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3
  • HDMI 1
  • Displayport mini
  • Card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack 2x 3.5 mm jacks for headset and external microphone
Features
  • Web camera 1080p Full HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 4 x speakers + 1 x subwoofer
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

View more laptops...

What’s in the box?

Expectedly, MSI presents the GS73VR 7RF in a fine manner, shipping it in a nice black box with enormous red MSI logo on top of it. The first thing we see inside is the device itself, thoughtfully placed in a black wrapping. Underneath it are located the charging adapter and the manual + set-up guides combo, accompanied by the mandatory MSI drivers CD. In the other compartment, you can find the power cord.
*This is the standard package, although our unit arrived with some gifts inside.*

Design and construction

MSI GS73VR 7RF has a beautiful (in our opinion) design, build using aluminum and plastic combination. While the materials make the device look like a tank, it feels as if made of glass when you hold it in your hands. That feeling is enhanced by the sub 20mm profile and 2.4 kg (5.3 lbs) weight. The laptop measures at 412 x 285 x 19.6 mm (16.22″ x 11.22″ x 0.79″), and the brushed aluminum used for the top of its lid attracts fingerprints like a geeky teenager is attracted to Fortnite.

Opening the lid happens easily using just one hand, and once again it is fascinating at how thin this thing is. Due to that, it bends a little when forced, despite the good build quality and use of aluminum. Above the screen, there is the usual camera plus mics combo. On the surface area, we can see a ventilation drill as well as some tiny holes, which house some front-facing speakers.

Beneath them, there is the keyboard which is unsurprisingly reminiscent of the one on MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider. It is more gaming oriented – long key travel but soft feedback. The keyboard is backlit by the same eye-pleasing, user-programmable SteelSeries branded RGB LEDs. On the bottom of the surface area – on its usual spot – we find the touchpad, which unlike the one found on its smaller brother is very accurate and has a nice distinctive click, although the keys are embedded under the pad. Here we have nothing to complain about. We like the simple trapezoid-carved touch on this area, which reminds us of the “mustache” of a 2012 Toyota Land Cruiser’s trunk.

If you’ve read our review of the smaller Stealth Pro – GS63VR 7RF you are already familiar with the I/O of this device too, since they share the same ports – RJ-45, SD card slot, three USB 3.0 Type-A and two 3.5 mm jacks on the left. And on the right – charging plug, Mini DisplayPort, and an HDMI port, as well as a Thunderbolt 3 connector and one USB 2.0 Type-A preferably for an external input device. Not only that, but the vents are in the same locations, resulting in side view exactly matching that of the smaller unit.

One thing we don’t like in this model (as well as the smaller one) is the location of the charging plug. It’s not very adequately positioned, given that first – it blocks some of the exhausted air when plugged to a charger, and second – you can easily mistake it for the Mini DisplayPort if you try plugging it without looking.

Display quality

MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro uses the same 17.3-inch 120Hz TN panel as the GE73VR RF Raider configuration we reviewed earlier. The model name is Innolux N173HHE-G32. It has a pixel density of 127 ppi and a pixel pitch of 0.1995 x 0.1995 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from further than 69 cm.

Due to the TN nature of the panel, the viewing angles of this device are poor.

We measured a maximum brightness of 285 nits in the middle of the screen and 284 nits average for the whole area, with a maximum deviation of just 6%. The Correlated Color Temperature on White screen and the highest brightness level is colder than the 6500K standard – 7160K. However, things go even worse along the grey scale as the color temperatures go up to 14000K, which is cold, even bluish light (this can be corrected by using our profiles).
On the image below you can see how the display performs from uniformity perspective. In other words, the light leakage from the light source.
Values of dE2000 over 4.0 should not occur, and this parameter is one of the first you should check if you intend to use the laptop for color sensitive work.
The contrast ratio is very good for a TN panel – 1020:1 (950:1 after profiling).

Color reproduction

The next image shows the sRGB coverage of MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro’s display. The color reproduction of the human eye is shown via the “CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram”. In the middle of the dark-grey triangle are located the standard colors used by Internet and digital TV – rec.709/sRGB.

Being used by million people around the world the colors from the sRGB gamut are the most common and their accurate reproduction is of key importance for the quality of the screen.

In addition to the Adobe RGB color space, used in the professional photography, we’ve included the color gamut, used by world-known movie studios – DCI-P3, and UHD-digital television (Rec.2020), which is very hard to achieve by modern display units.

We have drawn the Pointer’s Gamut with a black line. This color space covers all the colors we can see around us.

MSI GS73VR 7RF’s display offers attractive and vibrant colors that fully represent the colors on the Internet and also covers 97% of the DCI-P3 gamut.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile. Here you can see a noticeable improvement in the profile – a drop form dE 10 to dE 2.2.

The following chart shows us the prerequisites for comfortable gaming experience in terms of the darkest parts of the image.

The left side tells us the default settings results of the screen, and the right one shows us the results with “Gaming and Web design” profile installed. The horizontal gives us the levels of grey, and the vertical one – the screen brightness.

You can check how your device displays the first five levels of grey – 1% – 5% White – via the graphics below the charts. The image you see depends on several factors such as the panel of the display you’re currently reading this article on, its calibration, your eyesight, ambient light, viewing angle and more.

Response time

The chart below illustrates the response time of the pixels going from Black to White and around for levels of 10% to 90% and vice versa. We measured Fall Time + Rise Time = 8 ms – as you may already know from the previous time we tested this panel, it’s one of the fastest on the market at the moment of writing of this review.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. It can be particularly harmful to the eyes and the brain at levels lower than 300 Hz. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

MSI GS73VR 7RF’s display uses PWM for adjustment of the brightness up until 75 nits. However, the frequency is high enough and doesn’t overburden the sight in this aspect.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro is equipped with a fascinating 120 Hz display that is going to be adored by gamers. Thanks to the super fast responsiveness of the screen and the high contrast and saturated colors it completely justifies the use of a TN panel in a device of this price. In addition to that, the uniformity of the luminance and almost complete absence of PWM compensate for the only major disadvantage of this screen – its uncomfortable viewing angles.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro configurations with 17.3″ Innolux N173HHE-G32 (Full HD, 1920 x 1080) TN screen: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Thanks to the 3W Woofer, the MSI GS73VR 7RF has a relatively good sound in the lows, although the mid and high frequencies have some deviations.

Software

Your device will come either with an operating system already installed or without, you are going to receive a disk with all the necessary drivers and utility programs, like the MSI Dragon Center, which gives you control over the strings of the keyboard backlight and fan curves and profiles. But as every object that is not used around you, there is a high chance of being lost. In that case, you can find what you need on MSI’s official web-page: https://www.msi.com/Laptop/support/GS73VR-7RF-Stealth-Pro.html#!type=download

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits.

65Wh, 3-cell
$1799
price
244 min.
battery
367 min.+50.4%
220 min.-9.8%
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299-28%
389 min.+59.4%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
65Wh, 3-cell
$1799
price
204 min.
battery
310 min.+52%
182 min.-10.8%
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299-28%
326 min.+59.8%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
65Wh, 3-cell
$1799
price
59 min.
battery
130 min.+120.3%
53 min.-10.2%
48.9Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$1299-28%
94 min.+59.3%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Storage performance

The SSD on our unit was the same as the 256 GB drive, found on the smaller model – Samsung PM871A M.2 SATA SSD, although this part of the configuration is region-dependent, and the chances to receive a unit with a different drive are high. Results here were not bad for a SATA SSD with 550.8 MB/s Read and 495.7 MB/s Write speeds.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP, and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$1488.59
price
727
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1488.59
price
13298
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1488.59
price
10.11
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB GDDR5)

NIVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1060 GPU aims to be the mid-tier graphics card from the Pascal generation offering similar or even better performance than last year’s flagship models like the GTX 970M and 980M. However, the GPU will be used in high-end laptop configurations.

The graphics card is based on the GP106 chip built on the 16nm FinFET manufacturing process from TSMC paired with up to 6GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 8000 MHz effective on a 192-bit interface. The GPU also features the same amount of CUDA cores as its desktop counterpart (1280) and it’s clocked at slightly lower frequencies – 1404 – 1670 MHz.

Depending on the cooling solution, the GPU can be found in large 17 and 15-inch notebooks but some slimmed-down 14-inch notebooks are also an option. The TDP of the GPU is somewhat lower than the last generation GTX 970M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GS73 STEALTH PRO model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

Despite the thin profile and lightweight design, this device performed on point during gaming and scored some competitive results. However, in our benchmarks we noticed that the longer we keep the game running, the lower result we get. This means that the GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro’s cooling, as expected, strips you of the opportunity to utilize the full potential of the GeForce GTX 1060. Don’t get us wrong though, even in long sessions at 1080p all the games ran at a decent frame rate, and when you insert the 120 Hz screen, the soup gets a little spicy.

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 150 fps 107 fps 59 fps
Min FPS 62 fps 57 fps 26 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 87 fps 77 fps 65 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 133 fps 93 fps 47 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 71 fps 64 fps 56 fps
Min FPS 59 fps 53 fps 45 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Before we started the usual torture test we measured a relatively high idle temperature of 43°C on the cores. With a base frequency of 2.8 GHz and a Turbo one of 3.8 GHz, we found our selves right in the middle of the range – 3.4 GHz, with core Two being most stable of them all. In the first 20 seconds of this test, everything seemed fine until the temperatures hit 91°C and the frequencies dropped.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

Still not in the throttling zone, we had 3.05 GHz average for the second time period with the clock speeds stabilizing at 3.0 GHz. We were about to order meat and vegetables for the grill since the temperatures went no lower than 86°C.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

After 15 minutes of extreme load, which by no any means represents real-life load, and moreover gaming (when CPUs never exceed 50-60%) we finally got thermal throttling – 2.6 – 2.7 GHz. We should also note that the fans went super loud in order to cool down the poor CPU but didn’t succeed. As a result of the throttle the temperatures dropped by around 7°C, so we decided to scrap the idea for a barbeque.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

On the GPU side, we also noticed a slightly higher than the usual temperature of the die – 46°C. And yet, again the same looking graph as the one on GS63VR, although without any thermal throttling here and a slightly lower temperature. The GeForce GTX 1060 on this unit topped at 79°C, thus giving an average of 76.7°C and an averge Core frequency of 1479 MHz.

Although we are looking at a strictly gaming device here, the surface temperatures remained adequate, except the top middle part, which is a location crowded with heat pipes. You can easily fry some eggs there. Anyhow, your palms are safe since the large area of the GS73VR 7RF provides a lot of surface for the heat to dissipate. However there is a little detail for those who play on their laptop in their bed – well, forget it. This laptop gets so hot on the bottom, it’s hard to touch.

39.0°C
53.2°C
43.3°C
36.1°C
44.5°C
40.6°C
25.1°C
29.0°C
29.8°C

Verdict

After we were blown away by the capabilities of a super low-profile gaming device in the face of the MSI GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro, today we had practically the same hardware in a larger body, although with the same cooling limitations. The GS73VR 7RF offers a better keyboard and its touchpad beats that on the smaller device by a mile. We were also impressed by the build quality, as the body lacked the annoying bending and awkward squeaking sounds reminding of a bath duck, being stepped on.

Some more advantages to the larger model come from the temperatures department. The GS73VR 7RF’s larger surface area contributed to around 5°C cooler CPU and GPU. Sadly, this didn’t mean that the device is going to remain silent during low loads. On the contrary, the situation is quite the opposite – the fans kick in at a reasonably high speed, even when just browsing the web, or especially during updates, which can be a little annoying.

Screen-wise, however, MSI didn’t fail to impress, equipping the GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro with the same 120 Hz Full HD Innolux panel, as the one found on the GE73VR 7RF Raider, thus enabling its owners to experience super saturated – almost unnatural colors, with 100% coverage of sRGB and 97% of DCI-P3. Our Gaming and Web design profile is capable of making the display color accurate, lowering the dE from 10.0 to just 2.2. Its brightness adjustment lacks aggressive PWM, meaning the display is comfortable for long periods of use. Here we want to note that you can reduce the PWM to zero if using our Health-Guard profile, while also reducing the harmful blue light and maintain colors perceptually accurate at the same time. Lastly, the 120 Hz and super fast 8 ms response time of the panel, makes gaming on this device a very pleasant experience.

The battery of this 17.3-inch device is significantly larger than the one found on the Raider configuration, despite featuring less demanding hardware. It is the same that we found in the 15.6-inch GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro, but due to the larger display size we got a noticeably lower screen time on battery – 4 hours of web browsing, 3 hours and 24 minutes of video playback and just under 1 hour of gaming, not astonishing, but understandable result for a 17.3-inch 120 Hz monitor.

In the gaming aspect, which is most important here given the nature of the device, GS73VR 7RF performed on par with larger bulkier devices with the same hardware like the ASUS ROG STRIX GL703VM, for instance. While it achieved slightly lower scores in the raw benchmarks than both the GL703VM and the little Stealth Pro brother – MSI GS63VR 7RF, the 17.3-inch Stealth Pro got better results in gaming. However, there is one unpleasant formality – in long gaming sessions, performance seems to drop, due to some throttling, and the notebook gets smoking hot (well, not literally).

Actually, apart from the heat and loudness of this super thin gaming laptop, we didn’t find any major drawbacks that would outweigh (pun intended) the slim design and super light body for this size of a notebook. Tell us what you think of the MSI GS73VR 7RF Stealth Pro in the comments. Would you sacrifice performance for portability?

View more laptops...

Pros

  • One of the slimmest and lightest gaming devices of this size
  • Responsive 120 Hz screen with vibrant colors
  • RGB backlit tactile keyboard
  • No aggressive PWM-adjustment
  • Color accuracy is on point with our Gaming and Web design profile

Cons

  • Loud even at low levels of load
  • Tends to get really hot on the outside, especially on the bottom
  • Poor viewing angles
  • Super hard for a non-pro to upgrade and disassemble

HP 250 G6 review – the affordable alternative to the ProBooks

$
0
0

With the complete overhaul of the HP 250 series, the OEM is looking for a larger piece of the pie in the lower-end business segment. And it looks like they deserve some recognition. With a sleek, simple and fairly sturdy chassis packing relatively big battery and excellent input devices, the 250 G6 really does make an impression.

Also, the laptop boasts quite the range of configurations going from Intel Celeron and Pentium all the way up to Core i7-7500U. For this review, we got the Core i5-7200U-powered unit with an SSD (M.2 SSDs are supported!), which is priced in the $550-650 range depending on the memory and storage configuration. But how the battery will handle the hardware in reality and is the screen good enough for your daily needs – these are questions we aim to answer in the thorough review below.

HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
View more laptops...

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes with the standard user manual, AC adapter and power cord in a relatively small box.

Design and construction

As far as the design goes, the HP 250 G6 has been altered ever so slightly compared to its predecessor while changing some small details here and there. In any case, plastic is the main order of the day as usual, which is rather expected given the price point. We can also say that for a 15-inch laptop, the HP 250 G6 is fairly portable measuring at just 23.8 mm in height and tipping the scale at 1.86 kg. Everything under 2.0 kg, especially at this price range and form factor, is more than we could ask for. And fortunately, the overall sturdiness of the case hasn’t suffered too much.

The lid is the first change we’ve noticed – now the plastic surface isn’t patterned but features smooth glossy-like metallic finish with HP’s logo in the middle. The color doesn’t allow fingerprints and smudges to stick easily. Pressing the middle of the lid results in slight flex, ripples appear on the screen and we observed the same while attempting to twist the screen. None of our twisting and bending tests, however, made a bad impression – it appears to be sufficiently stable for the price. Still, we would rather a bit looser hinges as it’s really hard to open the machine even with both hands. It’s a good thing there’s a protruding element on the lid that helps with the opening. Anyway, the hinges do appear to be pretty solid and stand out with a chrome-colored plastic finish. The bottom of the device features slightly roughened metallic gray plastic with the user-removable battery and unusual silicone feet. There’s just one small grill for cool air intake.

The bare minimum of connectors can be found on the sides so it should suit most of the users looking for a budget-oriented laptop. The left side accommodates the VGA, HDMI, two USB 3.0 ports and a 3.5 mm audio jack. On the right, you will find the optical drive, another USB 2.0 connector and the SD card reader. We also find the port distribution rather convenient as most of the cables will be sticking out of the left side. Also, the main heat dispersing grill is on the left so it won’t get in the way even under load when using the mouse on the right.

Moving onto the interior, we find a similar plastic finish to the one used for the exterior – smooth surface but visually imitates brushed aluminum. Only strong presses result in slight bending around the spacebar, the middle of the keyboard and the area between the hinges – nothing to be worried about since it won’t be an issue in practice. Speaking of the keyboard – it’s nothing special but it’s definitely one of the best we’ve tried considering the price point. The keycaps feel a bit cheap to touch but each key press results in satisfying tactile and audible feedback combined with fairly long travel. All of this results in comfortable and fast typing experience. Also, the most important Fn shortcuts are here while the Numpad block is big enough for pleasant input. The touchpad, however, feels like a small step backward compared to the keyboard because of the slightly “sluggish” feel but it will surely get the work done on the go – the gliding surface is smooth while the mouse buttons feel pretty light.

Despite some of the obvious drawbacks, we understand the sacrifices HP had to make along the way to deliver such cheap business solution. Still, we call this a win since the most important aspects like general rigidity, hinge stability, portability and input devices are not overlooked.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Unfortunately, there are no service lids so you have to remove the whole bottom to access the internals. Still, the battery is user-accessible and can be swapped at any time. Just make sure you’ve removed all the screws on the bottom, including the ones under the silicone feet as shown in the photos below, and the optical drive too. Then gently pry the plate up.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

It appears that there’s room only for a 2.5-inch drive or an M.2 SSD. In our case, the notebook came with a standard M.2 SATA SSD – SanDisk X400 2280 256GB.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB SanDisk X400 M.2 SATA 2280 SSD Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

The motherboard hold two upgradable RAM slots each going up to 16GB of DDR4-2400. The unit we’ve reviewed has 8GB from SK Hynix.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 SK Hynix 8GB DDR4-2400 Buy from Amazon.com
Slot 2 Free Buy from Amazon.com

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is placed right nest to the cooling fan and it’s Intel 3168NGW.

As we already mentioned, the battery is user accessible and can be changed without a hassle at any time by pulling both of the levers right next to it. It’s rated at 41.44Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling system is pretty simple – it consists of just one heatpipe, a relatively big heatsink and a cooling fan pushing the hot air from the side. It should be sufficient given the configuration.

Display quality

The notebook features a Full HD (1920×1080) TN display manufactured by BOE with model number N156FHM-N41. Thus, it has 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are limited due to the TN matrix.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness 205 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 204 cd/m2 as average across the surface with just 7% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a bit colder – 7370K and shoots up to 15000K when going along the grayscale. This is fixed with our custom profiles. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (87% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for office work, web browsing, multimedia and office work, a deviation of 1.6 in the lower left corner is negligible. The contrast ratio is really low – 330:1 before calibration and 300:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers just 50% of the sRGB color gamut, which means that half of the web-based and HDTV colors are missing.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 11 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

We’ve detected PWM from 0 to 99% brightness but at really high frequency and low amplitude making it practically safe to use for long periods of time.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Obviously, the display has its apparent drawbacks – low maximum brightness, poor viewing angles due to the use of TN panel, low contrast and narrow sRGB coverage. However, we can’t expect more from a business notebook at this price range. The good news is that the panel uses high-frequency, low-amplitude PWM that shouldn’t affect the majority of users after prolonged usage.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP 250 G6 configurations with 15.6″ BOE NT156FHM-N41 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is decent – there are small deviations in the low frequencies but the mid and high frequencies remain clear.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

HP 250 G6 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), TN
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 SATA M.2 slot (B key) See photo
RAM
8GB
Dimensions
380 x 254 x 24 mm (14.96" x 10.00" x 0.94")
Weight
2.10 kg (4.6 lbs)
Body material
Plastic / Polycarbonate, Aluminum (Aluminum chassis and plastic cover)
Ports and connectivity
  • 3x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Card reader
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Web camera
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Security Lock slot

HP 250 G6configurations

HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
View more laptops...

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from HP’s official support page.

Battery

Despite the rather modest battery capacity, the notebook delivers considerably above average runtimes for the asking price maybe due to the use of an energy-efficient TN panel.

Of course, all tests were run using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature switched on.

price
493 min.
battery
48Wh, 4000 mAh
755 min.+53.1%
40Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
458 min.-7.1%
47Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
332 min.-32.7%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
383 min.
battery
48Wh, 4000 mAh
452 min.+18%
40Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
47Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
291 min.-24%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
173 min.
battery
48Wh, 4000 mAh
258 min.+49.1%
40Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
47Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
99 min.-42.8%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i5-7200U

download-4Intel’s Core i7-6200U is part of the 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs and it’s the direct successor of the Core i5-5200U (Broadwell) and Core i5-6200U (Skylake). It’s also based on the same architecture as the aforementioned chips with little differences that should bring a small performance increase and a bump in power consumption. However, the new CPU is clocked at 2.5 GHz and its Turbo Boost frequency is 3.1 GHz opposed to the 2.3 – 2.8 GHz clocks on the previous Core i5-6200U.

Anyway, we still have the 2/4 core/thread count, 3MB last level cache, and a TDP of 15W, which includes the iGPU and the dual-channel DDR4 memory controller. Speaking of the former, the chip integrates the newer generation Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip clocked at 300 – 1000 MHz.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7200u/

price
330.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
6367.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
price
17.65
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 integrated iGPU can be found in various ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the Kaby Lake generation. The GT2 version of the graphics chip uses 24 EUs (Execution Units) that can be clocked up to 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz but the former can vary depending on the CPU. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory of its own – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

price
801.00
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
price
247.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
price
220.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
price
0.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Temperatures

For every laptop we review, we run the usual stress tests on the CPU and GPU to see how the cooling system handles heavy workloads and how will it fare in the long run after years of usage. Still, this method of testing doesn’t represent real-life usage.

We ran the CPU stress test for about an hour and as you can see from the screenshot below, temperatures were okay and clock speeds were within the Turbo Boost range.

After an hour had passed, we started the GPU stress test alongisde the CPU torture test. As expected, the CPU toned down to give enough headroom for the GPU to perform while maintaining relatlively low temperatures.

Temperatures on the surface remained low as well and there are no signs of overheating.

36.0°
33.1°
30.2°
37.6°
33.8°
30.0°
38.0°
31.0°
29.0°

Verdict

Surely, you won’t fall in love from first sight with the HP 250 G6 but if you spend enough time with it, you will learn to appreciate the most important aspects for a business solution in which the device exels.

Build quality isn’t exactly great but it’s decent enough considering the price point. The keyboard, however, shines through with excellent feel while the touchpad is good enough to get some work done on the go. Battery life is another great thing to consider here and it’s user-replaceable, which is essential for some users.

In terms of image quality, the HP 250 G6 is no stunner for sure. But once again, this is one of the sacrifices HP had to make in order to keep the price low enough to actually make sense compared to the more expensive ProBooks. Still, the absence of conventional PWM has to be taken into consideration for sure.

So will we recommend? Yes, as long as you can’t spend the amount of money a standard ProBook asks. The most important requirements for a business-oriented laptop like comfortable input devices, long battery life and stability are met and at a decent price point.

HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
HP 250 G6
Not available
View more laptops...

Pros

  • Comfortable input devices
  • Long battery life
  • Relatively affordable
  • We didn’t detect a convential use of PWM so it’s practically safe to use for long periods of time

Cons

  • You can insert either M.2 SSD or 2.5-inch HDD, not both
  • The screen could still be a bit better (exceptionally low brightness and contrast)

Lenovo ThinkPad E480 review – ThinkPad quality on the budget

$
0
0

Today we will take an in-depth look at the Lenovo ThinkPad E480. As usual for a ThinkPad notebook, the E480 aims at delivering a high-quality experience to the business user. Although, a little bit pricier than other notebooks with similar hardware, the E480 is part of the more budget ThinkPad E series thus it lacks some premium features but it still offers great security options with its discrete TPM encryption.

However, the particular configuration that we are taking a look at today features a lot of horsepower inside the portable 14-inch body. You get the 8th gen Intel Core i7-8550U ULV processor and fast NVMe SSD storage. The notebook is also equipped with a discrete GPU – the AMD Radeon RX 550 with 2GB GDDR5 memory. Will the premium ThinkPad quality live up to its legacy? Stick around to find out.

You can find the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/lenovo-thinkpad-e480/

Contents

Specs Sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region.

Lenovo ThinkPad E480 technical specifications table

Acer
Not available
Display
14.0”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
329 x 242 x 19.9 mm (12.95" x 9.53" x 0.78")
Weight
1.75 kg (3.9 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Sleep and Charge
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Power Delivery (PD), DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI 1.4b
  • Card reader microSD (SD/SDHC/SDXC)
  • Ethernet lan Gigabit Ethernet
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
Features
  • Web camera HD 720p, fixed focus
  • Microphone Dual-Array Microphone
  • Speakers 2x 1.5W
  • Security Lock slot

Dell XPS 9370 configurations

What’s in the box?

Opening the box of this device reveals a bare minimum of content. Basically, inside you find the 65W power adapter, the power cord which ends with a USB Type-C port, a couple of papers which are the quick start guide and warranty card, and of course the laptop itself. There is nothing to fancy about the unboxing experience – it is a straightforward open and slide out procedure. The device itself is well protected with styrofoam.

Design and construction

At first glance, the Lenovo ThinkPad E480 strikes the eye with a rather appealing design. The matte black finish on the lid accompanied by a small textured ThinkPad logo in the bottom right corner gives the device a stylish look. However, we can’t say that we are very pleased with the materials used. The whole chassis is made out of plastic. Although it feels sturdy, the lid does flex a bit when pressure is applied. The only real problem we see is that the lid an absolute fingerprint magnet. A single touch and it becomes all smudgy so keeping the laptop clean and neat will be a nightmare. On the other hand, using plastic for the build has its advantages. The device is thin and light measuring at 29 x 242 x 19.9 mm (12.95″ x 9.53″ x 0.78″) and 1.75 kg (3.9 lbs).

Opening the lid reveals a pleasuring interior. The matte finish does not attract fingerprints. The keyboard is without a doubt excellent. Typing on the well-spaced curved keys is a pleasure and you get enough feedback from each press. There is also a two-level backlight. The trackpad is large, responsive, and accurate, and it includes three separate physical buttons. The only issue we had with the trackpad is the fact that we had to manually search and install drivers from the manufacturer’s website to get the usual multitouch gestures to work. In addition, you get the signature TrackPoint pointing device. On the right-hand side you have a fingerprint sensor and on the top right corner, you find the on/off switch.

Looking upwards from the keyboard, we see the 14-inch panel which we will talk about later in the review. Now we want to point out that the side bezels of the screen are quite thin but the bottom bezel is huge which is fairly common these days. Unfortunately, there are no special sensors housed in that free space. The top bezel is home to the 720p webcam. The hinge is tight and does not allow one-hand opening.

As for input/output options, the ThinkPad E480 is packed with ports which are evenly shared among the sides. On the left side, you can find the USB Type-C port which is also used for charging the laptop, an HDMI, two USB 3.0 ports, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. On the right side, you are presented with a security lock, an RJ-45 Ethernet port, a USB 2.0 port, and a Micro SD card reader.

Display quality

Lenovo ThinkPad E480 features a 14-inch (35.5cm) IPS panel manufactured by BOE with a model number NV140FHM-N49. With its Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) resolution and 14-inch screen size, you get a pixel density of 157 ppi which becomes “Retina” when viewed from 55cm (21.65 inches) or further. The pixel pitch is 0.161 x 0.161 mm.

The display offers comfortable viewing angles which you can check out from the image below.

We measured a maximum brightness of 286 nits in the center of the screen and an average of 272 nits for the whole surface. The maximum deviation is 14%. The Correlated Color Temperature on a white screen and maximum brightness is 6000K which is a bit warmer than the sRGB standard of 6500K. Meanwhile, the average color temperature throughout the grey scale is 5860K before calibration.
We check the uniformity of the display which represents the light leakage of the backlight. The results are shown on the illustration below. Values of dE2000 over 4.0 should not occur, and this parameter is one of the first you should check if you intend to use the laptop for color sensitive work.
The measured contrast ratio is good – 1320:1 before calibration and 1120:1 after.

Color reproduction

The next image shows the sRGB coverage of Lenovo ThinkPad E480’s display. The color reproduction of the human eye is shown via the “CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram”. In the middle of the dark-grey triangle are located the standard colors used on the Internet and digital TV – rec.709/sRGB.

Being used by million people around the world the colors from the sRGB gamut are the most common and their accurate reproduction is of key importance for the quality of the screen.

In addition to the Adobe RGB color space, used in the professional photography, we’ve included the color gamut, used by world-known movie studios – DCI-P3, and UHD-digital television (Rec.2020), which is very hard to achieve by modern displays.

We have drawn the Pointer’s Gamut with a black line. This color space covers all the colors we can see around us.

The yellow pointed line contours the ThinkPad E480’s sRGB coverage. It covers just 49% of sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 (web/HDTV standard) in CIE1976, which means that just below half of the colors used in Internet and HDTV are present.

Our “Gaming and Web design” profile is designed to show optimal color temperature (6500K) when the luminance is at 140 cd/m2 (nits) and sRGB gamma.

In order to test the display, we used 24 color samples, consisting of common founded and easy distinguishable ones like light and dark human skin, blue sky, grassy green and orange.
The image on the left shows the results with the default display settings where the average dE is 5.3. The image on the right shows the same result but after installing our “Gaming and Web design” profile, decreasing the average dE to 3.8.

Next, we look at the capabilities of comfortable gaming experience in terms of the darkest parts of the image.

The left side tells us the default settings results of the screen, and the right one shows us the results with “Gaming and Web design” profile installed. The horizontal axis gives us the levels of grey, and the vertical one – the screen brightness.

You can check how your device displays the first five levels of grey – 1% – 5% White – via the graphics below the charts. The image you see depends on several factors such as the panel of the display you’re currently reading this article on, its calibration, your eyesight, ambient light, viewing angle and more.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and vice versa. We measured Fall Time + Rise Time = 35ms which is slower than the average.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

The display of the Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is not PW-modulated only at maximum brightness. In all other scenarios, the value of the frequency of the pulsation is high – 1.25kHz which reduces the harmful effect it has.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

The Lenovo ThinkPad E480’s display has an IPS panel with Full HD resolution and offers comfortable viewing angles, good contrast ratio and maximum brightness, and adequate default settings. The panel’s downsides are its modest color gamut coverage and the PWM used for regulating the brightness level.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Lenovo Thinkpad E480 configurations with 14″ BOE NV140FHM-N49 (Full HD, 1920 x 1080) IPS screen.

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Lenovo Thinkpad E480’s Dolby Advanced Audio stereo speakers sound crisp and clear. They are particularly loud in the mid frequencies and a little quieter in the low part of the spectrum. You also get support for Conexant CX11852 codec.

Software

Our unit came preloaded with a 64-bit Windows 10 Home operating system. Some regions might offer a Pro version or no operating system at all. As for additional software, our ThinkPad E480 came without bloatware. You can find all the necessary drivers at the manufacturer’s support page: https://pcsupport.lenovo.com/bg/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/thinkpad-edge-laptops/thinkpad-e480-type-20kn-20kq/downloads

Battery

Battery life on the ThinkPad E480 is just about average. Although the web surfing performance is not great, video playback is good and gaming is above average. Fortunately, even if you do run out of battery, you won’t be stuck to the outlet long, because the 45W unit charges from 0 to 100% in about an hour and a quarter.

As usual, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, as well as screen brightness adjusted to 120 cd/m2.

45Wh, 3-cell
price
297 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
462 min.+55.6%
50 Wh, 3-cell
800 min.+169.4%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
45Wh, 3-cell
price
414 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
353 min.-14.7%
50 Wh, 3-cell
424 min.+2.4%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
45Wh, 3-cell
price
108 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
158 min.+46.3%
50 Wh, 3-cell
91 min.-15.7%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

GPU – AMD Radeon RX 550 (64-bit, 2GB GDDR5)

The Radeon RX 550 GPU is based on the Polaris 12 architecture utilizing the 14nm FinFET manufacturing process. However, the unit inside is a cut-down version so you should expect lowered performance. The chip features 640 shaders and 40 Texture Mapping Units (TMUs).

The chip integrates a 64-bit memory bus, 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1200MHz effective clock speed. The maximum core clock speed is 902 MHz. The RX 550 supports the usual features like DisplayPort 1.3 / 1.4, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync, DirectX 12 and Vulkan.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Storage performance

The Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is equipped with a manufacturer in-house NVMe SSD with 256GB capacity and a model number LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA. It manages to reach very high speeds as expected from an NVMe drive – around 1759.3 MB/s Read and 1024.2 MB/s Write. 

Gaming tests

The Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is equipped with an external GPU so gaming is a lot better than with an integrated one. The RX550 found inside is a cut-down version which performs fairly low in benchmarks but it can handle basic gaming. Even with the screen’s native resolution (1080p), you can comfortably play GTA V on the lowest setting of course.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS  85 fps  62 fps  44 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS  53 fps  23 fps 11 fps
Min FPS  32 fps  15 fps 3 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we are trying to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when it renders a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Before starting the test, the Core i7-8550U was idling at around 40°C. During the first 30 seconds of out CPU torture test, all the cores remained at about maximum clock speed that dropped near the end of the interval when the temperature got above 66°C.

Further in our test, in the 0 – 2:00 min interval the CPU clock went down to just above 2.0 GHz which is the CPUs normal workload speed. The temperature had a maximum of 72°C but then dropped to a steady 63°C.

We see that the same trend continues in the long term during the final stage of the 0 – 15:00 min torture test. The clock speed was fluctuating a little bit above the 2.0 GHz mark and the temperature rose a bit to around 67°C. From this data, we could say that the cooling system of the ThinkPad E480 can keep temperatures rather low with the cost of clock speed.

0-30 min. GPU torture test

Afterward, we ran a 30 minute GPU stress test. Initially, the clock speed of the Radeon RX 550 dropped to its base frequency of 214 MHz but then at the 2-minute mark, it rose up to its maximum of 902 MHz. During the whole period, the temperature gradually kept rising reaching above 80°C.

During the entire period of testing, fan noise was noticeable and surface temperatures were rather high.

Verdict

Like any other, the Lenovo ThinkPad E480 is not perfect. The notebook has its pros and cons, however, the overall experience using it left us with a pleasant thought. As we mentioned in the beginning, the ThinkPad E480 is priced a little bit more than other models with similar hardware but some premium features justify this.

One of the notebooks best features is its size. With a 14-inch form factor and 1.75 kg (3.9 lbs) weight, the device is easy to carry around. As you probably can figure, a ThinkPad notebook is aimed at business and office users which would appreciate the excellent keyboard and trackpad the E480 has to offer.

The ThinkPad E480 also has some additional features like the discrete AMD Radeon RX 550 GPU which makes it possible to play some games on it although we doubt that anyone would buy it for gaming. It gets rather hot while utilizing the GPU and the 14-inch screen size is not ideal for gaming. We would recommend purchasing a configuration without a dedicated GPU to save some extra bucks.

Speaking of the screen, it is a pleasure to look at thanks to the excellent viewing angles, high contrast ratio, and fairly high maximum brightness. However, it is not a screen suitable for color sensitive work due to the narrow gamma coverage. The panel uses harmful PWM to regulate brightness but our custom-tailored Health-Guard profile eliminates the unwanted effect.

Performance-wise the ThinkPad E480 is not a record breaker – not in the CPU/GPU department as well as battery life, however, it can get the job done. Fortunately, the fast battery charge times will make sure you do not get stuck to the outlet for too long.

When it comes to security, the ThinkPad E480 got you covered. A fingerprint reader is available but most important is the discrete hardware TPM which adds another layer of protection to your valuable data.

Pros

  • Portable – light and compact
  • IPS display
  • Excellent touchpad and backlit keyboard
  • Security options – fingerprint sensor and discrete TPM

Cons

  • PWM-adjusted for all brightness levels except 100% (fixed by our profiles)
  • Displays only 49% of sRGB colors
  • Not a very good cooling system

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510UQ) review – a great multimedia solution that you can actually afford

$
0
0

ASUS has recently started pushing the mid-range multimedia market segment with a number of VivoBook laptops but if you don’t have the extra money for the high-performance VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD and you are not quite into the plasticky feel of the VivoBook X510UQ, then the VivoBook S15 is probably the right choice for you. Moreover, the S15 has more in common with the VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD than the budget-oriented X510.

Anyway, the Core i5-7200U version seems to be reasonably priced and will most probably appeal to most. In any case, the slim, lightweight and partly aluminum chassis is definitely an eye-catcher while the slim side bezels allow for even smaller dimensions. Also, we expect better overall battery performance compared to the VivoBook Pro 15 so if you are looking for a more balanced approach, there’s a compelling reason to opt for the VivoBook S15 rather than the VivoBook Pro 15 despite their almost identical price, depending on the configuration of course. Let’s see how the rest of the features shape up the VivoBook S15.

ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
View more laptops...

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes with a standard VivoBook-branded box containing all of the usual user manuals, AC adapter and a DVD with drivers.

Design and construction

As we already mentioned, a lot of similarities can be drawn from between the VivoBook Pro 15 and the VivoBook S15, especially in the design department. But while the Pro 15 (N580VD) uses aluminum for most of the chassis, the only metal element here is the lid. Luckily that doesn’t take away the overall sturdiness of the case and keeps the weight pretty low at 1.7 kg. Thickness isn’t an issue as well measuring just 18 mm and making it one of the most portable 15-inch mid-range laptops out there.

The brushed metal plate on the back of the lid seems to be okay in terms of rigidity but nothing too impressive – there’s a visible deformation to our twisting and bending attempts. Still, we don’t think this should be a deal-breaker for anyone, especially in this price category. Opening the device with just one hand is possible thanks to the almost linear travel of the single-hinge design. The screen, on the other hand, impresses with thin side bezels while the lower chin and the upper one aren’t thick by any means. This has significantly reduced the dimensions of the device. And, as expected, the bottom piece is made of plastic and interestingly, the only grills are for the loudspeakers.

And regardless of the thin sides, the laptop comes with the usual I/O you’d expect from a 15-inch laptop. On the left, you will find a pair of USB 2.0 connectors and an SD card while on the right, you will see the DC charging port, USB 3.0 port, full-sized HDMI, USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1) and 3.5 mm audio jack. Although this covers the bare minimum of I/O, we would have appreciated at least two USB-A 3.0 ports and a slightly better distribution. With the current placement of the ports, most of the cables will be sticking out from the right side.

The interior uses hard plastic material that strongly imitates anodized aluminum and strangely enough, it doesn’t feel worse than the interior of the VivoBook Pro 15. In fact, we noticed the same weak points – near the spacebar area and right above the keyboard. This means that it’s something due to the structure and not just a poor choice of materials. Still, this shouldn’t be an issue in practice for most users. Anyway, the keyboard is a mixed bag – it has a slightly spongy feel to it and a rather short key travel but tactile and clicky feedback at the same time. Also, no Numpad area despite the standard layout. Luckily, we have no complaints towards the touchpad – it has an excellent gliding surface, light mouse clicks and it’s fairly responsive – a rare occurrence in this price range, to be honest. In addition, the fingerprint is well-integrated and it’s slightly concaved so you can always find it with your fingers without looking at it.

Our final verdict on build quality is mostly positive. There are a few hiccups like the flexible keyboard area and the unbalanced port distribution but generally, the build quality is fine. The case feels firm, light, portable and more importantly, there aren’t any noticeable gaps, protrusions or inconsistencies. That’s quite admirable in this price category for sure.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

There are no service lids so you have to remove the bottom to access the internals. In order to do so, you have to remove all the screws on the bottom including the ones placed under the upper rubber feet.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

The laptop supports a standard 2.5-inch drive and has an M.2 SSD slot for expansion. The reviewed unit featured just one 2.5-inch HDD while the M.2 slot remained empty. The latter is located right next to the RAM chips.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 Free Buy from Amazon.com
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB HDD Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

The motherboard supports two RAM chips each up to 16GB of DDR4-2400. Our sammple featured just one chip of 8GB DDR4-2400 from SK Hynix.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 SK Hynix 8GB DDR4-2400 Buy from Amazon.com
Slot 2 Free Buy from Amazon.com

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is located right next to the cooling fan and it’s Intel 8265NGW.

The battery is rated at 42Wh and takes a good chunk of the inner chassis.

Display quality

The notebook comes with a 15.6-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS display manufactured by AUO with model number B156HAN02.1. It offers 142 ppi, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and can be considered as ‘Retina” from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness 290 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 273 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 11% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is almost optimal – 6490K and stays close to the standard 6500K when going along the grayscale. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (67% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for office work, web browsing, multimedia and office work, a deviation of 3.16 is still high but will remain unnoticeable for most users. The contrast ratio is high – 1310:1 before calibration and 1280:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Unfortunately, display covers just 51% of the sRGB color gamut.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 31 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

No PWM was detected across all brightness levels so it’s safe to use for long periods of time in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

To be honest, we are a bit disappointed by the display mainly due to its limited sRGB coverage. The rest of the properties are fine, though – high contrast, decent maximum brightness and doesn’t use PWM for regulating brightness.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS VivoBook S15 configurations with 15.6″ AUO B156HAN02.1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The laptop delivers excellent sound quality with clear high, mid and low frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) technical specifications table

Acer
Not available
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2133 MHz
Dimensions
361 x 244 x 17.9 mm (14.21" x 9.61" x 0.70")
Weight
1.70 kg (3.7 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • Card reader SD, SDHC
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera VGA
  • Microphone
  • Speakers Stereo 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

ASUS VivoBook S 15 (S510) configurations

ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
View more laptops...

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

Unfortunately, battery life isn’t its strongest suit mainly due to the modest 42Wh capacity. However, video playback runtimes appear to be more than okay for some reason while failing to deliver decent web browsing score.

Of course, all tests were run using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature switched on.

price
300 min.
battery
$599
350 min.+16.7%
$947
326 min.+8.7%
48Wh, 3220 mAh
482 min.+60.7%
431 min.+43.7%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
427 min.
battery
$599
348 min.-18.5%
$947
372 min.-12.9%
48Wh, 3220 mAh
372 min.-12.9%
303 min.-29%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
112 min.
battery
$599
126 min.+12.5%
$947
86 min.-23.2%
48Wh, 3220 mAh
131 min.+17%
96 min.-14.3%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-8550u/

Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
14455.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$799.99
price
724
performance
$899.99+13%
425-21.2%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$799.99
price
14303
performance
$899.99+13%
8612-10.2%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$799.99
price
13.47
performance
$899.99+13%
22.74+5.8%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2GB GDDR5)

geforce-940m-3qtrThe NVIDIA GeForce 940MX is a refreshed version of the older 940M mobile chip but paired with a faster GDDR5 memory and slightly higher clock speeds, which result in noticeably better performance compared to the standard 940M. However, some OEMs will still choose to use the cheaper DDR3 version of the GPU.

Announced back in the first quarter of 2016, the chip is almost identical to the standard 940M (Maxwell) but with clock speeds increased up to 1242 MHz and base 1122 MHz. Again, the memory uses a 64-bit bus and has 2GB of GDDR5 VRAM. It still supports the DirectX 12 API and Shader 5.0 feature along with the usual NVIDIA technologies – CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, GeForce Experience, PhysX. The whole GPU is rated at around 15 to 30 Watts depending on the clock speeds and memory used in the specific notebook.

You can browse our GPU ranking to see where the graphics chip stands: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

For more information about the GPU, follow this link: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-940mx-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510) model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$799.99
price
935
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$799.99
price
276
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$799.99
price
207
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$799.99
price
212
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 83 fps 34 fps 17 fps

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 133 fps 99 fps 77 fps

Temperatures

Even though the stress tests don’t represent real-life usage because even the most demanding games don’t require 100% CPU and 100% GPU load, we find them very useful to assess the overall stability and effectiveness of the cooling system.

NOTE: Unfortunately, we weren’t able to test the unit with the Core i7-8550U processor but we doubt that there will be any significant difference in thermals between the Core i7-7500U and Core i7-8550U as both share the same thermal design power of 15W.

The CPU stress test didn’t show any issues with the Core i7-7500U reaching its maximum Turbo Boost frequency before going down to 3.0 GHz and staying there for good.

Switching on the GPU stress test resulted in CPU throttling at 2.2 GHz but the GPU ran at its maximum operating frequency. However, the latter also appeared to be pretty hot – 84 degrees Celsius. This is too high even for a gaming notebook and this is not the case here.

Interestingly enough, the inner temperatures didn’t affect the interior as much and it remained relatively cool throughout the test.

28.5°
33.3°
35.3°
29.0°
31.3°
32.0°
30.6°
28.0°
28.8°

Verdict

The VivoBook S510’s price suggests that it sits right between the VivoBook Pro 15 and the VivoBook F510 and judging by the overall user experience and performance, this stands true.

In terms of mobility and build quality, the VivoBook S 15 appears to be closer to the bit more expensive VivoBook Pro 15 but when it comes to hardware, the F510 is pretty similar to the currently reviewed model. We’ve got an Ultra-low voltage (ULV) Intel CPU on board paired with GeForce 940MX GPU and a bit lacking IPS display. At least for a multimedia notebook that is. The limited sRGB coverage doesn’t really fit the profile of a multimedia-ready notebook especially when you have the VivoBook Pro 15 with an excellent display at just about the same price as the S510. Also, the keyboard of the latter is a bit spongy and won’t suit everyone’s needs.

When it comes to battery life, the S 15 isn’t a stunner as well. The less than stellar web browsing runtimes will be a deal-breaker for some while the exceptionally high inner temperatures under heavy workload indicate that you may have some trouble in the future with the cooling performance if you do CPU or GPU-intensive tasks more often than not. But if you are going to use it mostly for multimedia and office work, don’t worry too much about it.

In reality, the VivoBook S 15 really is a stepping stone to the VivoBook Pro 15 and does things a bit better than its cheaper sibling, the VivoBook F510. So if you are torn between the VivoBook Pro 15 and the F510, take a moment and consider this option as well.

ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15
Not available
ASUS VivoBook S15 S510UA
Not available
View more laptops...

Pros

  • Fairly good build qualityо
  • Pretty portable for its price
  • Good touchpad
  • Display with high contrast and decent maximum brightness
  • The display doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness
  • Good sound quality

Cons

  • Spongy keyboard
  • Exceptionally high inner temperatures under heavy workload
  • Screen with limited sRGB coverage
  • Unsatisfactory battery life

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider review – one of the best GTX 1070 notebooks out there

$
0
0

MSI’s Raider line-up of gaming notebooks is probably the most refined of all the devices the company offers. They employ fast and powerful hardware, input devices which are of very good quality and also a 120 Hz Full HD monitor while keeping the temperatures adequate inside a thin form factor. We certainly like where the gaming laptop industry is going and we are looking forward to introducing the MSI GE63VR 7RF to you.

Actually, some time ago we showed you the 17.3-inch version of this very laptop, which is similarly named as MSI GE73VR 7RF. Both of them feature 120 Hz Full HD screens and a combo of Intel Core i7-7700HQ and GeForce GTX 1070 onboard. In addition to the remarkable hardware, we have RGB backlight under Steelseries certificate. This device also bears a “VR” branding which, according to the company, verifies that the laptop is good for Virtual Reality content. We are going to directly compare it to its larger brother and more precisely, we are going to check how temperatures change, when you decrease the amount of available space inside the machine.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/msi-ge63vr-raider/

Contents

Specs Sheet

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
HDD/SSD
256GB SATA SSD + 1TB HDD, 7200 rpm
M.2 Slot
2x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 with RAID 0 support See photo
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
383 x 260 x 27 mm (15.08" x 10.24" x 1.06")
Weight
2.20 kg (4.9 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum (Aluminum)
Ports and connectivity
  • 4x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Displayport mini
  • Card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack 2x 3.5 mm jacks for headset and external microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 1080p Full HD
  • Backlit keyboard RGB
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 2 x Speakers + 2 x Subwoofers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

View more laptops...

What’s in the box?

Inside the colorful box, there are two smaller boxes surrounding the device. Opening them reveals that one of them holds the cable that plugs into the wall, and the other one holds the charger itself. Beneath the laptop, which is put in a safety bag, there are a couple of the usual manuals and guides as well as a driver disk.

Design and construction

MSI has opted to use aluminum for the lid cover and the surface area of the GE63VR 7RF. Visually it is an almost complete copy of its larger brother although it’s smaller (obviously) and measures at 383 x 260 x 27 mm (15.08″ x 10.24″ x 1.06″) and weighs 2.2 kg, which while being heavier than the benchmark – MSI’s own Stealth Pro series, is pretty light for a GTX 1070-equipped notebook.

Thankfully, it lacks severe bending on the display when exposed to torsion load. The lid can be opened easily with one hand. Doing so reveals the keyboard and touchpad of the device. Here are also present the trio of buttons of which the northernmost one turns the device on/off. The second one is dedicated to the Dragon Center utility, while the last one pumps the fans to 100% to give you a maximum cooling performance.

Once again, the keyboard is illuminated by RGB LEDs by SteelSeries, which are programmable by MSI’s application. Keystrokes are tactile and fast, making typing experience pleasant. The touchpad is good enough, supports Microsoft Precision drivers, although it has Synaptics engines on top of it. It also has its keys separate from the touch area.

This laptop’s I/O include an RJ-45 connector, HDMI and Mini DisplayPort, one USB 3.1 Type-C and one of three USB 3.0 Type-A on the left, accompanied by two 3.5 mm audio jacks. On the other side are located the other two USB 3.0 Type-A ports as well as the SD card reader. On both sides as well as the rear there are exhaust vents for a total of four heatsinks.

Disassembly and maintenance

As you can see from the picture of the bottom of the device we shared with you earlier, you can peek inside through the huge vents. If you want to upgrade RAM or storage you need to open the MSI GE63VR 7RF, as the manufacturer has not provided a service cover. To do so, you have to unscrew 11 Phillips head screws and than carefully unclip the bottom cover with the help of a plastic tool.

You can see the complex cooling solution, which comprises a total of seven heat pipes and four heatsinks. Appart from the Core i7-7700HQ and GTX 1070 those heat pipes also cool their respective VRMs and memory modules. On the top of this photo, you can see a simple configuration of cells inside the 51Wh battery.

In the following image, you can see the Hard drive as well as the Wi-Fi adapter and one pair of speaker and woofer combo.

Here you can see a total of two RAM DIMMs currently taken by 16 GB of DDR4-2400 modules. There is also the same amount of M.2 slots, which support PCIe NVMe drives in RAID 0. They are located underneath a PCB that controls the RGB array of LEDs beneath the keyboard.

Display quality

MSI GE63VR 7RF has the same display that the company put on their 15.6-inch GS63VR 7RF Stealth Pro notebook – the Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1. It has a 1920 x 1080 resolution and runs at 120 Hz. The pixel density of the screen is 142 ppi with a pitch of 0.18 x 0.18 mm. This means that the screen can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from further than 60 cm.

Viewing angles are quite uncomfortable.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of 351 nits in the center of the screen and 328 nits as an average across the surface with an unacceptably high maximum deviation of 21% in the lower right corner (falling to 280 nits). The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is quite cold – 7650K and it goes even further away from the optimal 6500K as we go along the grayscale – 14000K – rather bluish light, which is fixed by our profiles. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (42% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. We measured a surprisingly high contrast ratio of 1280:1 (1080:1 after calibration)

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The new TN panels that MSI puts on their devices are exceptional. They provide super vibrant colors that cover completely the sRGB color gamut and spread further into the DCI-P3 to cover 96% of it.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 8 ms – super fast panel, surely going to appeal to the gamers.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.
You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Buy our profiles

MSI GE63VR 7RF configurations with 15.6″ Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

MSI GE63VR 7RF sounds really well. Its two regular speakers and two woofers pump loud crisp sound (for a laptop), which is clean in low, mid and high-frequency ranges.

Software

MSI keeps the trend of providing a disk with the necessary drivers, although their device lacks an optical drive. However, you can find all drivers and utilities on MSI’s official website: https://www.msi.com/Laptop/support/GE63VR-7RF-Raider

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. MSI GE63VR 7RF shares the same battery style as its larger brother, featuring 6 cells and a total capacity of 51Wh. This was enough for just three hours and 44 minutes of web browsing and 3 hours and 20 minutes of video playback. The 120 Hz screen drains the battery so fast, that you’ll get just over an hour of gaming experience if you actually try gaming away from the plug.

51Wh, 6-cell
$1749.99
price
224 min.
battery
51Wh, 6-cell
$1899+9%
103 min.-54%
167 min.-25.4%
6-cell, 90Wh
276 min.+23.2%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
51Wh, 6-cell
$1749.99
price
200 min.
battery
51Wh, 6-cell
$1899+9%
100 min.-50%
142 min.-29%
6-cell, 90Wh
233 min.+16.5%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
51Wh, 6-cell
$1749.99
price
73 min.
battery
51Wh, 6-cell
$1899+9%
60 min.-17.8%
41 min.-43.8%
6-cell, 90Wh
81 min.+11%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Storage performance

MSI GE63VR 7RF is equipped with a 1 TB HDD and 256 GB Samsung PM871A SATA SSD. Since it is a SATA device, it won’t be the fastest device on the market, but with 541.7 MB/s Read and 511.3 MB/s Write speeds it proves to be on par with the supply on the market.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor of the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

$1749.99
price
740.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1749.99
price
13738.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1749.99
price
9.36
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

MSI GE63 RAIDER CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the MSI GE63 RAIDER models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GE63 RAIDER model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$1466.53
price
740
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1466.53
price
13535
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1466.53
price
10.29
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)

2016-06-02-image-33The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the second fastest mobile GPU after the GTX 1080. It’s part of NVIDIA’s Pascal generation of GPUs and unlike previous releases, the company finally closes the gap between mobile and desktop graphics processors and that’s why there’s no “M” in the branding of Pascal GPUs. All thanks to the 16nm TSMC manufacturing process of the GPU, which allows better thermals and overall performance in a smaller form factor. That’s a big technology jump compared to the 28nm Maxwell generation.

Compared to its desktop counterpart, the GTX 1070 doesn’t differ too much. They share an identical number of ROPs (64) and identical memory – 8GB GDDR5 with 256-bit bus clocked at 8000 MHz. However, there’s a minor difference in clock speeds – the laptop GPU ticks at 1443 MHz and can go up to 1645 MHz while the desktop variant is running at 1506 MHz – 1683 MHz. To compensate to some extent, the laptop 1070 carries more CUDA cores (2048 vs 1920) and slightly more TMUs (170 vs 120).

Due to its performance, thermals and power consumption, which is believed to be 10W more than the GTX 980M, the GPU is suitable for large 17-inch laptops with the appropriate cooling solution.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Gameplay recordings with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8GB GDDR5)

MSI GE63 RAIDER GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the MSI GE63 RAIDER models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GE63 RAIDER model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$1466.53
price
12376
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1466.53
price
3866
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1466.53
price
2964
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1466.53
price
2260
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

While being smaller and housing a lot less space than the GE73VR (the big brother), GE63VR managed to even slightly outperform it. The performance was typical for a GTX 1070 unit – nothing short of brilliant, especially for a 1080p gaming. Experience is further enhanced by the 120 Hz screen, which utilizes the high framerates to deliver a super smooth image.

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 117 fps 72 fps 54 fps
Min FPS 64 fps 44 fps 25 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 87 fps 79 fps 77 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 119 fps 73 fps 48 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, Ultra (Check settings)
Average FPS 89 fps 78 fps 50 fps
Min FPS 75 fps 67 fps 44 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when it renders a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Prior to beginning our torture test the Intel Core i7-7700HQ inside this unit was idling at 42C. In the first 30 seconds, the frequencies were kept steadily at 3.4 GHz, while CPU temperature climbed gradually to 92C.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

Further, after around 10 seconds of the second checkpoint, the temperatures grew up to 94C. At this moment, the clock speeds went down to 3.1 GHz as temperatures also fell down to around 85C. Of course, the device became a little louder as fans sped up.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

While Prime95 was torturing the Core i7-7700HQ, the CPU was capable of 3.1 GHz and on some occasions up to 3.2 GHz. Temperature-wise, the device found its sweet spot at around 85C, balancing between fan and clock speeds to maintain it.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

While also idling at 42C, the GeForce GTX 1070 reached a maximum of 76C at an average frequency of 1537 MHz. Strangely enough that frequency is higher than that on the 17.3-inch notebook, although the temperature is also higher. It’s worth noting that if you don’t mind the loud noise from the fans, you can press the dedicated button in the top right corner to get 100% cooling performance, which will help you utilize those extra 100 MHz from your GTX 1070.

Temperatures on the surface were warm but surely not hot. Due to the allocation of heat pipes, the top part is far warmer than the bottom, which ensures a cool wrist rest area. There is also a lot of heat dissipated from the center of the keyboard as there is a GTX 1070 underneath it.

45.4°C
48.7°C
49.2°C
38.8°C
48.6°C
38.1°C
28.2°C
30.4°C
28.6°C

Verdict

MSI GE63VR 7RF doesn’t fall short of its larger brother in any aspect. Despite the size difference, not only it matches the GE73VR 7RF completely but in some cases, it excels in performance. It has been a while since we’ve liked almost every aspect of a device we test, but today we are certainly impressed by what we saw.

Once again we encountered good build quality, reasonable dimensions, and relatively low weight. Most of our attention, though, fell upon the 120 Hz TN panel. Although it has poor viewing angles, the display pumps beautiful colors that with the help of our Gaming and Web design profiles become accurate enough for color sensitive work. This, combined with the super fast panel and PWM-adjustment only for low brightness levels at a high frequency (this can be completely fixed by the Health-Guard profile), make for an amazing display quality. Moreover, when you connect a 120 Hz screen to a GeForce GTX 1070 – magic starts to happen, as the display utilizes the higher frame rate and transforms it into an immersive gaming experience.

Speaking of the GPU, this device is more than capable to cool down the beast. In longer gaming sessions we didn’t notice any severe drop in frame rates like we did when we tested the 15.6 and 17.3-inch devices of the Stealth Pro line-up – GS63VR and GS73VR respectively. This power-hungry monster makes gaming on a battery almost stupid as you’ll get a tad over one hour of gaming.

There is something in this notebook that disappointed us – the battery life. Well, okay – it is meant for gaming, so it is not expected to give you a lifetime on battery, but after all, this is a portable device. Take the Alienware 15 R3, for example – it is loaded with a huge 99Wh battery. We think that a portable computer should provide you with more than just 3 hours and 44 minutes of web browsing that you get with this notebook. Not only that but this unit may not go through an episode of Lord of the Rings on a single charge… shame.

Going back to reality, we really enjoyed the keyboard with its RGB backlight, and the touchpad, which is far more adequate than some of the laptops in this category. The good cooling solution and the ease of use of the Dragon Center utility, combined with the super useful fan boost button just add to the greatness of this device. If you’re ready to give battery life away for the immersive gaming experience provided by the 120 Hz screen, we can truly recommend the MSI GE63VR 7RF to you.

View more laptops...

Pros

  • Good build quality and slender outfit
  • Support of RAID 0 (combining two storage drives virtually into one)
  • Super fast vibrant display
  • RGB keyboard
  • No aggressive PWM-adjustment (our Health-Guard profile completely bypasses PWM)
  • RAM and storage are easy to access and upgrade
  • Loud and crisp speakers

Cons

  • CPU gets quite hot during extreme load
  • Unacceptable battery life
  • Poor viewing angles

Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M review – the 14-inch P648 makes a compelling case for the whole TravelMate family

$
0
0

It’s been a while since we reviewed the 15-inch TravelMate P658 and now we will take a closer look at the 14-inch TravelMate P648. Will it hold up to the legacy of its 15-inch sibling, which we liked so much, or the 14-inch form factor has taken away some of the features?

At first glance, the P648 doesn’t seem all that different from its bigger brother, aside from dimensions and weight, of course. But given the price range of the laptop, we are pretty interested on how the laptop will stand against the already renown Lenovo ThinkPad T-series, more precisely the T470. Sporting an Intel Core i7-7500U CPU crammed inside a relatively portable chassis with plenty of connectors, upgradability options and a good IPS panel suitable not only for business work but for multimedia as well. But how about battery life, input devices, etc. – questions every business users tend to ask first when looking for such laptop. We find out in the full review below.

Acer TravelMate P648
Not available
View more laptops...

Contents

Retail package

The package contains the standard AC adapter, power cord and the laptop itself.

Design and construction

Similar to the bigger model, the TravelMate P648 sports a plastic finish with carbon fiber-reinforced base. The latter keeps the chassis pretty solid, sturdy and lightweight as possible. Weighing at just 1.7 kg and measuring around 21 mm in height, the 14-inch TravelMate offers impressively sturdy base and lid.

First, let’s get the lid out of the way. It has anodized-like finish with Acer’s logo in the upper right corner and a sign saying the chassis is made of carbon fiber so it lets customers know from afar. We definitely believe that as the lid appears to be extra rigid – doesn’t bend at all and it’s fairly resistant to torsion as well. On the other side of the lid, you will find the 14-inch matte screen with quite thin side bezels and normal-sized lower chin and upper bezel. They sport soft-touch matte black finish, which is a cool finishing touch in our eyes. The whole lid is supported by two small metal hinges that provide smooth and linear travel allowing opening the lid with just one hand and surprisingly, the lid isn’t bending in the center of the lower chin at all. As for the bottom of the chassis, it uses the same material as the rest of the casing but also has some grills for extra airflow, a connector for the docking station and a dedicated service hatch providing easy access to some of the internals for upgrade.

Although the sides aren’t exactly super thin in our book, they provide quite the I/O set – RJ-45 for LAN connectivity, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB-C 3.1 with Thunderbolt support and a 3.5 mm audio jack on the left. This leaves the right side with only two USB 3.0 connectors and the DC charging port. The SD card reader is placed at the front near the left edge and at the back, you will see the main grill for dispersing the heat.

The interior continues to surprise with exceptional sturdiness not giving under our attempts to twist or bend the material. Virtually no visual deformation when pressed at the center of the keyboard or the palm rest. Speaking of the keyboard, it’s okay but definitely not the best we’ve seen from Acer. We didn’t like the fact that it’s shallow and we found ourselves questioning whether or not a certain key was pressed, although the clicky feedback of each key press helped to some extent. They’ve used the same keyboard on the 15-inch model, which we’ve criticized for the same issue. The touchpad, on the other hand, is excellent – good gliding surface, responsive, accurate and has comfortable mouse buttons. The fingerprint reader would have been better if it was somewhere else but you can definitely get used to it.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

Most of the upgradable hardware can be accessed via the service lids but in order to change the battery, for example, a teardown is required. The storage and memory can be easily accessed.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

The 2.5-inch HDD, which in this case is missing, can be accessed via the service lid while the M.2 SSD slot is hidden under the hood. In our case, it’s Lite-On 256GB SATA SSD.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB Lite-On M.2 SATA SSD (2280) Buy from Amazon.com
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot Free Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

Interestingly, the motherboard holds 4GB of DDR4-2400 soldered RAM chip and a slot for expansion. The reviewed unit feature 4GB of DDR4-2400 from SK Hynix making up for 8GB of memory. You can go up to 20GB (4GB soldered + 16GB additional).

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 SK Hynix 8GB DDR4-2400 Buy from Amazon.com

Other components

The Wi-Fi adapter is located right next to the 2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot and it’s Intel 7265NGW.

The battery is rated at the respectable 54Wh.

Display quality

The notebook features a 14-inch Full HD (1920×1080) IPS display from AUO with model number B140HAN01.3. The pixel density is 157 ppi and the pixel pitch is 0.161 x 0.161 mm and can be considered as “Retina” from at least 56 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness 276 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 270 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 11% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is almost optimal – 6700K and goes up closer to the standard 6500K when going along the grayscale. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (47% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for web browsing, multimedia and office work, a deviation of 3.0 is acceptable. The contrast ratio is high – 1350:1 before calibration and 1160:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 95% of the sRGB color gamut, which is an excellent result.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 20 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our equipment didn’t detect any pulsations throughout all brightness levels so it’s safe to use for long periods of time.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Once again, the TravelMate comes with an excellent IPS panel suitable not only for general office work but for multimedia as well. It has wide sRGB coverage, high contrast, decent maximum brightness and doesn’t have PWM across all brightness levels.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer TravelMate P648 configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN01.3 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.97
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The loudspeakers appear to be a bit quiet and there are small deviations in the low and medium frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Acer TravelMate P648-M technical specifications table

Acer
Not available
Display
14.0”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 SATA III (M key)
RAM
8GB
Dimensions
328 x 235 x 21.20 mm (12.91" x 9.25" x 0.83")
Weight
1.70 kg (3.7 lbs)
Body material
Carbon Fiber, Plastic
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort
  • 3x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11bgn
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Web camera
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Security Lock slot

Acer TravelMate P648 configurations

Acer TravelMate P648
Not available
View more laptops...

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

The system incorporates a relatively big battery (for a 14-inch machine) rated at 54Wh and unsurprisingly, the endurance ratings according to our tests are sky high. Beating its 15-inch sibling, the TravelMate P648 storms in with exceptional web browsing score and probably even more impressive video playback time. And even though, this isn’t enough to beat Dell’s Latitude 14 7480, it sure does leave the stock Lenovo ThinkPad T470 configuration far behind.

Of course, all tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

price
663 min.
battery
3-cell 24Wh + 3-cell 24Wh
$1199.95
394 min.-40.6%
45Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
$839.9
408 min.-38.5%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
585 min.
battery
3-cell 24Wh + 3-cell 24Wh
$1199.95
397 min.-32.1%
45Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
$839.9
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
197 min.
battery
3-cell 24Wh + 3-cell 24Wh
$1199.95
140 min.-28.9%
45Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
$839.9
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7500U

The Core i7-7500U is part of the latest Intel Kaby Lake generation of CPUs built upon 14nm manufacturing process – or 14nm+ as the company markets – and should offer marginal performance gains over the Skylake generation while improving overall power efficiency. It’s a direct successor to the Core i7-6500U (Skylake) and Core i7-5500 (Broadwell) but opposed to previous architecture refreshes, the Kaby Lake Core i7-7500U is bringing much higher clock rates. Now the chip is clocked at 2.7 – 3.5 GHz (compared to the 2.5 – 3.1 GHz on the Skylake Core i7-6500U) and still adopting the 2/4 core/thread count using the HyperThreading technology with a maximum 4MB cache.

However, the Core i7-7500U’s TDP is still rated at 15W including the iGPU and dual-channel memory controller that supports DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866 and DDR3L-1600. And as far as the iGPU is concerned, it integrates a slightly improved Intel HD Graphics 620 clocked at 300 – 1050 MHz, which is slightly higher than the iGPU on the Core i5-7200U (300 – 1000 MHz).

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7500u/

price
328.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
6730.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 620

intel_hd_graphicsIntel’s HD Graphics 620 is a direct successor to the integrated HD Graphics 520. The latter is found in ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from the 6th Generation (Skylake) of chips while the former is in the 7th (Kaby Lake) generation of CPUs.

Intel’s HD Graphics 620 uses the GT2 version of the graphics chip with 24 EUs (Execution Units) reaching as high as 1050 MHz and it has a base frequency of 300 MHz. However, the maximum operating frequency depends on the CPU, whether it’s the Core i3-7100U or the Core i5-7200U or the Core i7-7500U. Since the iGPU doesn’t have a dedicated memory – or eDRAM for that matter – it uses the available RAM on the system which is 2x 64-bit DDR3 or DDR4.

The TDP depends on the CPU model but it’s usually equipped with a SoC rated at 15W including the memory controller. Its performance should be enough for multimedia activities, light applications and gaming on really low resolution and minimum graphics settings.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook with this GPU that we’ve tested: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/intel-hd-graphics-620/

Temperatures

The CPU and GPU stress tests aim to help us assess the overall stability and performance of the cooling system in the long run and not represent real-life usage. We test all of the devices we review.

And as usual, we kicked things off with 100% CPU stress testing for about an hour. Interestingly, the CPU wasn’t able to sustain its maximum operating frequency for two active cores and ran a tad slower than it should be – 2.9 GHz. Temperatures were relatively high as well – 80-81 °C. Temperatures like these are usually intrinsic to quad-core chips in gaming laptops.

However, after we turned on the GPU stress test, the CPU’s frequency didn’t drop at all. Temperatures were sustained and the iGPU was running flawlessly.

We’ve also measured the surface temperatures – it appears that the center of the keyboard tends to get a little bit warm under load but this shouldn’t worry the general user as the cooling system is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks and simple web browsing.

37.4°
42.2°
34.7°
38.5°
45.6°
35.4°
39.2°
33.4°
33.0°

Verdict

The good news is that the TravelMate P648 is no different from its 15-inch sibling and the rest of the TravelMate family. Unfortunately, though, with the pros, the TravelMate inherits the cons as well. In this case, the rather shallow keyboard and the use of an M.2 SATA SSD in our configuration instead of PCIe NVMe drive. Given the price point, the latter would be more adequate. And with this, we ran out of issues to complain about.

All the requirements for an upper-mid-range business notebook are met – sturdy and light chassis, good touchpad, long battery life, stable and silent operations, plenty of I/O (including USB-C Thunderbolt 3) and a good display. The latter is, in fact, suitable for multimedia as well due to its high contrast, wide sRGB coverage and decent maximum brightness. Moreover, PWM isn’t used for regulating luminance making it suitable for long hours of work.

So is it worth your hard-earned money? Definitely yes! It even beats its direct rival the Lenovo ThinkPad T470 in a number of areas with the most prominent ones being screen quality and price.

Acer TravelMate P648
Not available
View more laptops...

Pros

  • Sturdy and portable chassis
  • Good touchpad
  • Long battery life
  • High-quality IPS display suitable for multimedia as well
  • No PWM across all brightness levels

Cons

  • A bit shallow keyboard
  • Some units ship with M.2 SATA SSD instead of PCIe NVMe drive

Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51G) review – one of the best budget media-centric laptops out there

$
0
0

Acer just released its new Aspire 5 and 7 lineup but the market responded shortly due to the great value these notebooks offer. And despite some obvious drawbacks, the 17-inch version of the Aspire 5 quickly became our favorite choice in the budget 17-inch segment thanks to its excellent price/performance ratio, ideal screen and fairly robust design. But for a little less, you can get the 15-inch Aspire 5 that we are reviewing here so we expect similar if not the exact same user experience.

Clearly, the Acer Aspire 5 (515-51G) is carrying a capable hardware for the asking price – Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory, support for M.2 SSD and a Full HD IPS panel for your viewing pleasure. However, we would like to see if the battery life and the quality of the IPS panel are just as good as the 17-inch version and which one would suit you better. Let’s dig in.

View more laptops...

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in the usual box containing the user manuals, AC adapter and power cord – nothing out of the ordinary.

Design and construction

The notebook comes with an identical to the 17-inch model chassis but obviously, a little bit smaller. Plastic is the main order of the day with a splash of brushed aluminum for the interior. It’s also fairly light tipping the scale at 2.1 kg and measures just 21.6 mm in thickness while also carrying some of the shortcomings from the 17-inch variant – wobbly touchpad and slightly flexible lid.

Speaking of which, it’s made of plastic that’s fairly resistant to pressure with the familiar texture on top. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same when attempting to twist the screen but it really isn’t something you have to worry about. The hinges are once again placed apart but on the contrary to the 17-inch model, this one holds up pretty well when pressing the bottom bezel. In addition, they provide fairly smooth and stable movement but opening the device with one hand isn’t possible.

The sides feature chamfered edges around the interior plate, measure 21.6 mm at its thickest point and provide all the usual connectors you’d expect. The left side comes with RJ-45 for LAN, USB-C 3.1 (Gen 1), HDMI, USB 3.0 and an SD card reader. On the right, you will find the DC charging port, two more USB 2.0 connectors and a 3.5 mm audio jack.

And as we already stated, the interior features brushed aluminum sheet that’s fairly stable – no visible flex around the keyboard and the touchpad – but it’s a strong fingerprint magnet. Anyway, the input devices are identical to the ones on the 17-inch variant – a bit shallow keyboard with satisfying, clicky tactile feedback and standard layout while the clickpad is a little jumpy and stiff in some areas. We’ve definitely seen better even at this price.

So the bottom line is that due to the smaller form factor, the 15-inch Aspire 5 feels a bit more solid in the hand compared to the 17-incher and obviously, it’s more compact and lightweight – features that are usually intrinsic to the smaller screen size. In any case, some of the issues we had with the 17-inch model are here as well – the interior is a fingerprint magnet while the touchpad offers subpar user experience.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

The disassembly process is the same as on the 17-inch model. Some of the upgrades require to dig deeper but most can be done by removing the dedicated service lids on the bottom. This way you can access the memory slot and the 2.5-inch drive.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As expected, the bottom cover has to be removed to access the M.2 PCIe NVMe-enabled SSD slot. The 2.5-inch drive under the service hatch, however, is a Toshiba 1TB HDD.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 Free Buy from Amazon.com
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot 1TB Toshiba HDD Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

The device comes with 4GB of soldered DDR4-2400 memory and in our case, with additional 4GB chip from ADATA, which can be further upgraded up to 16GB.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 4GB ADATA DDR4-2400 Buy from Amazon.com

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is right next to the cooling fan and it’s Intel 3165NGW.

The battery is located under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at 48Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design isn’t any different than the one used in the 17-inch variant. It consists of just one big heatpipe connecting both heatsinks and the cooling fan itself.

Display quality

The 15-inch Aspire 5 comes with Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel from Panda with model number LM156LF1L03 (NCP001C). The pixel density is 142 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.18 x 0.18 mm. It can be considered as “Retina” from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of just 218 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 206 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 17% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a bit colder than it should be – 6970K and remains the same as we go along the grayscale. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (63% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for office work, web browsing and multimedia, a deviation of 4.5 in the lower right corner is somehow acceptable. The contrast ratio is exceptionally high – 1470:1 before calibration and 1240:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Unfortunately, the panel covers just 53% of the sRGB color gamut.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 33 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, we’ve detected aggressive PWM only below 55 cd/m2 – everything over that is considered safe in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The display used here isn’t on par with what we saw on the 17-inch model because this one lacks almost half of the sRGB gamut but it still excels in other areas such as contrast. The absence of above 22% brightness PWM is also greatly appreciated.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Acer Aspire 5 configurations with 15.6″ Panda LM156LF1L03 (NCP001C) (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good – there are no noticeable distortions in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
1TB HDD, 5400 rpm
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4-2400
Dimensions
382 x 263 x 22 mm (15.04" x 10.35" x 0.87")
Weight
2.20 kg (4.9 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 2x USB Type-A 2.0
  • HDMI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth
  • Audio jack 3.5 mm combo headphone/mic jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Acer Aspire 5 configurations

Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51)
Not available
View more laptops...

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from Acer’s official support page.

Battery

Just like its bigger sibling, the battery performance is more than impressive. Sporting a relatively low-capacity battery rated at just 48Wh, the notebook surpasses a number of considerably more expensive laptops. The main reason for this is probably Intel’s new 8th Generation.

Of course, all tests were run using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature switched on.

price
569 min.
battery
48Wh, 3220 mAh
482 min.-15.3%
277 min.-51.3%
431 min.-24.3%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
420 min.
battery
48Wh, 3220 mAh
372 min.-11.4%
220 min.-47.6%
303 min.-27.9%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
157 min.
battery
48Wh, 3220 mAh
131 min.-16.6%
73 min.-53.5%
96 min.-38.9%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-8550u/

price
511.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
10558.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$419
price
217
performance
$649.99+55%
281+4.6%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$419
price
4206
performance
$649.99+55%
5686+2.7%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$419
price
19.43
performance
$649.99+55%
15.01-2.8%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2GB GDDR5)

The GeForce MX150 is an entry-level mobile card that is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs, based on the GP108 chip paired with 2GB of GDDR5 memory via 64-bit interface. The GPU is the successor of GeForce 940MX and it was announced in Q2 of 2017.

The GeForce MX150 operates at a relatively high base frequency of 1469 MHz, while the Boost frequencies can go up to 1532 MHz. The GPU incorporates 384 shader units (CUDA cores) while the memory is clocked at 6008MHz (effective). These specs ensure a significant performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. The TDP of the GPU is lower than the last generation GTX 950M and even the GTX 1050 – 25W compared to 40W for the two models above. Performance-wise, the GeForce MX150 should be similar to the desktop GeForce GT 1030.

Along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like Multi-Projection, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan and Multi-Monitor.

Check the prices of all notebooks equipped with NVIDIA GeForce MX150: Buy from Amazon.com

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which Acer Aspire 5 (A515-51) model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$419
price
855
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$419
price
270
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$419
price
218
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$419
price
1072
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 105 fps 54 fps 27 fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 137 fps 111 fps 78 fps

Temperatures

Of course, the stress tests that we perform don’t represent real-life usage scenarios because even the most demanding games don’t require 100% CPU and 100% GPU load at the same time for long periods of time. However, the torture tests remain as the most reliable way to assess the overall stability and longevity of the cooling system.

At first, the system was able to utilize the full performance of the Core i7-8550U before falling back to around 2.2 GHz, which is still within the Turbo Boost range. Temperatures were acceptable.

Turning on the GPU stress test reduced the CPU clocks down to its basic 1.8 GHz while the GPU ran at whopping 1620 MHz during the whole test. The cost was high, though, as the MX150 reached 83 degrees Celsius.

Temperatures on the surface remained pretty low despite the hot GPU.

36.4°
38.1°
26.8°
37.4°
36.3°
26.8°
38.6°
27.4°
26.5°

Verdict

The 15-inch Aspire 5 delivers pretty much the same user experience as the 17-inch model with one big exception – the screen. Apparently, Acer has cut some corners regarding screen quality and instead of a high-end IPS panel, they’ve put a mid-range display with limited sRGB coverage and slightly above average maximum brightness. However, we can’t really complain because at this price range, this panel makes more sense. The display on the 17-inch model was a bonus. Still, the absence of PWM above 22% brightness and the exceptionally high contrast should be considered.

And as for the rest? As we already said, the 15-inch model carries all the traits from its bigger sibling. This means that the 15-inch Aspire 5 comes with a decent (a bit shallow) keyboard, unsatisfactory touchpad, fairly good build quality, has extra long battery life and tends to get a little bit hot under the hood when you run heavy workloads for longer. This won’t affect the user experience, though.

What did we get from this? If you want better image quality – opt for the 17-inch model. If portability is more important to you, then maybe the 15-inch model will suit you better.

View more laptops...

Pros

  • Fairly good build quality
  • Decent keyboard
  • Generally good IPS display for the asking price
  • The display doesn’t use PWM for regulating brightness above 22%
  • Good price/performance ratio
  • Extra long battery life

Cons

  • Wobbly and stiff touchpad
  • No keyboard illumination
  • GPU gets a bit hot under heavy and extended workload

MSI GL62M 7RDX review – gaming on a budget – features vs. compromises

$
0
0

Recently we reviewed a lot of MSI gaming notebooks and every each of them had a distinctive feature that speaks for the device in general. For example, the Stealth Pro (GS63 review/ GS73 review) is chiefly characterized by a super light and thin form factor, while the Raider series adds a better cooling to the equation. On the other hand, GL62M 7RDX doesn’t have anything that particular. It is on the more affordable side and while the company has made some cuts to keep the price down, they also tried their best to provide a good quality product.

We are going to discuss a configuration that features Intel Core i7-7700HQ and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. You should know that if you ever opt to buy a laptop with GTX 1050, you should go for the 4 GB version, even if it’s at the expense of a little slower CPU. This is because modern day games tend to use more and more GPU memory due to the larger size of the textures. Anyhow, the display of choice here is once again a TN panel, branded as an IPS-level, and you’re going to see why in the “Display quality” part of this review.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/msi-gl62m/

Contents

Specs Sheet

MSI GL62M 7RDX technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), TN
HDD/SSD
1TB HDD, 7200 rpm
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe (M key) See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
383 x 260 x 27 mm (15.08" x 10.24" x 1.06")
Weight
2.40 kg (5.3 lbs)
Body material
Matte black plastic
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI 1
  • Displayport mini
  • Card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • Audio jack 2x 3.5 mm jacks for headset and external microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 4 x 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

MSI GL62M
Not available
MSI GL62M
Not available
MSI GL62M
Not available
View more laptops...

What’s in the box?

The first thing we see when we open the box is the GL62M 7RDX itself. Underneath it, neatly put inside a cardboard square you can find a bag with some manuals and a driver disk. In the other compartments are located the two parts of the 135 W charging adapter.

Design and construction

MSI GL62M 7RDX is built solely from hard plastic. It has a matte paint finish which is a huge fingerprint magnet. We can describe the design as rather incognito, although the surface seems to be pretty hospitable for stickers. This notebook measures at 383 x 260 x 27 mm (15.08″ x 10.24″ x 1.06″) and weighs 2.40 kg (5.3 lbs) – nothing spectacular. However, we like how MSI has decided to keep things simple instead of reinventing how a laptop should look. Like some other companies… *gasp* Dell *gasp*.

The lid of this notebook needs the help of a second hand to get open. This reveals a red painted full-size keyboard. Its backlight is also in the distinctive of MSI red color. It is better for gaming than it is for typing as key travel is long enough but the mechanism is quite soft. On the top right corner of the surface are located those famous three MSI buttons. This configuration is identical to what we saw in MSI GP62M. Underneath the keyboard is the touchpad with dedicated keys. It’s not very large and there is also a thin strip right over the buttons that is not touch sensitive.

Aside from the boring look on the surface, on the bottom things get more interesting. A good bouquet of drills and vents provides a peek inside the machine, with all the heatpipes and both fans being visible.

Portwise, the left side of the laptop is a bit overcrowded, compared to the opposite one. There is an RJ-45 connector, followed by a USB 3.0 Type-A port and two video connectors in the face of an HDMI port and Mini DisplayPort. Next, we have another USB 3.0 Type-A and one Type-C port. They are joined by two 3.5 mm jacks. While on the right we can see only a charging port, SD card reader, and single USB 2.0 Type-A port. We can say that this is reasonable enough, especially for people who use external mouse quite often.

Disassembly and maintenance

As most MSI devices we reviewed recently, GL62M 7RDX doesn’t offer upgrade through a dedicated service panel, so you need to remove the whole bottom plate of the device. However, this is fairly easy as you “only” need to remove 16 Phillips head screws. We like that all the screws have the exact same size, so you won’t need to lose extra time organizing elements. In the top middle part of the laptop is located the tiny (for this type of notebook) 41Wh battery.

As you see from the image below, there is a lot of headroom in terms of GPU cooling. Those three large heatpipes you see in the middle are connected to the GTX 1050. A smart decision was made to separate one of them and send it to the other fan, thus giving the other side more space to breathe. Actually, one would think that this is an overkill for this GPU, but keep in mind that GL62M comes also with the more powerful GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1060.

Here you can see a total of two RAM DIMMs, of which only one is occupied in our unit. You can also have a look at the Wi-Fi adapter, located in the top right part of the image.

In the next photo, the focus is on storage options. While it has an M.2 slot that supports NVMe devices, our unit is only equipped with a 1000 GB HDD, rotating at 7200 rpm.

Display quality

MSI GS63VR 7RF is equipped with a Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel with 15.6-inch diagonal, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and 142 ppi. The panel has a model number N156HGA-EAL and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

As can be expected from a TN panel, viewing angles are poor.

This panel is relatively dim as the peak brightness we recorded was 230 nits in the center of the screen and 311 nits as an average across the surface. Maximum deviation is 13%. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is colder than the 6500K sRGB standard – 7340K. Furthermore, at the grey scale temperatures are even colder – 11000K. However, this can be corrected by our profiles. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (56% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. Contrast ratio is mediocre – 330:1 (280:1 after calibration)

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec. 2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

This screen appears to be appropriate for gamers at it can display every color, found on the Internet and HD TV. It also covers 96% of the DCI-P3 color gamut, providing punchy and saturated colors.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 17 ms

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

There isn’t any serious PWM-adjustment here. The display uses this technology to control brightness levels up to 60 nits and moreover, it does it at high frequency, thus being not particularly harmful in this aspect.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

MSI has equipped GL62M 7RDX with a typically gaming display. It has its bright sides, but also some setbacks. While the color coverage spreads to DCI-P3 territories with 96% of colors being able to be reproduced, it has a poor contrast ratio, which takes a bit from the eye candy. And although PWM-adjustment is not particularly harmful (you can get rid of it with our Health-Guard profile) Luminance uniformity is not quite good at the same time. In addition to that, viewing angles are poor, but we have to note, that almost every drawback of this screen shouldn’t bother gamers.

Buy our profiles

MSI GL62M 7RDX configurations with 15.6″ N156HGA-EAL (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

MSI GL62M 7RDX sounds well and loud, with low, mid and high frequencies being clear from severe noise.

Software

As always, MSI has provided a disk with all drivers and features you need for the GL62M 7RDX. However, if you lose it or you can’t find a magical way around not having an optical drive, you can find everything you need on MSI’s official support page: https://www.msi.com/Laptop/support/GL62M-7RDX.html

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. This device is equipped with a 41Wh 6-cell battery. Our tests concluded that this battery is insufficient for a laptop of this type. Although you can get around 4 hours and 22 minutes of web browsing and a little over 4 hours of video playback, there is one thing that is most setting back – merely 30 minutes gaming on battery power. However, this is probably due to not very good optimization and we think that future updates are going to fix that.

41Wh, 6-cell
price
262 min.
battery
350 min.+33.6%
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
375 min.+43.1%
396 min.+51.1%
$999
712 min.+171.8%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
41Wh, 6-cell
price
245 min.
battery
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
396 min.+61.6%
$999
456 min.+86.1%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
41Wh, 6-cell
price
33 min.
battery
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
114 min.+245.5%
$999
175 min.+430.3%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-7700HQ

The Core i7-7700HQ is Kaby Lake’s top-shelf direct successor to the Skylake Core i7-6700HQ offering slightly higher clock speeds on the almost identical architecture and TDP. While Intel markets Kaby Lake’s architecture as “14nm+”, the Core i7-7700HQ is still on the same 14nm node with the only significant update being in the iGPU department. That’s why the slightly altered clock speeds (2.8 – 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 – 3.5 GHz) bring not more than 10% increase in performance compared to the Core i7-6700HQ. We still have the supported Hyper-Threading technology with 4/8 – core/thread design, the same 45W TDP, and 6MB cache.

However, the Kaby Lake generation boasts an updated video engine for the iGPU, although, its performance is just about the same. Branded as Intel HD Graphics 630, the GPU offers slightly higher clock speeds (350 – 1100 MHz vs 350 – 1050 MHz) compared to the Intel HD Graphics 530 and support for H265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth and the VP9 codec for full hardware acceleration. In addition, the HDCP 2.2 is also supported allowing Netflix’s 4K video streaming.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

price
735.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
13763.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
price
9.90
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

MSI GL62M CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the MSI GL62M models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GL62M model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$729
price
597
performance
$849+16%
735+9.7%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$729
price
11278
performance
$849+16%
13444+3.9%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$729
price
12.08
performance
$849+16%
10.22-1.2%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)

The GeForce GTX 1050 GPU for laptops is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs featuring a brand new architecture design but on contrary to the rest of the GPUs from NVIDIA’s lineup, the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti feature a Samsung-made FinFET 14nm chip instead of the TSMC 16nm found in the GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. The graphics card is based on the GP107 chip paired with 4GB of GDDR5 memory via a 128-bit interface.

Since the GTX 1050 is quite dependent on the cooling design, its performance may vary but if the laptop handles the GPU well and shouldn’t be much different from its desktop counterpart. Anyway, the GPU operates at relatively high frequencies (1354 – 1493 MHz) but incorporates the same amount of CUDA cores (640) while the memory is clocked at 7000 MHz (effective). These specs ensure a huge performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. For instance, the GTX 1050 performs better than the GTX 960M and can be compared to the GTX 965M’s capabilities while running at similar to the GTX 960M’s TDP of around 40-50W.

However, along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, improved H.265 encoding, and decoding.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

MSI GL62M GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the MSI GL62M models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which MSI GL62M model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

MSI GL62M 7RDX with a GeForce GTX 1050 manages to get some good framerate even in Full HD resolution and medium eye-candy. In GTA V we saw respectable minimum fps as the GPU never got tired, nor too hot, thus performing homogeneous. However let’s not forget that we’re on the budget side of gaming here, so titles like Tomb Raider won’t be very playable at high graphics settings.

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 114 fps 55 fps 34 fps
Min FPS 59 fps 35 fps 18 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 52 fps 45 fps 37 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 80 fps 52 fps 24 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 39 fps 36 fps 32 fps
Min FPS 33 fps 30 fps 26 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

We measured an idle temperature of 41°C of the Core i7-7700HQ of this unit. In the first 30 seconds of testing under extreme load with Prime95 we notice the frequency being relatively stable around 3.3 GHz. Meanwhile, temperatures were rising steadily and at the end of the first checkpoint they hit 92°C.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

Temperature growth transitioned into second checkpoint territories as they reached 95°C, which resulted in clock speeds dropping by 400 MHz for each core. After that, we saw fluctuation of the frequencies between 3.0 and 3.1 GHz.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

That fluctuation continued until the end of the test, hence the average clock speed is around 3.05 GHz. However, temperatures grew even further, reaching the former highs of 95°C. This is quite hot and keeps in mind that all our tests are conducted at a room temperature of around 21°C. However, Prime95 tests the components under extreme conditions that are unlikely to happen in real life, so don’t worry.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

Although CPU temperatures were pretty high, we saw something quite contrary with the GeForce GTX 1050. Not only the maximum temperature it reached was just 64°C, but the GPU clock speed never fell under 1500 MHz. It’s interesting because the actual maximum boost frequency should be 1493 MHz. This assures that you get 100% (and even more) performance out of the GTX 1050.

Surface temperatures were reasonably warm. There was some heat in crucial places like the middle of the keyboard and surprisingly – the touchpad. Of course, they won’t burn you, but keep in mind that it’s going to get quite warm on your hands.

41.0°C
47.9°C
38.8°C
39.1°C
45.5°C
35.1°C
33.1°C
36.9°C
24.9°C

Verdict

There are a lot of budget gaming devices on the market these days. Be they the popular faces of Lenovo Legion Y520 and Dell Inspiron 15 5567, or some lowkey newcomers like the facelift Nitro 5 with the brand new AMD combo. The MSI GL62M 7RDX offers a lot for the money, while keeping the design neutral, if not boring. Of course, there is a lot more than performance that defines a gaming notebook, but that’s a good starting point.

MSI GL62M 7RDX has one of the best price/performance ratios in this category. It utilizes the GTX 1050 fully while keeping temperatures low and noise levels relatively quiet. The CPU in this machine has already been proven in battles, although it can get quite warm, especially compared to the Nitro 5 low-voltage Ryzen 7 2700U processor that barely warms up. However, titles like GTA V and Far Cry Primal won’t be any trouble for this device even at medium-high settings.

We also like that there are upgradeability options right out of the box. First, there are two RAM DIMMs that support up to 32 GB of memory and on the storage side, we have an M.2 slot that is NVMe enabled. On the other side, if you don’t need that fast storage, you can just settle with an HDD, like the configuration we used.

Now we move to the most controversial part of this gaming notebook – the screen. While the company offers IPS screens, the cheaper choice will be a TN panel, branded as “IPS-level”. Beware of that by the way, because there are a lot of retailers that falsely mark the TN panel as an IPS one because of that door left open by MSI. Anyhow, this screen is a jewel for gamers as it is relatively fast and reproduces 100% of sRGB and 96% of DCI-P3 color gamut. Sadly it comes with some setbacks like poor color accuracy and cold color temperature (both fixable by our profiles). Also, we can’t overlook the poor viewing angles and mediocre contrast ratio.

Another feature we think MSI could have done better is the battery performance. It’s both too small (41Wh) and has terrible optimization as we got a hair over 30 minutes of gaming on a single battery charge – horrendous. Web surfing and video playback times were not very impressive either at 4 hours and 20 minutes and 4 hours and 5 minutes respectively. In this area, the GL62M is humiliated by the Acer Aspire VX 15 that offers around 3 times more battery life when gaming.

Tell us in the comments what your thoughts on this device are. Do you prefer slightly better performance or you’d spend your money on something with a bigger battery potential?

MSI GL62M
Not available
MSI GL62M
Not available
MSI GL62M
Not available
View more laptops...

Pros

  • Reasonable price tag
  • Screen with exceptional color reproduction capabilities (100% coverage of sRGB and 96% of DCI-P3)
  • Uses the most of the GTX 1050, while keeping it cool enough
  • Backlit keyboard
  • PWM-adjustment is not particularly harmful to the eyesight (our Health-Guard profile eliminates this completely)
  • NVMe SSD support

Cons

  • Mediocre contrast ratio and poor viewing angles
  • Plastic design
  • Short battery life

HP EliteBook Folio G1 review – the elite of ultraportables

$
0
0

The Folio G1 was introduced a while ago but it’s still a trending device and it’s not hard to see why. This ultraportable fellow is a worthy representative of the EliteBook lineup with sleek all-aluminum design, incredibly light and thin, completely silent and doesn’t compromise with the keyboard and the touchpad. Surely such a small chassis must come with some challenges but has the Folio G1 found a way to overcome them?

HP’s business solution for the elites comes with a small aluminum chassis measuring just 12.4 mm in height and tipping the scale right under 1 kg (980 g to be exact). Since there’s no room for a conventional cooling solution, HP has stuck with the Core m5-6Y54 mobile SoC and has sacrificed some I/O along the way. This might be an inconvenience for most users so prepare to spend a few extra bucks on a decent USB-C Thunderbolt dongle to expand your connectivity options. The 12.5-inch display ensures a good multimedia experience while the keyboard and touchpad work well on the go. But what about battery life? With a small 38Wh unit, you can’t really expect ground-breaking results but they are more than enough to keep things going for quite a while. The thin and light design always takes its share, though, especially when you have a passive cooling solution in the mix.

HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
View more laptops...

Contents

Retail package

The notebook comes in a small luxurious black box containing all the usual user manuals and AC adapter. Unfortunately, since the laptop has only two USB-C Thunderbolt ports, you cannot plug in your peripherals unless you carry a dongle. It would have been nice on HP’s behalf to at least provide a standard USB-C to USB-A adapter.

Design and construction

As we stated earlier, the EliteBook Folio G1 impresses with premium and portable design. The ultrabook sports anodized aluminum for the base and the lid, chrome-colored metal hinges and the only plastic you’d find around the bezels and even there, HP has used soft-touch matte finish making it feel even more sophisticated.

The appears to be very rigid and doesn’t give in too much under pressure. When pressed at the back, ripples don’t appear on the LCD screen while the material seems to be resistant to torsion as well. The small metal hinges provide smooth linear travel up to one point but then both hands are needed to fully open the device. This should prevent excessive rocking of the screen when in an unstable environment. Speaking of the display, the side bezels are delightfully thin and the upper one is reasonably big to make room for the IR camera and the webcam as the former is used for the Windows Hello feature. The bottom of the laptop is made of the same anodized aluminum and since the device uses a passive cooling solution, the only grills are for the loudspeakers.

The chamfered sides contrast to the whole metallic finish of the device but probably due to some design limitations, there are only three ports – one 3.5 mm audio jack on the left and two USB-C Thunderbolt ports on the right. But keep in mind that one of them is used for charging the device so when stationary, the ultrabook provides only one connector and without a dongle to expand the I/O, it’s pretty much useless. As all small ultrabooks, the Folio G1 suffers from the same issue – not enough I/O.

Opening the notebook reveals the same anodized aluminum finish for the interior so this means that fingerprints and smudges aren’t visible while the area is pretty stable and resistant to pressure. There’s only one spot – between the spacebar and the touchpad – that appears to be slightly flexible but nothing to worry about during normal use. As for the keyboard, it feels surprisingly deep and each keystroke results in satisfying clicky feedback. More often than not, we see thin ultrabooks lacking the comfortable typing experience but as you can see, the Folio G1 is one of those exceptions here. The clickpad has smooth gliding surface, offers deep and stable mouse clicks but somehow lacks responsiveness from time to time. It’s not that big of an issue but it’s there. You can feel it.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

As expected, the device doesn’t come with dedicated service lids so you have to remove the whole bottom cover in order to access the internals.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

As most ultrabooks, the Folio G1 comes with just one M.2 SSD slot and the unit we reviewed featured a Micron M.2 SATA SSD with 256GB capacity.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 256GB Micron M.2 SATA SSD Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

The memory chips are soldered to the motherboard and can’t be upgraded or changed. The configuration we’ve tested had 8GB of DDR3L-1866 memory.

Other components

The Wi-Fi card is placed near the huge heatsink and it’s Intel 8260D2W.

The battery takes up most of the internal space and it’s rated at just 38Wh.

Cooling system

Obviously, the cooling system is passive because the SoC allows it to be. You see the huge copper heatsink placed on top of the SoC in the image below.

Display quality

The EliteBook Folio G1 comes with a well-known Full HD (1920×1080) 12.5-inch IPS panel from AU Optronics with model number B125HAN02.2 (AUO226D). The screen offers 176 ppi, 0.144 x 0.144 mm pixel pitch and can be considered as “Retina” from at least 50 cm.

The display has excellent viewing angles.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of 310 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 291 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 15% maximum deviation in the lower left corner. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a bit warmer than it should be – 6300K and remains pretty much the same when we go along the grayscale – 6180K. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (73% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for multimedia, office work and web browsing, a deviation of 3.1 in the lower left corner of the screen can be overlooked. The contrast ratio is high – 1100:1 before calibration and 1090:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

As to be expected, the display covers just 56% of the sRGB color space.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 19 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.

You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Fortunately, we didn’t detect any PWM across all brightness levels so it should be safe to use in this regard.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

Overall, the display quality is good – high contrast, high maximum brightness and doesn’t use PWM for regulating screen brightness. However, the limited sRGB coverage doesn’t allow us to give the display an excellent score.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP EliteBook Folio G1 configurations with 12.5″ AUO B125HAN02.2 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is surprisingly good given the size of the body. The loudspeakers provide clarity in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

HP EliteBook Folio G1 technical specifications table

Acer
$1470.64
from Amazon
Display
12.5”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot
RAM
8GB
Dimensions
292 x 209 x 12.4 mm (11.50" x 8.23" x 0.49")
Weight
1.00 kg (2.2 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3, Power Delivery (PD), DisplayPort, HDMI
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac (2x2)
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack
Features
  • Web camera 720p HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone Dual-Array Microphone
  • Speakers 4x Bang & Olufsen speakers
  • Security Lock slot

HP EliteBook Folio G1 configurations

HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
View more laptops...

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from HP’s official support page.

Battery

Although this tiny fellow sports a rather small 38Wh battery, the endurance is quite impressive probably thanks to the small 12.5-inch display and the energy-efficient mobile SoC, the Core m5-6Y54. In fact, the battery performance of this thing is better than most devices we’ve tested with a passive cooling solution.

All tests, of course, are done using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

38Wh, 4-cell
$1470.64
price
563 min.
battery
52Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
461 min.-18.1%
764 min.+35.7%
$538-63%
545 min.-3.2%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
38Wh, 4-cell
$1470.64
price
500 min.
battery
52Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
475 min.-5%
$538-63%
353 min.-29.4%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
38Wh, 4-cell
$1470.64
price
257 min.
battery
52Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
256 min.-0.4%
$538-63%
200 min.-22.2%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core M5-6Y54

intel core mThe Core m5-6Y54 CPU is part of the Skylake generation processors and it’s part of the very power efficient SoCs from the m lineup. Due to its extremely low TDP, which can be adjusted from 3.5W up to 7W, but normally being 4.5W, the SoC can be integrated into passively cooled 2-in-1 devices, ultrabooks or tablets. The processor incorporates two cores supporting the crucial Hyper-Threading technology ticking at 1.1 GHz and can go up to 2.7 GHz for one active core and 2.7 GHz for two active cores. It’s manufactured using the latest 14nm FinFET process.

Normally the CPU can reach the core i5-6200U CPU in some short synthetic benchmark tests, but since the CPU is heavily temperature dependent, during prolonged usage the SoC won’t be able to keep up. So its performance relies quite a lot on the passive cooling system of the device.

The SoC also integrates Intel’s HD Graphics 515 GPU, codenamed GT2, with 24 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at 300 MHz and can go up to 900 MHz. Anyway, the whole SoC, including the GPU and memory controller (dual-channel LPDDR3-1866/DDR3L-1600), is rated at 4.5W TDP but it can be lowered down to 3.5W or raised as much as 7W but that’s up to the OEM that builds the machine.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-m5-6y54/

$1470.64
price
244.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1470.64
price
4887.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1470.64
price
22.39
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

HP EliteBook Folio G1 CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the HP EliteBook Folio G1 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which HP EliteBook Folio G1 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$877.7
price
236
performance
$7481.53+752%
258+1.5%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$877.7
price
192
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$877.7
price
28.51
performance
$1470.64+68%
32.27+2.4%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 515

intel_hd_graphicsNormally, the Intel HD Graphics 515 can be found on the latest Core m Skylake SoCs but it’s considered as a low-end iGPU. It represents the GT2 variants of the Skylake iGPUs and features 24 of the so-called EUs (Execution Units). They are clocked at 300 MHz and can go up to 1000 MHz but that depends on the CPU model.

Intel claims about 40% better performance than the last HD Graphics 5300 (Broadwell) generation GPUs, but that is strongly dependent on the CPU model and the TDP so statistics may vary. However, there are some notable features that come along with the HD Graphics 515 like H.265/HEVC fully hardware decoded and supports outputs like DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 and HDMI 1.4a. The GPU can handle up to three displays connected simultaneously.

The power consumption of the whole SoC may vary, but most of the time it’s 4.5W. Nevertheless, it can go down to 3.5W or go up to 7W. These numbers include the CPU, iGPU and the memory controller.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU:

$1470.64
price
572.00
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1470.64
price
198.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1470.64
price
178.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$1470.64
price
0.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Temperatures

The two-stage stress test that we run on all machines we test can’t be considered as a real-life usage scenario but it does give us a good idea of the overall cooling performance and stability of the system in the long run.

We started with one hour of CPU stress testing and the Intel Core m5-6Y54 was able to run at its maximum operating frequency of around 2.3 – 2.4 GHz for a short period of time, then slowly went down to 1.6 GHz and staying there for good. This suggests of a good implementation of the SoC with the passive cooling solution.

Of course, after we turned on the GPU stress test, the CPU’s frequency dropped to 700 MHz. This ensures better iGPU performance when both chips handle heavy workload together at the same time.

Temperatures on the surface appeared to be quite normal with the only a bit warm spot being the upper center of the keyboard where the heat from the SoC is dispersed.

37.0°
44.2°
38.6°
38.8°
37.5°
36.1°
39.3°
33.0°
33.4°

Verdict

Excellently built 12-inch ultrabook with the usual trade-offs for an ultra-portable device while still being relatively well-priced. It has a generally good display (the sRGB coverage holds it back), good input devices and extra long battery life. All the essential features for a business-centric machine.

However, like most ultra-portable 12-inch device, the EliteBook Folio G1 comes with some deal-breaking trade-offs. Firstly, the performance of the mobile SoC might not be enough for everyone, although it should do just fine for office work and general web browsing. Secondly, the rather limited I/O needs to be considered, especially if you are coming from a bigger notebook. Still, thanks to the pair of USB-C ports supporting Thunderbolt 3, the expandability is quite big but with dongles, of course.

HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
HP EliteBook Folio G1
Not available
View more laptops...

Pros

  • Portable, lightweight and sturdy design
  • Good keyboard and touchpad
  • Good IPS display with high brightness and high contrast
  • The display doesn’t use PWM
  • Two USB-C Thunderbolt 3 connectors
  • Long battery life

Cons

  • Color-deficient display
  • Only two USB-C connectors

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 review – modern business device with a great legacy behind it

$
0
0

Recently we showed you a laptop that is an attempt by a company to combine the rigidity of the past with modern looks – the ThinkPad E480. Today we are looking at essentially the same shell but in larger form factor – the 15.6-inch Lenovo ThinkPad E580. Lenovo is well known for its super sturdy ThinkPad products, dating all the way back to the IBM age. But modern times need modern methods. The old square body is not that appealing anymore. In an era of super thin MacBooks and even slimmer Dell XPS business devices, the ThinkPad series would be doomed if they didn’t change something. Okay, you are thinking why would we talk about MacBooks and XPSes when the ThinkPad E580 starts at $630. Well, because this device offers all that you need.

First of all, the CPU line-up of this model is on point – ultra-low-voltage and super powerful Core i5-8250 and Core i7-8550U. Lenovo also provides the option of a dedicated Radeon RX 550 graphics card, although our review unit features only the integrated HD Graphics 620U. And one more time we want to emphasize that this model tries to offer everything you actually need in the business segment (like a fast SSD with NVMe support, for example).

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/lenovo-thinkpad-e580/

Contents

Specs Sheet

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 technical specifications table

Acer
Not available
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
369 x 252 x 19.95 mm (14.53" x 9.92" x 0.79")
Weight
2.10 kg (4.6 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Sleep and Charge
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 2.0
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Power Delivery (PD), DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI 1.4b
  • Card reader microSD (SD/SDHC/SDXC)
  • Ethernet lan Gigabit Ethernet
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
Features
  • Web camera HD 720p, fixed focus
  • Microphone Dual-Array Microphone
  • Speakers 2x 2W
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

What’s in the box?

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 was accompanied by a 65W charging adapter as well as a bag, containing some manuals and set up guides. We have to prise Lenovo for using two huge foam pieces to protect the precious laptop from eventual kicks or drops during transportation.

Design and construction

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 has a plastic design following strictly the ThinkPad model. It possesses more of a simple look, rather than being eye-catchy, but hey, the logo in the corner is 3D and the dot of the “i” letter glows red when you turn the device on. Nice details, Lenovo. This device is neither the thinnest nor the lightest but the shape is appealing to business customers. It measures at 369 x 252 x 19.95 mm (14.53″ x 9.92″ x 0.79″) and weighs 2.10 kg (4.6 lbs). Expectedly, the plastic material on top is a huge magnet for fingerprints.

When you open the lid (the use of two hands is mandatory), you see a full-size keyboard, thankfully. It features adequately positioned arrow keys that spill from the usual rectangular shape of the keyboard down to the palm rest area just a little. Appart from being large enough, keys have good travel and feel super clicky which we really liked. However, the decision to switch the places of the “ctrl” and “fn” buttons left us confused. So often we found ourselves mixing them that it got kind of annoying. However, there is a setting in the BIOS that enables you to swap one for the other.

Anyhow, as usual for a ThinkPad, you can see the distinctive red “joystick” and mouse buttons on top of the touchpad, while there are also two embedded into the touchpad itself. Speaking of it, it has Windows Precision drivers and works fast and responsively. It’s not the best on the market but is actually very good for a business device. On the right, just above the ThinkPad logo (the dot of “i” letter glows again) is the location of the fingerprint reader.

No matter how much you turn the device around you won’t be able to easily find the heat exhaust vents. That’s because they are hidden right at the connection between the body and the lid. This means that the sides are reserved only for I/O. On the left side, we are happy to see that a USB 3.1 Type-C port is used to charge the notebook. It also supports DisplayPort output. Next, we have an HDMI connector as well as two USB 3.0 Type-A ports, one of which is Always On enabled. Lastly, we got the 3.5 mm combo jack. On the other side, there are just the Ethernet connector, one USB 2.0 Type-A port, and a Micro SD card reader.

Disassembly and maintenance

It is fairly easy to get inside the Lenovo ThinkPad E580 because you are 9 screws away from its guts. Once you unscrew them and carefully pry open the bottom panel, you are going to see a pretty regular package.

The Intel Core i5-8250U is cooled by a single heatpipe, while the heat is blown out by a medium sized fan. It’s not super effective, but given the ULV nature of the CPU, you won’t need more.

Very close to the CPU is where two RAM DIMMs are located. They support up to 32 GB of DDR4 memory and as you can see in our case one of them is free. On the right, you can see the tiny Intel made Wi-Fi adapter.

Further down you can see the 45Wh battery with its three-cell clearly visible through the black protective material.

Here you can see a fast PCIe NVMe SSD actually manufactured by Lenovo themselves. It bears a model number of LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA and has a capacity of 256 GB. We weren’t able to find a lot of information about it on the Internet but you can check the Read and Write speeds we tested in the “Storage performance” part of this review. However, keep in mind that it’s common for storage devices to be region dependent so don’t be mad at your retailer if the unit you receive lacks this specific drive.

Display quality

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 has a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with 15.6-inch diagonal, a pixel density of 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. The panel has a model number NV156FHM-N49 and can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles on this device are excellent.

We recorded a peak brightness of 276 nits in the center of the screen and 261 nits as an average across the surface. The maximum deviation is 16% in the bottom right corner. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness and white screen is 6000K – just a tad warmer than the sRGB standard of 6500K. The image gets even warmer along the grey scale – 5850K. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (71% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. The contrast ratio of this display is very good – 1300:1 (1140:1 after calibration)

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

This display is able to reproduce only 50% of the sRGB color gamut, meaning that image will neither be very saturated, nor vibrant.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and the other way around.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 33 ms – far from the fastest on the market, but okay for an IPS panel.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Our tools were able to detect PWM adjustment at all brightness levels except the maximum one. However, the frequency of the pulsations was high enough, so they are not that harmful.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

The screen fit on Lenovo ThinkPad E580 suits the business nature of the device perfectly. As expected from an IPS panel, it has good viewing angles at superb contrast ratio. While default settings are adequate, there are some setbacks. One of them is the modest color coverage and another one is the unacceptably high deviation of luminance in the lower right corner. There is also a presence of PWM in all brightness levels, except the maximum. And although those pulsations are with very high frequency, you can completely eliminate this threat by installing or Health-Guard profile.

Buy our profiles

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 configurations with 15.6″ NV156FHM-N49 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Lenovo ThinkPad E580’s sound is loud and clear. The low and mid frequencies have some deviations, while the highs are good.

Software

Our unit of Lenovo ThinkPad E580 came with a 64-bit version of Windows 10 onboard, hence all drivers and Lenovo bloatware were preinstalled. However, if you need them in case of reinstall you can find them here: https://pcsupport.lenovo.com/bg/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/thinkpad-edge-laptops/thinkpad-e480-type-20kn-20kq/downloads/ds501931

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. As we said earlier, this unit is equipped with a 45Wh battery, which at first glance may not sound a lot but it gave exceptional results. It got us through 9 hours and 36 minutes of web browsing and 8 hours and 25 minutes of video playback. However, you can only get around two hours of gaming, although we doubt you are going to do so away from the plug.

CPU – Intel Core i5-8250U

The Core i5-8250U is one of the first (along with the Core i7-8550U from the same generation) ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from Intel to feature not two but four cores. It’s part of the 8th Generation (Kaby Lake Refresh) and on contrary to the previous generations, the Turbo Boost range is pretty wide now.

The base frequency is 1.6 GHz and can go up to 3.4 GHz for a short period of time before stabilizing somewhere in between during continues loads. This also means that the single-core performance is really good. The rest of the features and specs, however, remain mostly the same with support for dual-channel DDR4-2400/LPDDR3-2133 memory, 14nm FinFET manufacturing process and the same integrated graphics chip, although re-branded now as Intel UHD Graphics 620.

The whole SoC along with the dual-channel memory is rated at 15W TDP but depending on the usage scenario, cooling capabilities and the configured TDP from the OEM, the TDP can vary from 7.5W up to 25W.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

GPU – Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel UHD Graphics 620 is a refresh of the HD Graphics 620 found as an integrated solution in many ULV Kaby Lake processors. UHD Graphics 620 is codenamed “Kaby Lake R U GT2” and it’s a part of the Gen 9.5 generation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 has roughly the same performance as HD Graphics 620, depending on the other components in the system. UHD Graphics 620’s performance is similar to AMD Radeon R5 M420X and NVIDIA GeForce 910M/920M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Gameplay recordings with Intel UHD Graphics 620

Storage performance

Lenovo put its own in-house Lenovo AM6671 M.2 2280 256GB NVMe PCIe SSD. This unit achieved up to 1774.0 MB/s Read speeds and 1041.2 MB/s Write speeds, which is impressive, but normal for an NVMe device.

Gaming tests

Despite the bravery of the Intel HD Graphics 620 inside this business notebook, it didn’t impress us at all. Still, you can turn down the resolution and also give up some good looking textures if you really want to play titles such as CS:GO and DOTA 2. However, GTA V is terra incognita for this device.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 35 fps 23 fps – fps
Min FPS 4 fps – fps – fps

DOTA 2 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings)
Average FPS 57 fps 28 fps – fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 27 fps – fps – fps
Min FPS 12 fps – fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 in the configuration we use is equipped with Intel Core i5-8250U, which in this case idles at 37C. It started well at 2.5 – 2.6 GHz until around the end of the first measurement frequencies slumped to 1.9 GHz. This coincided with the CPU package reaching 74C. The single fan on this device remained relatively quiet even when temperatures forced the frequencies to drop.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

After that for the whole remaining period of the second checkpoint clock speeds were stable at around 2.0 GHz, while temperatures were in the range between 60 and 64C.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

Until the end of the test, we saw some fluctuations in the frequencies of the cores from 2.0 to 1.9 GHz and back again. Although from the 7th minute they established at 2.0 GHz for the rest of the torture. Temperature-wise, a little gradual increase to 69C at the end. We are satisfied with this result as this temperature is a pretty stable one, especially at these extreme conditions. This means that even if you render a video on this laptop, you won’t get it to sweat at all.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

We want to note that the Lenovo ThinkPad E580 wasn’t loud at all, even when 15 minutes of Prime95 torture have passed. Surface temperatures were highest in the top left corner at 42C, while the hottest part of the keyboard area was in the middle. However, this will not be a problem as in regular use rarely saw ThinkPad E580 heating up and moreover, the palm rest area remained super cool at all times.

42.1°C
40.0°C
32.5°C
32.4°C
37.1°C
26.9°C
22.6°C
22.8°C
21.2°C

Verdict

Business laptops aren’t meant just to stay in the office and be connected to a couple of monitors or a dock, or whatever. They are meant to be taken to meetings, in the plane, at home or even at the coffee shop. They are defined by versatility and the best in the class are good all-rounders. Not only that but a business device represents its owner, hence it has to give a sense of authority. Although build solely from plastic, the Lenovo ThinkPad E580 is sturdy enough to give a feel of reliability, and the ThinkPad signature makes it recognizable. However, when we talk about style, we would be happier if we saw an aluminum body as in the case of Acer Swift 3, for example.

Performance-wise, we were impressed by the capabilities of this notebook. There was not a single time that the system lagged or failed to perform swiftly. This is mainly thanks to the Core i5-8250U processor and Lenovo’s in-house PCIe NVMe SSD, which boasts about 4 times faster Read and 2 times faster Write speeds than a casual SSD. Moreover, we noticed that in raw benchmarks and in some games this computer is able to get everything from its ultra-low-voltage CPU.

An area in which ThinkPads are usually strong is input devices. The keyboard has a perfect design for typing with fast feedback, long enough travel and relatively large key size. However, if you are not familiar with the series you’ll need a couple of days adjusting to the switch of the “function” and “control” keys.

Earlier we said that a perfect business device should be a perfect all-rounder. Well, the ThinkPad E580 is capable of almost everything. You can even enjoy some light gaming if you opt for the dedicated Radeon RX 550 GPU. Also, you can enjoy a long enough battery life thanks to the 45Wh battery and ULV processor. Lenovo promises around 13 hours of battery life, which is possible only if you turn on the computer and not use it at all. What we got was around 9 hours and a half of web surfing, 8 hours and a half of video playback and just under two hours of gaming, which is a very good result still. This is a huge improvement over last year’s ThinkPad E570.

Finally, we got the screen. Lenovo used an IPS panel but to cut costs even further they used a budget one. This results in only 50% coverage of sRGB color gamut and PWM used for all brightness levels except the maximum. However, latter can be fixed with our Health-Guard profile. All in all, there is nothing else we can really complain about and moreover, we definitely recommend this business device.

Pros

  • Super fast and responsive device
  • Very good input devices
  • Supreme contrast and viewing angles
  • Supports M.2 PCIe NVMe/SATA SSDs
  • Well calculated cooling
  • Very good battery life

Cons

  • PWM is used to regulate screen brightness (fixed by our Health-Guard profile)
  • Poor color reproduction

ASUS ZenBook Flip 15 (UX561UD) review – a versatile and universal solution

$
0
0

A 15-inch laptop for multimedia, 360-degree rotatable hinge, has great battery life and it’s conditionally suitable for gaming? Well, thanks to Intel’s new processors and NVIDIA’s undemanding but still powerful discrete GPUs, everything is possible. We once thought Lenovo’s Yoga notebooks are a great breakthrough in the industry and we are witnessing another big leap forward.

ASUS’ ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD notebook aims to be a universal solution and in the past, this has always been tied with considerable trade-offs along the way. Not anymore, though. Packing a powerful, yet efficient Intel Core i7-8550U processor, gaming-ready NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 GPU on board, crisp Full HD IPS display and at least 8GB of DDR4-2400 memory, the device seems to be ready for everything you throw at it. In addition, the ZenBook Flip 15 sports an all-aluminum chassis, 360-degree rotatable hinge and comfortable input devices for all the users out there who are looking for a reasonable office assistant. However, the notebook costs considerably more than its direct competitor – Acer’s Nitro 5 Spin so is it really worth it, especially when there’s a GeForce MX150 configuration that falls into the same price category as the latter? We find out in the full review below.

Contents

Retail package

The laptop comes in a rather big box containing all the usual user manuals, AC adapter, power cord and a carrying bag.

Design and construction

The ZenBook Flip 15 features a sleek all-aluminum body with anodized finish. Fingerprints are rather visible but easy to clean. The device feels relatively light in the hand and sturdy at the same time except for the interior. Pressing the middle section between the hinges results in visible and noticeable bending, although this shouldn’t affect day to day use.

The sides feature chamfered edges giving the device the familiar ZenBook appearance and somehow a more sophisticated look. We didn’t’ find any inconsistencies, protruding edges or design flaws along the way. Moreover, the hinges are probably one of the best we’ve seen on a convertible, especially with a 15-inch screen. They do feel a bit stiff when opening the machine and requires both hands but ASUS was able to almost fully eliminate the sway of the lid when using the touchscreen in normal laptop mode.

Speaking of the screen, our only small complaint would be the bezels – the upper and lower bezels appear to be just a tad thicker to our taste but the side ones are just fine. They will also make the device more comfortable to hold in tablet mode. In any case, in terms of portability, the notebook is still a 15-incher and if 2.1 kg and 21 mm thickness, don’t suit you, then you should probably stick with the 14 and 13-inch convertibles.

Input devices and I/O

We were pleasantly surprised by the buttery-smooth clickpad that not only feels great but does its job perfectly. All gestures, swipes and clicks are registered so if you are on the go, the external mouse won’t be needed. Pretty much the same goes for the keyboard. It has a standard layout with along with the Numpad block. The key travel is decent and each keystroke is accompanied by prominent clicky feedback – ideal for typing.

Another big surprise is the range of I/O the ZenBook Flip 15 offers – along with the usual connectors, you can take advantage of the USB-C 3.1 port supporting the latest Thunderbolt 3 standard for speedy data transfer or you can use it as a display output. Anyway, the port distribution is concentrated on the right side where you can find the full-sized HDMI, two USB 3.0 ports, an SD card reader and the 3.5 mm audio jack. On the right, you can see the power button, volume rocker and USB-C 3.1 connector that we mentioned earlier. And since this is a relatively powerful setup, the need for a dedicated exhaust vent is significant so ASUS placed it on the left.

Disassembly, maintenance and upgrade options

To access the internals, you have to remove the bottom plate. This requires all screws to be removed and then gently pry up the plate.

Storage upgrades – 2.5-inch HDD/SSD, M.2 SSD

The device supports 2.5-inch drives and M.2 SSDs but our unit came with just the M.2 SSD installed. Be aware that some units ship with SATA SSDs instead of PCIe NVMe which is a bit of a letdown considering the price point.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
M.2 SSD 2280 slot 1 512GB Micron M.2 SATA SSD Buy from Amazon.com
2.5-inch HDD/SSD slot Free Buy from Amazon.com

RAM

The notebook sports just one RAM slot, which in our case is occupied by an 8GB DDR4-2400 chip. You can go up to 16GB if you like.

Slot Unit Upgrade price
Slot 1 8GB DDR4-2400 SK Hynix Buy from Amazon.com

Other components

The battery is placed under the wrist rest area and it’s rated at 52Wh.

Cooling system

The cooling design is simple, yet effective. It consists of two fans and two heatpipes (one big and one small) each connecting both heatsinks and the fans.

Display quality

The ZenBook Flip 15 UX561 comes with a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS touchscreen manufactured by Innolus N156HCE-EN1. With a 15.6-icnh diagonal, the screen offers 142 ppi, 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch and can be considered as “Retina” from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are good.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of just 286 cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 265 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 16% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a bit colder than it should be – 6920K and remains the same as we go along the grayscale. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (70% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the laptop is going to be used mostly for office work, web browsing and multimedia, a deviation of 4.25 in the lower right corner is somehow acceptable. The contrast ratio is high – 1240:1 before calibration and 1020:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

The display covers 94% of the sRGB color space.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 cd/m2 luminance and sRGB gamma mode.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

We’ve detected PWM only below 74 cd/m2 and at really high frequency so even if you have sensitive eyes, keeping the slider above 30% won’t fatigue you.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The presented IPS display offers wide viewing angles, high contrast, wide sRGB coverage and doesn’t use PWM (above 30%) for regulating screen brightness. It’s suitable not only for work but for multimedia too. The maximum brightness combined with the glossy finish might get in the way when using the device outdoors but won’t be an issue most of the time.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS ZenBook Flip 15 configurations with 15.6″ Innolux N156HCE-EN1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound quality is good – there are no noticeable distortions in the low, mid and high frequencies.

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

ASUS ZenBook Flip 15 (UX561UD) technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
512GB M.2 SATA SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
364 x 246 x 21.3 mm (14.33" x 9.69" x 0.84")
Weight
2.00 kg (4.4 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

ASUS ZenBook Flip 15 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

The notebook comes with a generous 52Wh battery that appears to be more than enough to support the Full HD IPS display and the Core i7-8550U processor when working away from the plug. It scored impressive runtimes on the web browsing and video playback tests putting to shame most of the 15-inch laptops we’ve tested so far.

All battery tests are run with the usual settings – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

price
600 min.
battery
$999
712 min.+18.7%
$1285
833 min.+38.8%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
452 min.
battery
$999
456 min.+0.9%
$1285
523 min.+15.7%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
187 min.
battery
$999
175 min.-6.4%
$1285
131 min.-29.9%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-8550u/

Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (2GB GDDR5)

The GeForce GTX 1050 GPU for laptops is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs featuring a brand new architecture design but on contrary to the rest of the GPUs from NVIDIA’s lineup, the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti feature a Samsung-made FinFET 14nm chip instead of the TSMC 16nm found in the GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. The graphics card is based on the GP107 chip paired with 2GB of GDDR5 memory via 128-bit interface.

Since the GTX 1050 is quite dependent on the cooling design, its performance may vary but if the laptop handles the GPU well and shouldn’t be much different from its desktop counterpart. Anyway, the GPU operates at relatively high frequencies (1354 – 1493 MHz) but incorporates the same amount of CUDA cores (640) while the memory is clocked at 7000 MHz (effective). These specs ensure a huge performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. For instance, the GTX 1050 performs better than the GTX 960M and can be compared to the GTX 965M’s capabilities while running at similar to the GTX 960M’s TDP of around 40-50W.

However, along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, improved H.265 encoding, and decoding.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this GPU: http://laptopmedia.com/video-card/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-2gb-gddr5/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 114 fps 52 fps 29 fps

rise-of-the-tomb-raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 64 fps 44 fps 15 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 29 fps 24 fps 19 fps

Verdict

A great 15-inch all-rounder that can be used for work, multimedia and even casual gaming from time to time thanks to its rather powerful GeForce GTX 1050 GPU on board. What’s not to like? Well, just like every product out there, it has its quirks, although they are far from being considered as deal-breakers.

The ZenBook Flip 15 carries the usual all-aluminum sturdy and elegant build like most ZenBooks, it features excellent input devices for flawless working experience on the go and a sleek and portable design to impress. This, however, hasn’t limited the ZenBook Flip 15’s performance or endurance by any means. In fact, the 15-inch device easily overtakes some of the 14-inch and 13-inch devices in terms of battery life.

The display is also one of its strongest suits. It delivers excellent image quality and doesn’t use PWM below 30% brightness making it safe to use in this regard. The only issue with the panel is the glossy finish combined with not so great maximum brightness. It will pose an issue to users spending much of their time outdoors. And finally, beware of units with M.2 SATA SSDs instead of PCIe NVMe drives. The latter should be a standard for such highly-priced device.

So is it worth it? Most definitely yes but make sure to check out the Acer Nitro 5 Spin as well because it delivers similar but not better overall experience for way less. The performance is on par.

Pros

  • Sturdy and high-quality build
  • Portable despite the 15-inch footprint
  • Excellent keyboard and touchpad
  • Great screen
  • No PWM above 30% brightness
  • Long battery life
  • Pretty powerful despite its size

Cons

  • Some units ship with M.2 SATA SSD instead of PCIe NVMe drives
  • Glossy finish and slightly below average maximum brightness make it hard to use outdoors

Dell Inspiron 11 3179 review – ultra-budget 2-in-1 – is it worth it?!

$
0
0


Today we are looking at a cute little 11-inch convertible. It is suitable for students and young people in need of a tiny versatile device to keep track of everyday stuff, have their multimedia content with them and even do some work. It is powered by a mobile System-on-a-Chip by Intel – Core m3-7Y30, which comes together with the HD Graphics 615, while consuming only 7W. The laptop is sold in a bright gamma of colors, appealing to the sub-18 target group.

We hope that with this review we can help you make a choice of whether this laptop will be sufficient for your needs or you have to turn your attention to something else – probably standalone tablet. We look forward to seeing where Dell has made compromises to cut down the costs and whether the Inspiron 11 3179 is going to be a bank for the buck, or it’s going to prove that the Intel m series are not yet where they’d like to be.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/dell-inspiron-11-3179/

Contents

Specs Sheet

Dell Inspiron 11 3179 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
11.6”, HD (1366 x 768), TN
HDD/SSD
128GB SATA SSD
RAM
4GB DDR3L, 1600 MHz
Dimensions
292 x 202 x 22 mm (11.50" x 7.95" x 0.87")
Weight
1.35 kg (3 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 2x USB Type-A 2.0
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • Card reader microSD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 720p HD
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 2x 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

What’s in the box?

The retail package is nothing spectacular. Expectedly, it featured only the laptop itself, charging adapter and some manuals and set-up guides.

Design and construction

Inspiron 11 3179 has a little plastic body which, while being far from sexy, has some charm in it. Due to the 11.6-inch form factor the device looks bulky and also feels kind of heavy, which doesn’t give the best feel, especially combined with the round plastic panels. However, we should keep in mind the price of the laptop so we are okay to close our eyes here. The white baby measures at 292 x 202 x 22 mm (11.50″ x 7.95″ x 0.87″) and weighs 1.35 kg (3 lbs).

We turn our heads to the hinges of this unit. They certainly have the strength to hold the device in “Tent” mode. Its screen has some bend to it but it’s nothing too much. Also, the screen is protected by some kind of glass surface, which also enhances the touchscreen features. A thing we really liked in this 2-in-1 is actually the accuracy and low latency of touch inputs.

Next, we look at the keyboard and touchpad respectively. The latter is clicky but has a very short travel which is more inherent to a detachable keyboard, than to a dedicated one, especially with that much space beneath it. However, it is fast and when you get used to it, it is really pleasant to type on. On the other hand, the touchpad feels very good but has a bit slow acceleration. This, of course, can be adjusted by Windows’ software. Here on top we also found a long but narrow grill, hiding two speakers.

As every other 2-in-1 device, the Inspiron 11 3179 has tiny legs on the upper surface, intended to lift the notebook up, when in tablet mode. Also typical is the location of the power button and the volume rockers. The I/O here is simple and straightforward – charging plug, HDMI and USB 3.0 Type-A ports, accompanied by a micro SD card slot on the left. And on the right are located two USB 2.0 Type-A ports and a 3.5 mm jack.

One flaw in the design we noticed was that when used in “tablet” mode, the lid doesn’t go flat to the bottom surface of the device, hence there is a little wobble every time you type on the touchscreen. On the other side, there are some sensors that disable the touchpad and the keyboard via software when the lid goes past a certain point.

Disassembly and upgrade options

To remove the bottom cover of the Inspiron 11 3179 you need to remove 9 Phillips head screws, one (in the middle) of which is hiding under a cap that is easily removed with pinches. Once you peek inside, you can see both a tight package and more surprisingly a SATA SSD drive made by Samsung and bearing a model number PM871b.

As you can see about one-third of the area inside the laptop is taken by the two cells of its 32Wh battery.

On the next image, you can see the passive cooling of the Core m3-7Y30, which is actually a metal plank that dissipates the heat from the CPU. You are going to see in the “Temperature” section of this review if this type of cooling is sufficient enough.

It is kind of strange that the company opted for a SATA SSD interface, which takes around 3-4 times more space than an M.2 slot. The difference looks dramatic when you look at the tiny Wi-Fi adapter that Dell has put in this device.

Display quality

The display used in Dell Inspiron 11 3179 is a touchscreen one with TN panel with a model number AUO B116XTB01.0 and resolution of 1366 x 768. It has a pixel pitch of 0.188 x 0.188 mm and a pixel density of 135 ppi. This makes the screen “Retina” when viewed from further than 64 cm, which is kind of too far away for an 11.6-inch device.

Sadly viewing angles are terrible, which is unacceptable for a 2-in-1 laptop.

The peak brightness we recorded was of 237 nits in the center of the screen and 222 nits as an average across the surface with a maximum deviation of 16%, which is quite high. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is 7570K – colder than the sRGB standard of 6500K. Further along the grayscale, color temperature becomes colder and rather bluish – 15000K. However, this can be fixed by installing our profiles. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (42% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. We measured a mediocre contrast ratio of 480:1 (380:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Dell Inspiron 11 3179’s display keeps up the bad work, showing less than half of the colors on the Internet.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 18 ms – not a very bad result.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

This display doesn’t use PWM across all brightness levels, thus being comfortable for extended periods of use, without being an excessive burden to your eyes.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

Without being too harsh on Dell Inspiron 11 3179’s display, probably the only positive about it is the fast panel. All the other parameters of this screen are not up to date. Starting with the unacceptable for convertible device viewing angles and adding to that some poor color accuracy and coverage of merely half of the colors in sRGB. In addition to that the resolution is again too low, but keep in mind that this is a budget device and some sacrifices had to be made to keep the price low. However, there is one more plus to this screen – it doesn’t use PWM to adjust its brightness.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package are meant for Dell Inspiron 11 3179 configurations with 11.6″ AUO105C (HD, 1366 x 768) TN screen and the laptop can be found here: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

For a mobile device, Inspiron 11 3179 has a good sound with clear mid and high tones. However, the low range of frequencies have some deviations.

Software

Dell Inspiron 11 3179 is equipped with a 64-bit version of Windows 10 Home edition. All drivers and Dell features come included in the package, but if you ever intend to reinstall your operating system, you can find the necessary drivers here: http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/inspiron-11-3179-2-in-1-laptop/drivers

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting turned and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 cd/m2. We were impressed by the 32Wh battery on our Inspiron 11 3179. It got us through 9 hours and 20 minutes of web browsing and around 6 hours and 50 minutes of video playback and despite you are hardly going to game on this device, it will last you for almost 2 hours and 50 minutes.

32Wh, 2-cell
price
563 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
$499.99
356 min.-36.8%
$538
545 min.-3.2%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
32Wh, 2-cell
price
409 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
$499.99
444 min.+8.6%
$538
353 min.-13.7%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
32Wh, 2-cell
price
167 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
$499.99
181 min.+8.4%
$538
200 min.+19.8%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

Storage performance

Dell Inspiron 11 3179 is equipped with the mainstream 128GB Samsung PM871b SATA SSD. It scored very good for its price – 547.2 MB/s in Read performance and 519 MB/s in Write, although the scores and the SSD itself may differ, depending on the region you live in.

CPU – Intel Core m3-7Y30

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 chip is a two core/four thread SoC implementation, and the most budget oriented from all of the ultra low powered Core m line up. It ticks at 1.00 GHz base clock speeds, and can go up to 2.60 GHz on demand with the Turbo Boost technology. It can be found in all kinds of portable devices like light laptops, 2-in-1’s and some tablets. Its main advantage is the very low power demand of 7 W for the entire package, which includes the GPU.

Speaking of GPU, the Core m3-7Y30 is equipped with an HD Graphics 615 video controller, which has a base frequency of 300 MHz and a maximum one of 900 MHz. It also supports 4K video output. The chip also supports up to 16 GB of LPDDR3/DDR3L memory with maximum clock speeds of 1866 MHz and 1600 MHz respectively.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

price
186.00
performance
$499.99
163.00-1.6%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
4436.00
performance
$499.99
4326.00-0.2%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
price
20.95
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 615

Intel’s HD Graphics 615 is a low-end integrated graphics unit found in Y-series Kaby Lake processors. It incorporates 24 EUs (Execution Units) like all GT2 units and can be clocked at up to 1050 MHz while the base frequency is 300 MHz. With these specs, the chip is integrated into KBL-Y processors rated at 4.5W TDP, including the memory controller.

Since the iGPU is using the same architecture as before, the most noticeable feature would be the full hardware acceleration of the H.265/HEVC Main10 and Google’s VP9 codecs. With this, Intel aims to improve the overall energy efficiency and performance of the iGPU.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

price
542.00
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
price
194.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
price
138.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

Well, obviously this is not a gaming device. It couldn’t even run CS:GO with 768p and low eye candy at decent framerate, so you have to settle with less demanding titles… like Minesweeper or Solitaire for example.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 26 fps – fps – fps
Min FPS 5 fps – fps – fps

DOTA 2 HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Normal (Check settings) HD 768p, High (Check settings)
Average FPS 31 fps – fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

First, we want to start by mentioning that this package draws only 7W of power combined for the CPU and GPU. The base frequency of the Core m3-7Y30 is 1.0 GHz, while it can reach up to 2.6 GHz in Turbo mode. Our particular unit was idling at around 39°C, which skyrocketed to 90°C for just a few seconds under 100% load. This resulted in the clock speeds dropping all the way from 2.4 GHz at the beginning of the test, to 1.3 GHz after no more than 20 seconds and then up a little bit to at 1.4 GHz. Temperatures also plummeted to around 70°C.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

By the time the second minute passed, the frequencies had gone up to 1.5 GHz territory, while the temperatures gradually went up to 81°C.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

At the end of the stress test, we noticed a drop to 1.1-1.2 GHz, which is just shy over the base frequency of this CPU. However we should note that this device is passively cooled and lacks a fan, thus it is completely silent. This led to an average temperature for the entire period of the test of 80°C, even at 1.1 GHz at the end of it.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

Dell Inspiron 11 3179 kept adequate surface temperatures, the hottest being on the top right side and also heating up a little bit the keyboard area, but nothing dramatic. What we didn’t like was that the hottest part of this laptop was its bottom, where it reached more than 50°C – perfect for a medium-rare steak.

43.9°C
39.9°C
32.5°C
42.8°C
39.0°C
32.0°C
30.1°C
26.6°C
26.6°C

Verdict

This 11.6-inch 2-in-1 provides everything that a casual user would need. It’s fast and reliable, although it won’t be the first choice in certain departments. Actually, in many cases you won’t be impressed by the Inspiron 11 3179. First of all – build quality. It looks good and shiny, especially in a white dress but when you take in account that Dell used only plastic, the picture starts to get less rosy. All the bright and shine of the surface is going to disappear in no time, as it is super scratchable.

We also didn’t like that one of the most important areas of a 2-in-1 screen is overlooked like this… It doesn’t matter the low price tag if you put a crappy screen on it where the lack of PWM and the adequate touchscreen sensor are the only positive about it. By using a TN panel, Dell robs its users of utilizing the full potential of a convertible device, confining them to a very shallow point of view. It also fails to reproduce more than half of the colors found on the Internet and HD television. Furthermore, it has a super cold color temperature, although you can fix that by installing our profiles.

Another thing we have mixed feelings with are the input devices. While the touchpad feels accurate and responsive enough, we found the keyboard to be a little uncomfortable due to the super short travel – a little too short for a profile this thick. However, after some time of getting used to, it felt normal.

What impressed us most about this little piece of hardware is actually the battery life we got. With more than 9 hours of web browsing time and almost 7 hours of video playback, the Inspiron 11 3179 is going to be the perfect companion for students. You can use it to take notes, share videos with friends and show your presentations, while still having some juice left at the end of the day to watch your favorite TV series.

Although we were not very nice to the Dell Inspiron 11 3179, don’t get us wrong. We enjoyed our time with this little guy as it provides very snappy performance and is super portable. Of course, you have options with far better displays, which are also stylus enabled, like the Acer Switch 3 but they are equipped with an eMMC drive, instead of a dedicated SSD.

Pros

  • Fairly low price
  • The display is not PWM-adjusted at all brightness levels
  • Adequate touchscreen and touchpad experience
  • Good battery life
  • Completely silent

Cons

  • Lack of M.2 slot
  • Poor display quality with bad viewing angles
  • Cheap build materials

HP EliteBook 850 G5 review – feature-loaded business device with minor flaws

$
0
0


HP is one of the persistent brands found in the business segment. Today we are looking at a device that is more on the premium side, both with its price and with its claims. Actually, we reviewed its predecessor last year and were left with mixed feelings. At first glance, this unit lives up to the promise of great build quality and sleek design, aiming directly at Apple’s MacBooks. In addition to that, this year HP added a touch sensitive IPS panel as an option.

Moreover, HP is bragging about the docking capabilities of the EliteBook 850 G5. There are a lot of capable laptops in this segment, although HP’s EliteBook 850 G5 takes a little different approach and it addresses multimedia too. It will also be interesting to see how the new RX 540 GPU by AMD fares against the older one, which was burdened with AMD’s former blemishes. Without further ado, let’s see if the performance matches the premium looks of this high-priced piece of hardware.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/hp-elitebook-850-g5/

Contents

Specs Sheet

HP EliteBook 850 G5 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
512GB SSD NVMe
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
16 GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
370 x 252 x 18.3 mm (14.57" x 9.92" x 0.72")
Weight
1.78 kg (3.9 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Sleep and Charge
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI 1.4b
  • Card reader
  • Ethernet lan Gigabit Ethernet
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac (2x2)
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
  • Smart card reader
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera HD 720p
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone 3 multi array microphone
  • Speakers Bang & Olufsen stereo speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot
  • Spill-resistant keyboard with drain
  • Ambient light sensor

Configurations

What’s in the box?

The device is neatly protected by large foam pieces. Somewhere inside the box are thrown the manuals and set up guides, and for the charger there is a separate compartment.

Design and construction

HP EliteBook 850 G5 features a very sleek design with a premium build quality at first glance. We suppose that the paint job on this device is very thick as our tools weren’t able to detect the aluminum, advertised by HP (although it really feels like aluminum). The 18.3 mm profile suits very well the 15.6-inch form factor and moreover, it is built like a tank. It measures at 370 x 252 x 18.3 mm (14.57″ x 9.92″ x 0.72″) and weighs 1.78 kg (3.9 lbs). As you can see from the image below, there is a strip in the upper part of the top panel, which is made of plastic and resembles the antenna for the SIM card.

With a lot of willpower, the lid can be opened with a single hand and moreover – it feels very durable with almost no bend when exposed to external forces. This is both due to the aluminum lid and the tempered glass placed on top of the touch screen panel. Opening it up, we can see bezels which are hiding the face recognition sensors, the Web camera and some microphones on the top and HP’s logo on the bottom.

Next, we look at the base of the HP EliteBook 850 G5, which is once again made from aluminum. The grill on top, seen in the picture below, conceals the Bang and Olufsen branded speakers – upward facing speakers are always good. However, there is a lot more happening beneath it.

First – the keyboard – it has a good tactile feedback and it’s good for typing, although the key travel is relatively short. However, what we don’t like is the placement of the “up” and “down” arrow keys – usual “setback” of HP devices. The keyboard also houses the mandatory for a business device (as seen on Latitudes and ThinkPads), joystick.

Then we move to the touchpad, which has dedicated buttons on top, which are meant for when you use the joystick and integrated buttons beneath the glass surface of the touchpad itself. It feels adequate enough and the keys are easy to recognize, despite the lack of visual designation. A feature that HP integrated inside the touchpad area is an NFC antenna. Speaking of input devices, we can’t miss the brilliant touch screen. Combined with the super fast Core i7-8550U it appears to be very accurate and responsive.

In addition to the good build quality, this device features a couple of biometric security features – a fingerprint reader, as well as a face recognition system. We found the first one to be super accurate, while not the fastest on the market. What we liked more, though, is the facial recognition, which is rarely found on a laptop. Recently we tested the Dell XPS 13 9370, which is also equipped with this feature. HP’s technology has a slight edge over the Dell counterpart, as the device unlocked every time we looked at it. However, if your head is pointing at the keyboard, it won’t recognize you at all.

Last but not least, the I/O, which has some interesting additions compared to cheaper devices. The left side of the EliteBook 850 G5 houses the hot air vent, as well as a single USB 3.0 Type-A port that supports charging when the device is turned off, and a Smart Card reader expansion slot. On the other side, you can see the charging connector, accompanied by a Thunderbolt 3 port. Following next we have the docking connector, an RJ-45 port, one HDMI 1.4b connector, as well as another USB 3.0 Type-A port and a 3.5 mm combo jack.

Disassembly and maintenance

HP has done a great job making the EliteBook 850 G5 easy to upgrade. While it lacks a service panel, and you have to take off the entire bottom plate, this can be done very easily. You need to remove all 10 Phillips head screws (two of them are located in black holes). After that, carefully lift the panel, and you’re there.

As you can see, the internals resemble a wide area with barely any free space left. First, we’re going to take a look at the battery. It has three cells and a capacity of 56Wh, which combined with the ULV chipset should result in good amounts of time away from the plug. Right above it are located both RAM DIMMs, which support 32 GB of DDR4 memory.

In the image below you can see the cooling solution HP opted to use for this notebook. While retaining almost the same cooling design as its predecessor it proves to be insufficient for the Radeon RX 540 configuration. This design has the major flaw of connecting the CPU and GPU on one heat transfer path which ruins the efficiency and makes GPU temperatures, in this case, extremely hard to manage.

Here you can see both wireless adapters – the left one (WWAN adapter) is optional and provides 4G connectivity via SIM card.

Next, we have the SSD slot, which in our case is occupied by the superfast 512GB Samsung PM981 NVMe drive. However, storage devices are region dependent so keep that in mind when looking for a laptop.

In the image above you can see one more interesting thing that HP introduced to its series – I/O connectors are modular, so if one breaks you can replace it with the same model super easily.

And last but not least, here is the design of the touchpad PCB, if you’ve never seen one. In this case, there is an NFC antenna right between the PCB and the glass on the other side.

Display quality

HP EliteBook 850 G5 in the configuration we tested is equipped with a Full HD IPS touch sensitive panel and bears a model number AUO B156HAN02.3. It has a diagonal of 15.6 inches and a resolution of 1920 x 1080, leading to a pixel pitch of 0.18 x 0.18 mm and a pixel density of 142 ppi, thus making it appear as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are comfortable.

We measured a peak brightness of 232 nits in the center of the screen and 225 nits as an average across the surface with 7% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is 6810K – a bit colder than the optimal 6500K in sRGB. However, further along the grey scale we get a slightly warmer image – 6710K. You can see how values change at 142 nits or in other words – 80% brightness.

Values above 4.0 are unwanted and should not be present. The contrast ratio is good – 1200:1 (1140:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Sadly, the panel we tested failed to suffice in this aspect, rendering only 54% of the sRGB color gamut.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. In the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

HP EliteBook 850 G5 does not use PWM to adjust its screen brightness at any level. This makes it comfortable to use for extended periods of time in this aspect.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

HP EliteBook 850 G5’s IPS display proved to be a sufficient business grade panel. The lack of PWM adjustment of the brightness and good contrast levels, combined with the excellent viewing angles make it very good for office work. However, the display is inappropriate for web designers as it has a very shallow color range and moreover, the colors are not that accurate, even though our Gaming and Web design profile, vastly improves that.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP EliteBook 850 G5 configurations with 15.6″ AUO B156HAN02.3 (Full HD, 1920 x 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

Although EliteBook 850 G5’s Bang & Olufsen speakers sound good, there are some deviations in the whole frequency range.

Software

HP installed all sorts of security features that you may or you may not need on your Windows 10 operating system. However, if you really need them and you have to reinstall your device, you can find them as well as all of the drivers you’re going to need here: https://support.hp.com/us-en/drivers/selfservice/hp-elitebook-850-g5-notebook-pc/18491276

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. EliteBook 850 G5’s 56Wh battery unit provided decent performance, enabling the user to browse the web for 10 hours and 50 minutes, watch movies for 9 hours and do some minor gaming for two hours and a quarter, although we doubt you are going to do the latter away from the wall.

56Wh, 3-cell
price
650 min.
battery
51Wh, Li-ion, 3-cell
$1029.49
660 min.+1.5%
68Wh, 4-cell
606 min.-6.8%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$870.31
324 min.-50.2%
300 min.-53.8%
76Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$2005.1
626 min.-3.7%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
56Wh, 3-cell
price
542 min.
battery
51Wh, Li-ion, 3-cell
$1029.49
677 min.+24.9%
68Wh, 4-cell
429 min.-20.8%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$870.31
260 min.-52%
427 min.-21.2%
76Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$2005.1
444 min.-18.1%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
56Wh, 3-cell
price
133 min.
battery
51Wh, Li-ion, 3-cell
$1029.49
198 min.+48.9%
68Wh, 4-cell
122 min.-8.3%
3220 mAh, 4-cell
$870.31
82 min.-38.3%
112 min.-15.8%
76Wh, Li-Ion, 4-cell
$2005.1
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

price
527.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
10561.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
price
9.63
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

HP EliteBook 850 G5 CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the HP EliteBook 850 G5 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which HP EliteBook 850 G5 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$1205.1
price
279
performance
$1617.74+34%
571+20.7%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1205.1
price
5437
performance
$1617.74+34%
12079+12%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1205.1
price
15.55
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – AMD Radeon RX 540 (2GB GDDR5)

AMD Radeon RX 540 is based on the Polaris architecture and consists of 8 CUs, 16 ROPs, 32 Texture Units and 512 Stream Processors. According to AMD it can go up to 1219 MHz on demand and comes in two variants – 2GB and 4GB GDDR5 memory.

Radeon RX 540’s memory works at 6000 MHz effective and is build on a 128-bit interface. The memory bandwidth is 96 GB/s. This graphics card supports DirectX 12.0, H264/H265/HEVC encoding and 4K on 60Hz via the HDMI port.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Storage performance

Our HP EliteBook 850 G5 review unit has got a Samsung PM981 NVMe drive with 512 GB storage. It is one of the fastest SSDs we ever tested with Read and Write speeds of 3382.7 MB/s and 2025.5 MB/s respectively.

Gaming tests

The Radeon RX 540, found on this particular laptop is not exactly a gaming graphics card, but it can provide you with some decent framerates at low resolution and eye-candy in GTA V. We also tried CS:GO and DOTA 2, but in both cases there was Vsync interrupting the whole time, thus we didn’t take the results in mind. As you can see, the framerate on GTA V may also be mistaken for Vsync driven result, but the case was not the same here. Those 60 fps are an overall average from all five scenes on the GTA V benchmark.

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD, Low (Check settings) HD, Medium (Check settings) HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 60 fps 29 fps – fps
Min FPS 22 fps 11 fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Let’s start with reminding you of the Base and Turbo frequencies of the Core i7-8550U, which are 1.8 GHz and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Our unit idled at 39°C but needed no more than 7 seconds to reach 83°C and slump the frequencies to 2.0 GHz. Although the first couple of seconds were optimistic as the frequency of the cores fluctuated between 2.5 and 3.5 GHz, we didn’t wait long until we saw a huge drop in clock speed.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

At the second checkpoint, the temperatures remained stable at around 63°C. Sadly, this didn’t mean frequencies were going to jump back at reasonable levels as they remained at 2.0 GHz.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

This trend continued up until the end of the test as the core clocks were ticking at 2.0 GHz, occasionally dropping down to 1.9 GHz, but still in the “no throttling” zone. The average temperature for the whole period of the torture was 64°C, which is reasonable.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

Next, we tested the Radeon RX 540 with our favorite FurMark stress test. We are not proud to say that our fears of the cooling not being sufficient enough for this hardware were justified. Even at the beginning of the torture test we noticed some fluctuations in the clock speeds, which by the way were far from the maximum boost clock of this GPU. Moreover, around the 3-minute mark, which coincided with the GPU reaching 67°C, clock speeds fell drastically down to around 250 MHz. This was the trend for the entire test, excluding a 1-minute adventure to the relatively normal 550-750 MHz just to go back to the same 250 MHz, until the end.

Although the inside temperatures were not that high, the thin profile and aluminum body resulted in high surface temperatures. Moreover, unlike other devices, the EliteBook 850 G5 was warm across the whole surface area, with crucial parts like the keyboard reaching more than 40°C. Still, this happened on a very rare occasion of extreme load. However, keep in mind that the fan likes to spin even at low loads but it’s very quiet.

43.1°C
45.1°C
43.8°C
41.2°C
44.4°C
40.6°C
33.6°C
32.4°C
32.7°C

Verdict

As with every device in this price range, we approached HP EliteBook 850 G5 with a lot of expectations. Although the device is very well built, it didn’t meet some essential requirements. Performance-wise, it falls behind some cheaper devices like the Dell Latitude 15 5590 and the ASUS VivoBook S15 (S510). However, the build quality of this notebook is exceptional. Being so thin and lightweight, while featuring an all aluminum body resembles a Macbook approach, hence we decided to put the latter in the comparison charts (just for fun).

We must note that the foundations built by its predecessor – HP EliteBook 850 G4 were not stable at all and HP had some time to think about what went wrong with it. First of all – display quality. This year we definitely saw an improvement over the mediocre TN panel. Now featuring an IPS display, the laptop lets you enjoy high contrast ratio, comfortable viewing angles but sadly, because of the use of a budget panel, the color range is poor as the screen displays only half of the colors found on the Internet. However, this is our only complaint as it doesn’t use PWM for brightness adjustment.

Again, among the strongest points of this year’s model is battery life with around 11 hours of web surfing and 9 hours of video playback with twice the core count. Moreover, the device is NVMe SSD enabled and our unit actually shipped with such, which makes a huge difference. We were really impressed by the input devices as well. A fast keyboard, adequate touchpad with glass surface and NFC antenna embedded in it and last but not least – optional touchscreen, which behaves very well. However, HP doesn’t specify if it’s stylus-enabled or not.

We left the setbacks at the end on purpose. This is because almost all of them can be ignored given the target group of this computer. First of all – the Core i7-8550U doesn’t perform at a decent level in the raw tests, although the device proved to be very snappy and didn’t lag for a second. Next, we have poor graphics card management, which makes it throttle too soon and with low temperature (we don’t know if this is going to be fixed in a future update). However, this happens under extreme conditions, which are unlikely to occur in the business segment.

Finally, we have to say that this device is inappropriate for web designers as color accuracy is not decent plus there is the aforesaid poor color range. However, if you need a fast, cool looking laptop, loaded with features and made specifically for docking – EliteBook 850 G5 is your laptop if you are ready to pay the heavy price tag, though.

Pros

  • Very good input devices
  • High contrast screen with comfortable viewing angles
  • Easy to get inside and upgrade
  • PWM-free across all brightness levels
  • Supports super fast NVMe storage
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Swift and seamless to work with
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Core i7-8550U underperforms in raw benchmarks
  • A bit pricey
  • GPU throttles heavily
  • Gets warm on the surface under heavy load
  • Mediocre color range

ASUS TUF FX504 review – member of the new gaming line up with Core i7-8750H

$
0
0

ASUS introduced a new line of gaming laptops. They call it “The Ultimate Force” or TUF and it’s aimed at both gamers and professionals. At the top of the line sits a model with the new 6-core Coffee Lake Core i7-8750H, which should make the 15.6-inch device a little workstation. Moreover, ASUS provides a choice of four different styles to suit you most. Given the GPU options, we can conclude that this is a more budget version of the premium ROG brand.

Of course, for the purpose of our review, we chose the Core i7-8750H version. Alongside it, there is a 4GB GeForce GTX 1050 (it is also sold with a GTX 1050 Ti), 8GB of DDR4-2666 MHz RAM and a hybrid HDD by Seagate. In the next couple of minutes, you are going to see how the new CPU fares against its predecessor and whether more cores mean better performance in games.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/asus-tuf-gaming-fx504/

Contents

Specs Sheet

ASUS TUF Gaming FX504 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
1TB SSHD, 5400 rpm
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2666 MHz
Dimensions
384 x 262 x 25.1 mm (15.12" x 10.31" x 0.99")
Weight
2.30 kg (5.1 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-A 2.0
  • HDMI 1.4
  • VGA
  • Card reader
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Dual-Band 2.4GHz / 5GHz)
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slotKensington Lock

Configurations

What’s in the box?

The first thing you see when you open the box is the device itself. Beneath it are the usual manuals and set up guides, as well as a disk with all drivers and features… We are wondering when manufacturers will start providing more adequate options for receiving your drivers out of the box, as this model lacks an optical drive. In addition to that, there are two compartments dedicated to the cable and the 120W charging unit.

Design and construction

As we said earlier, ASUS offers a couple of options for the design of TUF FX504. Well, to be more precise – those options refer mainly to the top panel and the base of the device. While the changes are minor as they offer a simple alteration of the color scheme, it can make a huge difference, making you more, let’s say, presentable if you use your laptop for work mostly. The TUF FX504 itself measures at 384 x 262 x 25.1 mm (15.12″ x 10.31″ x 0.99″) and weighs 2.3 kg (5.1 lbs) – nothing exceptional for this price range.

ASUS used solely plastic for the design of this device, which is a bold move, given the statements of “unprecedented reliability”. While the body of this laptop seems sturdy enough, the lid is a little bendy and is prone to scratches as well as fingerprints. However, it can be opened with only one hand.

Moving to the base of the TUF FX504, we see the same plastic material we found on the top, which imitates brushed aluminum. On the topmost, we see drills for some speakers with the power on/off button right next to them. Beneath them, you can see the full-sized backlit keyboard with designated WASD keys painted in even redder than the other ones. We like how ASUS has opted to pull down the arrow keys in order to preserve their size, which in our opinion is mandatory for a gaming device.

In addition to that, keystrokes feel a little bit soft, although the travel is long enough. Here, the company has not missed the opportunity to brag about the durability of their keys, which are rated at 20 million clicks. Next, we have the touchpad. No matter how much we wanted, we weren’t able to test it as we experienced problems with the drivers. We hope that newer versions of Windows won’t have that problem, or ASUS are going to address the issue soon enough. However, we are not sure whether the issue iss isolated to our unit only, so if you have an ASUS TUF FX504 device yourself, please leave a comment below.

Finally, we are going to look at the sides of the laptop. What we like here is that the right side is completely free of I/O ports at the expense of the other side. There we can see the charging plug, RJ-45, and HDMI connectors, as well as three USB Type-A ports of which two are 3.0 and one is 2.0. Lastly, we got the combo 3.5 mm audio jack. There is also one speaker on both sides of the ASUS TUF FX504.

Disassembly and maintenance

At first glance, ASUS TUF FX504 looks like it has a service panel. Don’t let them fool you, though. This is only a texture and you need to remove the whole bottom plate to access the internals. However, this is easy enough as you only have to deal with 11 screws.

As you can see, the manufacturer has used only two heat pipes to cool the GTX 1050 and the newest Core i7 by Intel. One of them is significantly larger than the other and is shared by both chips. This design is controversial, as it can be a two-edged sword. Its effectiveness drops significantly if you use a program that is both CPU and GPU-intensive. However, if you are playing a less CPU-intensive title the second fan will help cool the GPU as well.

Here you can see the two RAM DIMMs which support 32GB of DDR4 memory.

Next is the battery – a 48Wh unit with 3 cells.

In the image below are visible both storage connectors. One of them is an M.2 slot that supports NVMe SSDs while the other one is a SATA port, currently occupied by the Seagate FireCuda Hybrid HDD. It features 8GB NAND memory, serving as the cache to the 1TB Hard Drive.

Display quality

ASUS TUF FX504 in the configuration we tested is equipped with a Full HD IPS panel with a model number AUO B156HAN02.3. It has a diagonal of 15.6 inches and has a resolution of 1920 x 1080, leading to a pixel pitch of 0.18 x 0.18 mm and a pixel density of 142 ppi, thus making it appear as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are comfortable.

We measured a peak brightness of 242 nits in the center of the screen and 239 nits as an average across the surface with just 6% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature on white screen at maximum brightness is 6920K – a bit colder than the optimal 6500K in sRGB. However, along the grey scale we get a slightly warmer image – 6710K. You can see how values change at 142 nits or in other words – 57% brightness.

Values above 4.0 are unwanted and should not be present. The contrast ratio is excellent – 1480:1 (1460:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction to the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

ASUS TUF FX504’s display covers only 54% of the sRGB color gamut.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 27 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

This panel does not use PWM to set its brightness at any level. That means the screen is comfortable and less intrusive in this aspect even for extended periods of use.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

ASUS TUF FX504’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles and exceptional contrast ratio. Moreover, it doesn’t use PWM for brightness adjustment which makes it comfortable to work with. However, there is one slight setback – poor color reproduction. Despite the good contrast, this panel can display only half of the colors in the sRGB color space.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS TUF FX504 configurations with 15.6″ AUO B156HAN06.1 (Full HD, 1920 x 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

ASUS TUF FX504 has a good sound, although a little too quiet to our likings. However low, mid and high frequencies are free from deviations.

Drivers

In some regions ASUS TUF FX504 may come with no operating system installed so if you need to download all drivers and features separately, you can find them here: https://www.asus.com/us/Laptops/ASUS-TUF-Gaming-FX504/HelpDesk_Download/

However, we have to note that we had some problems with the touchpad driver, which should be fixed with the latest versions of Windows. This doesn’t mean you are going to have problems with it, though. Also, make sure to install the latest version of BIOS you can find in the ASUS’s website, as it fixes the problem of the underperforming Core i7-8750H.

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. ASUS TUF FX504 is equipped with a 3-cell 48Wh battery. Typically for a gaming laptop, it didn’t impress us with huge times on battery power but still – 4 hours and 20 minutes of web browsing, near 4 hours of video playback, and if you are enthusiastic enough to play games away from the plug – you have no more than 1 hour and 38 minutes.

48Wh, 3-cell
price
263 min.
battery
41Wh, 6-cell
262 min.-0.4%
350 min.+33.1%
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
375 min.+42.6%
396 min.+50.6%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
48Wh, 3-cell
price
233 min.
battery
41Wh, 6-cell
245 min.+5.2%
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
396 min.+70%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
48Wh, 3-cell
price
98 min.
battery
41Wh, 6-cell
33 min.-66.3%
3-cell, 4605 mAh, Li-ion
114 min.+16.3%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8750H

Intel Core i7-8750H is a direct successor to the Core i7-7700HQ. The new Coffee Lake processors feature six physical cores instead of the just four found on Kaby Lake CPUs. Moreover, the blue company was able to fit the extra two cores on the same 14nm architecture while maintaining a TDP of 45W. In terms of clock speeds, we have a slight drop in the base frequency from 2.8 GHz to 2.2 GHz but the Turbo one is 4.1 GHz (up from 3.8 GHz). This means around 50% better performance in theory and 9 MB of cache (vs 6 MB on Core i7-7700HQ). However, the new Core i7-8750H will be more cooling-dependent, due to the higher clock count and the wide range of Turbo speeds.

On the iGPU end, there are no particular changes as the Core i7-8750H retains the HD Graphics 630 cores with 350 MHz Base frequency and 1100 MHz maximum Dynamic frequency. The only difference is the support of OpenGL 4.5.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

price
1077.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
15197.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4GB GDDR5)

The GeForce GTX 1050 GPU for laptops is part of the latest NVIDIA Pascal lineup of GPUs featuring a brand new architecture design but on contrary to the rest of the GPUs from NVIDIA’s lineup, the GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti feature a Samsung-made FinFET 14nm chip instead of the TSMC 16nm found in the GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. The graphics card is based on the GP107 chip paired with 4GB of GDDR5 memory via a 128-bit interface.

Since the GTX 1050 is quite dependent on the cooling design, its performance may vary but if the laptop handles the GPU well and shouldn’t be much different from its desktop counterpart. Anyway, the GPU operates at relatively high frequencies (1354 – 1493 MHz) but incorporates the same amount of CUDA cores (640) while the memory is clocked at 7000 MHz (effective). These specs ensure a huge performance boost over the previous generation of Maxwell GPUs. For instance, the GTX 1050 performs better than the GTX 960M and can be compared to the GTX 965M’s capabilities while running at similar to the GTX 960M’s TDP of around 40-50W.

However, along with all the power consumption and performance improvements, the GPU now supports essential features like DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, HDR, improved H.265 encoding, and decoding.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

In our gaming tests, we saw a performance typical of a GeForce GTX 1050-equipped laptop. Even the most demanding titles remain playable at Full HD resolutions and low to medium settings. However, we know what you’re most interested in – did the Core i7-8750H offer any significant improvement over the Core i7-7700HQ. In simple words – no. As you may already know, very few games actually use the full power of your CPU. In our tests, we only noticed an improvement with GTA V, which is known for being CPU dependent. In order to get a full perspective of this, however, wait for a review of the laptop equipped with GTX 1080 along the Core i7-8750H, as the bottleneck factor will be in play.

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 121 fps 62 fps 38 fps
Min FPS 50 fps 37 fps 24 fps

Far Cry Primal Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 50 fps 44 fps 35 fps

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings) Full HD, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 39 fps 35 fps 31 fps
Min FPS 32 fps 29 fps 25 fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

As a reminder – Intel Core i7-8750H has a base frequency of 2.2 GHz and reaches up to 4.1 GHz on a single core (3.9 GHz on all six). Idle temperature was 44°C, although it reached 84°C in no time. However, clock speeds were fluctuating around 3.0 GHz for around 15-20 seconds and at the end of the first checkpoint, we noticed a drop to 2.1 GHz.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

In a few seconds, core clocks stabilized to 2.5 GHz with temperatures around 70°C, which continued to the whole second checkpoint.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

With the exclusion of a few drops and peaks, the frequencies remained around 2.4-2.5 GHz for the entire period of our torture test. Temperatures also maintained relatively adequate at around 75°C. However, we think that the cooling is having a hard time with the hexacore Core i7-8750H.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

In the GPU department stuff was crazy as the GeForce GTX 1050 went sky high with 1690 MHz as an average. This is strong 200 MHz more than what we saw on MSI GL62M, although at higher temperatures – 75°C at the end of the test.

As you know, to measure the surface temperatures we put the laptops we test to extreme loads. However, the readings we got from this device got us stunned. We literally didn’t expect the temperature in the middle of the keyboard to reach smoking hot 60.9°C. This is just not right. Moreover, we noticed that the body was heating up a little too much while playing. While not being too hot to touch, it won’t be very pleasant for extended periods of use, so we hope ASUS will come up with a solution.

48.7°C
54.3°C
50.3°C
37.3°C
60.9°C
44.1°C
33.8°C
27.2°C
29.0°C

Verdict

We think ASUS has made a step in the right direction with the first device of its new The Ultimate Force series. Obviously, it is more budget-oriented but that doesn’t stop it from using the new Intel flagship – Core i7-8750H. Comparing it to devices like MSI GL62M and Acer Aspire VX15, we see a typical trend. While it completely destroys the 4-core competition at raw CPU benchmarks, on the GPU side there is almost no difference at all.

Even the higher clock speeds of GeForce GTX 1050’s GPU didn’t help it stand out. Quite the opposite, actually. The only thing that went up were temperatures. In the gaming tests, there was hardly any difference, except in GTA V which, as we all know, is also CPU intensive. The difference was not as dramatic as in the benchmarks where Core i7-8750H had around 20% better scores. In GTA V, framerate was barely 5-10% higher. However, we have to say that the new Coffee Lake CPUs are going to be a lot better at rendering videos, for example.

Screen-wise, it’s good that ASUS provides three options of Full HD screens, although the most common would be the IPS one and the 120 Hz TN one. We have chosen the IPS screen but given the limited color coverage, the colors were a little too dull for a gaming device. Nothing like MSI’s amazing TN panels. However, its excellent contrast and lack of PWM-adjustment justifies the panel. Battery life was nothing extraordinary unless you would settle for around 4 hours and 20 minutes of web browsing and 4 hours of video playback. If you are so desperate to play games away from the plug – you get a solid hour and a half from the 48Wh battery.

As you can tell, we don’t find ASUS’s new TUF FX504 laptop to be, let’s say, special. Although it comes equipped with the Core i7-8750H, this brings some setbacks. Our particular unit (and we are sure this will be a major issue in the beginning) had problems with the CPU underperforming. In our benchmarks, we received results which were the same, if not worse, to the Core i7-7700HQ. However, this problem was fixed by downloading the latest BIOS version from ASUS website.

Pros

  • Reasonable price tag
  • The display has exceptional contrast and doesn’t use PWM to adjust screen brightness
  • Intel’s 8th Gen CPU onboard
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Choice of color scheme options
  • NVMe SSD support

Cons

  • Poor color coverage – just 54% of sRGB (for the IPS version)
  • Cheap design
  • Sub-par battery life
  • We had some software-related hardware issues

HP ProBook 440 G5 review – fast, affordable and portable

$
0
0

What we have in front of us today is the HP ProBook 440 G5. As its name suggests, it is aimed at professionals, either in a business or freelancers, so it promises to be reliable, secure and of course – productive. This one is the fourth consecutive device from the fifth generation ProBook 400 series that we got our hands on. We have previously reviewed the 3rd generation of this model – ProBook 440 G3, so you are going to see if the new device is worth the upgrade or it’s just the latest minor refreshment.

Our particular unit is equipped with an Intel Core i5-8250U processor, which offers a lot of power for an Ultra-Low voltage chip and also for a fraction of the price of the Core i7-8550U, so in some regions it would be the CPU of choice, giving the best performance/price ratio. Another interesting thing about this series is that every model looks the same, despite the size of it – in other words, the ProBook 440 G5 looks like a child to the ProBook 470 G5.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/hp-probook-440-g5/

Contents

Specs Sheet

HP ProBook 440 G5 technical specifications table Also known as 2SS92UT#ABA

Acer
-0%
Old price $538.38
$538.37
you save $0 (-0%)
from Amazon
Display
14.0”, HD (1366 x 768), TN
HDD/SSD
500GB, 7200 rpm
M.2 Slot
1 x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
4GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
336 x 238 x 20.0 / 21.5 mm (13.23" x 9.37" x 0.79")
Weight
1.63 kg (3.6 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2)
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • DVI
  • Card reader SD
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack headphone/microphone
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

Configurations

What’s in the box?

Inside the box, we found an HP ProBook 440 G5 (obviously), accompanied by a tiny 45W charging adapter and some boring manuals and set up guides.

Design and construction

As we said earlier, the ProBook 440 G5 is reminiscent of every other ProBook 400 G5 device – plastic outer shell, an aluminum area around the keyboard and lid that can be easily opened using only one hand. This one measures at 336 x 238 x 20.0 mm (13.23″ x 9.37″ x 0.79″) and can grow to 21.5 mm if it has the optional touchscreen display. The device can be considered as light with 1.63 kg (3.6 lbs) of weight.

On the inside, we have a good keyboard, once again similar to the larger devices, although it lacks the numeric keys, which is common for a device of this size. We still don’t like the layout of the arrow keys, as the up and down arrow are hugging on top of each other and are easily mistaken by feel. However, the touchpad is adequate and responsive, as our favorite fingerprint reader, which is fast and super reliable. On the top side of the keyboard, under a grill, are placed the speakers of this 14-inch ProBook.

Moving to the sides of the notebook we are, once again, met by an exhaust vent, USB 3.0 Type-A, a headphone jack and an SD card reader on the left, while on the right we have the charging port, RJ-45 connector, followed by a VGA and HDMI port, as well as two more USBs, one of which is a regular Type-A, while the other one is Power Delivery and DisplayPort enabled Type-C.

Disassembly and maintenance

As every other device in the ProBook series, the fifth generation of ProBook 440 also has two service doors, which lead to every upgradable part of the machine. They are held in place by a single Phillips head screw (contrary to the whole bottom panel held by torxes), and some clips.

In the next photo, the focus falls on the cooling solution, consisting of a single heat pipe and a fan, and the two RAM DIMMs of which only one is occupied in our unit by a 4 GB of DDR4 2133 MHz memory stick. Of course, there are options with 16 GB, and you can further expand up to 32 GB, if you need to.

You can see there is a lot of free space in our unit, since it lacks an SSD drive, although featuring an M.2 slot which supports PCIe NVMe devices, and a Bluetooth card.

Finally, you can see the storage device in use here. It is covered by a black protective plastic where HP was kind enough to provide instructions on how to remove it.

Display quality – FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS

The HP ProBook 440 G5 uses a Full HD (1920×1080) IPS panel with a model number AUO B140HAN02.1 (AUO213D). It offers 157 ppi and 0.161 x 0.161 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 55 cm.

Viewing angles are great on this device.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of 224 nits in the center of the screen and 209 nits as an average across the surface with 12% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a hair warmer than the optimal 6500K – 6340K and remains practically the same when we go along the grayscale – 6320K. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (81% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. The contrast ratio is very good – 1230:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

ProBook 440 G5’s display covers only 50% of the sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 (web/HDTV standard) in CIE1976.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 32 ms. The panel is slow which is typical of an IPS display.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

HP ProBook 440 G5’s display brightness is not PWM-adjusted throughout all brightness levels, rendering the screen suitable for extended periods of usage without harassing your eyesight in this aspect.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.
You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The Full HD IPS panel used in the HP ProBook 440 G5 is excellent, as it has an excellent contrast ratio, as well as comfortable viewing angles and adequate default settings. Another positive about this panel is that it doesn’t use PWM at all for controlling the levels of brightness. The only drawback we were able to find is the disability to display basically half of the colors of the sRGB color space.

Buy our profiles

HP ProBook 440 G5 configurations with 14.0″ AUO B140HAN02.1 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Display quality – HD (1366 x 768), TN

The HP ProBook 440 G5 also uses a TN (1366 х 768 ) panel with model number BOE BOE0697. It offers 112 ppi and 0.23 х 0.23 mm pixel pitch. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 80 cm.

The display has uncomfortable viewing angles. We offer images to evaluate the overall image quality.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of 235 nits in the center of the screen and 230 nits as an average across the surface with 10% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a tad colder than the optimal 6500K – 7070K and gets even colder when we go along the grayscale – 12000K. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (80% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. The contrast ratio is mediocre – 285:1 before calibration and 350:1 after calibration.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

ProBook 440 G5’s TN display covers only 49% of the sRGB/ITU-R BT.709 (web/HDTV standard) in CIE1976.

Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 15 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

HP ProBook 440 G5’s TN display is PWM-adjusted across all brightness levels. Fortunately, the frequency of the emitted light is relatively high (1 kHz) which reduces the negative impact to a certain extent.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.
You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The HP ProBook 440 G5’s TN display has a budget panel that is reliable and relatively fast.

Buy our profiles

HP ProBook 440 G5 configurations with 14.0″ BOE BOE0697 (HD, 1366 х 768) TN screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.
w
Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

HP ProBook 440 G5 sounds well enough, although it has some deviations in the low frequencies.

Drivers

This device is sold both with and without an operating system. If you get the option without an OS, or you need to reinstall your drivers, you can find them at the following location: https://support.hp.com/us-en/drivers/selfservice/hp-probook-440-g5-notebook-pc/17047134

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. The following results are from the HD display unit.

48Wh, 3-cell
$538.37
price
457 min.
battery
434 min.-5%
963 min.+110.7%
3-cell, 48Wh
500 min.+9.4%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
48Wh, 3-cell
$538.37
price
427 min.
battery
257 min.-39.8%
668 min.+56.4%
3-cell, 48Wh
400 min.-6.3%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
48Wh, 3-cell
$538.37
price
95 min.
battery
125 min.+31.6%
330 min.+247.4%
3-cell, 48Wh
191 min.+101.1%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i5-8250U

The Core i5-8250U is one of the first (along with the Core i7-8550U from the same generation) ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from Intel to feature not two but four cores. It’s part of the 8th Generation (Kaby Lake Refresh) and on contrary to the previous generations, the Turbo Boost range is pretty wide now.

The base frequency is 1.6 GHz and can go up to 3.4 GHz for a short period of time before stabilizing somewhere in between during continues loads. This also means that the single-core performance is really good. The rest of the features and specs, however, remain mostly the same with support for dual-channel DDR4-2400/LPDDR3-2133 memory, 14nm FinFET manufacturing process and the same integrated graphics chip, although re-branded now as Intel UHD Graphics 620.

The whole SoC along with the dual-channel memory is rated at 15W TDP but depending on the usage scenario, cooling capabilities and the configured TDP from the OEM, the TDP can vary from 7.5W up to 25W.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

$538.37
price
575.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
11496.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
10.33
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

HP ProBook 440 G5 CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the HP ProBook 440 G5 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which HP ProBook 440 G5 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$538.37
price
575
performance
$552.95+3%
258-22.4%
$963.76+79%
609+2.4%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
11368
performance
$552.95+3%
4997-11.5%
$963.76+79%
11626+0.5%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
10.54
performance
$552.95+3%
23.08+7.9%
$963.76+79%
10.18-0.2%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel UHD Graphics 620 is a refresh of the HD Graphics 620 found as an integrated solution in many ULV Kaby Lake processors. UHD Graphics 620 is codenamed “Kaby Lake R U GT2” and it’s a part of the Gen 9.5 generation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 has roughly the same performance as HD Graphics 620, depending on the other components in the system. UHD Graphics 620’s performance is similar to AMD Radeon R5 M420X and NVIDIA GeForce 910M/920M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

$538.37
price
939.00
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
242.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
173.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
0.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

HP ProBook 440 G5 GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the HP ProBook 440 G5 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which HP ProBook 440 G5 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$538.37
price
939
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
276
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
207
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$538.37
price
213
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Gaming tests

HP ProBook 440 G5 didn’t do very well in our gaming tests, as it underperformed due to the 4 GB of RAM. Anyhow, these results are completely forgivable, given that the device is definitely not meant for gaming.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 54 fps 35 fps 15 fps
Min FPS 7 fps 5 fps 1 fps

DOTA 2 HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Normal (Check settings) HD 768p, High (Check settings)
Average FPS 56 fps 29 fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

Intel Core i5-8250 in our unit was idling at around 35-36C, and while the maximum operating frequency under Turbo boost mode of this CPU is 3.4 GHz, this one started the test at 2.6 GHz and maintained it for the first 30 seconds. That was, of course, until the temperatures climbed to 73C.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

This dropped the clock speeds to 2.1 GHz and during the second period of our test, it briefly got to 2.2 GHz for a couple of times. However, the temperatures dropped to 66C at the end of this checkpoint.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

In the remaining minutes of the CPU stress test we saw the frequencies dropping even further to 2.0 GHz and in the end, it went down to 1.9 on some occasions. This resulted in an average of 2.06 GHz for the entire period of the torture and an average of 68C, which is a relatively low temperature, meaning that the CPU will have a longer lifespan than other devices.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

On the contrary to the internals, the surface of the ProBook 440 G5 got quite warm. Actually, a little warmer than we expected because of the low internal temperatures, but it still in the margin of reasonable, given the 14-inch form factor.

42.4°C
42.6°C
36.9°C
36.4°C
40.3°C
30.8°C
30.8°C
29.1°C
29.8°C

Verdict

We have already shown you detailed reviews of a couple members of the ProBook 400 G5 series. These were the ProBook 470 G5 and ProBook 450 G5 and if you have read them, you already know what to expect from the ProBook 450 G5. And exactly because of that we decided to test a configuration, which is more on the budget side.

A major feature that boosts this device’s rating is the ease of upgradability provided by the service panels on the bottom. In addition to the memory and storage devices, you also have access to the WiFi and Bluetooth modules. Moreover, this 14-incher has slots for both a SATA drive and an M.2 one, which supports NVMe SSDs.

HP ProBook 440 G5’s battery life is not the most exceptional on the market, although it is better than that of the Lenovo V330, for example. You get around 7 hours and a half of web browsing and 7 hours flat of video playback, which seems enough for a workday on battery power. In addition to that, there is an option with a Full HD IPS panel, which doesn’t use PWM at all but has poor color reproduction capabilities. However, the second, cheaper option, is a 768p TN panel which is terrible. You will definitely need our profiles since it uses PWM across all brightness levels.

Finally, we want to add that this device provides swift performance despite the price tag. However, we would recommend at least 8GB of memory and an SSD storage device. And you have to know that we experienced some problems with the touchpad of our unit. It worked properly only when you press your free hand against the base of the laptop. This leads us to think that the problem was related to the accidental touch rejection system. Tell us in the comments if you experienced the same problem as us.

Pros

  • IPS model is free of PWM
  • Swift performance at a reasonable price
  • Supports M.2 PCIe NVMe/SATA SSDs
  • Battery life is good
  • Offers simple upgradability of memory and storage via service lid

Cons

  • The TN variant uses PWM for adjusting screen brightness at all levels (fixable by our Health-Guard profile)
  • We had problems with the touchpad of our unit, which may or may not occur on other devices

Dell Latitude 15 3590 – improvement over last year’s fluke but not that significant

$
0
0

The Latitude 15 3590 is a budget business device manufactured by Dell. It is meant to cover the most important security features of the Latitude line up while keeping the costs low. This, according to Dell, makes it the perfect laptop for growing businesses and we are here to test that. Of course, when you want to keep the price down, you have to make compromises either with hardware, or other areas. Well, Dell did that in a reasonable manner.

The unit we are about to review has the agility of the Coffe Lake ULV chips – Core i5-8250U, to be precise. At the same time, it is equipped with a Full HD TN panel, which is a pity, given the fact that there are laptops in this price range which include an IPS one. Moreover, it lacks the distinctive joystick and dedicated mouse buttons. Nevertheless, we are sure that everyone doubts the point of this joystick anymore, so no love lost here. One of the most prominent features is actually the fact that you get a three-year Next-Business-Day warranty from Dell, wherever you are, which is extremely important if you use your laptop for work.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/dell-latitude-15-3590/

Contents

Specs Sheet

Dell Latitude 3590 technical specifications table

Acer
New
$981.78
from Amazon
Display
15.6”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), TN
HDD/SSD
256GB SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
8GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
380 x 258 x 22.7 mm (14.96" x 10.16" x 0.89")
Weight
2.02 kg (4.5 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Power Delivery (PD), DisplayPort
  • 2x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI
  • VGA
  • Card reader SD, SDHC, SDXC
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth
  • Audio jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers 2x 2W
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot
  • 2x RAM slots

Configurations

What’s in the box?

Inside the box, we found everything one needs to survive an apocalypse – a knife, cans of food and a Latitude. Joke aside, there was nothing interesting inside, except the laptop itself and the 65W charger.

Design and construction

When it comes to build quality, Latitude devices never disappoint. However, the materials used to build the Latitude 15 3590 are not exactly exquisite. Although the notebook looks and feels sturdy, it is prone to cracks and internal damage in eventual drops. In addition to that, the device is not the thinnest either with its 22.7mm profile. Its measurements are pretty standard for a 15.6-inch laptop – 380 x 258 x 22.7 (14.96″ x 10.15″ x 0.89″) and it weighs 2 kg (4.4 lbs).

Opening the lid is a tough job for a single hand, so the other one might be useful. The lid itself has a little bend to it but it is normal, considering the plastic material. Looking at the base of the Latitude 15 3590, you can see a refined simple design, which we really like. The keyboard is full-sized and illuminated.

In addition to that, it has a fast feedback, although the key travel is a bit short to our likings. Moving down, we see the touchpad which is nothing spectacular visually. However, it is super responsive and the keys are easy to locate and fast to respond.

Latitude 15 3590 sits on four rubber feet, which prevent it from staying flat on the surface. On the bottom, you can also see the vent for the fan and two small grills right in front of the front feet. They are intended for the stereo speakers

Last but not least – the I/O panel. First, we’ll take on the left side. Starting from back to forth, there is the power connector, accompanied by a USB Type-C which supports DisplayPort output. Next, we have an HDMI connector, as well as an RJ-45 one, followed by a USB 3.0 Type-A and a 3.5 mm combo jack. On the opposite side, things look easier – a VGA port, single USB 2.0 port and an SD card reader. It is here that the optional Micro-SIM card slot could be.

Disassembly and maintenance

Like every other Latitude, this one is easy to upgrade/clean. First, you need to unscrew the 10 Phillips head screws located on the bottom of the device. Keep in mind that they will stay on the panel after you unscrew them. Then you just need to pry the bottom plate up and you’re done. From the image below you can see the size of the hinges, which offer a very good support for the screen.

In the next image, you can see the cooling solution, which consists of a single heatpipe, a small heatsink, and a tiny little fan. The latter happens to like attention, so you are bound to hear a lot from it even at minor load. Right next to it are located the two RAM DIMMs, which support up to 32 GB of DDR4 memory.

Next, we show you a the 56Wh battery unit. As you can see, its four cells take more than a third of the space inside the laptop.

Finally, there is the M.2 SSD drive. It is located to the right of the battery and the label reads Micron 1100 SATA SSD 256 GB. However, the choice of SSDs is strongly dependent on the region so we cannot assure you that you’ll receive the same drive as we did. Moreover, the Latitude 15 3590 also supports the faster NVMe drives. In addition to that, there is a SATA connector for more storage, which you can find right next to the CPU cooler (visible on the pictures above).

Display quality

Dell Latitude 15 3590 is equipped with a Full HD (1920×1080) TN panel with 15.6-inch diagonal, pixel density of 142 ppi and 0.18 x 0.18 mm pixel pitch. The panel in use is the same as in last year’s Latitude 15 3580 – AUO B156HTN03.8. It can be considered as “Retina” when viewed from at least 60 cm.

Viewing angles are poor.

Sadly, the display is a bit dim with a peak brightness of 220 nits in the center of the screen and also 220 nits as an average across the surface. Maximum deviation is 7%. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness and white screen is 7000K – colder than the sRGB standard of 6500K. Things get even worse along the grey scale, where the color temperature reaches 15000K – cold, bluish light. You can see how these values change at 140 nits (61% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. The contrast ratio of this display is mediocre – 335:1 (325:1 after calibration)

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.
Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

Latitude 15 3590’s display struggles to reproduce only half of the colors in the sRGB color gamut.


Our “Design and Gaming” profile delivers optimal color temperature (6500K) at 140 nits luminance and sRGB gamma mode.
We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange, etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. On the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.
We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 15 ms – one of the good sides of TN panels

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes.
You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Thankfully, this panel doesn’t use PWM to modulate its brightness at any point, which is a prerequisite for comfortable use even for extended periods.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

Dell Latitude 15 3590 is only sold with TN panels of which this is the better one, being with a Full HD resolution. Despite the usual setbacks of a budget TN panel like the poor contrast, terrible viewing angles and lack of colors, there are some merits. These are the speed of the panel and the lack of PWM adjustment. Moreover, color accuracy drastically improves with the use of our Gaming and Web design profile.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for Dell Latitude 15 3590 configurations with 15.6″ AUO B156HTN03.8 (FHD, 1920 × 1080) TN screen and the laptop can be found at:

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

The sound emitted from Dell Latitude 15 3590’s speakers is on point with clear low, mid and high frequencies.

Software

Our unit had all drivers and Dell security features preinstalled with the 64-bit Windows 10 operating system. However, you can download everything you need if you happen to reinstall in the future here: http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/latitude-15-3590-laptop/drivers

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting turned and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. The 56Wh battery does a very good job, especially in web browsing, providing the laptop with enough power for 11 hours and 46 minutes – quite impressive. However, times fall down to 7 hours and 20 minutes when watching videos, and two hours and a half when playing away from the plug.

56Wh, 4-cell
$981.78
price
706 min.
battery
45Wh, 3-cell
56Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
679 min.-3.8%
48Wh, 4000 mAh
755 min.+6.9%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
56Wh, 4-cell
$981.78
price
439 min.
battery
45Wh, 3-cell
56Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
487 min.+10.9%
48Wh, 4000 mAh
452 min.+3%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
56Wh, 4-cell
$981.78
price
149 min.
battery
45Wh, 3-cell
56Wh, Li-Po, 4-cell
217 min.+45.6%
48Wh, 4000 mAh
258 min.+73.2%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i5-8250U

The Core i5-8250U is one of the first (along with the Core i7-8550U from the same generation) ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors from Intel to feature not two but four cores. It’s part of the 8th Generation (Kaby Lake Refresh) and on contrary to the previous generations, the Turbo Boost range is pretty wide now.

The base frequency is 1.6 GHz and can go up to 3.4 GHz for a short period of time before stabilizing somewhere in between during continues loads. This also means that the single-core performance is really good. The rest of the features and specs, however, remain mostly the same with support for dual-channel DDR4-2400/LPDDR3-2133 memory, 14nm FinFET manufacturing process and the same integrated graphics chip, although re-branded now as Intel UHD Graphics 620.

The whole SoC along with the dual-channel memory is rated at 15W TDP but depending on the usage scenario, cooling capabilities and the configured TDP from the OEM, the TDP can vary from 7.5W up to 25W.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

$981.78
price
630.00
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$981.78
price
12624.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$981.78
price
10.25
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

Dell Latitude 15 3590 CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the Dell Latitude 15 3590 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which Dell Latitude 15 3590 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$558.08
price
317
performance
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$558.08
price
6168
performance
$743.44+33%
12455+11.4%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$558.08
price
22.05
performance
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel UHD Graphics 620 is a refresh of the HD Graphics 620 found as an integrated solution in many ULV Kaby Lake processors. UHD Graphics 620 is codenamed “Kaby Lake R U GT2” and it’s a part of the Gen 9.5 generation.

Intel UHD Graphics 620 has roughly the same performance as HD Graphics 620, depending on the other components in the system. UHD Graphics 620’s performance is similar to AMD Radeon R5 M420X and NVIDIA GeForce 910M/920M.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

$981.78
price
971.00
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$981.78
price
274.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$981.78
price
202.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$981.78
price
226.00
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Dell Latitude 15 3590 GPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the GPUs that can be found in the Dell Latitude 15 3590 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which Dell Latitude 15 3590 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different GPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / GPU.

$558.08
price
865
performance
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$558.08
price
274
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$558.08
price
220
performance
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
$558.08
price
1085
performance
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Storage performance

Dell Latitude 3590 is equipped with a Micron 1100 SATA SSD that delivers Read and Write speeds of respectively 524.7 MB/s and 506.9 MB/s – result inherent to a SATA drive.

Gaming tests

Dell Latitude 15 3590 is obviously not a gaming notebook, so the results are nothing shocking. Lower the resolution, disable almost all eye-candy, and you can enjoy some not very demanding titles like CS:GO and DOTA 2 for example.

cs-go-benchmarks

CS:GO Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Medium (Check settings) Full HD, MAX (Check settings)
Average FPS 31 fps – fps – fps
Min FPS 4 fps – fps – fps

DOTA 2 Full HD, Low (Check settings) Full HD, Normal (Check settings) Full HD, High (Check settings)
Average FPS 55 fps 28 fps – fps

GTA-V-benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) HD 768p, Low (Check settings) HD 768p, Medium (Check settings) HD 768p, Very High (Check settings)
Average FPS 27 fps – fps – fps
Min FPS 15 fps – fps – fps

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

Dell Latitude 15 3590’s Core i5-8250U idled at stable 42C. When the test began, the CPU was able to maintain 3.2 GHz for a couple of seconds, when it fell to 3.0 GHz up until the 15-second mark when something weird happened. Out of nowhere, the temperature reached 97C and the frequencies fell down to around 500 MHz. It left us scratching our heads, but this means that the Latitude 15 3590 favors stability and responsiveness in system apps or manipulations of heavy files in programs like Adobe Photoshop.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

However, after the temperatures dropped down to 62C, the clock speeds started to return their strength and gently climbed back to 2.5 GHz at temperatures around 82C.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

Finally, as for the final part of the session, Intel Core i5-8250U’s clock speeds fell a little bit to 2.4 GHz. The average temperature for the entire torture was 84.5C, which is relatively high, but this was probably the most informative test, performance-wise. First, we have to note that when we ran the benchmarks we saw the first run to be the lowest one by a lot… every time. So now we know why – after around 10-15 seconds of near maximum performance, thermal throttling kicks in aggressively and cuts the balls of the CPU. After that, the system needs some time to come to itself before it starts to deliver again. And moreover, it comes back with higher clock speeds at the third benchmark than most of the competition equipped with Core i5-8250U.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

When we take surface temperatures into account, Latitude 15 3590 is one of the hotter business devices. While this is expectable due to the higher clock speeds and internal temperatures, it is not acceptable for a laptop in this segment. Although the chances are very low that you put 100% load on this device, it is still hotter than what we are used to.

42.2°C
47.2°C
33.3°C
43.8°C
47.4°C
32.1°C
30.7°C
29.7°C
28.0°C

Verdict

Dell had a lot of issues to register when building the Latitude 15 3590. The model it substitutes – Latitude 15 3580 had a lot of problems such as flimsy build quality, lack of M.2 slot and more. This is unacceptable in the battle of entry to mid-level business solutions. However, this year we are happy to say that Dell has not done a terrible job!

As we said earlier, they’ve included an M.2 SSD slot that supports NVMe drives – itself being a huge step forward. There is also a slight improvement in terms of build quality, while it is still not on point with the direct competition of the fresh Lenovo ThinkPad E580 and HP ProBook 450 G5. Actually, there are more things that Dell has done right with the Latitude 15 3590 but falls short of their opponents by just a hair. For example, the input devices feel okay but they still drag behind the beautiful ones found in the ThinkPad, in addition to the lack of dedicated touchpad buttons.

Sadly, they’ve opted to use the same awful TN panel as last year, while Lenovo uses an IPS panel for their ThinkPad E580. The only positive thing about it is the lack of PWM adjustment and fairly fast response times. However, there is another feature that Dell kept, and this time – in a good way. We are talking about the battery life, which will last you way beyond your workday.

Lastly, we can’t help but talk about the strange thermal management used for this laptop. While performance-wise, it delivers better than the ThinkPad E580 by a fair margin and also keeps higher frequencies during extended extreme workloads, it is weird how it bumps the clock speeds to 500 MHz after no more than 15 seconds. In addition to that, it keeps high overall temperatures and like last year’s model, the fan kicks in pretty frequently.

All in all, there are better options (like the ones we mentioned earlier), but if performance is all you care for, Latitude 15 3590 is the device for you. Also, we have to mention that warranty. In the following three years after purchasing, you can get your device serviced in less than 24 hours. Maybe they could have invested more in a better cooling?

Pros

  • The display is free of PWM
  • Good overall performance, despite the weird thermal management
  • Supports M.2 PCIe NVMe/SATA SSDs
  • Exceptional battery life during web browsing
  • Offers easy upgradability of memory and storage

Cons

  • Odd thermal management, resulting in high internal and external temperatures, and throttle at some places during heavy load
  • The fan kicks in on a lot of occasions and it is fairly loud
  • Poor display options
  • Plastic design with mediocre build quality

HP EliteBook 840 G5 review – exquisite build quality at exquisite price

$
0
0

Today we are going to take a look at a 14-inch member of HP’s more exquisite business solutions. We are talking about the HP EliteBook 840 G5. You can look at it as the more expensive version of the ProBook 440 G5. For the higher price you get better build quality, more security features and more goodies like the touchscreen and face recognition system.

This particular model comes with several 8th Gen Intel ULV chips to choose from. However, we picked a Core i7-8550U model equipped with a Radeon RX 540 (2GB) and 16 GB of RAM. Actually, the configuration is practically the same (except the screen size obviously) as the EliteBook 850 G5 we tested a couple of days ago. If you are into these type of devices, stay with us to see if the EliteBook 840 G5 suits you well enough.

You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System: http://laptopmedia.com/series/hp-elitebook-840-g5/

Contents

Specs Sheet

HP EliteBook 840 G5 technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
14.0”, Full HD (1920 x 1080), IPS
HDD/SSD
512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
M.2 Slot
1x 2280 PCIe NVMe M.2 slot See photo
RAM
16GB DDR4, 2400 MHz
Dimensions
326 x 234 x 17.9 mm (12.83" x 9.21" x 0.70")
Weight
1.48 kg (3.3 lbs)
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), Sleep and Charge
  • 1x USB Type-A 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, HDMI
  • HDMI 1.4b
  • Card reader
  • Ethernet lan Gigabit Ethernet
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac (2x2)
  • Bluetooth 4.2
  • Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack
  • Smart card reader
Features
  • Web camera HD 720p
  • Microphone 3 multi array microphone
  • Speakers Bang & Olufsen stereo speakers
  • Security Lock slot
  • Spill-resistant keyboard with drain
  • Ambient light sensor

Configurations

What’s in the box?

A lot of protection foam is in play inside the box. It surrounds the laptop while the 65W charging unit is placed in a separate compartment.

Design and construction

EliteBook 840 G5 features a high-quality design with aluminum as its main building material. In addition to that, the device feels sturdy and has some weight with its 1.61 kg (3.56 lbs) for the touch version and 1.48 kg (3.27 lbs) for the non-touch. Dimension-wise, it measures at 326 x 234 x 17.9 mm (12.83″ x 9.21″ x 0.70″), which makes it pretty thin.

You can easily open the lid with a single hand. After that, you are met by the glass-protected touch screen panel. On top of it are located the camera, a couple of microphones, as well as the face recognition sensors. As with the bigger model, this one has a pretty strong lid, which is relatively resistant to torsion loads.

Looking at the base, you can see the large speaker grill, housing Bang & Olufsen branded hardware. Underneath is located keyboard that lacks NumPad keys. However, it has a joystick and dedicated mouse buttons beneath. The keyboard is pleasant to type on as it has surprisingly long travel for a device this thin. In addition to that, the feedback is good enough and that leaves us only to mumble about the arrow keys design.

Below the keyboard is a beautiful, fast, and accurate touchpad. It has a glass cover that makes working with it a pleasure. Moreover, there is an NFC antenna embedded into it. On the right, you can see the second biometric security option – the fingerprint reader. It works fast enough and is very accurate. The face recognition sensor itself is fast and secure, but not as fast as the fingerprint.

Last but not least is the I/O. It comprises a single USB 3.0 Type-A with a charging function and a Smart Card reader on the left. They are joined by the hot air exhaust vent. On the other side, things seem more overcrowded. There is the charging port followed by a Thunderbolt 3 port (USB Type-C), a docking connector and an RJ-45 port. Next, we see an HDMI connector as well as another USB 3.0 Type-A port, and a 3.5 mm audio combo jack. There is also a SIM card slot if you are buying the LTE version of this laptop.

Disassembly and maintenance

As we mentioned in the review of the larger HP EliteBook 850 G5 – it is fairly easy to get inside these devices. A set of 8 screws and careful prying up keeps us away from the internals.

In the image below, you can see the cooling solution picked by HP. Sharing two heat pipes between the CPU and GPU already proved insufficient so we don’t expect better results from this device either.

Here are both RAM DIMMs which support up to 32GB DDR4-2400 MHz (2x16GB).

In the following picture, you can see the 512GB Samsung PM981 NVMe SSD. Generally, storage devices are region dependent so you may receive a different SSD from the one we received. It is here that you can also see one of the significant features of the EliteBook 800 series – the ability to change ports.

Last but not least, we got the 3-cell 50Wh battery which is held in place by 5 torx head screws.

Display quality

HP EliteBook 850 G5 in the configuration we tested is equipped with a Full HD IPS touch-sensitive panel with a model number Chi Mei CMN14D4 (N140HCA-EAC). It has a diagonal of 14.0 inches and a resolution of 1920 x 1080, leading to a pixel pitch of 0.16 x 0.16 mm and a pixel density of 157 ppi, thus making it appear as “Retina” when viewed from at least 56 cm.

Viewing angles are excellent.

We measured a peak brightness of 221 nits in the center of the screen and 212 nits as an average across the surface with 12% maximum deviation. The optimal correlated color temperature in sRGB is 6500K. This device goes very close with 6410K on a white screen and slightly warmer along the grey scale – 6370K. You can see how values change at 142 nits or in other words – 81% brightness.

Values above 4.0 are unwanted and should not be present. The contrast ratio is very good – 1220:1 (1150:1 after calibration).

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction to the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

HP EliteBook 840 G5 lacks punchiness in color as it covers only 53% of the sRGB color gamut.

We tested the accuracy of the display with 24 commonly used colors like light and dark human skin, blue sky, green grass, orange etc. You can check out the results at factory condition and also, with the “Design and Gaming” profile.

The next figure shows how well the display is able to reproduce really dark parts of an image, which is essential when watching movies or playing games in low ambient light.

The left side of the image represents the display with stock settings, while the right one is with the “Gaming and Web Design” profile activated. On the horizontal axis, you will find the grayscale and on the vertical axis – the luminance of the display. In the two graphs below you can easily check for yourself how your display handles the darkest nuances but keep in mind that this also depends on the settings of your current display, the calibration, the viewing angle and the surrounding light conditions.

Response time (Gaming capabilities)

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 26 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

The light emitted from this panel pulsates (uses PWM) up until 60 nits. Moreover, it does it with high enough frequency not to be exceptionally harmful to the eyes. Meaning that the display is comfortable for extended periods of use.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

Conclusion

Unsurprisingly, the situation is nearly identical with the larger – 15.6-inch model of the EliteBook 800 G5 series. Although panels from different manufacturers are used, both devices share the same pros and cons, screen-wise. Good contrast, comfortable viewing angles on the bright side – poor color reproduction and slightly presence of PWM – on the other. However, PWM is not aggressive and you can dismiss it completely with the help of our Health-Guard profile.

Buy our profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for HP EliteBook 840 G5 configurations with 14.0″ Chi Mei CMN14D4 (N140HCA-EAC (Full HD, 1920 x 1080) IPS screen and the laptop can be found at: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Sound

HP EliteBook 840 G5 has a crisp sound with clear low, mid and high frequencies.

Drivers

HP EliteBook 840 G5 comes with a 64-bit version of Windows 10, thus you get all drivers and security utilities preinstalled. However, if you ever need to reinstall you can find the drivers here: https://support.hp.com/us-en/drivers/selfservice/hp-elitebook-840-g5-notebook-pc/18491271

Battery

As always, the battery tests were run with Windows power saving setting turned and Wi-Fi turned on, and the screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits. Being equipped with a 50Wh battery and an Ultra-Low Voltage CPU suggests a good amount of time on battery power. We proved that right with around 11 hours of web browsing and 8 hours of video playback. However, if you are optimistic enough to play games away from the plug, it will set you at two hours flat.

50Wh, 3-cell
price
650 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
462 min.-28.9%
53.9 Wh, 4670 mAh, 6-cell
$899.91
571 min.-12.2%
678 min.+4.3%
56Wh, 3-cell
650 min.
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
50Wh, 3-cell
price
480 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
353 min.-26.5%
53.9 Wh, 4670 mAh, 6-cell
$899.91
548 min.+14.2%
692 min.+44.2%
56Wh, 3-cell
542 min.+12.9%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
50Wh, 3-cell
price
122 min.
battery
4670 mAh, 2-cell
158 min.+29.5%
53.9 Wh, 4670 mAh, 6-cell
$899.91
122 min.
111 min.-9%
56Wh, 3-cell
133 min.+9%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core i7-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is part of the new 8th Generation Kaby Lake Refresh and it’s a direct successor to the Intel Core i7-7500U from the Kaby Lake generation and the Intel Core i7-6500U from the 6th Skylake generation. With the latest alteration to the ULV (ultra-low voltage) processors, Intel doubles the core count from 2 to 4 and retaining the so-called Hyper-Threading technology, keeping the same 14nm manufacturing process and feature the same 15W TDP.

However, due to the core count change, the base frequency of the Core i7-8550U is lowered to only 1.8 GHz while Turbo Boost frequencies remain pretty high – somewhere between 3.7 – 4.0 GHz. This ensures considerably higher multi-core and single-core performance during short workloads before going back to more bearable frequencies considering the 15W TDP but most of the other specs and features remain the same.

The chip also incorporates a newer Intel Gen 9.5 integrated graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 620. The support for Google’s VP9 codec and H.265/HEVC Main 10 is still the most notable feature of the iGPU. Intel claims that the new UHD 620 chips improve the overall power consumption compared to the previous one.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

HP EliteBook 840 G5 CPU variants

Here you can see an approximate comparison between the CPUs that can be found in the HP EliteBook 840 G5 models on the market. This way you can decide for yourself which HP EliteBook 840 G5 model is the best bang for your buck.

Note: The chart shows the cheapest different CPU configurations so you should check what the other specifications of these laptops are by clicking on the laptop’s name / CPU.

$1111.27
price
284
performance
$1229.98+11%
504+15.5%
$1492.93+34%
531+17.4%
Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
$1111.27
price
5518
performance
$1492.93+34%
10158+8.4%
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
$1111.27
price
15.78
performance
$1229.98+11%
9.25-4.1%
$1492.93+34%
8.91-4.3%
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – AMD Radeon RX 540 (2GB GDDR5)

AMD Radeon RX 540 is based on the Polaris architecture and consists of 8 CUs, 16 ROPs, 32 Texture Units and 512 Stream Processors. According to AMD it can go up to 1219 MHz on demand and comes in two variants – 2GB and 4GB GDDR5 memory.

Radeon RX 540’s memory works at 6000 MHz effective and is build on a 128-bit interface. The memory bandwidth is 96 GB/s. This graphics card supports DirectX 12.0, H264/H265/HEVC encoding and 4K on 60Hz via the HDMI port.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Storage performance

As with the larger model, EliteBook 840 G5 is equipped with a Samsung PM981 512GB NVMe SSD. While the model of the storage device may differ in some regions, we are pretty sure your unit is going to arrive with an NVMe drive. The model we tested was able to reach 3378.5 MB/s Read speeds and up to 2005.5 MB/s Write which is exceptional.

Gaming tests

If you are interested in some minor gaming, you won’t be disappointed by this device. Unfortunately, you can’t disable Vsync, so framerate will be locked. However, the EliteBook 840 G5 maintained solid 60 fps in GTA V with 768p resolution and lowest eye-candy. Moreover, 60 fps were reached in DOTA 2 with Full HD and low graphics settings without overloading the system which means there will be less noise from the fan.

Temperatures

The temperature tests go this way. We use Prime95 and FurMark to torture the CPU and the GPU respectively. This won’t give real-life representation but with our methodology, we try to give you the most optimal results.

The first values from the test are from the 30th second of running the Prime95 stress test, which simulates a heavy task run on your computer (usually lighter tasks take from a part of the second up to a couple of seconds). Next, we take the ones from the 2nd-minute mark, which imitates a very heavy task, run on the CPU. The last values we give you are the ones at the end of the test, which is 15 minutes, simulating the CPU load when rendering a video, for example.

0-15 min. CPU torture test

The 4-core 8-thread Intel Core i7-8550U was idling at 43°C. However, it reached 84°C in the first 10 seconds of torture, which bumped the frequencies from 3.2 GHz down to 1.8 – 1.9 GHz. As a result, the CPU cooled down a little to around 63C.

Cores frequency (0 – 00:30 sec.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 00:30 sec.)

During the second period (the first two minutes of the test) the device maintained a rather disappointing 1.9 GHz, especially given the temperature which was around 61-62°C. This means there is a lot of headroom and the capabilities of this laptop are not utilized fully.

Cores frequency (0 – 2:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 2:00 min.)

Moreover, this trend continued to the end of the test, although the frequencies were fluctuating between 1.9 and 2.0 GHz. However, the temperatures were still stable at 63°C. Despite the drawbacks, this approach to thermal handling has one significant advantage – the device remains relatively silent even at extreme loads. This is extremely important in the segment the EliteBook 840 G5 is part of.

Cores frequency (0 – 15:00 min.)
CPU Temperature (0 – 15:00 min.)

0-30 min. GPU torture test

Moving our heads to the AMD Radeon RX 540, we see no difference when compared to the EliteBook 850 G5 at all. Again, at the beginning frequencies fluctuated from 750 MHz to 900 MHz and after a couple of minutes – Bam! Thermal throttling. From that moment to the end of the stress test, frequencies were somewhere between 300 and 350 MHz. Temperature-wise, we got an average of 63.5°C, which is aimed at keeping noise low.

Looking at the surface temperatures, we can assume that EliteBook 840 G5 might also use its body for heat dissipation. As a result, the whole base was warmer than 30°C with the hottest point being in the middle of the keyboard. This itself is not very pleasant but keep in mind this temperature is reached at extreme loads.

41.9°C
46.8°C
40.7°C
45.6°C
47.5°C
39.6°C
33.5°C
31.0°C
30.8°C

Verdict

With the fifth generation of EliteBook 800 devices, HP is aiming to conquer the whole range of the business segment. However, if it really wants to do so it should give its best – without compromises. Unfortunately for HP, this is not yet the case. While it is fascinating how the EliteBook 840 G5 feels exactly the same as the EliteBook 850 G5 in day to day work, we can’t help but note the identical setbacks.

Once again we have a terrible thermal management that is aimed at lowering the sound from the fan. Usually, the approach is to speed up the fan and lower the frequencies after things get too hot. Here, however, expect longer video rendering times, because the EliteBook doesn’t want to disturb you. Although in some cases this is definitely a benefit, we still find it disappointing.

However, there is only one more drawback that is not connected to the cooling and this is the poor color range. Covering only 54% of sRGB, this is not the best choice for web designers and people whose work is color sensitive. However, for the rest of us – mortals – it is a pretty little screen. As you would expect from an IPS panel – it has a very high contrast ratio as well as good viewing angles. Moreover, it lacks PWM above 60 nits and before that it has a high enough frequency, which means it will not harm your eyes too much. If you want to get completely rid of it, of course, you can get our Health-Guard profile.

In the end, we can say that this is one of the best business laptops for general purpose. It is extremely fast in day-to-day tasks as well as in programs like Adobe Photoshop. In addition to that, the build quality is exquisite and you have the opportunity to upgrade like crazy. However, there is the competition of Acer Swift 5 and one of the best business devices – Dell XPS 13 9370, both having distinctive features that set them apart from the rest. So if you are at a crossroads – think smart!

Pros

  • Very good input devices
  • High contrast screen with comfortable viewing angles
  • Easy to get inside and upgrade
  • PWM-free across all brightness levels
  • Supports super fast NVMe storage
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Battery life is on point

Cons

  • Core i7-8550U underperforms in raw benchmarks
  • Heavy price tag
  • Thermal management is terrible
  • Gets warm on the surface under heavy load
  • Mediocre color range

ASUS Transformer 3 T305CA review – the iPad Pro competitor with full-fledged Windows experience

$
0
0

Ever since Intel launched its low-voltage SoCs and CPUs, OEMs have rushed to compete in the ultraportable and hybrid segment of the market. With the latest Kaby Lake generation, we saw even further improvement in this area and the company even renamed the Core m5 and Core m7 chips to Core i5 and Core i7 leaving only the Core m3 lineup as it is. While this suggests of closer to the full-fledged Core i5 and Core i7 series performance, it creates quite the confusion among users. Anyway, ASUS’ latest alteration of the Transformer tablets is the Transformer 3 T305C and can be configured with up to Core i7-7Y75 but we settled for the most affordable Core m3-7Y30 chip.

The real question is whether the new Transformer 3 can make a compelling case and will it beat the competitors like the iPad Pro, Acer Aspire Switch 12 S or even the Aspire Switch Alpha 12. And by looking at the specs sheet, the Transformer 3 packs a good punch with a 12.6-inch WQHD+ IPS panel, solid aluminum construction, up to 8GB of LPDDR3 memory, an active stylus pen and seemingly comfortable input devices thanks to the additional dock. Quite frankly, the only thing that’s missing here is a broader range of I/O so the laptop-like experience would be complete.

Contents

Retail package

The device comes in a luxurious box with the keyboard dock, the active stylus, the usual user manuals and, of course, the charging adapter.

Design and construction

The base consists of solid brushed aluminum but we have no info on the glass surface. On ASUS’ official website there’s no word whether the glass is Corning Gorilla or not. In any case, the chassis exudes quality. In terms of portability, the tablet is competitive as well – it weighs just 695 g and measures at just 6.9 mm in thickness. For comparison, Apple’s 12.9-inch iPad pro weighs 677 g and it’s exactly 6.9 mm thick.

The back of the device features thick aluminum sheet with concentric brushed finish reminding us of the notebook ZenBook series. In the upper right corner, you will find the slightly protruding 13MP camera. On the front, you will see the 12.6-inch screen and fairly thin upper and lower bezels. The side ones are just the right size to hold it without accidentally touching the screen with your thumb. The upper bezel provides room for a double mic setup, the ambient light sensor and the 5MP camera.

The sides impress not only with its thickness but with its stylish chamfered edges. Unfortunately, though, there’s only one USB-C connector (on the right) for charging and data transfer and, of course, the 3.5 mm audio jack on the left. The upper side accommodates the power button and the volume rocker, while the dock connector is placed at the bottom. One of the key features is the Harman Kardon branded quad speakers placed on the left and right side in pairs.

Keyboard dock

The keyboard dock is flexible and when attached to the tablet, it provides protection and expanded usability. It’s adjustable and supports the tablet in two largely different angles, although we think they will be enough in most cases. The dock itself is made of soft-touch kind of fabric (at least it feels like one) and doesn’t attract fingerprints but collects dirt and dust quite well.

And as for the input devices, they are surprisingly good for a hybrid like this. The clickpad is not only usable but provides excellent working experience thanks to the buttery smooth surface, light and clicky feedback. The surface registers swipes and gestures quite accurately. Pretty much the same goes for the keyboard – maybe a bit shallow but each key press results in clicky, audible and tactile feedback. The bonus here is the discreet LED backlight.

Stylus

The stylus has aluminum body with two small buttons activating various options while working with the pen. It’s definitely a nice alternative for working with the touchscreen but it cannot be docked and its usability for creativity is rather questionable.

Display quality

The device uses an IPS display featuring 2880×1920 pixels resolution that fits in a 12.6-inch diagonal. This means that the pixel density is 275 ppi while the pixel pitch is 0.0925 x 0.0925 mm. The panel is manufactured by BOE with model number NV126A1M-N52 (BOE06D0) and can be considered as “Retina” from at least 33 cm.

Viewing angles are good.

We’ve recorded a peak brightness of just 442cd/m2 in the center of the screen and 416 cd/m2 as average across the surface with 13% maximum deviation. The correlated color temperature at maximum brightness is a bit colder than it should be – 7600K and remains the same as we go along the grayscale. You can see how these values change at 140 cd/m2 (41% brightness) in the image below.

The maximum color deviation dE2000 compared to the center of the screen should be no more than 4.0 and if you are planning to do color-sensitive work, it should be lower than 2.0. But in this case, since the tablet is going to be used mostly for office work, web browsing and multimedia, a deviation of 3.6 in the upper right corner is somehow acceptable. The contrast ratio is pretty high – 1200:1.

Color reproduction

To make sure we are on the same page, we would like to give you a little introduction of the sRGB color gamut and the Adobe RGB. To start, there’s the CIE 1976 Uniform Chromaticity Diagram that represents the visible specter of colors by the human eye, giving you a better perception of the color gamut coverage and the color accuracy.

Inside the black triangle, you will see the standard color gamut (sRGB) that is being used by millions of people in HDTV and on the web. As for the Adobe RGB, this is used in professional cameras, monitors etc for printing. Basically, colors inside the black triangle are used by everyone and this is the essential part of the color quality and color accuracy of a mainstream notebook.

Still, we’ve included other color spaces like the famous DCI-P3 standard used by movie studios, as well as the digital UHD Rec.2020 standard. Rec.2020, however, is still a thing of the future and it’s difficult for today’s displays to cover that well. We’ve also included the so-called Michael Pointer gamut, or Pointer’s gamut, which represents the colors that naturally occur around us every day.

In this case, the display covers 98% of the sRGB color space.

Response time

We test the reaction time of the pixels with the usual “black-to-white” and “white-to-black” method from 10% to 90% and reverse.

We recorded Fall Time + Rise Time = 18 ms.

PWM (Screen flickering)

Pulse-width modulation (PWM) is an easy way to control monitor brightness. When you lower the brightness, the light intensity of the backlight is not lowered, but instead turned off and on by the electronics with a frequency indistinguishable to the human eye. In these light impulses, the light/no-light time ratio varies, while brightness remains unchanged, which is harmful to your eyes. You can read more about that in our dedicated article on PWM.

Unfortunately, the display uses PWM for regulating brightness and the frequency of the emitted light is extremely low and aggressive – 200 Hz. At 100% brightness, though, the panel doesn’t use PWM.

Blue light emissions

Installing of our Health-Guard profile not only eliminates PWM but also reduces the harmful Blue Light emissions while keeping the colors of the screen perceptually accurate. If you’re not familiar with the Blue light, the TL;DR version is – emissions that negatively affect your eyes, skin and your whole body. You can find more information about that in our dedicated article on Blue Light.

You can see the levels of emitted blue light on the spectral power distribution (SPD) graph.

Conclusion

The display used for the Transformer is excellent when it comes to image quality. It offers high maximum brightness, good viewing angles, wide sRGB color gamut coverage and high contrast. However, the aggressive PWM that’s used from 0 to 99% brightness is a bit of a letdown.

Buy our display profiles

Since our profiles are tailored for each individual display model, this article and its respective profile package is meant for ASUS Transformer 3 T305CA configurations with 12.6″ BOE NV126A1M-N52 (BOE06D0) (2880 × 1920) IPS screen and the device can be found at Amazon: Buy from Amazon.com

*Should you have problems with downloading the purchased file, try using a different browser to open the link you’ll receive via e-mail. If the download target is a .php file instead of an archive, change the file extension to .zip or contact us at bg.laptopmedia@gmail.com.

Read more about the profiles HERE.

In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible.

Office Work - screen profile

Office Work

Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve (2.20), native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors.

$4.96
Buy Now
Design and Gaming - screen profile

Design and Gaming

This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65.

$4.97
Buy Now
Health-Guard - screen profile

Health-Guard

THealth-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced.

$4.98
Buy Now
All
$9.99
Buy Now

Specs sheet

The current specs sheet is for this particular model and configurations may differ depending on your region

ASUS Transformer 3 T305CA technical specifications table

Acer
Upcoming
Display
12.6”, QHD+ (2880 x 1920), IPS
HDD/SSD
256GB M.2 SATA SSD
RAM
4GB LPDDR3, 1866 MHz
Dimensions
303 x 202 x 7 mm (11.93" x 7.95" x 0.28")
Weight
0.69 kg (1.5 lbs)
Body material
Aluminum
Ports and connectivity
  • 1x USB Type-C 3.1 (3.1 Gen 2), Thunderbolt 3
  • Ethernet lan
  • Wi-Fi 802.11ac
  • Bluetooth 4.1
  • Audio jack combo audio/microphone jack
Features
  • Fingerprint reader
  • Web camera 5MP
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Microphone
  • Speakers
  • Optical drive
  • Security Lock slot

ASUS Transformer 3 T305 configurations

Software

We used the pre-installed Windows 10 for the writing of this review but if you wish to perform a clean install of the OS, we suggest downloading all of the latest drivers from ASUS’ official support page.

Battery

To be honest, we’ve expected a bit longer battery life since the device uses a rather small 12.6″ IPS panel, an energy-efficient Intel Core m3-7Y30 SoC and a reasonably-sized 38.5Wh battery but probably the extra pixels on the screen (2880×1920) took a toll on the battery life. In any case, the battery endurance is rather unsatisfactory, especially compared to some of the 13-inch laptop alternatives on the market.

Of course, all tests were performed using the same settings as always – Wi-Fi turned on, screen brightness set to 120 cd/m2 and Windows battery saving feature turned on.

price
363 min.
battery
$537.46
545 min.+50.1%
54Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
543 min.+49.6%
In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.
price
250 min.
battery
$537.46
353 min.+41.2%
54Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
464 min.+85.6%
For every test like this, we use the same video in HD.
price
113 min.
battery
$537.46
200 min.+77%
54Wh, Li-Po, 3-cell
236 min.+108.8%
We use F1 2017’s built-in benchmark on loop in order to simulate real-life gaming.

CPU – Intel Core m3-7Y30

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 chip is a two core/four thread SoC implementation, and the most budget oriented from all of the ultra low powered Core m line up. It ticks at 1.00 GHz base clock speeds and can go up to 2.60 GHz on demand with the Turbo Boost technology. It can be found in all kinds of portable devices like light laptops, 2-in-1’s and some tablets. Its main advantage is the very low power demand of 7 W for the entire package, which includes the GPU.

Speaking of GPU, the Core m3-7Y30 is equipped with an HD Graphics 615 video controller, which has a base frequency of 300 MHz and a maximum one of 900 MHz. It also supports 4K video output. The chip also supports up to 16 GB of LPDDR3/DDR3L memory with maximum clock speeds of 1866 MHz and 1600 MHz respectively.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/

Results are from the Cinebench 15 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
price
4177.00
performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

GPU – Intel HD Graphics 615

Intel’s HD Graphics 615 is a low-end integrated graphics unit found in Y-series Kaby Lake processors. It incorporates 24 EUs (Execution Units) like all GT2 units and can be clocked at up to 1050 MHz while the base frequency is 300 MHz. With these specs, the chip is integrated into KBL-Y processors rated at 4.5W TDP, including the memory controller.

Since the iGPU is using the same architecture as before, the most noticeable feature would be the full hardware acceleration of the H.265/HEVC Main10 and Google’s VP9 codecs. With this, Intel aims to improve the overall energy efficiency and performance of the iGPU.

You can browse through our top GPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-graphics-ranking/

Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)

Temperatures

Of course, the device isn’t made for long and heavy workloads but we still did the usual stress test to see how the system is able to utilize the Core m3-7Y30 SoC since devices with passive cooling solutions often struggle to maintain or at least reach the maximum clock speeds of the CPU.

Running the CPU stress test shows that the system doesn’t utilize the full performance of the CPU. For the first minute or so, the cores ran at 1.9 – 2.0 GHz but then clocked down to 1.4 GHz stable. Even though Intel hasn’t specified the maximum Turbo Boost frequency for two active cores we assume that the chip can run at least 2.3 – 2.4 GHz with two active cores. So reaching just 2.0 GHz for a short period of time suggest of poor utilization.

As we ran the GPU stress test, the CPU frequency dropped to around 400 – 500 MHz so it can give enough headroom for the CPU to perform – nothing out of the ordinary.

Verdict

The Transformer 3 excels in what it’s built for – to be a good rival of the iPad Pro. And it makes a compelling case in this regard – it’s cheaper, it has pretty powerful CPUs for the higher tier configurations and carries a comfortable keyboard dock that will let you forget all about your conventional notebook. However, there are some things that the standard notebook can do and the Transformer 3 can’t.

For starters, the CPU is rather limited in terms of performance probably due to the closed and passive cooling design. Secondly, the battery life is rather disappointing despite the generous battery capacity, energy-efficient SoC and small display. In addition, due to the very nature of the form factor, connectivity is going to be an issue due to the missing I/O. Of course, if you are looking into 2-in-1s like the Transformer 3, the I/O probably isn’t a deciding factor anyway. And last, but not least, the presence of PWM from 0 to 99% brightness isn’t exactly an issue limited to tablets but the aggressive one used in this device should raise some red flags to potential buyers with sensitive eyes.

Once again, if you are looking for a sleek, compact and still capable of running a full-fledged Windows OS, the Transformer 3 is one of the best choices out there as long as you are okay of sacrificing some performance, I/O and battery along the way. It still is cheaper than the iPad Pro and the 13-inch Windows notebooks.

Pros

  • Good build quality, portable design
  • Good keyboard and touchpad on the dock
  • Excellent display quality
  • Well-priced

Cons

  • Some performance struggles with the Core M configurations
  • The display uses aggressive PWM from 0 to 99% brightness (our Health-Guard profile takes care of that)
  • Unsatisfactory battery life
Viewing all 220 articles
Browse latest View live